Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Zeev Buium Has the Opportunity To Seize A Top-Four Role On Day 1


    Image courtesy of Stephen R. Sylvanie - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    The Minnesota Wild have a long history of great defensemen, but with Zeev Buium, they hope they have something a bit different.

    Blueliners like Jared Spurgeon, Jonas Brodin, and Ryan Suter have been true top-pairing defensemen, dictating play every night, giving them incredible stability over the last decade. However, the Wild didn't target and draft Buium to follow in those footsteps.

    They landed Buium to be a true gamebreaker.

    The standard is Quinn Hughes and Cale Makar, who've won three of the past four Norris Trophies. They don't just dictate the play; they also influence it. Hughes and Makar push the pace, are capable of generating offense on any shift, and are dominant on the power play.

    It's a high bar to live up to, but Buium's points per game at Denver (1.18 over two seasons) exceed what Hughes (0.89 in two seasons) and Makar (0.93) accomplished at the NCAA level, suggesting he has a chance.

    Hughes and Makar memorably stepped into the NHL during the 2019-20 season, waging a Calder Trophy battle that Makar eked out in the end. A big reason for this was that they were thrust into top-four roles almost instantly.

    In October of that season, Hughes averaged over 20 minutes per night, while Makar was second among defensemen on the right side with over 18 minutes. Each defender was able to build confidence quickly (with 10 points in their first 12 games) and parlayed that into minute-munching for the rest of the year.

    That's not typically how the Wild do things. During Bill Guerin's tenure as GM, Minnesota has tended to be cautious with prospects before throwing them into the deep end, with Brock Faber as the major exception. We saw a taste of that in the postseason last year, when Buium played in the playoffs, but for limited minutes on a relatively short leash.

    Minnesota's depth has a significant impact on that. Brodin is still on the Wild, and his defensive powers are still mighty. The team also has a lot of trust in Jake Middleton, a glue guy who had a career-high 21:52 average time on ice last season. Coach John Hynes can be conservative with the rookie Buium, limiting his minutes for the season.

    Except at the start of the season. With Brodin needing surgery that will leave him out past the beginning of the 2025-26 campaign, Hynes doesn't have the luxury of slow-playing Buium. Middleton can soak up a bunch of minutes. Still, without Brodin or the recently-traded Declan Chisholm, 20-plus minutes per night on the left side of the defense is open for the taking.

    That's why October will be more critical for Buium than perhaps any other player on the Wild.

    Buium is going to get a second chance at a first impression. He wasn't ready to jump straight out of college into a playoff lineup against the Vegas Golden Knights, a Cup contender. There's no shame in that for a 19-year-old. Still, it wasn't a performance like Faber's in the 2023 playoffs, which inspired Minnesota to move on from Matt Dumba and pencil Faber in as a top-pairing defenseman immediately.

    Under normal circumstances, we'd probably expect Buium to bide his time on the third pairing and work his way up past Middleton, then Brodin. Now, Buium gets to jump the line, and he must ensure to hold onto the spot.

    Buium is only going to get true top-four minutes if he can thrive at 5-on-5 with either Faber or Spurgeon. If he can't move the puck like he did at Denver or defend reasonably well, it's going to be easy to bump him back behind Brodin and Middleton.

    It's hard to see him losing a spot on the top power play, unless he struggles mightily, but being a power play specialist isn't going to get Buium a run at a Calder Trophy. To do that and truly become a gamebreaker for Minnesota next season, he must earn Hynes' trust at 5-on-5 and do so immediately.

    He has to be undeniably ready.

    Why is this so crucial? Why not have patience with a 19-year-old kid?

    The Wild have had very few avenues to make meaningful improvements this offseason. Adding Vladimir Tarasenko and Nico Sturm were decent, low-risk adds, but neither raised Minnesota's ceiling significantly. While Buium's not the Wild's only prospect who should be making the team full-time -- Danila Yurov, Liam Öhgren, and David Jiříček should join him -- Buium is probably the one who has the most potential to truly transform the Wild's dynamic.

    Fortunately, Buium is a mature player who has won virtually everywhere he's gone, and knows the stakes. His offseason goal is to add 10 to 15 pounds (he's currently listed at 185), which would certainly help his chances to impress the Wild coaching staff heading into training camp. If he can do that and parlay his added strength into a fast start, then he has a chance to shine for Minnesota immediately, and never let go of a top-four spot.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    13 hours ago, 1Brotherbill said:

    Lambos needs to have a very good camp to make the Wild think long and hard on what they are going to do with him.  Even if it comes down to a showcase for a trade latter in the season he needs to have a really good camp.

    I thought he had a real good camp/preseason last year. My thinking on why Chisholm was expendable is because the difference between Chisholm and Lambos is negligible. Chisholm's only a bit better. Lambos came into last year noticeably larger. My bet is he does this again this offseason.

    Just a little stats note, Lambos was hovering somewhere around the -5 mark for most of the season, but really kicked it into gear the last 15 games or so to make it into positive territory. Most of the baby Wild were -double digits. I thought Spacek greatly improved and was a -17. Lambos had really good + numbers in jrs. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Citizen Strife said:

    That's what I meant.  I think they are going to go Middleton with Faber and Buium with Spurgeon until Brodin is back.  If Buium is basically Kap-level awesome, then it's pretty much Brodin or Buium at Pair 1 with Middleton down at 3 with Jiricek or Bogo.

    Midsy gets his money just about when Buium is out of his ELC. That's pretty good planning.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    50 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Do you think the costly giveaways Chisholm had late in the year were the reason they moved on? 

    I do.  Chizzy had some absolute brain fart giveaways in front of his own net.  One or two and you can chalk it up to freak occurences.  More than that and there's a pattern of a player having the yip's under pressure which is a fatal flaw for an NHL defenseman.  Chizztastic had a number of these type of plays and I believe that soured the Wild.

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    34 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Lambos had really good + numbers in jrs.

    Let's say for arguments sake that Lambos, Buium and Jiricek play well enough to demand roster spots.  Faber, Buium, Jiricek, Lambos, Brodin, Spurge, Mids and Bogo makes 8 D men.  

    Brodin is out for the beginning of the year but when he comes back someone becomes an odd man out.  Do you trade someone? 

    If we trade?  I don't see us trading Spurge, Brodin, Faber or Jiricek.  Which means either Bogo, Mids or Lambos are traded.  If Lambos plays well enough to force himself into the lineup I can't see us trading him away at such a young age.  You keep guys like that.  Which really means Bogo and Mids are the trade pawns.  Bogo has very little value to trade away and would likely sit in the press box and be okay with that.  Mids becomes the odd man out.  His 4.35M/AAV becomes valuable as well.  Mids has also shown that he needs a quality guy next to him to really shine.  So he doesn't fall to the 3rd pairing very well.  

    If Lambos, Buium and Jiricek play that well you Shouldn't send them down to the A.  It would be a complete waste of an ELC contract.   I really hope you are right in that Lambos shines along with Buium and Jiricek.  That is an extremely good problem to have.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    29 minutes ago, MNCountryLife said:

    Brodin is out for the beginning of the year but when he comes back someone becomes an odd man out.  Do you trade someone?

    Two of the others will be hurt by this time.  Have you not been paying attention?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Two of the others will be hurt by this time.  Have you not been paying attention?

    I wish I could say you are wrong with that statement, but you're almost assuredly not.  At the same time, having (we hope) eight NHL -capable D means we can weather those injuries much better than we have in past seasons. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, Burnt Toast said:

    Faber Boldy Rossi. Chisholm was given ice time though he’s a bit older. The players I mentioned are still developing. What I’ve seen is there’s a baseline to stay with the NHL team that’s pretty strict. This is nothing new, just ask Ek, Zucker, Granlund etc.

    I think you missed my point. Many teams allow guys to play in the NHL even if they are not quite ready.  Boldy tore up the AHL before he was called up.  Rossi spent a year longer than needed in the AHL. 

    Faber was NHL ready.

    I actually thought keeping Boldy and Rossi down was smart because it made sense with the teams timeline.

    The point I'm trying to make is the baseline for the rookies is strict but veterans who play significantly below that baseline are given ample ice time.  Its an old school approach than only the Wild seem to use.

     

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, Burnt Toast said:

    Faber Boldy Rossi. Chisholm was given ice time though he’s a bit older. The players I mentioned are still developing. What I’ve seen is there’s a baseline to stay with the NHL team that’s pretty strict. This is nothing new, just ask Ek, Zucker, Granlund etc.

    Khusnutdinov and Addison were also given ample ice time to prove they weren't what we were looking for. 

    The idea that Guerin/Hynes only play ancient vets is so overblown. 

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/14/2025 at 2:44 PM, Scalptrash said:

    This is imperative. Not only so he doesn't get pushed around or hurt, but also for the stamina of an 82 game season. Faber has kind of struggled with that, but it's not his fault they play him 25 minutes per game.

    Faber is listed at 200lbs.

    I believe it was Middleton that even mentioned he has sort of a doughy body type. Gotta remember he’s 22 yrs old. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, MNCountryLife said:

    If Lambos, Buium and Jiricek play that well you Shouldn't send them down to the A.  It would be a complete waste of an ELC contract.   I really hope you are right in that Lambos shines along with Buium and Jiricek.  That is an extremely good problem to have.

    The only upside to sending Lambos down under this circumstance is he doesn't have to pass waivers. Secondarily, he gets valuable playing time and can be recalled at a moment's notice. 

    I would also suggest that a tradeable guy is Spurgeon. While he is the captain, we've got leaders who can replace him. If the right deal came around, that would be the route I would go and plug Jiricek into the 2nd pairing. Also, there needs to be some patience with him learning, but I think what he adds is more than what he subtracts. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Two of the others will be hurt by this time.  Have you not been paying attention?

    I'm also quite high on Spacek, and think he may be ready for a couple of callups should disaster occur.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Patrick said:

    The point I'm trying to make is the baseline for the rookies is strict but veterans who play significantly below that baseline are given ample ice time.  Its an old school approach than only the Wild seem to use

    I think what you're noticing is a coach who trusts the vets. It's really hard to trust rookies because they have such rollercoaster seasons. A vet has got a decent track record. You know what you're going to get. Coaches don't like surprises, and rookies give you good and bad surprises. 

    We can take Merrill, for instance. Everyone knew he'd have trouble keeping up with the VGKs in the playoffs. But you knew what you had. Buium was a wildcard, and you didn't really know what he was going to do. Yet, it was Merrill, whose mistake cost them a game. In this instance, the decision affected more than just Merrill too, it affected Bogosian who cannot delay one bit on his play or he's blown by. Buium gave him that quick delay which was enough to throw him off his game too. 

    I think there needs to be an understanding with Heinzy that this is a different season, and they need ice time. The rookies, in Heinzy's case, may have him grow back hair on his head, but he's got to breathe deeply, close his eyes and realize that the kids will get video taught after the game. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Mateo3xm said:

    Faber is listed at 200lbs.

    I believe it was Middleton that even mentioned he has sort of a doughy body type. Gotta remember he’s 22 yrs old.

    That was his weight coming out of UoM. I suspect he's closer to 210 by now. He looked different last season, that he'd added about 5 lbs. of strength. It was needed too. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Two of the others will be hurt by this time.  Have you not been paying attention?

    I laughed when I read this... but in reality ... it is a very good point.  

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/15/2025 at 11:08 AM, MNCountryLife said:

    Let's say for arguments sake that Lambos, Buium and Jiricek play well enough to demand roster spots.  Faber, Buium, Jiricek, Lambos, Brodin, Spurge, Mids and Bogo makes 8 D men.  

    Brodin is out for the beginning of the year but when he comes back someone becomes an odd man out.  Do you trade someone? 

    If we trade?  I don't see us trading Spurge, Brodin, Faber or Jiricek.  Which means either Bogo, Mids or Lambos are traded.  If Lambos plays well enough to force himself into the lineup I can't see us trading him away at such a young age.  You keep guys like that.  Which really means Bogo and Mids are the trade pawns.  Bogo has very little value to trade away and would likely sit in the press box and be okay with that.  Mids becomes the odd man out.  His 4.35M/AAV becomes valuable as well.  Mids has also shown that he needs a quality guy next to him to really shine.  So he doesn't fall to the 3rd pairing very well.  

    If Lambos, Buium and Jiricek play that well you Shouldn't send them down to the A.  It would be a complete waste of an ELC contract.   I really hope you are right in that Lambos shines along with Buium and Jiricek.  That is an extremely good problem to have.

     

    I don’t think they trade Midds. He’s one of few D with good nhl defenseman size.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/15/2025 at 5:42 PM, mnfaninnc said:

    I would also suggest that a tradeable guy is Spurgeon. While he is the captain, we've got leaders who can replace him.

    I really thought I would see a significant decline in Spurgeon last year.  He surprised me and had a good year.  He will be 37 when his contract expires in 2027.  If he continues to play at his current level I hope we keep him through his contract.  I would think at 37 (turning 38) he would retire.  Such a smart and effective player.  It has been fun to watch him.  I do get why you would move on from him.  But his current skill level gives us a better chance of winning than with a rookie.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, MNCountryLife said:

    But his current skill level gives us a better chance of winning than with a rookie.

    This is true, the rookie would be an immediate downgrade, but that rookie would also likely be an upgrade soon. He played really well last season, and I'll admit that Spurgeon surpassed my expectations. I don't think we will make a cup run with Spurgeon in the lineup, though, and that's what we are building towards. Unlike the article where Button trashed Jiricek, I believe he will be right at home on the 2nd pairing and have to face less offensive competition than Faber. I also think that pairing him with Brodin will help nullify any mistakes he makes. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...