Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Where Is Minnesota Scoring From? And Will It Work In the Playoffs?


    Image courtesy of Matt Blewett-Imagn Images
    Bekki Antonelli

    In my last piece, I described the Minnesota Wild’s defensive breakdowns. The Wild has struggled to put the puck in the net this season, but have still clinched a playoff spot. Now that Minnesota is facing off against the Las Vegas Golden Knights in the first round, let’s tackle what the Wild are doing right and where they can improve to make it past the first round. 

    Minnesota has netted 30 goals over the last 10 games. Regular zone play accounted for most of them, but two scenarios stood out. 

    Power plays accounted for 5 of the goals

    The Wild have had one of the league’s worst power plays all season and finished 20th overall, but a one-man advantage still means more scoring opportunities. For the past 3 weeks, the Wild has implemented a new 5-forward power play strategy to boost their scoring chances. Though they have not yet scored significantly more power-play goals, it’s become a league-wide trend because of its effectiveness. 

    Hopefully, the Wild will be able to take advantage of their new strategy going into the first round, considering Vegas has been finding success in their power play. 

    Only 2 of Minnesota’s 30 goals were unassisted, which is unsurprising in the NHL, where passing is essential to scoring. The Wild scored many of their goals passing around the zone, but cycling is one of your strengths. 

    Minnesota used cycling to open space for 6 of their goals

    The difference between cycling the puck and passing it around the zone is how cycling creates space. Players often drop the puck back down low in the zone and send it in the opposite direction of a defending player. Players also continue to move while cycling, making defending even harder. 

    Marcus Johansson’s goal against the San Jose Sharks last Saturday is an excellent example of this strategy. Jared Spurgeon brings the puck down the wall and passes to Gustav Nyquist. The defender, Sharks center Alexander Wennberg, is on Spurgeon, then switches direction to follow Nyquist. 

    Nyquist draws Wennberg up the wall before passing to Frederick Gaudreau. Wennberg continues to follow Nyquist. San Jose defenseman Lucas Carlsson steps up to defend Nyquist and slides it back to Johansson. Carlsson stays on Nyquist, so Johansson has room to walk in and score. 

    The constant movement and passing confuse the defending team, who are unsure whether to follow the puck or the passer. Eventually, a defender will make a mistake and cover the wrong player, allowing a different player to shoot undefended. While it takes keen awareness from the entire line, it’s a very effective strategy when they can pull it off. 

    17 of the Wild’s goals were direct shots, which include any shot from in front of the net where the goalie is present, excluding rebounds. A subset of direct shots are one-timers. 

    9 of the goals were one-timers

    One-timers are one of the Wild’s primary strengths. During Minnesota’s March 25 game against the Knights, Mats Zuccarello sent a soft pass up to Johansson. Johansson slapped the puck in without collecting it first, making it a classic one-timer and a highlight-reel kind of goal. 

    While the Wild scored on typical one-timers like this, my definition is a little broader. I define one-timers as shots from passes that catch the goalie off-guard, whether it was a slapshot or a quick catch-and-release. 

    Johansson scored on a one-timer against the New York Rangers on April 2. He got a pass from Gaudreau low in the zone but had two Rangers players between him and the net. Instead of throwing it on net, he makes the smarter play and backhands it up to Brock Faber, who quickly catches it and shoots. Igor Shersterkin is not easily fooled and was able to re-position in time. However, the defense wasn’t, and Faber fired his shot past them. 

    The Wild capitalized on scoring opportunities in various other scenarios, including 1 breakaway goal, 2 overtime goals, 1 goal from a drop pass, and 1 on the penalty kill. Minnesota is 11-0-7 in overtime, so they certainly do not have a weakness during 3-on-3 play. Opportunities for breakaways and penalty-kill goals are rare.

    Minnesota struggles to defend drop passes during zone entry and could benefit from doing it themselves. The Wild excel at dropping the puck back to cycle when they’re already in the offensive zone, but only scored one goal off a zone entry. 

    The Wild beat the Sharks in overtime on April 9 because Kirill Kaprizov dropped the puck back to Zuccarello and went deep to draw both of San Jose’s defensemen deeper. Zuccarello took that space and walked it into the zone before passing back to Kaprizov, who scored. 

    Rebounds accounted for 7 goals

    Like one-timers, rebounds are hard to defend because the puck suddenly comes from a new direction. While players can specifically shoot for a rebound, the Wild mainly capitalizes off random rebounds, such as Faber’s goal against the Vancouver Canucks last Saturday. The puck popped out from another shot on net, and he stepped up to score.

    Minnesota has the patience to cycle but also knows when to step out of place and slap it at the net, which is why rebounds are one of their strengths. 

    Zuccarello bounced the puck off of Ilya Sorokin from behind the net, which resulted in 1 goal.  While I love a weird goal, this strategy won’t require much practice time. 

    Where did the rest of Minnesota’s scoring come from?

    An empty netter accounted for 1 goal, while the remaining 5 were tip-ins. One came from out front, while 4 were back-door tips. 

    Back-door tips are fun to watch and hard to defend, but leaving someone low is not always advantageous. If possession is in contention and the puck ends up with the other team, a Wild player hovering at the goal line will have difficulty effectively backchecking. 

    Minnesota’s players are also constantly cycling, so the timing has to be just right for someone to open up back door. Given that their opponents will capitalize on every opening in the playoffs, this may be too risky of a strategy. 

    The Wild are especially effective at scoring off one-timers and creating time and space by cycling the puck. Going into the playoffs, they must play to their strengths and improve their scoring strategies. Given the Wild’s skill at cycling, they could utilize more drop passes upon zone entry to increase scoring opportunities. Minnesota will also need to find success with its new power play strategy to gain an edge over the competition. Hopefully, we’ll see an increase in Wild goals going forward.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Since 2 Johansson goals were highlighted in this article, I'm going to do the math on something that has been mentioned before, but not fully investigated, which is the shocking difference in his scoring between times where Nyquist is on the team and when he is not.

    I'm willing to concede that this might be purely coincidence since they typically are not even on a line together, but let's see the results.

    Johansson without Nyquist on the Wild roster(combined 3 seasons):

    22 goals, 41 assists, 63 points, in 165 games, so roughly 11 goals, 20.5 assists, and 30.5 points per 82 game season.

    *****************

    Johansson with Nyquist on the Wild roster(combined 2 seasons):

    12 goals, 21 assists, 33 points, in 41 games, so roughly 24 goals, 42 assists and 66 points per 82 game season.

    Nyquist was injured and didn't play for the Wild for most of the initial stretch of games included here, but this season has seen a substantial shift for Johansson as well.  He played 51 games with 19 points before Nyquist was added, and Johansson has 21 games with 15 points since the Nyquist acquisition.

    I cannot explain it, but it's one hell of a coincidence if that's all it is.

    giphy.gif?cid=6c09b952a2qv4k26ptjrne05fx

     

     

    Edited by Imyourhuckleberry
    • Like 2
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hynes should remove Zucc from the PP game 1.  Hopefully that will send the message to SHOOT THE DANG PUCK!!!  Obviously Zucc is too talented to keep him off the PP for long but passing up on shots for turnovers seems to be his specialty lately.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Patrick said:

    Hynes should remove Zucc from the PP game 1.  Hopefully that will send the message to SHOOT THE DANG PUCK!!!  Obviously Zucc is too talented to keep him off the PP for long but passing up on shots for turnovers seems to be his specialty lately.

    Wide open look in the slot? Nah don't shoot it, throw it to a covered Kaprizov leading to a clear...

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Since 2 Johansson goals were highlighted in this article, I'm going to do the math on something that has been mentioned before, but not fully investigated, which is the shocking difference in his scoring between times where Nyquist is on the team and when he is not.

    I'm willing to concede that this might be purely coincidence since they typically are not even on a line together, but let's see the results.

    Johansson without Nyquist on the Wild roster(combined 3 seasons):

    22 goals, 41 assists, 63 points, in 165 games, so roughly 11 goals, 20.5 assists, and 30.5 points per 82 game season.

    *****************

    Johansson with Nyquist on the Wild roster(combined 2 seasons):

    12 goals, 21 assists, 33 points, in 41 games, so roughly 24 goals, 42 assists and 66 points per 82 game season.

    Nyquist was injured and didn't play for the Wild for most of the initial stretch of games included here, but this season has seen a substantial shift for Johansson as well.  He played 51 games with 19 points before Nyquist was added, and Johansson has 21 games with 15 points since the Nyquist acquisition.

    I cannot explain it, but it's one hell of a coincidence if that's all it is.

    giphy.gif?cid=6c09b952a2qv4k26ptjrne05fx

     

     

    I'll add that the Sharks game is probably the best I've seen NoJo perfrom the past two seasons. I'm sure the coaches are even saying, "where the f#@ has that been!?"

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 4/16/2025 at 7:57 AM, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Since 2 Johansson goals were highlighted in this article, I'm going to do the math on something that has been mentioned before, but not fully investigated, which is the shocking difference in his scoring between times where Nyquist is on the team and when he is not.

    I'm willing to concede that this might be purely coincidence since they typically are not even on a line together, but let's see the results.

    Johansson without Nyquist on the Wild roster(combined 3 seasons):

    22 goals, 41 assists, 63 points, in 165 games, so roughly 11 goals, 20.5 assists, and 30.5 points per 82 game season.

    *****************

    Johansson with Nyquist on the Wild roster(combined 2 seasons):

    12 goals, 21 assists, 33 points, in 41 games, so roughly 24 goals, 42 assists and 66 points per 82 game season.

    Nyquist was injured and didn't play for the Wild for most of the initial stretch of games included here, but this season has seen a substantial shift for Johansson as well.  He played 51 games with 19 points before Nyquist was added, and Johansson has 21 games with 15 points since the Nyquist acquisition.

    I cannot explain it, but it's one hell of a coincidence if that's all it is.

    giphy.gif?cid=6c09b952a2qv4k26ptjrne05fx

     

     

    I would have to guess that both of them being Swedish has something to do with it. Grew up playing in the same development system and that can create a sense of familiarity and make the game easier.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...