Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Wild Make Significant Deadline Trade For Familiar Face


    Image courtesy of © Jerome Miron-Imagn Images
    Thomas Williams

    The Minnesota Wild made their first substantial move around the NHL trade deadline, and it was for an aging veteran who has worn the colors before.

    Announced by the team on Saturday afternoon, the Wild acquired forward Gustav Nyquist from the Nashville Predators and sent their 2026 second-round pick down south.

    It was a move seemingly out of nowhere, as the Wild have been subtlety connected to a couple of players on trade boards scattered across the internet, but nothing as a cemented rumor.

    However, it was a trade potentially made out of necessity. With Joel Eriksson Ek and Kirill Kaprizov out of the lineup and some mediocre play from the team overall, the Wild have been losing their grasp of a playoff spot. A 5-5-0 record in their last 10 games and a three-game losing streak -- it's no coincidence that it has been three games since Eriksson Ek suffered his injury -- put the Wild in a position to make a move now before it was too late.

    Is Nyquist the right candidate for this potentially season-saving move? If he played like he did in his previous stint in Minnesota, potentially. Just two years ago, the Wild traded a fifth-round pick for a then-injured Nyquist, and he was able to play the final three games of Minnesota's regular season and then all six playoff games against the Dallas Stars. Through those nine games, Nyquist scored one goal and 10 points and appeared to find new life in St. Paul.

    Now two years older and a pending unrestricted free agent at the age of 35, Nyquist is showing his decline. The winger has scored nine goals and 21 points in 57 games with the Nashville Predators, the third-worst team in the West. Not the electric season he hoped for when he was able to be on a team with Steven Stamkos and Ryan O'Reilly, but no one on that team has had anything anyone would call a good season.

    Nevertheless, Wild general manager Bill Guerin has pulled a familiar move. He knows Nyquist and knows what he looks like in Minnesota, so he went ahead and traded a much higher draft pick for a player who is significantly older than he was when he was last playing for this team.

    The timing of this trade and the player they acquired just feels like a slight act of desperation and trying to cling onto a top-three spot in the Central Division. Thankfully, the Wild banked enough points that they shouldn't completely drop out of the postseason.

    The Colorado Avalanche are banging on the door and most likely will take the Wild's spot. Still, as Minnesota drops into the first Wild Card spot, the Vancouver Canucks are seven points behind them with just one game in hand. It would take two significant streaks -- the Wild continuing to lose and the Canucks re-finding their form -- for Minnesota to be at risk of not making the playoffs.

    But that is the fear and what might have just caused this trade to be made. Nyquist could be a welcome addition to the Wild's top six, but it is a little bit of a puzzling move until the puck hits the ice and we see it fully fleshed out. For now, it's trading a fairly valuable asset for a 35-year-old winger who isn't having a great season and might not even make more of an impact than anyone in the organization before Saturday.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    19 hours ago, Burnt Toast said:

    This move makes the Wild better right now, without significant cost to the team over the next few years. I think it’s important for the Wild to make the playoffs this year. They are NOT a lock, especially with injuries to top players. I see this as a smart, measured move. If you want high risk, all in, 2027 might be a better year to do so. Why is making the playoffs important? There’s no better teacher for our players than experience. I think it is important for KK as well. 

    I think a 2nd was way too much for a 35 yr old 

    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It is doubtful that the Wild will trade for anyone.  Unless they trade a bunch of prospects and I doubt that is what they want to do.  The money just isn't there.   Unless salary is retained this is probably the only deal the Wild make.  

    First month under 500 all season was February.  They have a 9 point lead over last out of playoffs.  21 games left to go.  

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I kind of love that they put Nyquist right up on line 1. That move to draw the penalty nearly was a Nyquist goal and Boldy finished the game with 8 shots on goal. The line didn't score, but he gives Boldy some juice on the other side that many of their other wings don't bring to the ice.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    28 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    I kind of love that they put Nyquist right up on line 1. That move to draw the penalty nearly was a Nyquist goal and Boldy finished the game with 8 shots on goal. The line didn't score, but he gives Boldy some juice on the other side that many of their other wings don't bring to the ice.

    Yah Boldy probably the biggest beneficiary of G Nyq on the team

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 3/1/2025 at 7:42 PM, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    This is not a significant trade.  It’s a non event.  This team needs a big shakup with another 4-6 new players.  To much of the same for years not getting it done.  

    And until they stop making the same, damn moves, nothing will change.

    At this point, any "rental" will be just that. Bad goaltending, an abhorrent pp kill isn't going to get you far in the playoffs. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, 1Brotherbill said:

    It is doubtful that the Wild will trade for anyone.  Unless they trade a bunch of prospects and I doubt that is what they want to do.  The money just isn't there.   Unless salary is retained this is probably the only deal the Wild make.  

    First month under 500 all season was February.  They have a 9 point lead over last out of playoffs.  21 games left to go.  

    What good is making  the playoffs only to get wrecked? So if they barely make it they go against the jets... what's their record against them?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    I think ogz is used as a sweetener along with 2027 1st+2nd to return a legitimate top 6 forward

     starting to sound like the Chuck Fletcher mortgage the future to save his job?  Yep

    Ogy was a guerin pick... and yes, it seems they play him and others on the 4th lines to try and hope they break through to just trade.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Need4speed99 said:

    What good is making  the playoffs only to get wrecked? So if they barely make it they go against the jets... what's their record against them?

    After trading the picks for Jiricek, what would be the point in selling off and tanking?  Guerin didn't want to pay whatever price it would take for vaunted "needle movers" if they were even offered.  Playing to lose games would just help Columbus.

    Guerin is doing the tightrope walk he's been doing for years.  I've already accepted the team doesn't really have a chance.  I'm willing to ride things out though, because getting to the playoffs and winning games is what a team is supposed to do.

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think this is just getting a serviceable warm body in the line up that may have some impact. The 2026 2nd pick was all due to cap space being retained as well as future picks having less weight than current picks from what I was reading as well as an interview with Billy G. The wild have NO cap space. This caused them to send Ohgie (more so to make room for Gus Ny) and Marat (pure cap space per Billy) down to Iowa. Also seemed to have talk about not putting Ek and Kap on LTIR until end of the season which would means they would need to accumulate as much cap space as possible to bring one if not both back during the regular season. It does not seem this is to protect Ohgie and Khus for a future trade or anything else major, just trying to balance a spreadsheet with the hopes of getting 2 of your top forwards back during the regular season.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, Mateo3xm said:

    I’m not crazy about giving a 2nd round pick for a 35 yr old. That’s way too much in my opinion.

    The salary retention raised the price. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    26 minutes ago, IllicitFive said:

    The 2026 2nd pick was all due to cap space being retained as well as future picks having less weight than current picks from what I was reading as well as an interview with Billy G. The wild have NO cap space.

    I agree that the cap retention is what moved it to be a 2nd round pick rather than a 3rd. Nyquist could help the Wild in many areas, particularly before Kaprizov comes back, but also as a guy who remains in the top 6 after Kaprizov comes back.

    He's also younger than Zuccarello by exactly 2 years, so if the Wild were to trade Zuccarello in the summer, Nyquist could be a decent replacement for him next season.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    whatever happens this year - billy must NOT re-sign nyquist or anyone else with deteriorating skill set and age of 32 and above to a contract. if he wants to sign someone old - go ahead and offer 1.5 mil to bogo and be done. otherwise this is Kap's team on his timeline. please focus on that. 

    you have your core top 6, if unchanged, it looks like this - 

    • Kap
    • Zuccy (until Kap signs - you keep him)
    • Ek
    • Boldy
    • Rossi
    • Yurov

    say your final goodbyes to MAF, Nyquist and MJ

    if you can avoid NOT tying up money for aging has-beens - go after big fish. yes overpay by a million or two on a superstar. To instead sign any of the combo of these 3 - Nelson, Boeser and Nyquist for next year, rather than doing so for Ranty - is moronic.

    Move Spurge for a pick to Chicago or talk to your friend at Pitts (who love colleting antiques) or Buffalo (who love collecting MN players) and give that C to Kap already. And along with C offer him 16 MM per this July. 

    The above is the best scenario as it does NOT remove any of the current core. It still allows us to keep Rossi using Bridge deal - as i see it a win-win for both sides (wild get him back on the "cheap" and he knows his next contract will be much better). 

     

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, Citizen Strife said:

    "Don't re-sign Nyquist"

    Ok.  Sensible.

     

    "move Spurge"

    Stopped paying attention.

    right .... a 36 year to-be defenseman, coming after multiple injuries, who is also tiny and is known to be somewhat a liability during the POs because of his size and is due another 7.5mm for two more seasons....yeap you right! let's give him a Billy's special (4 more years!) and you and Freddy can celebrate

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So, you'd rather play Bogo or Jiricek over Spurgeon?  That's rich.  That's what you're proposing.  Spurgeon is still one of the best defenseman the team has (Brodin when healthy is better).  The second injury wasn't even his fault.  He and Foligno have pretty much rebounded from last year's injury BS with their defensive performances.

    But whatever.  They don't score for the team.  Oh wait.  Spurgeon has about the same amount of points as Faber does in less games played.  Both are sitting right outside the Top 50 defensemen...so huh.  Guess they aren't doing their jobs either direction.

    Spurgeon has a lot left.  Could he end up like Goligoski?  Sure.  But that's a couple years from now.  Hynes's style is predicated on everyone buying into being defensively sound.  Punting one of the best defensemen the team has for an unproven guy they just signed, and a dude barely treading water as a 1st/2nd pair when Spurgeon was out, is not my idea of fun.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Citizen Strife said:

    So, you'd rather play Bogo or Jiricek over Spurgeon?  That's rich.  That's what you're proposing.  Spurgeon is still one of the best defenseman the team has (Brodin when healthy is better).  The second injury wasn't even his fault.  He and Foligno have pretty much rebounded from last year's injury BS with their defensive performances.

    But whatever.  They don't score for the team.  Oh wait.  Spurgeon has about the same amount of points as Faber does in less games played.  Both are sitting right outside the Top 50 defensemen...so huh.  Guess they aren't doing their jobs either direction.

    Spurgeon has a lot left.  Could he end up like Goligoski?  Sure.  But that's a couple years from now.  Hynes's style is predicated on everyone buying into being defensively sound.  Punting one of the best defensemen the team has for an unproven guy they just signed, and a dude barely treading water as a 1st/2nd pair when Spurgeon was out, is not my idea of fun.

    what about our rich prospect pool? or that is not "yet" ready?

    or what about all world minute muncher Faber? stud Middleton? phenom Zeev? beast Jiricek? rugged muscle man Bogo? all world McDavid deterrent Brodin? 

    isn't there such a thing as FA also where you can pick up a D to play 3rd pair? or you don't think 7.5 MM of extra money can help you more than 36 year old injured (slow and tiny) defenseman?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, OldDutchChip said:

    Move Spurge for a pick to Chicago or talk to your friend at Pitts (who love colleting antiques) or Buffalo (who love collecting MN players) and give that C to Kap already. And along with C offer him 16 MM per this July. 

    For better or worse, Spurgeon is not getting moved. 

    He's at 913 games played. He is going to be in a Wild sweater when he hits 1k. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    For better or worse, Spurgeon is not getting moved. 

    He's at 913 games played. He is going to be in a Wild sweater when he hits 1k. 

    unfortunately you are right. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    Spurgeon

    I believe JS has a role to play on this team. He plays fast, confidently and is a master at being in the right position. He gets shots through to the net and almost never gets beat when he pinches down the wall. I like him paired with Chisholm. He’s got his limitations, pretty much every player does. I think he can finish off his current contract in MN. I see him getting slotted into the third pair eventually. Statistically he still shines and he definitely passes the eye test. Watch him closely and you will see a player that knows the game and anticipates what’s coming next. ….IMO

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 hours ago, Need4speed99 said:

    What good is making  the playoffs only to get wrecked? So if they barely make it they go against the jets... what's their record against them?

    Does anyone think they were going to win the Stanley Cup this year?  Anyone?  That's what I thought.  So if you aren't going to win the Cup the next option is to make the playoffs.  What you do in the playoffs is next.  

    Sure it is a gut punch every year to see this team get rolled in the playoffs.  I would rather have a short playoff run over being a Buffalo Saber esc franchise. 

     

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, 1Brotherbill said:

    Does anyone think they were going to win the Stanley Cup this year?  Anyone?  That's what I thought.  So if you aren't going to win the Cup the next option is to make the playoffs.  What you do in the playoffs is next.  

    Sure it is a gut punch every year to see this team get rolled in the playoffs.  I would rather have a short playoff run over being a Buffalo Saber esc franchise. 

     

    How in the hell does this help?. That was the point and you proved it( the staney cup bit, on it). Otherwise, nothing changes. Pretty simple. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    After trading the picks for Jiricek, what would be the point in selling off and tanking?  Guerin didn't want to pay whatever price it would take for vaunted "needle movers" if they were even offered.  Playing to lose games would just help Columbus.

    Guerin is doing the tightrope walk he's been doing for years.  I've already accepted the team doesn't really have a chance.  I'm willing to ride things out though, because getting to the playoffs and winning games is what a team is supposed to do.

    So you try to sound like you know guerin and leipold... that's great, tell the owners fans are sick of mediocre.

    Being a contender is what they should do. You are ALWAYS an apologist. 

    Some people want results. Why is thus hard to understand.... look at the last 20 years, moves made and get back to me.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...