Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Why Did the Wild's Penalty Kill Fall Apart In 2023-24?


    Image courtesy of David Gonzales-Imagn Images
    Robert Brent

    One of hockey’s most treasured and time-tested tropes is that special teams can make or break a team. A good power play or penalty kill has proven to be an excellent weapon for hockey's great teams. However, a bad special teams unit can sink a season. 

    In 2023-24, the Minnesota Wild had one of the worst penalty kills in the NHL, ranking third worst in penalty-killing percentage. With a rate of just 74.52% successful kills (67 goals against total), the team all but guaranteed they'd be giving up an average of around one special teams goal per game.

    We all know the Wild's poor penalty-killing was disastrous for the team in 2023-24, but let's dive deeper. How did the Wild perform so poorly? What factors contributed to their poor performance? Are there any reasons to believe they can turn it around in 2024-25?

    What Went Wrong For Wild

    Let’s start where things went wrong in 2023-24. Penalty-killing goaltending was a weakness for the Wild, especially when Marc-André Fleury was in net. Fleury played 40 games for the Wild and racked up the second-worst goals saved above expected (-8.8) in the league. With a -.026 save percentage above expected, Fleury performed poorly 4-on-5 independently of the quality of chances the team gave up.

    All that said, the quality of chances the Wild give up short-handed is a considerable problem. Looking at the Wild’s PK shot map from last season, their most glaring weakness becomes evident. The team doesn’t limit shots from high-danger areas. 

    Shot Maps provided by Hockeyviz.com.

    Brent1.png

    The Wild allowed a much higher number of shots than average from the most dangerous areas of the ice. Instead of pushing shots to the outside or from tight angles, Minnesota’s opponents feasted on them in the slot and front of the net. 

    The high circle is one of the few areas where the Wild limits shots. That may be a great strategy if you’re trying to stop Alexander Ovechkin’s power play setup. However, the rest of the league is trying to run their offense in the areas Minnesota struggled at defending. 

    The Wild’s penalty kill struggles become even more obvious when you compare their shot maps against teams that were highly successful killing penalties last season. 

    Comparison To Top PKs

    Top3PK.png

    Above are the shot maps for the top three penalty-killing teams in the league: the Carolina Hurricanes, the Los Angeles Kings, and the New York Rangers. Minnesota can learn crucial lessons from examining how the best penalty-killing teams in the league operate. 

    Carolina and the Rangers are very effective at limiting shots, especially in the slot and middle of the ice. In contrast, the Kings did a great job limiting shots directly in front of the net but allowed many chances from tight angles on the sides of the goal mouth. 

    The three teams do things differently but share one modus operandi. They allow shots from concentrated, often low-danger areas. The teams know where chances will come from in high quantities, making defending it easier. The Hurricanes, Kings, and Rangers have designed their penalty kills to push teams to specific areas. On the other hand, the Wild have multiple areas of the ice where they allow high-danger chances.

    Learning from Past Success

    We can acknowledge that the Wild penalty kill was porous in 2023-24, but it hasn’t always been that way. Minnesota has struggled with its special team consistency for years. Still, the 2022-23 season represented a high point. The Wild successfully killed 82.03% of penalties that year, good for 10th in the league. Examine the shot maps from the 2022-23 season, and it’s easy to see why the results differed.

    Brent3.png

    The Wild dominated the middle of the ice and pushed their opposition to the boards. The shot maps from 2022-23 and 2023-24 are nearly exact opposites in many ways. What contributed to such a stark contrast in results from year to year?

    Key Pieces Missing

    Personnel is one of the most noticeable differences between the penalty kills between 2022-23 and 2023-24. The easiest way to illustrate the lack of consistency between years is by looking at the hockeyviz.com presence and importance charts. 

    The chart shows the number of minutes a player plays in a specific situation throughout the season. When you look at the Wild’s PK presence and importance chart from 2022-23 to 2023-24, the penalty kill’s lack of consistency becomes obvious.

    Brent4.png

    Long-time penalty contributor Matt Dumba is no longer on the team after playing on the team’s penalty kill for years. Mason Shaw was a penalty kill specialist and missed nearly the 2023-24 season with an injury. Shaw’s absence was felt on special teams in 2023-24 and will continue to be now that he signed with the Winnipeg Jets. 

    Along with Dumba and Shaw, two players no longer in the organization, two of the Wild’s most essential players also missed significant time in 2023-24. 

    Jonas Brodin played in 62 games but suffered several injuries throughout the year. Brodin also missed time in 2022-23, so having him for a full season would be beneficial. Jared Spurgeon missed even more time, playing in only 16 games. Spurgeon played the most penalty kill minutes of his career in 2022-23 with 234.3 minutes on the PK. 

    With Spurgeon’s return and a clean bill of health for Brodin, some of that consistency will return next season.

    Can the Wild Turn the PK Around?

    As mentioned, the Wild should have much more consistency next year. Hopefully, Brodin and Spurgeon will return and play meaningful minutes on the penalty kill. Brock Faber will continue to play a crucial role for the unit but should improve after playing a full season. 

    The WIld also signed one of the league’s premiere penalty killers, Yakov Trenin, this offseason. There’s been much discussion about whether Trenin is an excellent signing, but he’ll almost certainly help out on the penalty kill. 

    Minnesota’s special teams were better under John Hynes last season than Dean Evason. Penalty-killing was an especially strong area for the team immediately after hiring Hynes. The Wild still didn’t perform well enough, but perhaps the team will benefit from a full season under Hynes.

    Concerns remain, of course. For example, Spurgeon and Brodin should start the year healthy, but they’re on the wrong side of 30. If any more injuries occur or declines occur from key players, the Wild could just as quickly find themselves having special team woes again. 

    Still, the Wild simply must perform better on the penalty kill. They’re not going anywhere without better special teams. They should be better positioned to see that success with key pieces in place this season.

    Brent2.png

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    A goal a game can mean a lot.  Even if it isn't a win, there's potential for games to go into overtime, earning at least an extra point at minimum.  The Wild's offense is not built for high scoring output.  That means defensive play, goaltending, and PK must be at a premium.  Sure, Fleury is what he's going to be, but you can't tell me having two of the best defensive defenseman in team history (Brodin/Spurgeon) and a great defensive forward (Foligno) fully healthy means nothing.

    I did like that even with so many injuries, the Wild still managed to play decently against lacking offensive or more defensively sound teams.  Ramp up that side, and maybe you can mitigate the feasts the heavy hitters do, if not blank them completely.  I don't expect overnight seachange.  But even a modicum of improvement should be doable.

    • Like 6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I looked up the league GA stats again.  Going from least goals (Panthers: 198) to most goals allowed (Sharks: 326), the Wild were 20th (260).  So, here's a thought experiment about what improved PK might do.  Maybe not a goal a game, but what about 25%, 50%, or 75% of that?  So, 20.5 goals per 25%.  So let's just say the Wild let in 20.5, 41, 61.5, and 82 less goals than they did.

     

    As is: 260 goals (20th)

    .25 less goals per game: 239-240 goals (10th-11th between Oilers and Sabers)

    .5 less goals per game: 219 goals (4th-5th between Carolina and Boston)

    .75 less goals per game: 199-200 goals (3rd between Winnipeg and LA)

    1 less goal per game: 178 goals (1st by a wide margin)

     

    What I'm getting from this is the gulf between playoff contention and missing is not as impossible as it seems.  Sure.  60-80 less goals per game seems unlikely.  But even getting 20-40 makes the Wild Top 5-10 in the league.  I'm not saying PK has everything to do with making up that 20-40 margin, but it will have an impact.  Heck, even giving up 10 less goals puts the Wild top half of the league.  You'd be surprised how little margin separates bubble teams.  The Wild need to find ways to come out ahead.  It looks like defense is the plan for this year.

    • Like 7
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It was definitely a personnel problem last year with so many injuries to key players.  There were even times when Johansson was out on the PK because other players were exhausted.  You put players like that out there and give the other team a lot of chances and your goalies aren't going to look so great.  Players like Faber did well, but he couldn't hold the fort together by himself.

    I do like the Trenin signing.  I know it would be nice to have more offense, but if we are stronger defensively and can be a little better on the PK like Citizen mentioned, our offense is good enough to win us games.  If Rossi hits another gear this year and Boldy can add a bit more power forward to his game, then I think the offense will be even less of a concern.

    Looking forward to watching some pre-season games in a couple weeks!

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Heck, even giving up 10 less goals puts the Wild top half of the league.  You'd be surprised how little margin separates bubble teams.

    Yes, specifically if those 10 goals impact the games against the bubble playoff teams.  If the Wild gave up 2 fewer goals to Nashville right before the all-star game, that reduces Nashville to 97 points and the Wild to 89 points in the standings. If the Wild hold the 3rd period lead against Anaheim in the next game, they climb to 91 points.

    Another 6 goals could flip 6 more points to the Wild. If they won that January 25th game, they would still have needed to get to 98 points to pass Nashville in the standings because Nashville had more regulation wins, but 1 more OT goal could have been the difference. It does come down to about a dozen goals, stopped or scored in the Wild's favor, that could have changed their fate, but I'm glad it played out as it did so they could add Buium. He adds exciting possibilities for their future.

    They had a really rough year for injuries last season, but were pretty competitive in some stretches. A healthy team with some developments from the young guys could make a difference. Boldy, Rossi, Faber, Gus & Chisholm could all have better years, and I'll mention a possible improvement from a healthy Gaudreau as well.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I’ve seen the Wild ranked as high as 2nd to finish in the central, all the way to second to last by THG. My hope is the Wild find and develop players that take pride in being elite at the PK. I heard the new assistant PK coach on a podcast and he played in the NHL and seems serious about making a difference. It can’t hurt to take staying out of the box seriously, taking only “good” penalties as much as possible. I’d like to see the Wild heading towards being one of the least penalized teams in the league. 

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Burnt Toast said:

    I’ve seen the Wild ranked as high as 2nd to finish in the central, all the way to second to last by THG.

    What’s THG? Yes, I’m a noob.

    • Thanks 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Sam said:

    THG?

    The hockey guy. Great unbiased take on the NHL. He’s covering the whole league so sometimes he’s off. There’s no way the Wild are only going to finish ahead of Chicago. I think the cap penalties are a big part of his predicting the Wild so low. He’s on YouTube. 

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This should be mandatory reading for all the Spurgeon haters. There is a lot more to being a good hockey player than individual stats show. I predict a strong season for the PK if Spurgeon is healthy.

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, Burnt Toast said:

    I heard the new assistant PK coach on a podcast and he played in the NHL and seems serious about making a difference. It can’t hurt to take staying out of the box seriously, taking only “good” penalties as much as possible. I’d like to see the Wild heading towards being one of the least penalized teams in the league. 

    I hope your definition of "good" penalties are earned penalties and not these stupid stick infractions. Don't hook, don't slash weakly, don't trip and don't high stick. I don't mind earned penalties where you get your money's worth. It's even better if you can take a guy with you. 

    As for the PK, this is the 1 glaring area that if fixed and we can gain a 10% fix over last season (finishing around 84% kill rate), I think our season goes dramatically better. I think our personnel will be much better too. Getting Foligno back, Dino becoming a killer and Trenin being a killer will help. Something tells me Ohgren might be a pretty good killer. Specifically on the back end if we get Spurgeon back (which I am pessimistic about) and start the season with Bogosian, we've got a better back end of killers too. All of Spurgeon, Faber, and Bogosian can kill on the right side. Brodin and Middleton are good on the left. 

    That heat map shows just how bad our coverage was. What we need are specific places that the goalie knows where the shot is coming from and that he can count on being at that place, that helps out a goalie tremendously. This is why on our PP it is important to have a competent player in Ovechkin's office. The opposing goalie doesn't even have to honor a weak Zuccarello wrister from that area. Sure, a couple get by but there's no canon coming from that side. 

    To me, we will be adding speed and youth to this PK which will be a nice shot in the arm.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mnfaninnc said:

    As for the PK, this is the 1 glaring area that if fixed and we can gain a 10% fix over last season (finishing around 84% kill rate), I think our season goes dramatically better. I think our personnel will be much better too. Getting Foligno back, Dino becoming a killer and Trenin being a killer will help. Something tells me Ohgren might be a pretty good killer. Specifically on the back end if we get Spurgeon back (which I am pessimistic about) and start the season with Bogosian, we've got a better back end of killers too. All of Spurgeon, Faber, and Bogosian can kill on the right side. Brodin and Middleton are good on the left. 

    Mermis was particularly poor in his 43+ minutes short-handed. The fact he was in 47 games and used on the PK tells a story about how injured the Wild were. The Wild only saved 69% of shots while short handed with Mermis on the PK.

    They had 13 goals against in less than 44 PK minutes for Mermis, so opposing teams scored more often than not every 2 minutes of his short-handed ice time.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 9/10/2024 at 3:14 PM, Burnt Toast said:

    I’ve seen the Wild ranked as high as 2nd to finish in the central, all the way to second to last by THG. My hope is the Wild find and develop players that take pride in being elite at the PK. I heard the new assistant PK coach on a podcast and he played in the NHL and seems serious about making a difference. It can’t hurt to take staying out of the box seriously, taking only “good” penalties as much as possible. I’d like to see the Wild heading towards being one of the least penalized teams in the league. 

    The ppl that ranked them to be second in the central need to lay off the bong hits. Avs, Jets, Stars and even Preds are far better teams than we are. I don’t see a way that’s happening.

     

    Random question but do any of you guys play fantasy hockey?

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Mermis was particularly poor in his 43+ minutes short-handed. The fact he was in 47 games and used on the PK tells a story about how injured the Wild were. The Wild only saved 69% of shots while short handed with Mermis on the PK.

    They had 13 goals against in less than 44 PK minutes for Mermis, so opposing teams scored more often than not every 2 minutes of his short-handed ice time.

    I hope they give hunt a shot. Couldn’t be much worse than mermis.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...