Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Who Would the Wild Put In Their Ring of Honor?


    Image courtesy of © Harrison Barden-USA TODAY Sports
    Justin Hein

     

    The Minnesota Wild have an incredibly passionate fanbase. They are hero-makers, showering the team’s best and most charismatic players with adoration. Speak to a fan who’s followed the team from its inception, and they can recount names from decades ago who are etched into their minds forever. That’s history, and the legacies of those players don’t seem reflected in the building when fans pour into the Xcel Energy Center. 

    Where most fan bases would retire numbers for these players, making a case for any Wild player clearing that bar is tough. The main reason? A lack of playoff success. Minnesota has often become a stepping stone for teams en route to Stanley Cup championships. Even so, players who leave their mark on the team, like Zach Parise, Niklas Backstrom, and Marian Gaborik, deserve a place of honor in the arena. 

    Earlier this summer, Michael Russo hinted on his podcast that the Wild Alumni Association might be the foundation for future projects such as a Wild Ring of Honor. While that never came to fruition, such a program would be the perfect middle-ground to recognize these players. 

    So, what is a Ring of Honor? There’s an excellent example of one just down I-94 at U.S. Bank Stadium, home of the Minnesota Vikings. The NFL Hall of Fame describes the Vikings Ring of Honor as “[recognizing] Vikings legends for their contributions to the team's success on and off the field.” Put another way, it’s like a team Hall of Fame. 

    Part of why the Vikings instituted the Ring of Honor is that they can’t keep retiring numbers. Logistically, they need 90 of the 100 possible jersey numbers in circulation to provide numbers for the 90-man preseason roster. A Ring of Honor is like the zero-calorie version of having your number retired in hockey. 

    The Minnesota Wild are entering their 24th season. They’ve outgrown their early expansion years, and their adolescence of regular-season success has grown old as well. The franchise has matured, and with that comes a quarter-century of history. But who should be included in a Ring of Honor? 

    The Vikings have inducted 27 players, coaches, and executives into the Ring of Honor over 62 seasons. The Wild have played 24 seasons, meaning their first class could include around 10 players. However, it’s worth noting that NFL teams have 22 starters on offense and defense. If we pare those 44 guys down to a 20-man NHL roster, that works out to more like four or five members. So, the Wild have local precedent to bring in five or ten members in the inaugural Ring of Honor. Who should make up that group? 

    A ring of honor should include the players, coaches, and executives without whom you cannot tell the team's story. They could easily include Jacques Lemaire, Manny Fernandez, and Andrew Brunette. They could also induct guys like Pierre-Marc Bouchard, Wes Walz, and Darby Hendrickson. Eventually, the team could even include Sid Hartman, Michael Russo, and Craig Leipold. But the founding members feel pretty straightforward. 

    The No-Brainers

    Mikko Koivu (C)

    All the reasons that Koivu had his number retired apply here. In truth, I support the Wild retiring his number, even if they had already created a Ring of Honor when they retired it. On the other hand, there’s an argument that Koivu never rose to the bar of a jersey retirement due to the team’s failure to make it past the second round of the playoffs. 

    Establishing Koivu as the founding member of the Wild Ring of Honor would have been a perfect fit. If the Wild set up their Ring of Honor like the Vikings, it would include retired numbers, so Koivu is a natural inclusion either way. 

    Niklas Backstrom (G)

    Backstrom might be the easiest pick on this list. He was synonymous with the Wild in his nine-season tenure in Minnesota. He started 350 games for the Wild, owns franchise records for shutouts and wins, and was largely excellent on a per-game basis. 

    He won the 2006-07 Jennings Trophy with Manny Fernandez, awarded for the fewest goals against per game (minimum 25 starts). While those teams never enjoyed much national recognition, fans in Minnesota knew Backstrom as a rock in net. 

    Marian Gaborik (RW) 

    Until Kirill Kaprizov arrived, Gaborik was the measuring stick for a game-breaking forward in Minnesota. Kevin Fiala, Zach Parise, and Mikael Granlund were all excellent players, but none measured up in the eyes of long-term Wild fans. Gaborik's raw skill at handling and shooting the puck was magnificent. 

    Even for the first year or two of Kaprizov’s career (by all accounts an instant success), many fans still preferred Gaborik’s work. While Kaprizov has likely won over most fans by this point, that’s a real testament to what Marian Gaborik means to the history of this team. 

    Zach Parise (LW) 

    Parise returned to his home state Wild in free agency on one of the two largest contracts in team history. For four straight seasons, he scored at a 30-goal pace in one of the lowest-scoring eras in NHL history by going to the most punishing areas of the ice. 

    After the team’s emotional 2014 postseason, he led a gritty comeback in their first meeting against the rival Colorado Avalanche. He gave more to this franchise in flesh and blood than perhaps any other player, and it’s all the more meaningful from the hometown hero. 

    Parise’s buyout complicates his legacy with the team, primarily due to a decline in play due to injuries. Bringing him back into the fold by honoring him with a place in the Ring of Honor would be one of the best reasons to start the Ring in the first place. 

    Derek Boogard (Enforcer) 

    Boogard is an icon of Wild history. He was 6’7” but stood even taller in fans’ hearts. The Boogeyman was a vital founding member of the Wild, setting a physical tone and creating a warm locker room environment

    Perhaps more than any other player, Boogard is why the Wild need a Ring of Honor. Teammates and fans have etched him into their memories. His tragic passing could leave a complicated legacy, but somehow, it never takes his shine away. Enshrining him in a Wild Ring of Honor would be a perfect way to honor his memory on and off the ice. More than simply remembering and celebrating him, it strikes the proper reverent tone. 

     

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Thanks Justin, something off the regular path for discussion. I agree with most of your "No Brainers", but one, at least for right now. I'm having a hard time wrapping my mind around Gaborik.

    So why not Gaborik now? He was uber talented and did impact our team in its infancy and went on to have a good career in the NHL. I just have this empty, abandoned feeling left in my gut that he left us. Had he resigned one more contract I may feel different. I feel a sense of loyalty is needed for him to get my acknowledgment. I hate to swear, but I would put Suter in before him and I'm not saying I would never put him in. Just not now.

    My standard is mixed, I want loyalty, character, impact, heart, longevity, selflessness, sacrifice, team first, and leadership. Now Suter is out....but Koivu, Backstrom, Parise, Boogaard, Lemaire, Fernandez, Brunette, Bouchard, Walz, and Hendrickson...I'm all in! Gaborik someday.

    Edited by vonlonster67
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I liked the choices, but when looking at Suter subjectively, I would have to add him. But, for Parise and Suter, not now, because a prerequisite to being put in the ring of honor is retirement. Parise and Suter are not retired.

    I'd also like to suggest a place for the sons of MN, perhaps there is a place already, but more of a State of Hockey HOF. I don't know if you could fit in 2 rings of honor, but I think there needs to be someplace for that to happen if it hasn't already.

    I haven't visited the X in a long time, and certainly haven't walked around the whole place. Maybe in the courtyard coming up to the arena in the back, where they are planning more building, they could do something like that?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would gladly include Koivu in a team hall of fame or ring of honor, but I am not sold on anyone else. In my opinion, the Wild have not been successful enough to warrant the other folks getting in. I support Koivu, because he was basically the captain and face of the franchise all these years after Gaborik left.

    Backstrom and Granlund were also good players and fellow Finns, but not elite ring of honor material. 

    The ring of honor idea is a good one, but it's way to soon to be thinking of 5-10 nominees. The early Vikings teams were loaded with pro bowl level or hall of fame talents, which is not the case with the Wild. Coach Lemaire was a hof talent, so maybe an exception could be made for him.

    I may be a little biased, but the Finns are the best players. Therefore, it should be no surprise that the best Wild player during the teams first two decades was a Finn. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not sure I'd include Boogaard. Is there any other team in the league that has retired a number or placed in the team hall of fame that was an enforcer? The guy did very little on the ice make the hockey better.

    In fact, he was on the team when Kim Johnsson was suckerpunched by Brad May. It was only after this episode that Lemaire put him on the ice. It didn't deter the injury on iota. 

    We placing him in the RoH because he broke Todd Fedoruk's face? Pummeled the other team's enforcer? Didn't deter cheap shot hits by Mattias Ohlund or Matt Cooke.

    Idk, I think a RoH is reserved for special players that did things that would otherwise not get then in a true hall of fame. 

    Bruno, Walz, Bouchard, Rolston all come to mind. If you want, Nick Schultz. Dwayne Roloson, Manny Fernandez too. Jacques Lemaire, Bob Naegle Jr are a few off-ice people that could be placed there. But these guys showed excellence on the ice, even if it was short-lived.

    Idk. I just don't know if there's a place for enforcers in a RoH.

    Edited by joebou15
    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    47 minutes ago, joebou15 said:

    Jacques Lemaire, Bob Naegle Jr are a few off-ice people that could be placed there. But these guys showed excellence on the ice, even if it was short-lived.

    I would support these 2 candidates. 

    Also, if we do a ring of honor, can we trade that for unretiring #1? 

    We don't want to fill up the ring of honor either. Leave plenty of space for what is yet to come. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    26 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    We don't want to fill up the ring of honor either. Leave plenty of space for what is yet to come.

    With the team we have now let's hope we will have several candidates.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I would support these 2 candidates. 

    Also, if we do a ring of honor, can we trade that for unretiring #1? 

    We don't want to fill up the ring of honor either. Leave plenty of space for what is yet to come. 

    I would say keep #1 retired, but no future numbers should be retired, unless someone makes the hall of fame. 

    The Minnesota Twins seem to be going overboard by having a hof inductee every year now (sometimes they even have more than one). The Wild should learn from this, by keeping the proposed ring of honor small. 

    Kaprizov, Boldy, Ek, Brodin, Spurgeon and soon the WallaAll seem like future members of a ring of fame, but only Koivu stands out from the previous years. Had Gaborik stayed longer, then he might be on that list as well.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 9/3/2023 at 10:35 PM, Quebec1648 said:

    I would gladly include Koivu in a team hall of fame or ring of honor, but I am not sold on anyone else. In my opinion, the Wild have not been successful enough to warrant the other folks getting in. I support Koivu, because he was basically the captain and face of the franchise all these years after Gaborik left.

    Backstrom and Granlund were also good players and fellow Finns, but not elite ring of honor material. 

    The ring of honor idea is a good one, but it's way to soon to be thinking of 5-10 nominees. The early Vikings teams were loaded with pro bowl level or hall of fame talents, which is not the case with the Wild. Coach Lemaire was a hof talent, so maybe an exception could be made for him.

    I may be a little biased, but the Finns are the best players. Therefore, it should be no surprise that the best Wild player during the teams first two decades was a Finn. 

    I realize that your bar just seems to be higher, but after 25 years of history it's a shame that we only honor one player. There have been excellent members of Wild history who deserve this level of recognition -- by your measuring stick, why can't Andrew Brunette go up based on his Game 7 winner? Why wouldn't Backstrom's team records and Jennings trophy put him over the top? I'm curious how you'd define a ring of honor member if it's short of a jersey retirement.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would add Koivu, Backstrom, and Lemaire. That's about it. It would be enough for a start at the very least.

    Suter and Parise were solid players, but inevitably did way too much damage to the team via rumored behaviors and landing us in cap hell. Gaborik's exit was also tumultuous. It doesn't make sense to include players in the Ring of Honor for the franchise who visibly put themselves before the franchise.

    They also all played a substantial amount of hockey for other teams. If they had some playoff success, we might be able to move past that. Unfortunately, none to speak of.

    The Wild already honored Derek Boogaard with the helmet sticker they wore the season he passed. No disrespect to him, but he wasn't a good player and doesn't belong in the ring. In my opinion, honoring Boogaard actually gives reverence to a very dark and ugly side of hockey. Suiting up for it caused his CTE and likely his premature death. Boogaard should be remembered, but his time on the ice should not be admired.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Justin Hein said:

    I realize that your bar just seems to be higher, but after 25 years of history it's a shame that we only honor one player.

    It's a shame that the team has performed so poorly after 25 years of history. Bluntly, this is a legacy of mediocrity. I guess their 13 playoff appearances are a quality number, but.....

    4-13 in playoff series all time is downright embarrassing.

    Only two series' wins in the past 20 years too. It's a shame considering how much fan support the team gets.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Neageles for sure at the start. I'd say Maijka at the exec. level too. He's been around forever through the different groups. 

    Players should include Brunette, Gaborik, Koivu, and others in that top tier. A few more from tier two, Darby of course, Backstrom, perhaps.

    Coaches is Lemaire only IMO.

    Bombardir is another guy who has played and served the Wild organization. He'd be on my overall list. 

    Ring of honor to me should remain pretty exclusive. Like, one guy every few years is as frequent as I would want. 5-10 total for the Wild's existence is my take on it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...