Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Zeev Buium Can Immediately Impact the Wild's Power Play


    Image courtesy of Stephen R. Sylvanie-Imagn Images
    Robert Brent

    When Zeev Buium makes his regular-season debut with the Minnesota Wild in September, he’ll be doing so as the crown jewel of their young core of prospects. The defender will only be 19 when the season starts, but expectations are already high. Buium could play a key role for the Wild immediately, especially with Jonas Brodin missing the beginning of the season with an injury

    While fans, the organization, and media alike are excited for the player’s rookie season, perhaps no one has higher expectations for Buium than the young defender himself. 

    In an interview with NHL.com, the Denver University product signaled his intention not just to be a part of the Wild’s lineup, but to be an impact player.

    "I do think that there is an opportunity for me to step in and be a player on the team," Buium said. "And for me, I don't just want to be a guy who's out there. … [I want to] help this team win. So yeah, I'm going to do whatever I can to do that."

    While Buium has all the tools to fulfill that goal, he’s a young and inexperienced player. The Wild will have to deploy him wisely to get the most out of his skill set while not drowning the player in responsibility. 

    One of the best ways to maximize Buium’s potential would be to give him the opportunity for significant minutes on the power play unit. 

    Buium is exceptionally suited to quarterback a power play unit given his refined offensive talents. In the Athletic’s recent top 100 drafted NHL prospects ranking, Scott Wheeler outlined some traits of Buium’s game that translate well to the extra-attacker unit.

    “He’s a plus-level skater and handler who plays an extremely involved game in all three zones,” wrote Wheeler, “whether that’s activating into the rush or off the point, shaking pressure on exits or across/off the blue line.”

    Buium showed those attributes in spades at Denver. The defender led the nation in scoring for two consecutive years due to his elite skating, ability to distribute to his teammates, taking the attack into his own hands when necessary, and using deception and agility to retain possession of the puck.

    That bundle of skills should translate well to the NHL, especially on power plays when there’s more room on the ice for Buium to go to work. Buium may face challenges early on as he adjusts to the league. Still, the power play is the perfect place for him to utilize his strengths in a controlled environment and become a key contributor for the Wild.

    If Buium can transition to the NHL as a power play specialist immediately, it would be a massive boon for Minnesota. The team struggled with the extra man last season, ranking 20th in the league with a 20.9% success rate.

    One of the key components missing from Minnesota’s power play is a true leader from the blueline on the unit. Brock Faber and Jared Spurgeon were the primary blueliners the Wild used on the power play last season. They’re both serviceable, but neither is a game-breaking distributor or offensive threat. 

    According to Naturalstattrick.com, 80 defenders played more than 50 minutes on the power play last season. Jared Spurgeon ranked 32nd in points per 60 minutes (4.86), while Faber ranked 49th (3.41). 

    Spurgeon and Faber are both high-level blueliners, but they lack the skills to make them lethal weapons with the man-advantage, specifically. Meanwhile, the best man-advantage units in the league are run mainly from the blue line, featuring an elite skating and passing defenseman who is also a scoring threat. 

    Here are the best special teams units from last season:

    Screenshot 2025-07-28 at 6.59.33 PM.png

    (Source: ESPN)

    Of the top ten power plays, seven of the clubs employ defenseman who ranked top-15 in points per 60 on the power play. That group of defenders includes elite puck-moving and skating blueliners such as Cale Makar, Shea Theodore, Luke Hughes, and Victor Hedman

    Buium shares many attributes with that group of players. He has similar size and possesses a comparable skill set to Makar, Theodore, and Hughes. 

    They’re all puck-movers and the kind of distributors that have gravitational pull. Even if they aren’t finishing plays, the offense runs through them when they’re on the ice. While Hedman is an outlier in terms of size, he has a similar offensive skill set to one of the best passing defensemen in the league. They can also be a scoring threat when given the space.

    If Buium can use those skills on Minnesota’s power play, it would solve a few issues at once. Buium can fulfill his aspiration to be a massive asset for the Wild. Defenseman prospects generally take a bit longer to develop than their forward counterparts, so it’s conceivable that Buium could experience some growing pains as a 19-year-old. 

    That won’t be as big an issue if he immediately becomes an impact player on the power play, which will take less time for him to be accustomed to due to his skill set. 

    Buium’s ascent on that unit would also free up some of the load for Faber and Spurgeon. While one of the two would likely be the anchor of their second unit, it’s still less time on the ice. Spurgeon is getting older and could use a lighter assignment. 

    While Faber is still young, he has also played a considerable number of minutes in his short career. It might benefit him to ease that load. 

    The team also desperately needs to improve on special teams. Using Buium in that role would foster his development, benefit the team, and be advantageous for the other defenders' usage. 

    How Buium adjusts to the NHL will be one of the most fascinating storylines for the Wild this season. They stand to get the most out of him by making him a focal point of their power play unit.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 4

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    20 hours ago, Bobby S said:

    I watched Buium closely in his college highlights the last two season and have concerns about his defense. I absolutely believe he is a conscientious defender and a gifted puck mover with elite offensive instincts. But conscientious defender and gifted defender are two very different things. I am sky high on him as everyone else is and will be eagerly watching his development over the next couple seasons. 

    Any defensive concerns have pretty much been done away with now. Maybe the first season a little bit, but that was never a big concern in the first season in college. He was like +34 his first season. Go watch him lock up Celebrini when he played them in the playoffs that year. If he’s paired with Faber in a few years, it would be perfect. Faber is better suited as a solid #2 defensive defender that could cover for Buium while he’s providing offense.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I like your point in the comment, but this is a little biased. 1 season with 16 games played. Last season not much PP time. Spurgy may not be the answer here, but it's not quite the black hole portrayed. 

    I am not a fan of the 5 forwards either. And, like you, I also observed panic holding the point. 

    Last year with his minimal Power Play time as you say he had 1 goal and 8 assists.  So the year before the injured season he was the Power Play guy at a humungous stat total of 1 goal and 3 assists.  It had gotten so bad last year when he was on the ice for Power Play time that the other team didn't even bother pressuring him when he had the puck.  Because the word was out he will just skate around and pass the puck laterally and not attack. 

    As a defenseman he is pretty solid.  Probably would have not given up the short handed goal in the playoffs.  However, they probably wouldn't have scored the three Power Play goals either. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 hours ago, SkolWild73 said:

    My main point is, our powerplay has been middle of the pack or worse every year but two years ago where it ranked tenth.  Even with Kap and Ek, we need something else, and maybe Buium will become that PP quarterback that has been missing to help us maybe add a few percentage points to our PP.  If our PP was the same percentage as Colorado or Toronto last year who were 8th and 9th, we would have had 8 more power play goals.

    Did Faber or Spurgeon really QB the PP, or was that player Zuccarello? I thought for a large part, the playmaking ran through Zuccarello, and the defender up top was more of a bumper to the other side of the rink. 

    Since we really only had 1 unit functioning, Most of our goals came from the right side. Zuccarello put in a couple from the other side, but since we are left hand dominant, our shooters came from the right side. If Buium can replace Zuccarello's playmaking from the top, then maybe we can sneak in a Jiricek at Zuccy's normal spot to get some shot generation from the other side of the rink? It would seem to me that this adjustment would add chances and perhaps create more rebounds. We have missed any consistent shot generation from the left side, so PKs don't even have to honor it. They merely overplay the right side with relatively no threat on the weak (left) side. Wow, a Zuccy wrister from the left side, scary! 😉 for Pewter

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, 1Brotherbill said:

    Last year with his minimal Power Play time as you say he had 1 goal and 8 assists.  So the year before the injured season he was the Power Play guy at a humungous stat total of 1 goal and 3 assists.

    Looks like I should have looked at the actual stats instead of assuming he had a real good year 3 seasons ago. I had no idea it was actually that bad. Was that the year Addison had all the points?

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    30 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Did Faber or Spurgeon really QB the PP, or was that player Zuccarello? I thought for a large part, the playmaking ran through Zuccarello, and the defender up top was more of a bumper to the other side of the rink. 

    Since we really only had 1 unit functioning, Most of our goals came from the right side. Zuccarello put in a couple from the other side, but since we are left hand dominant, our shooters came from the right side. If Buium can replace Zuccarello's playmaking from the top, then maybe we can sneak in a Jiricek at Zuccy's normal spot to get some shot generation from the other side of the rink? It would seem to me that this adjustment would add chances and perhaps create more rebounds. We have missed any consistent shot generation from the left side, so PKs don't even have to honor it. They merely overplay the right side with relatively no threat on the weak (left) side. Wow, a Zuccy wrister from the left side, scary! 😉 for Pewter

    Usually the defenseman is the quarterback of the power play.  Since Faber and Spurg didn’t really do it kinds of point to why we need one.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    Usually the defenseman is the quarterback of the power play.  Since Faber and Spurg didn’t really do it kinds of point to why we need one.

    That's usually. But if Buium does do that, what do we do with Zuccy?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    That's usually. But if Buium does do that, what do we do with Zuccy?

    Replace him with Tarasenko or keep him where he is

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    Replace him with Tarasenko or keep him where he is

    You wouldn't be worried about the redundancy of Zuccy up there? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    You wouldn't be worried about the redundancy of Zuccy up there? 

    I am not sure what you mean.  Most power plays have 4 forwards and one defenseman. Buium would be that defenseman while the other 4 would play there roles.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    I am not sure what you mean.  Most power plays have 4 forwards and one defenseman. Buium would be that defenseman while the other 4 would play there roles

    In the Wild's PP, to me it looks like Zuccy QBs and is the designed playmaker of the unit. If Buium takes over as QB, we really don't need the other playmaker there, we need more of a lethal shot to balance out the PK coverage. Even the fear of Jiricek's shot will keep most PKs honest and give the Wild's right side or strong side just a little more room to operate, perhaps even a check of passiveness for us to make our moves. Zuccy then becomes a redundant piece on the unit. 

    The 4 forwards should then be shooters, not just point getters. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    In the Wild's PP, to me it looks like Zuccy QBs and is the designed playmaker of the unit. If Buium takes over as QB, we really don't need the other playmaker there, we need more of a lethal shot to balance out the PK coverage. Even the fear of Jiricek's shot will keep most PKs honest and give the Wild's right side or strong side just a little more room to operate, perhaps even a check of passiveness for us to make our moves. Zuccy then becomes a redundant piece on the unit. 

    The 4 forwards should then be shooters, not just point getters. 

    Is Necas a shooter or more of a distributor for the Avs?  He plays with Makar who is the qb.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    Is Necas a shooter or more of a distributor for the Avs?  He plays with Makar who is the qb.

    He's got a really nice shot.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    40 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    Replace him with Tarasenko or keep him where he is

    Time will tell if Zucc belongs, but with Ek out front and two snipers in Kap and Boldy, it is nice to have another guy that can pass.

    Edited by SkolWild73
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Zucc should not be on PP1.  He is no threat to shot.  We need a RH shot there that can shoot.  Can Jiricek be that guy?  Maybe abd worth trying.  That’s why we need a guy like Necas or Thompson.  They both have great shots in that spot. Not a huge fan of a LH shot D like Zeev running the PP from the point.  To hard for him to 1 time shots as well.  We need to shoot more and more quickly.  Our PP is way to pass happy

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    Our PP is way to pass happy

    Do you think any of that has to do with our low-event, conservative brand of hockey?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    In the Wild's PP, to me it looks like Zuccy QBs and is the designed playmaker of the unit. If Buium takes over as QB, we really don't need the other playmaker there, we need more of a lethal shot to balance out the PK coverage. Even the fear of Jiricek's shot will keep most PKs honest and give the Wild's right side or strong side just a little more room to operate, perhaps even a check of passiveness for us to make our moves. Zuccy then becomes a redundant piece on the unit. 

    The 4 forwards should then be shooters, not just point getters. 

    Without the PP there is no nhl role for Zuccy this upcoming season.  He’d be a nice 13th forward (only playing in top 6) on an nhl playoff contender.  My guess is he’ll play top 6 minutes all season, and it’ll be tough to watch unless he’s with 97

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, SkolWild73 said:

    Is Necas a shooter or more of a distributor for the Avs?  He plays with Makar who is the qb.

    I’d argue a PP can’t have too many playmakers, and that’s really zuc’s only remaining super power.  Seeing passes most can’t envision

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 hours ago, MNCountryLife said:

    Actually I have a few reasons. 

    I'm not a big fan of the single man high with the puck.  Makes us one mistake away from a break away going the wrong way. 

    I would also consider Buium and Jiricek as very aggressive d-men that are more than capable of attacking low and creating.  Spurgeon is capable of sliding down effectively as well. 

    IMO: the D-men I listed are better players than the O-men I didn't list.  Brodin, Spurgeon, Buium and Faber are better players than Trenin, Foligno, Sturm ...

    Hartman maybe... I do like his play.  I have no idea if Yurov or Ohgren could be effective.  But quite a few of our best players are on D.  Play them.  Tell them to be aggressive, create and score.

    Not totally sure I agree, but I appreciate the clarification.

    I'm in total agreement on needing to be more aggressive though.  Take calculated risks.  Make the opposing team react.  They aren't going to give the Wild high-danger chances.  The Wild have to pressure the other team into those mistakes.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Without the PP there is no nhl role for Zuccy this upcoming season.  He’d be a nice 13th forward (only playing in top 6) on an nhl playoff contender.  My guess is he’ll play top 6 minutes all season, and it’ll be tough to watch unless he’s with 97

    Understand.  I am not a huge fan of him on the team but understand he is Kaps buddy.  He shouldn’t be on our PP1 and shouldn’t be playing top 6 minutes.  On a contending team he wouldn’t sniff either of them.  I’m any our goal to be a contender.  Why do we keep running it back with the same stiffs hoping a different result

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 minutes ago, Enforceror said:

    Do you think any of that has to do with our low-event, conservative brand of hockey?

    Yes I think it has to do with our coach.  Get Deboer in here to coach and you will see a much better team. He won’t get pushed around by Billy saying who to play where. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Looks like I should have looked at the actual stats instead of assuming he had a real good year 3 seasons ago. I had no idea it was actually that bad. Was that the year Addison had all the points?

    2022/23 Addison had 18 power play points, was a -17 and was replaced by John Klingberg for the post season.  That was the year everyone had a fantastic season and they are still looking to replace that scoring. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...