Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Why I'm Afraid Of the Minnesota Wild's "Christmas Morning"


    Image courtesy of Stephen R. Sylvanie-Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    I can clearly remember the last time it felt like Christmas Morning to be a Wild fan.

    The exact date was July 4, 2012, the date the Minnesota Wild signed the now-onerous and crippling Zach Parise and Ryan Suter contracts. Make no mistake, no one thought those deals would look good in the mid-2020s. But that was a problem for mid-2020s Wild fans.

    Ha ha.

    But for the moment, it genuinely felt like Christmas Morning. It had everything -- Wild fans making a wish list for those players, the anticipation, and even a dramatic flourish with owner Craig Leipold bringing them to Minnesota via plane as beat writers hid in the bushes to take a peek. It was undeniably Christmas in July.

    (And no, I don't want to hear about how Kirill Kaprizov's arrival in Minnesota was like Christmas Morning. The day Kaprizov arrived was like when your deadbeat dad shows up for the first time in four years and gives you a gift that's "for the birthdays he missed," but it's good enough for you to say, "Actually, Ron kinda came through here.")

    But now that the hangover of Christmas Morning 1.0 will wear off in July 2025, we're being promised Christmas Morning 2.0. No, really. "Next July 1 is going to be like Christmas," declared Mr. Leipold back in October. And I'm afraid of Christmas morning. 

    Don't get me wrong, I'm writing to Santa about a long-term extension for Kirill Kaprizov to arrive on exactly that date. Whether it's for $13, $14, or, heck, $20 million per year, I don't care as long as it's eight years. If that gets done, I'll get something I'm thrilled about under the tree.

    But after four straight lean years where the Wild have had to do their shopping at Five Below, there's no doubt Minnesota wants to make a big splurge. That's also the fear -- of leaving a Parise/Suter situation and diving right into another one.

    That's not an indictment on Mr. Leipold's ownership. For one, it's his team and his money, and Wild fans should be happy to have an owner willing to break the bank to try and field a winning product. You can hop the Green Line over to Target Field Station and see what happens when the owner isn't as willing to invest in the team.

    Nor is it an admonishment of the Parise/Suter contracts. Those two were top-50 players, and the Wild were an afterthought in the NHL before those moves. They became relevant overnight and remained so ever since. The ending would always be bad, but if I had a chance to go back in time and get the Wild's ear before signing those deals... I'd advise them to do it again.

    But this is a different free agent class, a different Wild team, and a different juncture in franchise history. 

    Let's start with the players available. There are only three players who've been in the NHL's Top-50 in Evolving-Hockey's Standings Points Above Replacement since the start of the 2021-22 season that are hitting free agency: Mitch Marner (seventh), Mikko Rantanen (eighth), and Brad Marchand (28th). If Marner or Rantanen want to sign with your team, you do that in a heartbeat and ask questions later. Marchand would move the needle. Still, at 37, he'd be a short-term, late-career signing.

    Everyone else is especially subject to The Winner's Curse, where signing them virtually guarantees a bad ending. To get a player in free agency, you're almost always overpaying in both money and term.

    Look at the Nashville Predators, who had their Christmas morning in July. They threw cash around and inked two-time Rocket Richard Trophy winner Steven Stamkos, Conn Smythe Trophy winner Jonathan Marchessault, and threw in a top-four defenseman in Brady Skjei for good measure. Look what they got for it: Seventh place in the Central Division, with Stamkos and Marchessault on pace for 22-and-24-goal seasons, respectively.

    No one is saying the Wild can't use a top-six center in Matt Duchene, Brock Nelson, or John Tavares, even into their mid-to-late 30s. Nor would a right-shot scoring winger like Brock Boeser or a speedster like Nikolaj Ehlers be out of place in Minnesota. 

    But again, this is a different Wild team at a different juncture of their franchise. They have Kaprizov and Matt Boldy, two star players who will keep them relevant. Minnesota also isn't so desperate for centers that it needs to sign a Faustian contract to get one -- while the depth isn't great, Marco Rossi and Joel Eriksson Ek make a good 1-2 punch. 

    They also have a great prospect pool that won't need to carry the team the way Minnesota depended on Mikael Granlund and company to do in 2012. Goalie Jesper Wallstedt and defenseman Zeev Buium probably need to become tentpole pieces. Still, if players like Danila Yurov, Liam Öhgren, David Jiricek, and Riley Heidt become solid players instead of stars, that doesn't throw the whole plan into flux.

    The Wild did a great job assembling this foundation, and it'd be a shame if an ill-advised free agent signing blew that up. How would it feel if, four years from now, the Wild were forced to choose between keeping Buium and Jiricek, or Rossi and Yurov because they had one or two poorly-aging Stamkos-esque contracts?

    Now, free agency isn't the only way to bring aboard an impact player. If the Wild target a young player on the outs with their team or one who wants out, that's a different story. The Florida Panthers did that with Matthew Tkachuk, for example. The whispers are out about Elias Pettersson, and buying low on a three-time 30-goal scorer at center before turning 27 would be exactly the kind of Christmas morning move I would welcome.

    It's hard to imagine that the Wild won't make a big splash this offseason. The front office and ownership are motivated to make a move. Minnesota is in a contention window with Kaprizov, and the fanbase is starved for something good after four years of league-imposed frugality. But Christmas morning needs to come with the right presents, or the memory of Christmas 2.0 will turn into sour egg nog.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 6

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    If the "Christmas Morning" consists of Kaprizov and Rossi extensions, and one impactful signing, I'll be happy with it.  If it's a trade deadline thing, it better fucking work, and that guy must re-sign (though I'd rather that be plan B).  Any other option (Nashville haul) or Kap leaves is just an abject failure.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Didn’t realize Ehlers was coming up as a UFA. He’d be a solid pickup (bonus points he’s Danish!), although I think he’s been a little injury prone. 
     

    Rantanen, Marner and ODC’s boy Tkachuk are pipe dreams with their contracts and what they’ll command. Boeser would be a good add too. Going to be fun/interesting/stressful to see where the Wild are in a month-ish to see if there’s something big on the horizon before the TDL. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would love to see the Wild get Elias Petterson, but that is not likely. Going after a top 50 player would be ok, provided it's a deal that ends at the players age 35 season. Make a trade for a top tier player if Marner won`t sign here, such as getting the other Tkachuck brother from Ottowa. 

    We need Kaprizov to sign a long term deal, or else we might as well rebuild. Getting a big name player would help.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd rather not think about it, but multiple 1st-3rds, a prospect or two, and then expiring contracts to make the money work.  I highly doubt they are going to pull off a Huberdeau/Tkachuk kinda thing. That's why the sooner July 1st hits and they sign the extension, the sooner the doom and gloom can die down.

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    OCL mentioned a 5 year plan. I’m hoping that means giving the Wild top prospects time to make a difference with at least a couple still on ELCs. As Citizen Kane, I mean Strife mentioned I’d be ok with a reasonable trade for the best top six they can afford with an eye to resigning our top talent down the road. I need to see a lot more from the $4M club before going all in or else as Toni clearly layed out we might get “Nashvilled”. 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, RedLake said:

    Wonder what the return would be for a Kaprizov trade? 

    Not enough. It would mean resetting the timer for any kind of SC window back half a decade minimum. He’s an awesome player to build a championship team around. If he really wants to walk we won’t get equal value. I’m beginning to wonder if not resigning Rossi is a $ panic button to make sure $ is DEFINITELY 100% not going to be an issue. Not to mention the majority of the buyout $ is gonzo. Kinda nice that not many teams are positioned to “bust a Kap.”

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Kap has moved up a level this year.  He is a must sign.  I would like a few guys to step up and for BG to let a few guys walk.  Let the lineup be something like: 

    Kirill, Rossi, Boldy, Ogren, Ek, Yurov, Foligno, Freddy, Hartman,Trenin, Knut, Heidt

    Brodin, Zeev, Faber, Mid, Jiricek, Chisholm

    Gus, Wall

    I would think that is a lineup we can afford and leave us something for the trade deadline if needed.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Watching the patterns with this team I'm worried they will go out and overpay for a good but aging vet.

    They need to find a way to unload some of the bad contracts. Trenin, Hartman, freddy and even foligno should be moved if the opportunity arises. 

    Bring up your top playing prospects and actually give them a shot( not stick them on the 4th line)to see where they are at and what roles they can fill. 

    The other thing will be how much money will they really have to spend when you factor in having to resign players and extensions kicking in. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Trenin, Foligno, and Freddy are only bad contracts if you care about "OOH GOALS!" and little else.  Hartman is the only one right now not providing much because he has the track record of being a streaky scorer.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/27/2024 at 10:14 AM, Citizen Strife said:

    Trenin, Foligno, and Freddy are only bad contracts if you care about "OOH GOALS!" and little else.  Hartman is the only one right now not providing much because he has the track record of being a streaky scorer.

    Yeah, they are a part of why our team defense is so good this year.  Defense isn't just played by defenseman.  Hartman is definitely an issue.  And it's not just streaky scoring.  His overall play has just sucked in general for a while now.  Usually when he gets like this his composure starts to crack a bit and he becomes far less disciplined, taking a ton of penalties.  I'm glad he's keeping it together, though Boldy has been taking those penalties instead unfortunately.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Quote

    Don't get me wrong, I'm writing to Santa about a long-term extension for Kirill Kaprizov to arrive on exactly that date. Whether it's for $13, $14, or, heck, $20 million per year, I don't care as long as it's eight years.

    I'd love if Kap re-signs, but if it's going to take $20M to keep him here, then we should make other plans.  We'd be signing ourselves up for the same type of salary cap limitations as we've been dealing with for the past few years with the recapture penalties.

    I kind of feel like he's already made his decision, though I don't know what that decision is.  He either likes the trajectory or he has a preference for a different location (or maybe his girlfriend has a preference) and there is absolutely nothing we can do to change his mind. 

    The worst thing we can do is try accelerate that trajectory prematurely by dumping all our prospects.  A few for surgical improvements to the roster I'm fine with as the best rosters are grown and the gaps are filled here and there with someone who fits that gap, but you need those prospects to backfill or you crash hard against the salary cap.  You trade away too much of those prospects and you are quickly getting on a train to Fletcher's style of management that ages poorly.

    If you try and tip the scales too far too fast, you swing and miss and fall flat on your face.  People keep saying we need to go all in now are fools.  We don't have the depth for that.  You do that and Kap heading out the door is a certainty because we will swing and miss and then will have nothing behind it for years.

    The teams that are contend for the cup and win it typically are the teams that are set up to make multiple swings.  We're getting there.  I truly like the methodical approach and the depth we are gaining.  Yes, I'm impatient and want guys in the AHL to be more ready than they are, but I remind myself most of them are young and still developing.  It seems like COVID really did slow a lot of players down by a year or two.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...