Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Will the Wild Lapse Into A Sunk Cost Fallacy With Brazeau?


    Image courtesy of Bob Frid-Imagn Images
    Luke Sims

    The Justin Brazeau trade didn’t make much sense at the time, and it has made even less sense in the weeks since the trade deadline. 

    The Minnesota Wild gave up a 2026 sixth-round pick and two young, cost-controlled fourth-liners, Marat Khusnutdinov and Jakub Lauko, for the Boston Bruins’ 6-foot-6 forward. 

    Brazeau has 10 goals and 10 assists in his 57 games with the Bruins this season. By all accounts, he’s a useful NHL player in a bottom-six role. He’s a decent playmaker, decent with his hands, decent shot, and a hulking frame that he can use to be physical or make plays around the front of the net. Brazeau is also one of Minnesota’s only right-shot players. He’s also cheap, making only $775,000 for one more season. 

    Not a bad get for two bottom-six players Minnesota didn’t see in their future. The only issue is that he hasn’t played like he did in Boston with the Wild. 

    Brazeau has been practically invisible in his first seven games with the Wild. He has no goals, assists, or points in his time on the ice in a mostly fourth- and occasionally third-line role. Brazeau has a 0 goals-for percentage and a 37.62% Corsi-for percentage. Both last on the team this season. 

    The Wild also haven’t used Brazeau on the powerplay, where his frame would seem like a natural fit. With Joel Eriksson Ek out of the lineup, Brazeau could be Minnesota’s go-to net-front presence on the powerplay. Travis Boyd and Dermott have more power play time than Brazeau, and one of those guys is in the AHL while the other is no longer on the team. It doesn’t make sense why he’s not on the ice when they brought him in for his size and versatility around the net.

    The biggest knock I've seen on Brazeau is his inability to skate well. He’s not a powerful skater and can get caught out of position or behind the play. Therefore, he can’t impact the play as it moves from one end of the ice to the other. 

    Minnesota already has a similar player: Yakov Trenin

    On the other hand, Khusnutdinov has two goals in five games with Boston. That’s as many goals as Khusnutdinov had in 57 games with the Wild. He’s played on a line with the talented Elias Lindholm and his buddy from Minnesota, Lauko, who also has two points in five games playing on that line. 

    While it’s unlikely that Khusnutdinov and Lauko continue their recent scoring tear, Boston blew up its core at the deadline and will likely miss the playoffs. So, those two will get an extended look higher in the lineup with more talented players and increased ice time. 

    Wild fans had clamored for Khusnutdinov to get an elevated role in Minnesota’s lineup. Now they see what it could have looked like while Brazeau struggles to adjust to the Wild’s systems. 

    But Wild fans are not the only witnesses. The man who made the move is watching from the rafters of the Xcel Energy Center and also sees it. Guerin traded for Brazeau for two main reasons: He’s big and cheap. 

    Those two factors alone will probably keep Brazeau in Minnesota for next season and beyond. He's in his first full NHL season at age 27. 

    Despite his poor play in Minnesota, the Wild and Guerin will likely fall into the sunk cost fallacy with Brazeau. They may extend the player for what they hope he can do despite what he’s already shown. 

    While Khusnutdonov looks to have a new lease on life in Boston, the Brazeau trade looks increasingly worse. Maybe it’s too early to write Brazeau off, but I doubt Guerin will want to see him walk for nothing in free agency after giving up Khusnutdinov for him. 

    If the Wild can find a cheap, short-term deal for the big winger, they should bring him back. Otherwise, they should have already learned their lesson on big, slow forwards and long-term contracts with Yakov Trenin.

    No matter how good Khusnutdinov looks in a spoked B, Guerin and the Wild cannot let it affect how they see Brazeau.

    All stats and data via Evolving Hockey, Hockey DB, and Cap Wages unless otherwise noted.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    1 minute ago, OldDutchChip said:

    are you thinking of the right russian? there is one in philly who i get confused with marchenko. 

    the real marchenko 🙂 played super well against us

    Isn't the one in Philly in LA now? I didn't think he did.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The CBJ Marchenko has pretty much the same stats as Boldy, is a RHS, from memory plays a more north south game and they're about the same size and 1 year apart. The RHS and north-south interests me. But having 2 Kirills on the team is confusing.

    Edited by mnfaninnc
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, mnfaninnc said:

    The CBJ Marchenko has pretty much the same stats as Boldy, is a RHS, from memory plays a more north south game and they're about the same size and 1 year apart. The RHS and north-south interests me.

    thats the one! hahaha

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    thats the one! hahaha

    He's definitely affordable, but I would suggest futures before Boldy (like prospects). That Marchenko looks like a nice add. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, mnfaninnc said:

    He's definitely affordable, but I would suggest futures before Boldy (like prospects). That Marchenko looks like a nice add. 

    he may cost more than boldy....he has been playing very good on L1 for them

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    FA is going to be tough way to improve the team and NOT overpay

    Free Agent signing means overpay. If a player is at least serviceable, teams will outbid each other for his services. Let’s not kid ourselves.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 hours ago, MNCountryLife said:

    Brazeau is big and our roster is only 6'0''... It may be that simple for GMBG.

    Unfortunately i think you are correct. What a terrible way to run a team.

    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Boston GM; "Hey Billy, I got a big, old, slow rookie, who can maybe kind of score, interested? I mean he's so awesome that I'd love to keep him, but I just can't afford his rookie salary."

    BG: "Hell yes! What will it take for me to get this specimen? I'll give you whatever you want!"

    Boston GM: "How about that Lauko kid? He gives 110% every shift and the people here kinda miss him. That's not quite enough though. How about you throw in that 22 year old 2nd round pick Russian. I mean, you can't even pronounce his name, am I right?!" And just to make it seem on the up and up, because Brazeau is so hot right now, how about a 5th round pick?"

    BG: "Done, but make it a 6th round pick. I don't want people to think we're getting taken advantage of."

    Boston GM: "Thanks Billy, you really saved my ass on this one. I didn't know how we were going to afford to pay that kid. Hate to see him go, he's the next McDavid, but it's just a business, right? Let me know if I can ever fleece, er um, I mean help you out again sometime."

     

    • Thanks 1
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 3/21/2025 at 7:57 AM, MNCountryLife said:

    Kind of lends credence to building a team through the draft.  FA pickups are more expensive.  I thought it was extremely interesting how Boston loaded up on draft picks this year. 

    Chicago won a few cups because of a key free agent signing.  I agree building through the draft is best but this team has a window.  I isn't opened very much but it is still open.  Signing someone like Ehlers would push that window wide open. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 3/20/2025 at 11:34 PM, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    The kid from Canada is going to go to the old declining roster for the US team and the kid from the US is going to re-sign with the Canadian team?

    Interesting perspective. There are a lot of possibilities. There will be plenty of opportunity to judge Guerin after this summer.

    Marner is friends with the Pittsburgh GM.  Sidney and Pittsburgh wants to make another push for the Cup.  The roster is pretty much set as it is adding Marner would be a big help for them.  

    After losing Marner, Toronto will pretty much be forced to sign Knies. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 3/20/2025 at 5:42 PM, Citizen Strife said:

    If the trade was just done to clear space for Yurov and free agents (and Hartman keeps playing as is), it's a small price to pay.

    Mojo, Nyquist, Brazeau out, Ohgren, Yurov, and a couple FAs/call-ups in.

    Sooooo, if that was the case this year would mean nothing.... next year they have all that money..  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 3/21/2025 at 9:42 AM, OldDutchChip said:

    exactly!

    this year we sent out Marat, Lauko, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 6th for 

    Braz, Nyquist and Jiri (who looks good but is being parked in a room) 

    this is a horrible waste of assets! wouldn't the above be enough to have gotten us Ranty? We could have likely had him for Rossi and that long list of picks! 

    Dont say things like that. This world is owned by apologists.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 3/21/2025 at 7:57 AM, MNCountryLife said:

    Kind of lends credence to building a team through the draft.  FA pickups are more expensive.  I thought it was extremely interesting how Boston loaded up on draft picks this year. 

    Yet the wild are trading them away, or atleast picks. Not to mention our top prospects don't get any playing time with worthwhile lines.... some not at all... hhmmm

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, Need4speed99 said:

    Yet the wild are trading them away, or atleast picks. Not to mention our top prospects don't get any playing time with worthwhile lines.... some not at all... hhmmm

    Agreed.  I thought the Wild should be sellers this year to increase draft capital and money on bad contracts.  BG didn't do that.  What is worse is that I haven't seen IA Wild players improving at a rate that prepares them for the NHL.  Making it difficult to build through the draft.  I think the Wild have some fundamental issues with building a contender.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Same old problem with mediocrity and never reaching full potential. 

    The Wild have a lot of good players but the wrong dynamic and no team identity. The leaders and talent aren't enough to overcome those qualities on other teams. Just aren't. The Wild can get some good regular season wins but they can't hang with the big teams in a series. FL, Vegas, Dallas, and Washington are a whole other level above MN. A fully healthy Wild team might change that a little but MN still can't win draws, kill penalties, score on the PP, or get greasy goals. It's always finesse and goaltending which isn't good enough to win a Cup. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is part of a running series re: grading the Braz for Khuz/Lauko/6th trade:

    Small sample size but the PK has improved markedly with Khuz and Laukzy being removed from the equation.  I'll keep an eye on this and report back as new data presents itself.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 3/25/2025 at 8:07 AM, MNCountryLife said:

    Agreed.  I thought the Wild should be sellers this year to increase draft capital and money on bad contracts.  BG didn't do that.  What is worse is that I haven't seen IA Wild players improving at a rate that prepares them for the NHL.  Making it difficult to build through the draft.  I think the Wild have some fundamental issues with building a contender.

    Couldn't agree more. Why is the wild are rated in the top 5 for prospect pool over the last 3 maybe 4 years yet none of them really get a shot. There are exceptions but you either give the kids a real shot or realize you can't develop prospects. And in the high priced world of sports, homegrown talent is how you win. Yet the wild always sign "stop gap" aging vets to fix it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...