Protec Verified Member Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 Lekhonen scoring the first goal at 4:34 of the 1st just like last time. Super weird. Not a good start for MN. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Protec Verified Member Posted April 10 Author Share Posted April 10 Dolla dolla bills! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Protec Verified Member Posted April 10 Author Share Posted April 10 Let's see if MN can go 3 for 3 on the PP. 😁 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Protec Verified Member Posted April 10 Author Share Posted April 10 The Wild are winning the majority of draws so it seemed like an equally uncharacteristic PP percentage in this game was at least possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Protec Verified Member Posted April 10 Author Share Posted April 10 Good grief. Same couple guys every time. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forrest Gump Worsley Verified Member Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 It's starting to feel like the Wild's objective tonight was to make sure fans aren't disappointed that they're not going to be in the playoffs this season. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Protec Verified Member Posted April 10 Author Share Posted April 10 5 Colorado goals, all points attributed to 5 Colorado players. Impressive. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Protec Verified Member Posted April 10 Author Share Posted April 10 Middleton got his doors blown off by MacKinnon like Suter used to do. MN just doesn't have an answer for the top teams. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MNCountryLife Verified Member Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 If there was any doubt that we lack high quality D-men... this game removed it. We do not have the D-men on the roster to get a SC. It is a fundamental problem with our roster that not enough attention has been given to the D. This is why all trades should be considered and/or the draft needs to focus on D-men. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pewterschmidt Verified Member Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 21 minutes ago, MNCountryLife said: If there was any doubt that we lack high quality D-men... this game removed it. We do not have the D-men on the roster to get a SC. It is a fundamental problem with our roster that not enough attention has been given to the D. This is why all trades should be considered and/or the draft needs to focus on D-men. The draft capital has been spent on D-men. Question remains whether it's been spent wisely or not 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MNCountryLife Verified Member Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 2 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said: The draft capital has been spent on D-men. Question remains whether it's been spent wisely or not Great Response. Let's hope some of those players are able to step in and play in 2025-2026 at a very high level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.