We are getting closer and closer to the current season. I sure hope I get to type "neutral, still progressing" a few times in the next few of these. Somehow, I doubt it though. Let's get right to it, shall we?
The best news with Gilles is that, save for a couple exceptions, most of the guys drafted around him are also still in development.
The worst news? The Wild traded their second round pick in this draft to move up three spots to get him. Ugh.
Result: Neutral. If he was still up with the Wild, I would call him a bust. Right now, he has been given the chance he needed. Playing in Houston, he will get to develop. He could still be a win.
Round Two: No pick. See above. Please, try not to gouge your own eyes out.
Result: I'm going to say Win. He is a minor win at this point, and still in development. However, a fifth round pick is a long shot for the NHL at all, and Almond has received nothing but praise in recent months. I like this kid's chances.
Sixth Round: Harri Ilvonen (D) - Hey, a sixth round pick, who cares, right? Let's just burn it on a guy who will never play in North America, let alone for the Wild. OK, OK, so there is still a small chance he makes the NHL, but if you really believe that is going to happen, I would like you to share whatever you are on.
Result: Bust.
Result: Neutral, still in development. I like what I see, but he is not a win, yet.
Summary: The urge to kick He Who Shall Remain Nameless out of class is growing. Gillies is likely a good pick, but trading a second round pick to get him? Ridiculous. And then to shove him onto the NHL roster and attempt to castrate his career the same way they did with Shep? I just do not understand how this guy kept his job. No second round pick, no third round pick because of a bad trade that resulted in giving up a guy other GMs have traded for a second round pick not once, but twice? Sigh. A couple good late picks in McMillan and Almond. Falk could also be good. None of the three have proven themselves at an NHL level, but they still could, and that is much better than some of the drafts, right?
The stupid trading away of picks pulls this draft into the toilet. Could have been a decent draft if that had not happened. Late round picks currently in development will make or break this in the long term. Right now, I give the draft a D.
-Buddha
Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.
Recommended Comments
There are no comments to display.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.