Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Zeev Buium Is A Bona Fide Top Prospect


    Image courtesy of Brace Hemmelgarn-Imagn Images
    Robert Brent

    The Minnesota Wild are building the foundations of a solid future. 

    Experts believe Minnesota’s front office drafts well, and several prospects appear ready to make an impact in the NHL. Marat Khusnutdinov, Liam Ohgren, and Jesper Wallstedt have all played games for the Wild this year. Meanwhile, Danila Yurov seems to be on the way soon. The team's farm system is so good that Scott Wheeler recently ranked them second in the NHL in his yearly prospect rankings.

    Wheeler had them at 11th in the same rankings last year. The heavy lifting of the improved ranking is the new crown jewel of the Wild's prospect pool.

    Zeev Buium. 

    When the Wild drafted Buium 12th overall in last year's draft, people immediately considered him a steal. We ranked Buium as the Wild's third-best prospect entering the season behind Yurov and Wallstedt, and the pick has only aged better since. Buium is a great defender with a winning pedigree. He had just finished a historic season at Denver University, becoming the first teenager to score 50 points in a season in over 20 years.

    Buium has built on his breakout year. In his second year at Denver, he turned himself into more than just a good prospect that the Wild got as a draft steal. Instead, the Californian is now a genuine top-defensive prospect in the league. 

    After a draft year as productive as Buium's, imagining how he could improve was difficult. How do you improve historic scoring totals capped off by a national championship and World Juniors Gold Medal? 

    Buium has answered by refining his impressive arsenal of skills. 

    Last year, Buium showed the ability to be a positive player in every phase of the game. He wasn't bad defensively, but his offensive prowess stood out. Buium has been more committed to improving his defensive play and dominating possessions this season. 

    "The harder I play in my own end and take pride in it," Buium told the Star Tribune, "the more likely I'm not going to be playing defense as much."

    It's an approach that has already resulted in better all-around play and even improved his offense. Buium isn't letting the game come to him. Instead, he's involving himself in every level of play. 

    A player who can make a strong defensive play in his own end, execute a breakout pass, join the rush, and set up in the offensive zone all at the same time? That's a dangerous skill.

    Denver and Team USA coach David Carle also spoke about this ability.

    "He knows he needs to crank it up a little bit," Carle said. "So, that's what I think is really impressive about him is he has an ability to interpret what the game needs from him, and he can adapt and give it what it needs."

    His hockey IQ and high-end skills make him an elite offensive organizer. When Buium is on the ice, Denver's play on both ends flows through him. He's a smooth-skating puck-mover and a breakout quarterback. His mix of instincts, speed, and commitment to defense allow him to overcome his average stature in making plays in his end. 

    When you compare Buium to some of the league's top defenders, he fits the mold of a modern elite NHL defender. He plays college hockey and doesn't have elite size, but he isn't small, either. He can play an extremely well-rounded game, even if explosive offense is his primary weapon. Players like Cale Makar, Quinn Hughes, Adam Fox, and Charlie McAvoy are similar and among the league's most elite blueliners. 

    While Buium's play has been encouraging, it is impossible to look past the eye-popping stat sheet. Early in the season, Buium was producing but not quite at the level he had in his previous year. With no goals and 10 points in his first 10 games, the blueliner had impressive production but not the elite scoring we saw in his 50-point freshman campaign. 

    Part of that decreased production was due to Buium's evolving role at Denver, which includes more responsibility. The team relies on him more defensively and as a play-driver than last season. Buium focused more on the process than the results. His stats indicate that his investment in improving his overall game is paying meaningful dividends.

    Buium's stat sheet production is catching up with his play. Now, he's scoring at a similar pace to last season while still playing a more well-rounded game. 

    He has 32 points in 26 games, including 13 in his previous 10. That's a rate of 1.23 points per game, better than the 1.19 points he registered as a freshman. His 32 points are the most among college defenders. If Denver makes a deep run, he could have another 50-point season. Since 2009-10, only two defenders, Buium and Brendan Smith, have reached that 50-point mark in college hockey. Now, Buium has an opportunity to do it twice. 

    Buium has myriad elite skills he’s constantly improving. He is also a historic producer. Those two attributes would already be enough to make him a top prospect. However, he also has a track record of being a consummate winner. 

    Even at 19, Buium has already experienced more winning than many great hockey players do in their careers. In his freshman season, he won the national championship with Denver and played a key role in winning a gold medal for the USA at the 2024 World Juniors. 

    He followed up that gold medal this year with another in the 2025 World Juniors, the first time the USA won back-to-back golds at the premiere event for junior-aged players. Buium again played a vital role, providing a beautiful assist on the overtime game-winning goal. 

    The entire team wanted that game badly, but Buium had a burning desire to win hockey games. After the assist, the defender hesitated to join the celebratory scrum, focusing more on winning the game than celebrating. 

    "I just wanted to win that game so bad," Buium recalled. "I wasn't even thinking about a celebration. I just didn't want to lose."

    Buium's ultra-competitive spirit has been evident at every level of hockey. That intangible quality completes his profile as one of the top prospects in the NHL. 

    The Minnesota Wild are getting an elite talent. Buium affects the game just as much off the scoresheet as he does off it. He’s a defender who profiles as a top-pairing, play-driving defender. Most of all, Minnesota will be welcoming a winner. Time will tell if Buium can carry all of that to the NHL. For now, he's one of the best prospects in the league and is only improving.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 8
    • Thanks 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    10 hours ago, SkolWild73 said:

    The thing with this trade is it is also hypothetical. 

    32 GMs, owners and fan bases all pondering the burning question…. How can we get better? So in such a competitive environment timing becomes a crucial component. Every year the SC winner will represent 3% of the NHL. With timing our roster construction, can we get closer to say 15-20 % for a 3-5 year run? Absolutely! Lots of teams with SCs have taken this approach. If we remain patient our window is coming. 

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, Burnt Toast said:

    32 GMs, owners and fan bases all pondering the burning question…. How can we get better? So in such a competitive environment timing becomes a crucial component. Every year the SC winner will represent 3% of the NHL. With timing our roster construction, can we get closer to say 15-20 % for a 3-5 year run? Absolutely! Lots of teams with SCs have taken this approach. If we remain patient our window is coming. 

    Agree wholeheartedly.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    Agree wholeheartedly

    Edmonton is sitting just above 15% this year. (Odds makers). I think they are right in their timing peak. And yes it took them a long time to get there. There are no shortcuts!! Disclaimer: Vegas Golden Knights working the NHL new team rules. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Burnt Toast said:

    Absolutely! Lots of teams with SCs have taken this approach. If we remain patient our window is coming. 

    Agreed. We've all seen teams fail a lot when they try to accelerate to contender status too soon, giving up a bunch of assets for players who have been very good, but have already peaked and are declining. I think it's better to become a contender with the young players improving into the prime of their careers, and then you can make adjustments to put your team over the top.

    If Kaprizov extends with the Wild, he could be contending both in the near future and for a rather long window. The Wild will add forward talent and the defense looks like it's going to be getting better. They might have a Middleton/Spurgeon 3rd pairing as early as next year.

    The Wild have 3 of the top 25 drafted (non-goalie)prospects not currently in the NHL, according to the Athletic's Scott Wheeler. He actually listed Jiricek and Yurov in the top 20(Buium in the top 3), but even if you think a few guys behind them deserve to be higher, they have a bunch of talent about to join the Wild and cap space to replace Johansson with a much more impactful player.

    He also still sees Wallstedt as a top 5 goalie prospect. He may not be elite, but should at least be a solid #2 guy as his game matures.

    Edited by Imyourhuckleberry
    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Burnt Toast said:

    Disclaimer: Vegas Golden Knights working the NHL new team rules. 

    This exactly.  Plus, Vegas was coming of a year where they led the league in points when they made the Eichel trade, and they did not really give up any young top producing talent that had seen NHL time.  Yes, they gave up Tuch who was 25 at the time, had played 249 games and scored 139 points which was good for .55 points per games, a prospect and a first and second round pick.

    And for those who want to point out the Panthers trade for Tkachuk.  They too were coming off a season of leading the NHL in points.  They gave up a lot more, but no young players.  They traded Jonathan Huberdeau, who was 29, defenseman Mackenzie Weegar who was 28, an AHL prospect and a first-round pick.  Both players Florida sent were coming up on the last year of their deal.  They were able to get younger and saved money since Tkachuk was 24 and signed for 8 years at 9.5 mil a year, while Huberdeau signed for 8 years at 10.5 a year and Weegar signed for 8 years at 6.25 a year.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    They traded Jonathan Huberdeau, who was 29, defenseman Mackenzie Weegar who was 28, an AHL prospect and a first-round pick.  Both players Florida sent were coming up on the last year of their deal.  They were able to get younger and saved money since Tkachuk was 24 and signed for 8 years at 9.5 mil a year, while Huberdeau signed for 8 years at 10.5 a year and Weegar signed for 8 years at 6.25 a year.

    That Huberdeau trade/signing ooof.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, Mateo3xm said:

    Not one time did I say he was going to be the next Makar. For some reason you seem to be interpreting it as such, even though it’s pretty obvious I’m not.

    It was UpNorthGuy who talked about Buium as a "Makar clone". I haven't seen anyone else make a comparison and I've tried to avoid that altogether.

    There's no question that Buium is an incredible prospect that we're all anxious to see with the Wild. Makar scored similarly to Buium as a sophomore in college. After losing in the Frozen Four, Makar went right into the playoffs with Colorado, then posted 50 points in 57 games in his 1st regular season with the Avs.

    Buium seems to have a well rounded game with power play 1 offensive capabilities, so adding him and a scoring forward for the top 6 could really put the Wild into another level competitively, assuming Kaprizov stays around.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 2/11/2025 at 11:24 PM, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    Watch the Buffalo games and you will see why the trade makes sense.  Tuch and Thompson are what we need. Our PP is trash and they fix that.  Our top 6 has no size and they fix that.  Also they have speed and are RH.  

    This is exactly what I was afraid of, MNH03 just makes logical sense on this. The other side of the argument is that we don't have the finished products yet in Rossi and Boldy and they might be 90 pt. players (yes, both). 

    Are we willing to sacrifice points to restructure the team into a large bodied top 6? Would a Kaprizov-Tage-Tuch top line be able to get things done? Would they even have chemistry? Then, what do we do about secondary scoring. It would look like Ek would be surrounded by not that much offensive talent. Perhaps this is where Bankier, Haight, Milne come in? Or, we hire UFA guns! 

    The MNH03 logic is solid. Thompson is signed through '27-28 season. Tuch through next season. I still think using Rossi, Boldy & Faber is an overplay, but, what if Mattias Samuelsson was a part of this deal? In thought, if I were Buffalo, would I do this the other way around? 

    Something in Buffalo is broken. They've got way more talent on paper than their results indicate. Would a blockbuster deal make them better? It would certainly shake them up. Thompson and Tuch both have 5 team M-NTCs. Boldy, Rossi, Faber have no trade protection at all. I would suggest that MN is not on the Tuch or Thompson NTC list. 

    I've got an issue with subtracting an "it" defensive player, and I really like the prospect of having 2 of those guys in Faber and Buium. Of course, the money doesn't work out now, but it could over the summer. And, I would much rather have a Samuelsson than a pick.

    I'm still a no. Boldy is closer to the '20 draft, and I think loading up with players from the '20-22 draft window is the way to go. Thompson comes from '15 and Tuch from '14. But, MNH03 has a very good eye on this one and if it were to happen I would support that too and enjoy watching it. 

    I think the real question here is does Guerin like the way the team talent has improved incrementally, or does he want to tip over the applecart? 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, Will D. Ness said:

    Haha... I thought you had lost it.

    I'm just trying to wrap my head around the whole proposal. MNH03 gets me almost everything that I wanted. All that's missing is for Tuch to change his last name to Tkachuk and I might be in. It's a solid proposal, but I'd need a little more back from Buffalo than just Tuch and Thompson. It would certainly change the dynamics of both teams, and, I'd want an extension on the table for Tuch too. 

    Honestly, I think a deal like this certainly gets us out of the 1st round in '25, and may take us to a conference championship round. I also think a deal like this propels Buffalo into the playoffs in 2025. But, our window could abruptly shut quite a bit sooner by banking on the '14 and '15 drafts as opposed to the later ones, and I think we have a larger window of opportunity if we stay the course.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Also if Buffalo doesn’t want to part with Tuch then let’s try to flip Rossi to Pittsburg for Rakell.  He looked very sporty last night and was one of the best players on the ice for Sweden.  Then flip Boldy and Faber to Buffalo for Thompson and another solid dman or prospect from Buffalo.  Then sign B Nelson for 4mm this summer.  The thought of Thompson, EK and Brock Nelson as our top 3 centers would have me very very excited. Three big guys that can skate.  
     

    I really think this team needs to free up the salary of Faber or Spurgeon to really help us add forwards.  Faber can get you the most in return and then maybe we could offload Spurgeon on someone by giving them a pick and prospect.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    It was UpNorthGuy who talked about Buium as a "Makar clone". I haven't seen anyone else make a comparison and I've tried to avoid that altogether.

    There's no question that Buium is an incredible prospect that we're all anxious to see with the Wild. Makar scored similarly to Buium as a sophomore in college. After losing in the Frozen Four, Makar went right into the playoffs with Colorado, then posted 50 points in 57 games in his 1st regular season with the Avs.

    Buium seems to have a well rounded game with power play 1 offensive capabilities, so adding him and a scoring forward for the top 6 could really put the Wild into another level competitively, assuming Kaprizov stays around.

    Yes, i probably was over my skis a bit in the comparison. I am not an expert as my hockey playing days were in a very different era. To clarify, I see similarities between Zeev and Makar. It is not fair of me or anyone to claim that he is a clone. I read the gushing profile on the Athletic and other sights and have to think there is room for some comparing.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I'm just trying to wrap my head around the whole proposal. MNH03 gets me almost everything that I wanted. All that's missing is for Tuch to change his last name to Tkachuk and I might be in. It's a solid proposal, but I'd need a little more back from Buffalo than just Tuch and Thompson. It would certainly change the dynamics of both teams, and, I'd want an extension on the table for Tuch too. 

    Honestly, I think a deal like this certainly gets us out of the 1st round in '25, and may take us to a conference championship round. I also think a deal like this propels Buffalo into the playoffs in 2025. But, our window could abruptly shut quite a bit sooner by banking on the '14 and '15 drafts as opposed to the later ones, and I think we have a larger window of opportunity if we stay the course.

    I think a good gauge of this trade proposal is to look at who is playing in the game tonight and who is not.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Will D. Ness said:

    I think a good gauge of this trade proposal is to look at who is playing in the game tonight and who is not.

    An un-ignorable fact but let's see how our young guns do against the best of the best. Our known vets came through last night, maybe that's an indicator as well.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    then let’s try to flip Rossi to Pittsburg for Rakell.

    C’mon man! That doesn’t make a shred of sense. Trading  blooming player with equal or greater contribution for someone who is around ten years older. I thought the whole “trade Rossi” nonsense was put to rest.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    58 minutes ago, Enforceror said:

    An un-ignorable fact but let's see how our young guns do against the best of the best. Our known vets came through last night, maybe that's an indicator as well.

    I'm looking to see what Boldy can do with Brock Nelson.  I think they are on a line together.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    Also if Buffalo doesn’t want to part with Tuch then let’s try to flip Rossi to Pittsburg for Rakell.  He looked very sporty last night and was one of the best players on the ice for Sweden.  Then flip Boldy and Faber to Buffalo for Thompson and another solid dman or prospect from Buffalo.  Then sign B Nelson for 4mm this summer.  The thought of Thompson, EK and Brock Nelson as our top 3 centers would have me very very excited. Three big guys that can skate.  

    I thought Rakell was playing wing. Perhaps you're just putting him on the wing. I am not a big fan of Rakell, think he's pretty overrated. At $5m for another 3 years, it would seem like you could get him for prospects and picks, not a Rossi. If I'm Dubas and get this call from Guerin, I'd simply say, "fine, I'll fill out the paperwork," and do it immediately do it before Guerin changed his mind.

    Really, I'm not interested in a 31 yr. old up and down wing. He checks the RHS box and is a solid build, but as I remember his game which I haven't paid attention to, I think he comes from the Johansson school of contact and gets bounced around quite a bit. To me, he disappears a lot in games, especially games where you need him to come through.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    28 minutes ago, Sam said:

    C’mon man! That doesn’t make a shred of sense. Trading  blooming player with equal or greater contribution for someone who is around ten years older. I thought the whole “trade Rossi” nonsense was put to rest.

    Or does it.  If people think Rossi will get $8mm which is a huge overpay we can’t afford why not get a very skilled top 6 forward in Rakell for $5mm a year for the next 3 years.  If Rossi asks for over a 2-3 year bridge at 5mm I do think Rossi will be traded this summer for something. 

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I thought Rakell was playing wing. Perhaps you're just putting him on the wing. I am not a big fan of Rakell, think he's pretty overrated. At $5m for another 3 years, it would seem like you could get him for prospects and picks, not a Rossi. If I'm Dubas and get this call from Guerin, I'd simply say, "fine, I'll fill out the paperwork," and do it immediately do it before Guerin changed his mind.

    Really, I'm not interested in a 31 yr. old up and down wing. He checks the RHS box and is a solid build, but as I remember his game which I haven't paid attention to, I think he comes from the Johansson school of contact and gets bounced around quite a bit. To me, he disappears a lot in games, especially games where you need him to come through.

    I agree I like Tuch better but Rossi is not a center in the west especially the central.  If he asks for 6-8mm they are going to trade him so we have to look at options. Billy wants big fast centers down the middle and Rossi isn’t that and isn’t fast period.  His top end speed may be ok but his first 10 steps are slow and he isn’t big.  

    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    Or does it.  If people think Rossi will get $8mm which is a huge overpay we can’t afford why not get a very skilled top 6 forward in Rakell for $5mm a year for the next 3 years.  If Rossi asks for over a 2-3 year bridge at 5mm I do think Rossi will be traded this summer for something. 

    So now you want to trade a 23 year old player for a 31 year old who has averaged .63 points per game and is -31 for his career?  

    Edited by SkolWild73
    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    So now you want to trade a 23 year old player for a 31 year old who has averaged .63 points per game and is -31 for his career?  

    I am just saying we have to look at options.  I laid out the ideal option with Tuch and Thompson but Rossi is not making 6-8mm a year and if he asks for that he’ll be traded.  I honestly think he will be anyway.  We need big centers and against physical teams he doesn’t perform well and don’t think he ever will.  Rakell last night was a top 3 player on the ice on either side and is a RHD shot we need.  For $5mm that’s not a bad value. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    I am just saying we have to look at options.  I laid out the ideal option with Tuch and Thompson but Rossi is not making 6-8mm a year and if he asks for that he’ll be traded.  I honestly think he will be anyway.  We need big centers and against physical teams he doesn’t perform well and don’t think he ever will.  Rakell last night was a top 3 player on the ice on either side and is a RHD shot we need.  For $5mm that’s not a bad value. 

    5mm for him may not be bad value, but trading Rossi for him would be.  

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    5mm for him may not be bad value, but trading Rossi for him would be.  

    You have to look at Rossi for 7mm or Rakell at 5mm I am taking Rakell.  Even if 6 and 5 still taking Rakell.  Rakell is a RH shot which we need.  Is faster and bigger.  Tuch is preferred but Rakell would be option 2.  Necas would have been option 1 last offseason but no one wanted to trust me on that one and look at what we could have had.  

    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    29 minutes ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    Rakell last night was a top 3 player on the ice on either side and is a RHD shot we need.  For $5mm that’s not a bad value. 

    It's a 4 Nations Tournament which carries 0 competitive nature. It's like an exhibition. It's akin to the World Championships that nobody cares about. Johansson looked great for Sweden in those. This is essentially a high level spritzer league play where players aren't going to really hit + it doesn't even include Russia. I put absolutely no stock in how any players look in this tourney....except for the goalies. 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

     We need big centers and against physical teams he doesn’t perform well and don’t think he ever will.

    Let's say we don't trade Rossi. In your mind, does he work out at wing? I still couldn't sign off on the offer, even with Samuelsson in the mix, but it is tempting.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...