Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property

Article: Best of the Rest: Which Wild Prospects Barely Missed the Cut?


Luke Sims
 Share

Recommended Posts

Thx Luke, the above players who missed the top ten, but were considered, sound like a good problem to have.

Appreciate you putting pen to paper on them. Not many Wild fans know some of these kids. So it's awesome you highlighted them.

Future and trade chips are bright!

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

How did Mikey Milne miss the top 10?????????

😁

Sammy walker and Beckman seem to be nhl ‘tweeners.  Not big enough/gritty enough/hockey iq enough to earn a top 6 spot or a bottom 6 spot. 
Be like Mike may lack flash, but he makes up for it with FU.  
prediction: Milne takes SHAWZY’s spot as fan favorite grinder in next couple years

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

Sammy walker and Beckman seem to be nhl ‘tweeners.  Not big enough/gritty enough/hockey iq enough to earn a top 6 spot or a bottom 6 spot. 
Be like Mike may lack flash, but he makes up for it with FU.  
prediction: Milne takes SHAWZY’s spot as fan favorite grinder in next couple years

Agreed!

Definitely this year is their year to show or go with the next wave of prospects to hit IA. Petrovsky, Heidt, Lorenz and Haight

Milne got lost on his first draft year and has been playing piss'd off ever since.  He had an impact in IA last year for his first. He and Lambos were teammates two years ago and play similar physical games.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good looking group of prospects Top Ten and six more here and a couple more still in Iowa. I see Faber and The Wall are going to a Rookie NHL get together on September 5, can’t remember where, but 35 Young guns coming. 

And good job to all the writers and staff at the new and improved Wilderness site. You got us through the late summer doldrums with a plethora of really decent articles that just keep on coming. Keep ‘em coming, we are getting close to real hockey.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Walker has nice instincts. Beckman shoots the puck. Those are two guys who are physically ready to go. Neither guy has really had a long-look. Rossi either. It will be interesting to see what happens at training camp and in the preseason.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Protec said:

Walker has nice instincts. Beckman shoots the puck. Those are two guys who are physically ready to go. Neither guy has really had a long-look. Rossi either. It will be interesting to see what happens at training camp and in the preseason.

Hey, if the kids are ready, trades could happen for the placeholders!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Athletic's Corey Pronman released the 168 top prospects under 23 this morning. With 32 teams and 168 players listed, the average amount of prospects per team comes to 5.25. The Wild are doing great with 9 U23 prospects on the list. They are:

  • 14: Matt Boldy
  • 62: Marco Rossi
  • 66: Jesper Wallstedt
  • 92: Charlie Stramel
  • 108: Danila Yurov
  • 112: Brock Faber
  • 114: Marat Khusnutdinov
  • 120: Caedan Bankier
  • 163: Liam Öhgren

Not too shabby at all! Here's a breakdown of how many prospects the rest of the teams have (plus the players' rankings):

  • 12: Buffalo Sabres (#'s: 6, 13, 27, 64, 70, 80, 91, 100, 126, 138, 139, 165)
  • 11: Montreal Canadiens (#'s: 11, 19, 25, 47, 51, 89, 123, 127, 136, 146, 162)
  • 10: Detroit Red Wings (#'s: 12, 26, 32, 40, 65, 93, 106, 149, 155, 167)
  • 9: Minnesota Wild (#'s: 14, 62, 66, 92, 108, 112, 114, 120, 163)
  • 8: New Jersey Devils (#'s: 2, 9, 28, 50, 119, 124, 132, 148)
  • 8. Anaheim Ducks (#'s: 8, 10, 15, 34, 59, 61, 142, 153)
  • 8: Columbus Blue Jackets (#'s: 4, 20, 35, 88, 111, 121, 140, 145)
  • 8: Ottawa Sentators (#'s: 3, 18, 46, 97, 115, 125, 156, 159)
  • 8: Nashville Predators (#'s: 56, 68, 72, 90, 96, 99, 118, 133)
  • 7: Arizona Coyotes (#'s: 24, 43, 44, 45, 98, 117, 166)
  • 7: Chicago Blackhawks (#'s: 1, 31, 58, 79, 113, 158, 164)
  • 6: New York Rangers (#'s: 29, 37, 52, 75, 107, 130)
  • 6: Seattle Kraken (#'s: 7, 30, 95, 129, 131,151)
  • 6: San Jose Sharks (#'s: 16, 57, 67, 73, 87, 143)
  • 5: Dallas Stars (#'s: 22, 42, 69, 77, 168)
  • 5: St. Louis Blues (#'s: 39, 78, 110, 135, 152)
  • 5: Winnipeg Jets (#'s: 55, 81, 101, 105, 128)
  • 5: Vancouver Canucks (#'s: 60, 134, 154, 157, 160)
  • 4: Philadelphia Flyers (#'s: 5, 38, 86, 102)
  • 4: Carolina Hurricanes (#'s: 23, 36, 122, 147)
  • 4: Los Angeles Kings (#'s: 33, 48, 71, 144)
  • 4: Washington Capitals (#'s: 49, 84, 94, 161)
  • 4: Calgary Flames (#'s: 53, 82, 104, 150)
  • 3: Colorado Avalanche (#'s: 17, 109, 116)
  • 3: Edmonton Oilers (#'s: 54, 85, 103)
  • 2: Florida Panthers (#'s: 21, 83)
  • 2: Pittsburgh Penguins (#'s: 63, 76)
  • 1: Toronto Maple Leafs (#41)
  • 1: Vegas Golden Knights (#74)
  • 1: New York Islanders (#137)
  • 1: Tampa Bay Lightning (#141)
  • 0: Boston Bruins
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WheelSnipeCelly said:

The Athletic's Corey Pronman released the 168 top prospects under 23 this morning. With 32 teams and 168 players listed, the average amount of prospects per team comes to 5.25. The Wild are doing great with 9 U23 prospects on the list. They are:

  • 14: Matt Boldy
  • 62: Marco Rossi
  • 66: Jesper Wallstedt
  • 92: Charlie Stramel
  • 108: Danila Yurov
  • 112: Brock Faber
  • 114: Marat Khusnutdinov
  • 120: Caedan Bankier
  • 163: Liam Öhgren

Not too shabby at all! Here's a breakdown of how many prospects the rest of the teams have (plus the players' rankings):

  • 12: Buffalo Sabres (#'s: 6, 13, 27, 64, 70, 80, 91, 100, 126, 138, 139, 165)
  • 11: Montreal Canadiens (#'s: 11, 19, 25, 47, 51, 89, 123, 127, 136, 146, 162)
  • 10: Detroit Red Wings (#'s: 12, 26, 32, 40, 65, 93, 106, 149, 155, 167)
  • 9: Minnesota Wild (#'s: 14, 62, 66, 92, 108, 112, 114, 120, 163)
  • 8: New Jersey Devils (#'s: 2, 9, 28, 50, 119, 124, 132, 148)
  • 8. Anaheim Ducks (#'s: 8, 10, 15, 34, 59, 61, 142, 153)
  • 8: Columbus Blue Jackets (#'s: 4, 20, 35, 88, 111, 121, 140, 145)
  • 8: Ottawa Sentators (#'s: 3, 18, 46, 97, 115, 125, 156, 159)
  • 8: Nashville Predators (#'s: 56, 68, 72, 90, 96, 99, 118, 133)
  • 7: Arizona Coyotes (#'s: 24, 43, 44, 45, 98, 117, 166)
  • 7: Chicago Blackhawks (#'s: 1, 31, 58, 79, 113, 158, 164)
  • 6: New York Rangers (#'s: 29, 37, 52, 75, 107, 130)
  • 6: Seattle Kraken (#'s: 7, 30, 95, 129, 131,151)
  • 6: San Jose Sharks (#'s: 16, 57, 67, 73, 87, 143)
  • 5: Dallas Stars (#'s: 22, 42, 69, 77, 168)
  • 5: St. Louis Blues (#'s: 39, 78, 110, 135, 152)
  • 5: Winnipeg Jets (#'s: 55, 81, 101, 105, 128)
  • 5: Vancouver Canucks (#'s: 60, 134, 154, 157, 160)
  • 4: Philadelphia Flyers (#'s: 5, 38, 86, 102)
  • 4: Carolina Hurricanes (#'s: 23, 36, 122, 147)
  • 4: Los Angeles Kings (#'s: 33, 48, 71, 144)
  • 4: Washington Capitals (#'s: 49, 84, 94, 161)
  • 4: Calgary Flames (#'s: 53, 82, 104, 150)
  • 3: Colorado Avalanche (#'s: 17, 109, 116)
  • 3: Edmonton Oilers (#'s: 54, 85, 103)
  • 2: Florida Panthers (#'s: 21, 83)
  • 2: Pittsburgh Penguins (#'s: 63, 76)
  • 1: Toronto Maple Leafs (#41)
  • 1: Vegas Golden Knights (#74)
  • 1: New York Islanders (#137)
  • 1: Tampa Bay Lightning (#141)
  • 0: Boston Bruins

Ohgren at 163 sort of confirms what my eye test has shown to date.  Think low end Nino

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think our hope for Ohgren is that he can develop into a player like Holmstrom, Hornqvuist, or Ninoriedder.

It might never reach that level. The eye test and numbers haven't been building the hype. Perhaps that's better? It will be interesting to see how his year goes in elite Sweden.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

Also interesting that stramel ranks above yurov.  Very interested to watch the badgers this year to monitor our future hulking center.  Let’s go Stram-ba-lambo 

I wouldn't go to the bank on Pronman's opinion only, he's just one of many talking heads out there. 

He was the same guy who was skeptical of KK before he blew up as he was worried about his size, speed and skills combo and if he would ever be a 30/60 guy.  Also, graded the Wild down for taking Stramel?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Protec said:

I think our hope for Ohgren is that he can develop into a player like Holmstrom, Hornqvuist, or Ninoriedder.

It might never reach that level. The eye test and numbers haven't been building the hype. Perhaps that's better? It will be interesting to see how his year goes in elite Sweden.

Eye test reference what? When did you watch him, just curious. I've also been watching him and see him make everyone better around him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is one prospect here who doesn't get a lot of talk from fans or prospect gurus. Jack Peart, a 20 year old home grown MN kid who has seen two very good years at SCSU, as Luke noted, but also some action on the international stage at the World Juniors.

He's gonna take center stage for the Huskies this year on D and his offensive game and hockey IQ is gonna get another boost. He has been an informal leader on their D at a young age and this could be another step in the right direction for his hockey maturity.

The IA D core is gonna have a heavy focus on all the D this year. D-men prospects are piling up and someone may have to be moved as we need some room for the continued trek of D headed that way soon. Peart, Pionk, Healey in a year or two.

Peart is under 6'0 (5'11) and not quite 190 lbs., but is physical, solid, offensively gifted player who uses his skates to create space and entry options. He would be a nice addition to IA next year. There's gonna be a logjam at IA next year. It wouldn't hurt Peart to go back to SCSU and take on a leadership role as an assistant captain and get another year of experience. If this scenario played out it may be in the best interest of the Wild and give them some roster breathing room.

The alternative being, we move some of our D that we feel are not a good fit as draft capitol for the 1C or first line D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...