We finally have a league disciplinarian that gets it, and uses sound judgment to decide on suspensions, why would we suddenly want him to throw all that away for the sake of a terrible rule that no one can make an argument for? The emotions of it overwhelmed some, and caused them to forget their objectivity exists and find any and all reasons (factually correct or not) to recommend a suspension.
This, despite video evidence to the contrary. Of course, as we have learned in the past, video doesn't mean anything. Right?
Links and news after the jump.
NHL Sources: Eric Nystrom unlikely to be suspended | StarTribune.com - Russo with the news and a bit of explanation.
Nystrom offers an apology and comes to own defense | StarTribune.com - Newspaper version.
Zulgad: Can Wild provide wins during trying time in Minnesota sports? | 1500 ESPN Twin Cities – Minnesota Sports News & Opinion (Twins, Vikings, Wolves, Wild, Gophers) - Judd Zulgad in his new role with AM1500 talks some puck.
Tending the Fields
Aeros, Stars in Preseason Action Sunday " Pilot to Gunner - A bit of insight about the Aeros.
Off the Trail
Eric Nystrom Hit On Taylor Fedun: Suspension Worthy, But For How Long? - The Copper & Blue - If you ever want to read a homerific, hysterically funny take on an event that doesn't match the actual event, this is it. Notice the overwhelming vote to not suspend Nystrom. That worked out well.
Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.
Recommended Comments
There are no comments to display.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.