Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Why the Wild traded for Will Butcher


    Image courtesy of © Stan Szeto-USA TODAY Sports
    Thomas Williams

    Reported and then officially announced before the puck dropped for the Minnesota Wild's game against the Nashville Predators on Thursday night, the Wild have acquired 29-year-old defenseman Will Butcher.

    In return, the Pittsburgh Penguins received AHL forward Maxim Cajkovic -- a forward who was included in the Pat Maroon trade from before the season began.

    Why are the Wild doing this though?

    One stark and obvious reason is just to get depth on the blue line. With Jared Spurgeon out for the remainder of the season, and players like Dakota Mermis now a mainstay on this roster, the depth has become much more shallow than it was before.

    And due to Mermis playing in the NHL instead of the AHL, since Butcher will be starting in Iowa, it could be seen as just getting a steady hand down in Des Moines. Before this trade, the oldest defenseman on the roster was 24-year-old Simon Johansson, who himself is playing hockey in North America for the first time. Other than that it is all players stepping into pro hockey with no steady force to guide them on the blue line.

    We can imagine that was supposed to be Mermis, but with him getting called up due to the multiple injuries and then just sticking, the AHL blue line needed a hand.

    Plus, Butcher should be a serviceable player no matter where he plays. In the AHL, he is clearly an offensive force. Just last season for the Texas Stars, the left-handed defenseman earned 43 points in 65 games. That would be decent output from any forward, let alone a blueliner. So, maybe just in case of emergency or a whole bunch of defensemen being traded at the deadline, Butcher could make his way to St. Paul while protecting the development of the prospects.

    There are options now.

    That's Wild

    • And speaking of trades, whatever the Minnesota Wild do, they need to focus on the future and not short-term fixes. [Hockey Wilderness]
    • The Wild had a one-goal lead against the Predators and they blew it. More from the 3-2 loss: [The Hockey News]

    Off the trail...

    • We don't know how they keep doing it (having very talented players, maybe) but the Edmonton Oilers just keep on winning games. They have won 15 games and are now just two more wins behind the record set by the historic 1992-93 Penguins. [Sportsnet]
    • Top performers in the final years of their Entry-Level Contracts. Who could be seeing a giant contract at the end of this? [The Hockey News]

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Wild got a step closer to a top 16 pick with that 3rd period last night.

    Adding Butcher for the kids in Iowa might help juice the scoring down there. He played 5 straight NHL seasons after college, posting 39 NHL regular season assists back in 17-18, and 3 more in 5 playoff games, so maybe the youth can learn a few things from him along the way as well.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    To me, this is a sign of the end coming for Jon Merrill on our roster. It looks like an insurance policy in case he is traded/waivers.

    Last night was brutal. Spending 2 periods gaining and holding a lead only to watch it wash away in 38 seconds. On the 1st goal, to me, it seemed like Mermis was playing too far to the right and opened up the lane for Carrier to get a great look at the goal. He hit one of the spots that has great success, high stick side. Goose2 had little chance outside of luck that it hits the shaft. Mermis has been good, better than Goligoski and Merrill. Yet, he has had some defensive gaffes lately.

    2nd goal is a deflected shot which Goose2 couldn't pick up and 3rd goal is a deflection off a block by Faber. Again, Goose2's only hope on those is that the puck hits him, he really has no time to react.

    And, now we're down to 1 game before the long break. Another 4 point swing. We are now looking at drafting 9th and falling further out of the playoff picture. We are 6 points out of 7th & 8th now. 

    It was nice to see Boldy get a goal, I don't know what it is about him, perhaps it's just youth, but he sure seems to fumble a lot of pucks. LaPanta's call of "Boldy fans on the shot" seems like it could simply be bottled he calls it so much. To me, Boldy simply needs to be harder on pucks and play more big boy hockey. It would also open up more for his finesse game if they have to respect his drive to the net. 

    And, in other news, Yurov with another 3 point night. He's up to 42 points now. What was Kaprizov's number at that age?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    36 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    It was nice to see Boldy get a goal, I don't know what it is about him, perhaps it's just youth, but he sure seems to fumble a lot of pucks. LaPanta's call of "Boldy fans on the shot" seems like it could simply be bottled he calls it so much. To me, Boldy simply needs to be harder on pucks and play more big boy hockey. It would also open up more for his finesse game if they have to respect his drive to the net. 

     

    Twice on the power play (including his goal) Bolds made a hard drive to the net instead of dancing around the outside and doing another drop pass, to set up a drop pass, for a pretty drop pass right into a drop pass.

    It was nice to see someone take the initiative to make a hard move to the center, attack the net and get rewarded.

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, MrCheatachu said:

    Huh, I assumed they traded for him because Billy only knows how to call the Penguins.

    Billy’s jitterbug phone only has Penquins front office programmed

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    37 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Last night was brutal. Spending 2 periods gaining and holding a lead only to watch it wash away in 38 seconds. On the 1st goal, to me, it seemed like Mermis was playing too far to the right and opened up the lane for Carrier to get a great look at the goal. He hit one of the spots that has great success, high stick side. Goose2 had little chance outside of luck that it hits the shaft. Mermis has been good, better than Goligoski and Merrill. Yet, he has had some defensive gaffes lately.

    It's hard to put it all on Mermis there.  Middleton also was out of position too and there was a severe lack of urgency from the forwards to get back as well.  I don't think it was that long of a shift either.  Lots of blame to go around on that one.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, Will D. Ness said:

    It's hard to put it all on Mermis

    I’d put Mermis on the short list of ‘pleasant surprises’ this season.  Also listed: Roszy , Fabzy, Midzy, not trading future considerations at TDL for this season’s playoff push, end of list

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not to excuse the play of Mermis, Middleton, or any of the other D, but if I'm not mistaken, the first two Nashville goals came while Bogosian was serving his 10 minute misconduct from late in the 2nd.  So, we were playing five D and likely mixing pairings through that stretch.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, bisopher said:

    Not to excuse the play of Mermis, Middleton, or any of the other D, but if I'm not mistaken, the first two Nashville goals came while Bogosian was serving his 10 minute misconduct from late in the 2nd.  So, we were playing five D and likely mixing pairings through that stretch.

    Yup.  Costly decision by Bogo but somebody needed to do it.  Refs didn't call high elbow and instead they called an instigator.  Go figure WTF these refs are trying to accomplish there.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, Will D. Ness said:

    Yup.  Costly decision by Bogo but somebody needed to do it.  Refs didn't call high elbow and instead they called an instigator.  Go figure WTF these refs are trying to accomplish there.  

    They also called a penalty on Kaprizov when a Nashville player was holding Kaprizov's stick in his glove.  The ref was literally like 10ft away.

    I understand they aren't going to get every call right or catch every infraction in a game, but sometimes I think they are in dire need of an eye exam.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Will D. Ness said:

    It's hard to put it all on Mermis there.  Middleton also was out of position too and there was a severe lack of urgency from the forwards to get back as well.  I don't think it was that long of a shift either.  Lots of blame to go around on that one.

    Looked to me that the forwards were line changing. Middleton and Mermis switch sides from time to time and perhaps that's what got Mermis confused. To me it looked like Middleton had the right side on the play and Mermis needed to slide left. He was in position as if he was the only one back. 

    Yes, I guess it could be a communication problem with the D at that time, or it could be that Middleton was going to change and then had to stay in due to the rush? I would have to chalk it up to Mermis not reading the play correctly which may or may not have been his fault entirely. The play kind of came out of nowhere.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, bisopher said:

    Not to excuse the play of Mermis, Middleton, or any of the other D, but if I'm not mistaken, the first two Nashville goals came while Bogosian was serving his 10 minute misconduct from late in the 2nd.  So, we were playing five D and likely mixing pairings through that stretch.

    This is absolutely correct. However, it seemed like Goligoski was getting short shifted and Hynes was keeping the normal pairs together the best he could until Bogosian came back. I believe it was Faber-Brodin who were victimized for the 2nd goal. They may have even scored the 3rd goal before Bogosian's return.

    This also brings up another point: If Kaprizov got elbowed in the face, how come no Nashville skill player, at least, got reverse checked?

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Will D. Ness said:

    Yup.  Costly decision by Bogo but somebody needed to do it.  Refs didn't call high elbow and instead they called an instigator.  Go figure WTF these refs are trying to accomplish there.  

    They also called the elbow, it just got evened out with the instigator penalty. Taking out the 2 big defenders and making Mermis-Goligoski play as a pair was not a bad strategy. Maybe we should try doing that with our 4th line?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...