Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Brock Boeser Is the Perfect Wild Offseason Target


    Image courtesy of Bob Frid-Imagn Images
    Robert Brent

    All eyes in Minnesota are on the playoffs and the arrival of highly-touted prospect Zeev Buium. While getting mixed up in the end-of-season excitement is easy, the off-season will be upon us in short order. 

    The Minnesota Wild will finally have some cap room this offseason after the Zach Parise and Ryan Suter contracts expire. That financial freedom comes at a pivotal time for the Wild, who have many promising pieces on the roster but are deeply flawed. Minnesota will now have the chance to shore up some weaknesses through free agency. 

    One option for the Wild's offseason recently emerged when Vancouver Canucks forward and pending free agent Brock Boeser told Sportsnet it was "unlikely" that he would return to Vancouver next season. If Boeser hits free agency, he'll immediately become one of the most sought-after prizes this summer. 

    With the opportunity to bring in a difference maker, Minnesota should take a good long look at adding Boeser to the team if the price is right. The goal-scoring forward could bring a lot to the team.

    The most helpful aspect of a Boeser addition would be that he fills gaps for the team as it's currently constructed. The team sorely lacks depth scoring, with most of the heavy lifting coming from only four players (Matt Boldy, Kirill Kaprizov, Marco Rossi, Mats Zuccarello). Frederick Gaudreau has had an excellent bounce-back season, but he's fifth in scoring on the Wild with only 37 points. Minnesota desperately needs to add scoring to be in serious contention. 

    Boeser would immediately be one of the Wild's most dangerous scorers. He averages .78 points per game over his career and is one season removed from his career-best season, where he scored 40 goals and 73 points. 

    While he isn't a strong defender, Boeser's offensive contributions and ability to drive events on the ice far outweigh those negative results. Throughout his career, Boeser has never posted a Corsi-For or Fenwick rating below 50. He has also never had a negative on-ice expected goals% and has been one of Vancouver’s best offensive performers every year of his career.

    Source: Moneypuck.com

    Screenshot 2025-04-15 at 1.45.24 PM.png

    Boeser should also appeal to the Wild because he’s a powerplay weapon. Minnesota has struggled with extra-skater opportunities this season, ranking 19th in the league with a 21.1% conversion rate. They've even had to get creative with a five-forward unit to kickstart their powerplay.

    Adding Boeser would be an immediate boon to that unit. He’s dangerous on the powerplay because he can score from all areas of the ice. Boeser possesses an elite shot as a right-handed forward, but he scores most of his goals in front of the net with the man advantage.

     

    In 2023-24, Boeser ranked seventh in the NHL in power-play goals, tallying 16 times with the extra attacker. It was the third time in his career that Boeser scored double-digit power-play goals. Minnesota needs that kind of power-play weapon.

    The Wild need to add players who drive winning. Minnesota hasn’t advanced in the playoffs since 2014-15 and needs to add players who can contribute to a deep playoff run. 

    At first glance, Boeser may not fit that build. He isn't the stereotypical bruising player who gets to the tough areas who are often associated with playoff success. Still, he's a proven postseason performer. The Canucks haven’t reached the playoffs frequently in Boeser's career, but they make deep runs when they do, and Boeser is a key contributor. 

    In 29 career playoff games, Brock Boeser has scored 11 goals and 12 assists for 23 points. That’s a .79 points-per-game pace, which makes him a more effective scorer in the postseason than in the regular season. 

    While Boeser is a good fit for the Wild's lineup, a free-agency move for the forward would include a substantial price tag. Fortunately for Minnesota, they should have plenty of money to spend. According to Puckpedia, the Wild should have roughly $21 million to play with this offseason. 

    The Wild must work out new deals for Kirill Kaprizov and Marco Rossi (should they choose to keep Rossi), which will eat into that budget a bit. Still, Minnesota has already mostly solidified its roster for next season. 

    Minnesota has nine forwards from its current who are still under contract for next season. Pending unrestricted free agents Gustav Nyquist, Marcus Johansson, and Justin Brazeau should easily be replaced by prospects like Liam Ohgren and Danila Yurov. The Wild are already set at defense with six current players under contract for next year, and David Jiricek is waiting to return from injury. 

    Still, the Wild should have plenty of cap space to leverage in a Boeser bidding war. We already have some clues on how much that might run them. Boeser reportedly turned down a contract extension from Vancouver worth $8 million annually over five years. 

    According to a Nick Kypreos report, Boeser would be looking to make north of $8 million on an 8-year deal. If he hits unrestricted free agency, his number could increase slightly. Still, a 7-year contract for around $8.5 million is likely close to his asking price.

    The Wild undoubtedly could afford that, but would it be a sound investment? He fills a huge need for the team. He'd be a significant boon to the team's depth-scoring and powerplay woes. He should be worth nearly $8.5 million at the beginning of the deal, but it may become problematic toward the end of that contract when Boeser is in his mid-30s.

    Fortunately, the cap will skyrocket, growing from $88 million this season to $113.5 million by 2027-28. An $8.5 million contract is now worth 9.6% of the cap. By 2027-28, that will shrink to just 7.5% of the cap. That's equivalent to a $6.6 million average annual salary under the current cap. Can Boeser live up to that later in the contract? It's certainly conceivable.

    Any unrestricted free-agency signing carries significant risks. You have to overpay players to attract high-level talent. The time is right for the Wild to take one of those risks. The team should look for the final pieces to contend. If they can solidify deals with vital players like Rossi and Kaprizov. Boeser is the perfect piece for that push to the next level.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    He is a RH shot which would be nice and he's not all that old but I'm saying pass unless he gives one hell of a hometown deal and nothing more than a 5-6yr deal. He's a good player but I don't think the Wild should throw a lot of money at him.

    Edited by M_Nels
    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Absolutely terrible idea. He has had ONE good year. ONE. Absolutely the most overrated player by MN hockey fans. And dreadful defensively.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    While Boeser is a good fit for the Wild's lineup, a free-agency move for the forward would include a substantial price tag. Fortunately for Minnesota, they should have plenty of money to spend. According to Puckpedia, the Wild should have roughly $21 million to play with this offseason. 

    That $21 mil is a little off. Looking at puckpedia, they are only showing 1 goalie. Adding Wallstedt would subtract $2.2 mil. Of the 6 returning defensemen, one of those is Buium. If we add in thecontracts of Jiricek, Ogren, Yurov and an extension of Rossi ($6 mil?) that will leave the Wild with around $7.5-$7.7 mil for free agancy.

    The buyouts are still present though much reduced.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    Lots of trades need to happen. 

    Based on them just barely qualifying with a WC1 seeding and with GK having the Wild's number often, most likely during Round 1 as well, I cannot agree more.  It is evident the roster isn't SC competitive as it sits. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2024-2025 Numbers Game (82 Games Played)

    Record: 45-30-7; (97 pts, 4th in Central, 7th in Western Conference, 12th in NHL, 5-3-2 in L10)

    1st Wild Card: Will Face Vegas in 1st Round

     

    Goals For: 2.74 Per Game (25th in NHL)

    Goals Against: 2.88 Per Game (14th in NHL)

    PP: 20.9% (20th in NHL)

    PK: 72.4% (30th in NHL)

     

    Gustavsson: 31-19-6, 2.56 GAA (23rd in Goalies), .914 SV% (T-13th in Goalies)*

    Fleury: 14-9-1, 2.93 GAA (55th in Goalies), .899 SV% (46th in Goalies)*

    *Goalie Rankings could be skewed due to differences in games played. For instance, when weighed against goalies with 25 or more starts, Gus is ranked 11th in GAA and 5th in SV%.

    Boldy: 27G, 46A, 73P (T-36th in NHL), +1

    Rossi: 24G, 36A, 60P (T-81st in NHL), +3

    Kaprizov: 25G, 31A, 56P, (T-96th in NHL) +19

    Zuccarello: 19G, 35A, 54P (T-104th in NHL), 0

    Gaudreau: 18G, 19A, 37P (T-209th in NHL), -2

    +/-

    Highest: Kaprizov (+19), Middleton (+11), Brodin (+10)

    Lowest: Bogosian/Khusnutdinov/Ohgren (-6), Johansson/Hartman (-7), Merrill/Shore (-8)

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, hydguy75 said:

    Based on them just barely qualifying with a WC1 seeding and with GK having the Wild's number often, most likely during Round 1 as well, I cannot agree more.  It is evident the roster isn't SC competitive as it sits. 

    This is all true.  But they were something like 21-6-2 when ek and Kap both played. (Going off of memory from a stat during the game when the came back).  Someone correct me if I am wrong.

    Edited by SkolWild73
    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Free agency is a great way to increase the team talent pool.  It's also easy to overpay for that talent.  Signing him for 7 years at $8.5M is what the article stated he likely wants.  Seems like most of the comments are coming in as a "No" don't bring him in at that value.  I'm curious, at what value does that change to a "Yes".

    5 years/$7M/AAV?

    3 years/$8.5M/AAV?

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's possible he just wants to play somewhere else other than vancouver and the money on the proposed contract wasn't really the issue.

    But, assuming it is money related, at 28 years old, how long of a contract would anyone want to hand out. if the wild did do $8-8.5 AAV would 6 years be paying someone to skate with a piano on their back at that age 34 season? 

    As I mentioned earlier, if the Wild are bringing in some rookies on entry level contracts at least 1 of them would need to play in Iowa for the year for them top be able to affrord the $8-8.5

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, MNCountryLife said:

    Free agency is a great way to increase the team talent pool.  It's also easy to overpay for that talent.  Signing him for 7 years at $8.5M is what the article stated he likely wants.  Seems like most of the comments are coming in as a "No" don't bring him in at that value.  I'm curious, at what value does that change to a "Yes".

    5 years/$7M/AAV?

    3 years/$8.5M/AAV?

     

    I have not watched enough of him over the years to really have a good idea of what type of player he is. I can see his statistics and he's put up good numbers over the years. Lot's of comments to stay clear of him. 

    If I had to throw a guess out there, and the Wild were actually interested, they cannot afford the $8.5 AVV and I would say 3 years/$6-6.5 AVV.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not worth what he will demand. He has peaked and will only decline from here. Vancouver also has a much stronger offensive squad overall, he will not produce the same in MN.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, BeanPole Harvester said:

    While Boeser is a good fit for the Wild's lineup, a free-agency move for the forward would include a substantial price tag. Fortunately for Minnesota, they should have plenty of money to spend. According to Puckpedia, the Wild should have roughly $21 million to play with this offseason. 

    That $21 mil is a little off. Looking at puckpedia, they are only showing 1 goalie. Adding Wallstedt would subtract $2.2 mil. Of the 6 returning defensemen, one of those is Buium. If we add in thecontracts of Jiricek, Ogren, Yurov and an extension of Rossi ($6 mil?) that will leave the Wild with around $7.5-$7.7 mil for free agancy.

    The buyouts are still present though much reduced.

    I think they will have a little more than $7.5-$7.7, assuming they don't resign anyone besides Rossi.

    Projected salary cap: $21,691,834 with 9 forwards (Kap, Boldy, Ek, Zucc, Foligno, Hartman, Trenin, Freddy and Vinnie, 1 goalie (Gus) and 6 defensemen, (Faber, Spurg, Brodin, Midds, Bogo and Zeev) already included.

    The Wall: $2,200,000

    Ohgren:    $886,666

    Jiricek:     $918,333

    Yurov:       $966,500 (I used the money Zeev got)

    That would leave us $16,720,335, with 11 forwards, 7 defensemen, and two goalies.

    If Rossi gets $6.75-$7M, would leave us around $9.7-$10M for a free agent to fill out the forward spot.  Hopefully they don't spend over $8M and leave some room to make some moves at the trade deadline next year if needed.

     

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, JRR said:

    Alex Tuch would be an epic pickup or Tage Thompson.  
     

    Both are extreme long shots. Tuch loves Buffalo (his favorite team growing up) and I don't see them letting Thompson go. They are building around both of them.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    I think they will have a little more than $7.5-$7.7, assuming they don't resign anyone besides Rossi.

    Projected salary cap: $21,691,834 with 9 forwards (Kap, Boldy, Ek, Zucc, Foligno, Hartman, Trenin, Freddy and Vinnie, 1 goalie (Gus) and 6 defensemen, (Faber, Spurg, Brodin, Midds, Bogo and Zeev) already included.

    The Wall: $2,200,000

    Ohgren:    $886,666

    Jiricek:     $918,333

    Yurov:       $966,500 (I used the money Zeev got)

    That would leave us $16,720,335, with 11 forwards, 7 defensemen, and two goalies.

    If Rossi gets $6.75-$7M, would leave us around $9.7-$10M for a free agent to fill out the forward spot.  Hopefully they don't spend over $8M and leave some room to make some moves at the trade deadline next year if needed.

     

    What about Kaprizov? He'll want to renegotiate, instead of re-signing, if he is going to stay here. If they don't do it this summer he is probably gone. I've been saying all along that they should trade him this summer so they don't overpay and put the team in cap constraints again. The reality is, he's now too injury prone and too much of a liability if this team is serious about going very far.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Scalptrash said:

    What about Kaprizov? He'll want to renegotiate, instead of re-signing, if he is going to stay here. If they don't do it this summer he is probably gone. I've been saying all along that they should trade him this summer so they don't overpay and put the team in cap constraints again. The reality is, he's now too injury prone and too much of a liability if this team is serious about going very far.

    Why would he renegotiate?

    And any re-sign will be for the season AFTER this next one, meaning it's not part of next season's cap hit.  Given how the cap is projected to increase, we'll have more than enough to sign him for whatever that ends up being.

     

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I realize the Free Agency market doesn't have a ton to offer, but I feel like we could make better choices than Boeser.

    If he is willing to sign for less duration (like 3 years, and I'd prefer for a little less money too), maybe, but even then I'd be a little unsure about it.

    I'd honestly rather have Nelson for 3yrs than Boeser if we are going after one of them.

    That said, I'd rather they look at other options before collecting more Brocks.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, Patrick said:

    Absolutely terrible idea. He has had ONE good year. ONE. Absolutely the most overrated player by MN hockey fans. And dreadful defensively.

    Boeser has 8 full seasons in the NHL and was 0.75 ppg in 6 of the 8 seasons. The only players on the Wild the match that are KK, Boldy, and Zuccy.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, raithis said:

    Why would he renegotiate?

    And any re-sign will be for the season AFTER this next one, meaning it's not part of next season's cap hit.  Given how the cap is projected to increase, we'll have more than enough to sign him for whatever that ends up being.

     

    That's a normal re-signing scenario, but he will want to renegotiate his current contract because the Wild will finally have money. Why would he wait another year and make less money when he could make it now. He's in the driver's seat. It will be a negotiating tactic for him to stay and Guerin will foolishly over pay him, like he always does.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    24 minutes ago, Scalptrash said:

    What about Kaprizov? He'll want to renegotiate, instead of re-signing, if he is going to stay here. If they don't do it this summer he is probably gone. I've been saying all along that they should trade him this summer so they don't overpay and put the team in cap constraints again. The reality is, he's now too injury prone and too much of a liability if this team is serious about going very far.

    Kap is signed through next year and I don't believe a player can renegotiate an existing contract.  

    Offside Sports Law: Can NHL Contracts be Renegotiated Before Their End Date?

    Edited by SkolWild73
    • Like 1
    • Thanks 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, raithis said:

    I realize the Free Agency market doesn't have a ton to offer, but I feel like we could make better choices than Boeser.

    If he is willing to sign for less duration (like 3 years, and I'd prefer for a little less money too), maybe, but even then I'd be a little unsure about it.

    I'd honestly rather have Nelson for 3yrs than Boeser if we are going after one of them.

    That said, I'd rather they look at other options before collecting more Brocks.

    You are right, not a ton to offer.  The Athletic had their top 15 UFA's in the following order.  I am only including forwards

    1. Marner

    2. Bennet

    3. Tavares

    4, Ehlers

    7. Nelson

    8. Duchene

    9. Boeser

    11. Donato

    12. Kane

    13, Marchand

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    54 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    I think they will have a little more than $7.5-$7.7, assuming they don't resign anyone besides Rossi.

    Projected salary cap: $21,691,834 with 9 forwards (Kap, Boldy, Ek, Zucc, Foligno, Hartman, Trenin, Freddy and Vinnie, 1 goalie (Gus) and 6 defensemen, (Faber, Spurg, Brodin, Midds, Bogo and Zeev) already included.

    The Wall: $2,200,000

    Ohgren:    $886,666

    Jiricek:     $918,333

    Yurov:       $966,500 (I used the money Zeev got)

    That would leave us $16,720,335, with 11 forwards, 7 defensemen, and two goalies.

    If Rossi gets $6.75-$7M, would leave us around $9.7-$10M for a free agent to fill out the forward spot.  Hopefully they don't spend over $8M and leave some room to make some moves at the trade deadline next year if needed.

     

    Looks like I was a  little past my bedtime when I did my math...

    I think you forgot to add the buyout's still on the books with your numbers. If my assumption is correct that would put them at about $8.8 mil

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, BeanPole Harvester said:

    Looks like I was a  little past my bedtime when I did my math...

    I think you forgot to add the buyout's still on the books with your numbers. If my assumption is correct that would put them at about $8.8 mil

    Buyouts should be included in my numbers.

    Edited by SkolWild73
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...