Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • A Reality Check Is the Wild's Biggest Trade Deadline Need


    Image courtesy of Matt Krohn-USA Today Sports
    Tony Abbott

    The Minnesota Wild had every opportunity to prove the haters and losers wrong. With home dates against the Nashville Predators, their direct competitor for the second Wild Card spot, then a bad Anaheim Ducks team, Minnesota could have entered their All-Star Break on a five-game winning streak. They even held third-period leads in both games.

    Hold on to win against two beatable teams, and the Wild would've entered Monday just three points behind the mediocre St. Louis Blues and free-falling Los Angeles Kings for both Wild Card spots. Instead, they blew both leads, lost in regulation, and took zero out of four points to stay seven points out of a playoff spot.

    Since the Wild lost captain Jared Spurgeon for the season, freeing up his $7.575 million cap hit, Minnesota threatened to make moves to add a defenseman to get back into the race. Being three points back surely would've been enough excuse to believe they could climb back. They might still believe it.

    So far, Bill Guerin's front office has only made moves at the margins to stabilize their defensive corps. First, they traded for Will Butcher, a now-former NHLer who figures to be minor-league depth. Next, they claimed former Winnipeg Jets defenseman Declan Chisholm off waivers. Chisholm, a 24-year-old left-shot defenseman, could provide a solid third-pair option behind Jonas Brodin and Jake Middleton.

    If the Wild are smart, they'll limit themselves to that when it comes to improving the team's chances of winning now. If they're smarter, they'll look to the future, perhaps inquiring about the many out-of-favor young players around the league, such as the Edmonton Oilers' Philip Broberg, the Kings' Arthur Kaliyev, or the Columbus Blue Jackets' Adam Boqvist (realistically) or David Jiricek (for that go-big Hail Mary).

    As difficult as these past two games were to watch, there's a big upside for the franchise's long-term health. Nothing says this team doesn't have the juice like blowing two third-period leads at home.

    If this can't convince the front office that this season isn't worth salvaging, nothing will. The Wild had nearly 50 games to convince us they could make any noise. So far, they've shown an inability to be better than the Arizona Coyotes, Buffalo Sabres, and Montreal Canadiens.

    Even the Calgary Flames, with two more points in the standings than Minnesota, are preparing for a fire sale at the trade deadline. If that's the case, what hopes are the Wild holding onto?

    Certainly, this is a team with talent. Kirill Kaprizov, Matt Boldy, Joel Eriksson Ek, and Jonas Brodin are franchise cornerstones. Brock Faber and Marco Rossi are proving to be more than legitimate NHLers. Is wasting a season of their primes a bummer? Sure. Those are years Minnesota won't be able to get back.

    But at this point, it's inevitable. Evolving-Hockey's playoff projections give Minnesota the 11th-highest playoff odds in the Western Conference, at 10.8%, as of Monday. Those are long odds, and they seem downright generous compared to Moneypuck, which puts their chances of making the playoffs at a minuscule 1.9%. The only teams less likely to make the playoffs are Anaheim, Columbus, the San Jose Sharks, and Chicago Blackhawks, whose odds are all 0.0%.

    The Wild aren't a sleeping giant, either. As much as the players believe that this team isn't much different than last season, and even if that is true-ish on paper, it doesn't show in the stats. Last year, Minnesota was an okay 5-on-5 team, controlling 51.0% of the expected goal (xG) share, good for 17th place in the NHL. Now, they're 22nd with 49.0%.

    It might not seem like a huge difference, but being on the wrong side of 50% means they can't rely on getting good results over the long run. They're a worse 5-on-5 team than Arizona, Buffalo, and the Ottawa Senators. Who's predicting big things for those teams post-All-Star Break?

    Even more incredibly, they got worse, not better, since the Wild moved from Dean Evason to John Hynes. Before the coaching change, Minnesota controlled 49.5% of the expected goals share. After, those numbers dipped down to 48.7%. A small but not negligible difference.

    Injuries during the first two weeks of the New Year played a role, sure. Still, since Kaprizov and Brodin were both in the lineup on January 15, Minnesota controlled 43% of the xG share. It's simply not a good team.  

    Any assets that go into propping this team up carry a double cost. First, it's whatever draft picks or prospect capital they trade to add to the team. Then, it's the opportunity cost of what Minnesota could get if they sold or made future-looking moves. 

    And for what? A one-in-10 chance, at best, of making the playoffs? Are two home gate receipts where history suggests they'll get waxed by the Colorado Avalanche or Dallas Stars worth it? 

    It just isn't, and if these last two games can't convince Guerin's front office that making as much of a strategic retreat to finish the season as possible, it will threaten their ability to make hay out of a lost season. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 5

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    This is precisely the right take. If we're going to acquire some players, they should be young and help us with the future. 

    But, Tony, I think you underestimated the problem we're in. It's not just the 2 recent must haves where we had 3rd period leads, it was also the Winnipeg and Dallas home and homes. There is a lot of evidence out there that this simply isn't our year.

    I am fully against trading for a player who will be a rental UFA to try and make the playoffs. I'd be open to an idea of a player who would be a UFA and would resign here, though, who could help us going forward. That guy would likely be entering his prime. 

    I'd prefer to sell rather than buy, but there may be a little of both.

    • Like 6
    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like the idea of trading for a once highly touted young guy. Especially if they are only asking a mid round pick. I agree that it's not worth trying to push for the playoffs this year, take your lumps and your lottery pick and come back next year with a couple cheap free agents.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's pretty hard to watch this last game vs the Ducks and not admit that they mailed it in.  I think this team's morale, attitude, or whatever you want to call it is crushed.

    I think it is mostly just the inconsistency of play and few duds in the lineup that flop when needed most.  More than a few duds actually.  

    Also, we cannot sit back and rely upon young guys to carry the team either.  A lot of these losses look like young team losses.  Things are a little fragile in the State of Hockey.   

    The biggest problem of all though is defense hands down.  It's a broken record at this point though so I won't bore y'all.  

     

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I’m all for trying something different like you suggested. Go after some younger players that might be a fit for the future. It’s a nice consolation prize that we’re near the top for picking up players hitting waivers. BG can still be aggressive, just a short term change of what that might look like. 

    Edited by Burnt Toast
    Spelling
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Given that the front office gave out all those silly no movement clauses, what can we realistically do at the trade deadline? Who can we move out, that would get us a decent player or draft pick in return? Most of the older players, are the ones who have the no movement clauses. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, Quebec1648 said:

    Given that the front office gave out all those silly no movement clauses, what can we realistically do at the trade deadline? Who can we move out, that would get us a decent player or draft pick in return? Most of the older players, are the ones who have the no movement clauses. 

    Well I assume the guys who just got re-signed this past summer aren't moving anywhere. 

    That said, a NMC isn't all that hard to get around if a guy wants to leave an organization that's going nowhere to join a potential contender. MAF had a NMC when we acquired him from Chicago, for instance. It DOES give them leverage on where they get traded to, however, so that lessens the potential return by eliminating potential suitors.

    So guys like Goose or MAF or Maroon are definitely still on the table to get moved despite their clauses. I just wouldn't expect a great return on them given their age and talent level at this stage. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Wild need to be sellers at the trade deadline. Unload the veterans teams are looking for in a playoff run. Foligno, Gudreau, Fluery, Johanssen, Maroon, Hartman, Merrill

    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, Jamesgang said:

    The Wild need to be sellers at the trade deadline. Unload the veterans teams are looking for in a playoff run. Foligno, Gudreau, Fluery, Johanssen, Maroon, Hartman, Merrill

    The only ones that can be moved in that group without their permission are Maroon and Merrill. There may be a small market for Maroon but the move i can see for Merrill is Iowa.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Given Guerin's propensity for painting himself in a corner he may have promised CL that if he agrees to buy out Parise and Suter that the Wild will at the very least continue to make the playoffs every year until cap hell is over giving CL those few extra games of gate receipts to help ease the pain. Now we are not only paying huge salaries to players we no longer have but are on the cusp of not making the playoffs putting CL further in the red. Seriously doubt he likes that business model. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, MacGyver said:

    Given Guerin's propensity for painting himself in a corner he may have promised CL that if he agrees to buy out Parise and Suter that the Wild will at the very least continue to make the playoffs every year until cap hell is over giving CL those few extra games of gate receipts to help ease the pain. Now we are not only paying huge salaries to players we no longer have but are on the cusp of not making the playoffs putting CL further in the red. Seriously doubt he likes that business model. 

     

    I believe CL is only paying Parise and Suter something like $1M a year at this point. The contracts were designed for the team to not feel any pain at the end. But of course the league had to step in an ruin the whole thing.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Lindholm is gone already in Calgary. Off the board and finished as an option for the Wild. Didn't see if he signed long term in Vancouver. 

    MN needs center depth and scoring. It's gonna have to come from somewhere. When and where from is the question. The Wild should be careful the rest of this year. The safest thing is to be sellers and prep for the Summer. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...