Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Brock Boeser Is the Perfect Wild Offseason Target


    Image courtesy of Bob Frid-Imagn Images
    Robert Brent

    All eyes in Minnesota are on the playoffs and the arrival of highly-touted prospect Zeev Buium. While getting mixed up in the end-of-season excitement is easy, the off-season will be upon us in short order. 

    The Minnesota Wild will finally have some cap room this offseason after the Zach Parise and Ryan Suter contracts expire. That financial freedom comes at a pivotal time for the Wild, who have many promising pieces on the roster but are deeply flawed. Minnesota will now have the chance to shore up some weaknesses through free agency. 

    One option for the Wild's offseason recently emerged when Vancouver Canucks forward and pending free agent Brock Boeser told Sportsnet it was "unlikely" that he would return to Vancouver next season. If Boeser hits free agency, he'll immediately become one of the most sought-after prizes this summer. 

    With the opportunity to bring in a difference maker, Minnesota should take a good long look at adding Boeser to the team if the price is right. The goal-scoring forward could bring a lot to the team.

    The most helpful aspect of a Boeser addition would be that he fills gaps for the team as it's currently constructed. The team sorely lacks depth scoring, with most of the heavy lifting coming from only four players (Matt Boldy, Kirill Kaprizov, Marco Rossi, Mats Zuccarello). Frederick Gaudreau has had an excellent bounce-back season, but he's fifth in scoring on the Wild with only 37 points. Minnesota desperately needs to add scoring to be in serious contention. 

    Boeser would immediately be one of the Wild's most dangerous scorers. He averages .78 points per game over his career and is one season removed from his career-best season, where he scored 40 goals and 73 points. 

    While he isn't a strong defender, Boeser's offensive contributions and ability to drive events on the ice far outweigh those negative results. Throughout his career, Boeser has never posted a Corsi-For or Fenwick rating below 50. He has also never had a negative on-ice expected goals% and has been one of Vancouver’s best offensive performers every year of his career.

    Source: Moneypuck.com

    Screenshot 2025-04-15 at 1.45.24 PM.png

    Boeser should also appeal to the Wild because he’s a powerplay weapon. Minnesota has struggled with extra-skater opportunities this season, ranking 19th in the league with a 21.1% conversion rate. They've even had to get creative with a five-forward unit to kickstart their powerplay.

    Adding Boeser would be an immediate boon to that unit. He’s dangerous on the powerplay because he can score from all areas of the ice. Boeser possesses an elite shot as a right-handed forward, but he scores most of his goals in front of the net with the man advantage.

     

    In 2023-24, Boeser ranked seventh in the NHL in power-play goals, tallying 16 times with the extra attacker. It was the third time in his career that Boeser scored double-digit power-play goals. Minnesota needs that kind of power-play weapon.

    The Wild need to add players who drive winning. Minnesota hasn’t advanced in the playoffs since 2014-15 and needs to add players who can contribute to a deep playoff run. 

    At first glance, Boeser may not fit that build. He isn't the stereotypical bruising player who gets to the tough areas who are often associated with playoff success. Still, he's a proven postseason performer. The Canucks haven’t reached the playoffs frequently in Boeser's career, but they make deep runs when they do, and Boeser is a key contributor. 

    In 29 career playoff games, Brock Boeser has scored 11 goals and 12 assists for 23 points. That’s a .79 points-per-game pace, which makes him a more effective scorer in the postseason than in the regular season. 

    While Boeser is a good fit for the Wild's lineup, a free-agency move for the forward would include a substantial price tag. Fortunately for Minnesota, they should have plenty of money to spend. According to Puckpedia, the Wild should have roughly $21 million to play with this offseason. 

    The Wild must work out new deals for Kirill Kaprizov and Marco Rossi (should they choose to keep Rossi), which will eat into that budget a bit. Still, Minnesota has already mostly solidified its roster for next season. 

    Minnesota has nine forwards from its current who are still under contract for next season. Pending unrestricted free agents Gustav Nyquist, Marcus Johansson, and Justin Brazeau should easily be replaced by prospects like Liam Ohgren and Danila Yurov. The Wild are already set at defense with six current players under contract for next year, and David Jiricek is waiting to return from injury. 

    Still, the Wild should have plenty of cap space to leverage in a Boeser bidding war. We already have some clues on how much that might run them. Boeser reportedly turned down a contract extension from Vancouver worth $8 million annually over five years. 

    According to a Nick Kypreos report, Boeser would be looking to make north of $8 million on an 8-year deal. If he hits unrestricted free agency, his number could increase slightly. Still, a 7-year contract for around $8.5 million is likely close to his asking price.

    The Wild undoubtedly could afford that, but would it be a sound investment? He fills a huge need for the team. He'd be a significant boon to the team's depth-scoring and powerplay woes. He should be worth nearly $8.5 million at the beginning of the deal, but it may become problematic toward the end of that contract when Boeser is in his mid-30s.

    Fortunately, the cap will skyrocket, growing from $88 million this season to $113.5 million by 2027-28. An $8.5 million contract is now worth 9.6% of the cap. By 2027-28, that will shrink to just 7.5% of the cap. That's equivalent to a $6.6 million average annual salary under the current cap. Can Boeser live up to that later in the contract? It's certainly conceivable.

    Any unrestricted free-agency signing carries significant risks. You have to overpay players to attract high-level talent. The time is right for the Wild to take one of those risks. The team should look for the final pieces to contend. If they can solidify deals with vital players like Rossi and Kaprizov. Boeser is the perfect piece for that push to the next level.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    24 minutes ago, Scalptrash said:

    That's a normal re-signing scenario, but he will want to renegotiate his current contract because the Wild will finally have money. Why would he wait another year and make less money when he could make it now. He's in the driver's seat. It will be a negotiating tactic for him to stay and Guerin will foolishly over pay him, like he always does.

    Per Puck pedia...

    image.png.9f3cf1280ae0a3cce64f3f56824725e9.png

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, SkolWild73 said:

    Hopefully they don't spend over $8M and leave some room to make some moves at the trade deadline next year if needed.

    I think we gotta leave some room for the inevitable rash of injuries.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    59 minutes ago, Kato AK said:

    Boeser has 8 full seasons in the NHL and was 0.75 ppg in 6 of the 8 seasons. The only players on the Wild the match that are KK, Boldy, and Zuccy.

    If you remove last year (the obvious outlier) he averages 45 points per year for his career.  He has also been a negative 32 for his career.  That jumps to a negative 52!!! if you remove last years outlier.  He was negative 24 this year.  By comparison Jon Merrill (our worst player by a considerable margin) was only negative 8.  Its hard to understate how bad he is defensively. And with age his "defense" will only get worst.  The minute he signs his contract it becomes the worst contract in the NHL.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    Not even Ehlers?

    Yeah, but he's a little older, has peaked, and will be just as expensive for a long term. You'll never get that production out of him in MN anyway. Just not enough surrounding talent on this team.

    I wish they would go after guys more like Matt Coronato, who is an RFA, but Calgary would be foolish to let him go. Younger, skilled, high upside potential, cheaper, etc. 

    I'm always thinking big picture and building a better foundation than adding a veteran or two every year and trying to make them fit in.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Patrick said:

    If you remove last year (the obvious outlier) he averages 45 points per year for his career.  He has also been a negative 32 for his career.  That jumps to a negative 52!!! if you remove last years outlier.  He was negative 24 this year.  By comparison Jon Merrill (our worst player by a considerable margin) was only negative 8.  Its hard to understate how bad he is defensively. And with age his "defense" will only get worst.  The minute he signs his contract it becomes the worst contract in the NHL.

    The second part of your point is a 2-way street. if you take THIS year as an outlier, VAN was terrible this year, then Boeser is a career -8 and -7 including playoffs. One of the biggest knocks on the Wild is secondary scoring, trying to imply there is no room for Boeser is a bad look. Do I think he is worth 8.5M? No, but I would take him on a team friendly deal. Same with Nelson.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Kato AK said:

    The second part of your point is a 2-way street. if you take THIS year as an outlier, VAN was terrible this year, then Boeser is a career -8 and -7 including playoffs. One of the biggest knocks on the Wild is secondary scoring, trying to imply there is no room for Boeser is a bad look. Do I think he is worth 8.5M? No, but I would take him on a team friendly deal. Same with Nelson.

    This year isn't an outlier for him.  He has been a liability his entire career.  The reality is that Boeser is a power play specialist who gets BADLY outplayed 5 on 5. Something that will get substantially worse as he ages. This year Boeser had the worst +/- on the VAN roster by a wide, wide margin. Frankly, I don't think the Wild have space on the roster to carry a player like that for any price.  Go on the VAN subreddit.  Very few are sad to see him go.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Patrick said:

    If you remove last year (the obvious outlier) he averages 45 points per year for his career.  He has also been a negative 32 for his career.  That jumps to a negative 52!!! if you remove last years outlier.  He was negative 24 this year.  By comparison Jon Merrill (our worst player by a considerable margin) was only negative 8.  Its hard to understate how bad he is defensively. And with age his "defense" will only get worst.  The minute he signs his contract it becomes the worst contract in the NHL.

    I am not saying we should get him, but his lowest scoring season is 45 points and that was in 57 games.  He averages .78 pgp in his career.  He has 434 points in 553 games.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Boeser is garbage and a floater player who doesn’t play physical.  The only way to make this team better is through trades.  Everyone on the team should be on the table in trades to improve including Kap.  We need an identity change.  It’s embarrassing the lack of depth and strength this team has.  We need 3-4 new top 6 forwards not including Yurov.  Faber and Rossi are our best trade chips.  Spurgeon trade for salary dump. Same with Hartman and Trenin.  Foligno and Freddie should never play higher than 4th line on a good team.  Sane with Hartman and Trenin. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not another NoJo. Even if it's a North American one. The Wild need guys like Brock Nelson only younger if they're gonna pay big money. Center depth is still their biggest issue along with size, speed, and toughness. 

    Last season's Stamkos, Montour, Marchesseault deals go to show you can get burned on big money deals for high-profile players. 

    Also the Wild are not gonna be able to plug in player-types and all of the sudden, the puzzle is solved. 

    Teams like STL, WSH, WPG, DAL, FL, etc. have built groups where all the elements fit well together but the fundamentals are there. MN isn't way off but they have too many soft little Euros and not enough speed/strength/size. 

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 million for depth scoring?  Depth scoring kind of implies 3rd line.  Is that a good spot for him?  Putting him on a line that normally goes up against the other teams top line on the road.

    An average of 65 points a season is decent.  However, he doesn't take that many faceoffs.  Almost half of his points have come on the power play.  The lack of defensive skills is a problem as well.

    Granted he isn't required to take faceoffs, but if you have watched any Wild games they really need to focus on that aspect of the game.  Depth scoring means that the scoring comes from other areas besides power play.  If his only bright aspect is his power play ability he isn't considered depth scoring then.

    I don't know on signing this guy.  If he shows up on the cheap great.  If they spend top dollar for him it is a bad move.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 hours ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    Boeser is garbage and a floater player who doesn’t play physical.  The only way to make this team better is through trades.  Everyone on the team should be on the table in trades to improve including Kap.  We need an identity change.  It’s embarrassing the lack of depth and strength this team has.  We need 3-4 new top 6 forwards not including Yurov.  Faber and Rossi are our best trade chips.  Spurgeon trade for salary dump. Same with Hartman and Trenin.  Foligno and Freddie should never play higher than 4th line on a good team.  Sane with Hartman and Trenin. 

    I don't agree with a lot of your comment, but I believe you are spot on when you say that the best chance to improve is a trade.

    I've seen numerous reports (let's be honest though - rumors) that Pastrnak is frustrated in Boston.

    Boston is settling into the hard reality that they have been trying for too long to stay relevant with an aging roster and don't have much of a prospect pool as a result.  They are reportedly trying to re-tool rather than re-build, but that probably means several years of missing the playoffs or barely making it.

    Does Pastrnak want to wait through that?

    He has a NMC so we'd have to convince him that he will help complete the team.

    Boston would want good players AND prospects back.  I feel like they would want Boldy, but I think it's wiser to hold onto him.  Would they be interested in some combination of Rossi, Yurov, Heidt, and high picks?  We'd have to probably find a way to move someone like Trenin to help make the money work, but maybe it is possible.

    I know it would be hard to pry Pastrnak from Boston, and maybe it's not even realistic, but it's worth thinking about.  With Free Agency not likely to have a lot available and every team wanting to grab the better options, our best choice is to find teams to trade with or ones that we can potentially offer sheet (maybe Knies?).

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, raithis said:

    I don't agree with a lot of your comment, but I believe you are spot on when you say that the best chance to improve is a trade.

    I've seen numerous reports (let's be honest though - rumors) that Pastrnak is frustrated in Boston.

    Boston is settling into the hard reality that they have been trying for too long to stay relevant with an aging roster and don't have much of a prospect pool as a result.  They are reportedly trying to re-tool rather than re-build, but that probably means several years of missing the playoffs or barely making it.

    Does Pastrnak want to wait through that?

    He has a NMC so we'd have to convince him that he will help complete the team.

    Boston would want good players AND prospects back.  I feel like they would want Boldy, but I think it's wiser to hold onto him.  Would they be interested in some combination of Rossi, Yurov, Heidt, and high picks?  We'd have to probably find a way to move someone like Trenin to help make the money work, but maybe it is possible.

    I know it would be hard to pry Pastrnak from Boston, and maybe it's not even realistic, but it's worth thinking about.  With Free Agency not likely to have a lot available and every team wanting to grab the better options, our best choice is to find teams to trade with or ones that we can potentially offer sheet (maybe Knies?).

     

    I would think Pastrnak would cost about as much as Ranty did.  That was one young player and 2 firsts and 2 thirds if I remember correctly.  I would think Rossi and a little less draft compensation would get it done.  Would have to include Rossi to fit his salary, unless Rossi signs for under $5M.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Instead of selling the farm to get a defensive black hole, I think we should target some offer sheets instead. While Winnipeg is busy signing Ehlers I would love to target Vilardi and with Toronto's cap situation we should also target Knies. Kick the can down the road to get back our draft picks to pay if we get them and move on. None of the UFA's on this years list are going to heavily move the needle for what they are asking. 

    Sew up Rossi, bring up Jiricek and keep Buium up to replace Merrill and Chisholm. Yurov and Ohgren move up to the big leagues and save space for some trade deadline move after paying either Vilardi or Knies.

    Makes us seriously younger, deeper and gives a higher ceiling. None of the trades here has seriously made me think about trading out our young core. To go out and get a Tkachuck or Tuch we would have to pay more than we would get back and I would rather watch out young talent develop as far as they can here. 

    Kap- Ek- Zucc

    Boldy- Rossi- Vilardi

    Ohgren- Yurov- Hartman

    Foligno- Trenin- Hino

    Buium- Faber

    Midds- Sprug

    Jiricek- Bogo

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, TheGoosesAreLooses said:

    Instead of selling the farm to get a defensive black hole, I think we should target some offer sheets instead. While Winnipeg is busy signing Ehlers I would love to target Vilardi and with Toronto's cap situation we should also target Knies. Kick the can down the road to get back our draft picks to pay if we get them and move on. None of the UFA's on this years list are going to heavily move the needle for what they are asking. 

    Sew up Rossi, bring up Jiricek and keep Buium up to replace Merrill and Chisholm. Yurov and Ohgren move up to the big leagues and save space for some trade deadline move after paying either Vilardi or Knies.

    Makes us seriously younger, deeper and gives a higher ceiling. None of the trades here has seriously made me think about trading out our young core. To go out and get a Tkachuck or Tuch we would have to pay more than we would get back and I would rather watch out young talent develop as far as they can here. 

    Kap- Ek- Zucc

    Boldy- Rossi- Vilardi

    Ohgren- Yurov- Hartman

    Foligno- Trenin- Hino

    Buium- Faber

    Midds- Sprug

    Jiricek- Bogo

    If we give Rossi $7X5 and give Vilardi $6.8X5. 

    $21.1M left in cap space

    $7 Rossi

    $6.8 Vilardi 

    $1 Jiricek

    $1 Ohgren

    $1 Buium

    $1 Jiricek

    = 3.3M for callups and a baseline for more pickups at the TDL.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, TheGoosesAreLooses said:

    Instead of selling the farm to get a defensive black hole, I think we should target some offer sheets instead. While Winnipeg is busy signing Ehlers I would love to target Vilardi and with Toronto's cap situation we should also target Knies. Kick the can down the road to get back our draft picks to pay if we get them and move on. None of the UFA's on this years list are going to heavily move the needle for what they are asking. 

    Sew up Rossi, bring up Jiricek and keep Buium up to replace Merrill and Chisholm. Yurov and Ohgren move up to the big leagues and save space for some trade deadline move after paying either Vilardi or Knies.

    Makes us seriously younger, deeper and gives a higher ceiling. None of the trades here has seriously made me think about trading out our young core. To go out and get a Tkachuck or Tuch we would have to pay more than we would get back and I would rather watch out young talent develop as far as they can here. 

    Kap- Ek- Zucc

    Boldy- Rossi- Vilardi

    Ohgren- Yurov- Hartman

    Foligno- Trenin- Hino

    Buium- Faber

    Midds- Sprug

    Jiricek- Bogo

    We need to think bigger than this lineup.  Not close to a Stanley cup roster.  We need more forward changes.  Rossi and zucc should not be top 6 or should Ek is a perfect 3C. Rossi is not a center and not worth over 4mm. To get big fish we are going to have to look at moving Rossi, Faber, Spurgeon. Brodin, Hartman, Trenin etc.  we need huge changes not small ones.  Running the same team back will be a disaster. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 4/17/2025 at 4:41 PM, TheGoosesAreLooses said:

    I think we should target some offer sheets instead.

    Uno problemo... you need your draft picks for offer sheets. Russo has outlined this to a "T". If you get the player you HAVE to HAVE your draft picks to give to the other team. That's why St Louis traded for to get their picks back last year. It is really a non-starter. And as has been outlined, the rising cap means it will be easier for teams to match. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 4/19/2025 at 10:52 AM, PNW Wild said:

    Uno problemo... you need your draft picks for offer sheets. Russo has outlined this to a "T". If you get the player you HAVE to HAVE your draft picks to give to the other team. That's why St Louis traded for to get their picks back last year. It is really a non-starter. And as has been outlined, the rising cap means it will be easier for teams to match. 

    Yeah, so?  Any offer sheets would be for 2026 and beyond.  We are only missing our 2nd rounder for 2026 and 2027.  We have something to work with.

    And yes, the rising cap does make it easier for teams.  That said, Toronto does have a number of contracts to figure out and even with the rising cap ceiling, they still might have trouble making it work.  It really depends whether Warner wants more and whether they want to lose Tavares with no good way to replace him.  Tavares probably takes less by if Marner wants more, then they still have to find a way to make the rest work to fill out the roster.  Something to keep an eye on anyway.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...