Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness

Article: Joel Eriksson Ek Can Make A Selke Run This Year


Luke Sims
 Share

Recommended Posts

Who are we kidding? Ek may deserve the recognition, and may even be in the top 3, but this will be won by a much larger market player. I'm betting it's Kopitar.

This is one reason why I put very little stock in end of the season awards. They really do pretty much eliminate any team in the fly over zones. You'd think as Russo grows in national prominence, that the Wild would get a little more favorable coverage.

So, I wonder how much the front office mess will affect Ek's chances?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More importantly than a shiny award, something someone posted on another forum struck me.

PLD, who was just signed to $8.5mx8 has 12 points.  EEK has more goals than that, and is making $5.25m...just insane.  Either that or we dodged a bullet for an "elite" 1C in the free agency market.

Edited by Citizen Strife
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

definately a red flag when players bounce around to often early  .Columbus, Winnipeg, LA  makes you wonder   , heck even none of our players demand trades  so thats a good sign considdering everything theyre willing to play through .  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Dango said:

heck even none of our players demand trades  so thats a good sign considdering everything theyre willing to play through .  

I think that is a testament to how nice it is to play in St. Paul. A mid-market team that takes its hockey like a large market team. That big city pressure is missing, the area seems to be a little more suburban, maybe, like the atmosphere where the players grew up in. 

Sure, maybe there's not as much to do, but the demands on players to make public appearances appear to be less also. Out of all of the major sports, I'd say St. Paul fits the lifestyle of hockey players better than all the other sports. Therefore, we should have players wanting to stay.

Also, another factor that shouldn't be missed is that even in the other sports, many of the athletes when they retire stay in the area. To me, that's a real good sign.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a matter of a week, we swept the Bruins series. The beasts of the east. You'd have to say this would add to the confidence of the team. 

I'd also like to once again point out that Goligoski had a solid game, as did Bogosian. Sometimes, I wonder about Goligoski and his decision making but it worked out ok last night. Also, to me, Bogosian looks better than a 3rd pairing defender. It looks like he's skating a bit faster, and has no problem handling the extra ice time. In comparison, we'd have been in a real pickle if this would have been Addison back there. 

There are still some things that need to be pointed out:

  1. Duhaime had a spirited bout which I thought he handled well
  2. Ek played like a Selke candidate last night
  3. Boldy is still learning, and I'd hope he'd learn to be more decisive. For instance, make up his mind he's going to beat you driving the net and just get it done. There is a power forward game missing right now, and it appears he needs to build up a little more strength to execute that part.
  4. We don't even need to mention Faber, he was just good. In fact, when there is Faber news it will probably be when he has an off game. 
  5. It was nice to see Foligno on the score sheet in a different column than PIM.
  6. In the Hynes' era, this is the 1st game where the team that scored the 1st goal didn't win. We've gone a lot of games for that to happen. 
  7. We were able to accomplish this without Jimmy and Tank. 
  8. Fleury was hot again. I'm glad his workload was down.

Boston had gotten blown out in Winnipeg the night before. Apparently Montgomery was not too happy and they came out playing it very tight. Chances were down for both teams. Did anyone notice the shot totals switch after our 2nd goal? All of a sudden, looking at the screen we were up to 30 in what was a tight checking game. 

Another thing I watched and enjoyed was the Ek-Coyle battle. I was always a Coyle fan while he was here. They battled hard, but it was a clean battle, even though sometimes they both went down into a heap. We probably should have just made Coyle our 3rd line C and kept riding that. I think he and Niederreiter could have been terrific linemates and still be effective today. But, we have what we have now. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on the above post, I started wondering: How are the fab 4 we had tabbed in the organization doing? Of course there were 6, but we'll focus on the forwards, this year

  • Charlie Coyle 32gp 10-11-21
  • Nino Niederreiter 32gp 10-10-20
  • Mikael Granlund 27gp 4-19-23
  • Jason Zucker 26gp 5-5-10
  • Bonus Eric Haula 27gp 8-7-15

That's not terrible production from the guys we had. You just have to wonder what could have been?

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

PLD, who was just signed to $8.5mx8 has 12 points. 

This guy had a reputation of taking nights off correct?   This is exactly the type of player you don’t bring in at that AAV.  I trust BG to avoid these types.  Foligno has his warts but I trust he’s going to bring it every night and I suspect BG does too

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

Charlie Coyle 32gp 10-11-21

Nino Niederreiter 32gp 10-10-20

Mikael Granlund 27gp 4-19-23

Jason Zucker 26gp 5-5-10

Bonus Eric Haula 27gp 8-7-15

So this is the value we received in return for each trade:

Coyle turned into Donato which turned into a 3rd pick which we used to move up 2 spots to get Wallstedt.

Nino turned into Rask which turned into future considerations.

Granlund turned into Fiala which turned into Faber and Ohgren.

Zucker turned into Lambos and Addison which turned into a future 5th rd.

Haula and Tuch went to Vegas in the expansion so we could keep Dumba.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just went through the month of December highlights for the Iowa Wild. A couple of things to report-

  • Wallstedt was pulled in his last start. McIntyre has had the net for 2 consecutive starts. To me, this says Wallstedt is day to day. He was shelled in his last outing, I wonder if he was trying to play through something?
  • For Pewter, Beckman is hurt. He may, or may not, have been called up, but being hurt certainly canceled him off that list. Lucchini is one of those vets that the Wild brought in for depth. Often, the team will give those guys a little extra on their A contract, and a even higher guarantee (meaning they will be expected to be called up at some point). Without looking at capfriendly, I suspect Lettieri and Lucchini are 2 of these guys. Mermis may also be one. 
  • Bankier is playing a significant role in the offense right now.
  • The defense looks extremely leaky. In the highlights, it's mostly Welinski and Hunt that I'm seeing. From the camera angle, when we get scored on, I am not seeing the backs of players for numbers. 
  • They showed a bunch of great Wallstedt saves. Unfortunately, these saves are HDSC saves where the defense hung him out to dry.
  • Also, Iowa is experimenting with a 5 forward PP. What this means is that guys like Lambos, Masters, Spacek are not getting opportunities to run the PP, and I did see Welinski back there too (maybe the 2nd unit). 
  • Petan is on a scoring heater.
  • Sammy Walker is getting hot.

Iowa is staying in the heat of the race in the central. Last I looked, they were in 3rd place. After a slow start, they reeled off some wins. As I mentioned earlier, Hunter Jones had been recalled to sit in the backup goalie chair. So, that makes me think something's not right with The Wall. But, nothing's been reported so I'd assume it's d2d. 

I like that they're winning, and I think that's important, but I'd also like to think the young defenders are getting ample opportunity. I haven't found TOI numbers for the A.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing about the original "great core" was that they would be so inconsistent.  I think only Granlund managed a 70-point season once while he was here.  Zucker and Nino were 25-goal scorers, but little else.  Coyle would be nice as a 3rd C, but at the time, I think the Wild needed a LOT more than that.  Staal was amazing for like two seasons, but Koivu was on his way WAY down pretty quickly.  Coyle couldn't really do more than be Hartman-esque: good for a few games, cold for a few games, repeat.  

It ended up really frustrating.  There was definitely talent there.  However, none of those players were that game changer Kaprizov (and even Fiala to an extent) were.  If you could add Kap, Fiala, and Zuccarello to the core they had before Koivu and other started faltering, the offense would have been really something special.  Add Faber to that defense, and good lord.  There's like zero holes to deal with.  Not sure how you'd balance contracts, but there was a "ceiling" that certain players now just don't really have.  Kap, current Ek, and Faber especially tilt the ice more than any players from the past, other than Gaborik.

Sure, no guarantees any of these players now end up in any different positions than the previous ones: but something about Kaprizov and Faber (and Ek being 3-5 years older) just adds a completely new dimension to the team.  They are still offensively lacking, but I think they are more stout defensively than at any point.

God I hate that Hanzal trade so much...what could have been.

Edited by Citizen Strife
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

We probably should have just made Coyle our 3rd line C and kept riding that. I think he and Niederreiter could have been terrific linemates and still be effective today. But, we have what we have now. 

I think the expectation was that Coyle would be 1-C or 1st line RW but that was never his skill set. He is great as a 3rd line forward. NN is a straight line missile and should have succeeded at that but kept getting jacked around (in my opinion). They are the two I would like to have kept although I liked Haula a lot too.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/24/2023 at 9:11 AM, mnfaninnc said:

Out of all of the major sports, I'd say St. Paul fits the lifestyle of hockey players better than all the other sports. Therefore, we should have players wanting to stay.

I can assure you don’t speak for a large amount of NHL hockey players.

Mn is one of the highest taxed states.

theres a huge amount of young and talented hockey players that want to live in a big city/big market team. 
players want to win and win a Cup. They aren’t stupid and they know which teams have the best chances of winning.

id argue that Mn is where talented but over the hill players that have families want to come to basically finish their hockey career.

players don’t want to come to a team that’s stuck in mediocrity.

sure the Wild have some good prospects coming but none of them are projected to be superstars like Bedard for instance.

I also think you vastly underestimate how many players would love to play in an area with a nice and warm climate.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2023 at 4:21 PM, Mateo3xm said:

Mn is one of the highest taxed states.

Mateo, you may indeed be right. The guys I was thinking about were the European players, Swedes, Finns and even Russians, as well as the small town boys from rural Canada. I also made a terrible assumption that these players had families and I do have large city bias against them. 

But there are plenty of players who grow up in suburban or urban areas too that like that lifestyle. Typically, I consider the state taxes in draw. I thought the MN state taxes were decent, of course, not like Nashville, Vegas, or the Florida and Texas teams, but at least competitive with your Chicagos, New Yorks, Torontos, and CA teams. 

If you look at Kaprizov, he has been well shielded from the media here, and from a lot of high profile appearances. That would not be the case for him if he were in New York or LA. He seems like he wants to stay out of the public eye probably because he has little confidence in his English and does not like to be embarrassed. 

But I can certainly see your point(s), they are pretty solid. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im willing to bet that if MN was able to dangle 15 million dollars worth of salary  we could have had 80-85 % of players willing to come here if it was up to them ,   And  why would you want to play in a time zone where everyone else in the world is in bed  .   theres alot more of a national audience playing in MN at 8-10  than in LA 10-12  .     but i do get the LA / Hollywood nightlife thing is something  no one else has  ,  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...