Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness

Article: Wild Closing In On Another Prospect Signing


Recommended Posts

I like that Peart looks at Spurgeon as a model. But, recognizing that Spurgeon is the unicorn not the norm is important. Peart is similar in size to Heidt, and may have grown an inch or 2 in college. I think the same issue is there with him as in Heidt. He currently sits at 5'11" 185 lbs. I think adding 10 lbs. to that makes him a good size for the A, and looking to get to 200 at the NHL level would be good.

Could anyone imagine a Spurgeon at 190 instead of 166? That's a lot of pounding that could be absorbed along the boards. The same holds true for Peart, add the strength/weight, take the pounding better. You can still model your game after Spurgeon's, you just have a little more tools to work with.

Now, I believe that this is Peart's size when drafted. He may be there now for all we know.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey now: just when you think the Moose is further away than he appears, he trucks people and then scores a goal out of nowhere.

As for Peart, I'd be ok with another Spurgeon if that's what the Wild get.  Spurgeon's best feature was his well-rounded approach and mobility to work in all facets.  Spurgeon definitely excelled more in defense later in his career though.  I would love to have a younger big guy to balance things out though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Citizen Strife said:

just when you think the Moose is further away than he appears, he trucks people and then scores a goal out of nowhere.

Doing this once every 20 games makes it the exception, not the rule.  This hot take applies to both trucking opponents and executing a hockey play.

#blindsquirreltheory

#unlikeTonyi'llpileonwhentheAAVandTOIdontmatchoniceperformance

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verified Member

Foglino needs to be like a 20 goal, 20 assist guy. Otherwise, I don't think he's making enough of a positive offensive impact. Some positive is nice but you could ask Beckman to run around and fire off hits at the same rate and he'd get the same number of goals/assists or better. I'd like to see a smarter, more focused Flogino. It's not enough. How's he helping the team most right now? Answering the press about tough losses in the Central?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Protec said:

Foglino needs to be like a 20 goal, 20 assist guy. Otherwise, I don't think he's making enough of a positive offensive impact. Some positive is nice but you could ask Beckman to run around and fire off hits at the same rate and he'd get the same number of goals/assists or better. I'd like to see a smarter, more focused Flogino. It's not enough. How's he helping the team most right now? Answering the press about tough losses in the Central?

When Moose was on the GrEEF line, which caught lightning in a bottle in the '21-'22 season, we were able to run a shut-down, high checking, frustrating line that could bottle up top lines across the league.  Moose got his 23g/19a that season just absolutely smothering other teams, and wearing their top players down in their defensive zone.

This season, we see him skating with (a clearly injured) FreddyG and rotating cast of Maroon/Ek/Rossi?  No offense to FreddyG, while he's a 'responsible' player, he isnt out-working you with his 'punchable dopey face' like JEEK is.  Rossi aint a banger either, and Foligno's game isn't designed around Rossi's game.

I've also noticed that both Moose and Hartman appear to have been instructed to play it a few steps away from the line this season.  While I appreciate them not taking stupid penalties, some of there effectiveness was in being pests...which they have not done this season.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Protec said:

Foglino needs to be like a 20 goal, 20 assist guy. Otherwise, I don't think he's making enough of a positive offensive impact.

Is this the actual stat line, or would you settle for on pace scoring? I ask because it is likely that Foligno's injury history grows stronger not weaker. If he's at 60 games, his stats will need to adjust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verified Member

I think if your paying Foligno 4M per year for awhile yet, what are you paying for? ~ 40pts? If not, then are you back-paying for good years, hitting, heavy-body, fighting, leadership, aloof-answers for questions about losing? 

Just asking the questions? To me it seems like we'd want a player that does those types of things but scores 30-40pts for 4M per year. 

Perhaps it's right that without good balance, players are not getting to their best. I think Foligno is probably like a 20-30pt guy year to year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Protec said:

Perhaps it's right that without good balance, players are not getting to their best. I think Foligno is probably like a 20-30pt guy year to year.

This sounds about right, but I also think he's a 60 game player at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...