Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • When Will Kirill Kaprizov Catch Fire Again?


    Image courtesy of Jayne Kamin-Oncea-Imagn Images
    Eric Forga

    Kirill Kaprizov went from driving an early Hart-caliber pace last season before his lower-body injury to opening this year below his usual scoring clip. The contrast between those stretches tells a story about expectations, health, and how much weight rests on his shoulders in Minnesota. 

    The underlying signs suggest his game is rounding into form. Still, the bar he set before getting hurt makes this season’s “slow start” feel louder than it might actually be in a vacuum. The numbers suggest there may be an extra gear he can reach, or that his scoring is a bit more spread out this year.

    Before everything derailed in late January, Kaprizov’s 2024-25 season was one of the best individual campaigns in franchise history. He scored 23 goals and 52 points in only 37 games before surgery, putting him on a 50-goal, 115-point pace over a full season. 

    Kaprizov’s production was front-loaded but sustainable, driven by his usual blend of volume shooting, power-play touch, and transition play. In his first 19 games alone, he recorded 13 goals and 34 points, essentially dragging the Wild to relevance every night with multi-point performances. 

    Those early months were the version of Kaprizov that changes game plans and award ballots. Defenses shaded towards him at five-on-five, and penalty kills overplayed his flank. Still, he found ways to create, often tilting the ice almost single-handedly when Minnesota needed a push.

    The turning point was the lower-body injury that ultimately led to surgery in late January and a much longer absence than the original four-week estimate. What began as he’ll be back before the end of the regular season turned into months of uncertainty and speculation around how much damage had been done, physically and rhythmically, to the Wild’s most important player.

    Kirill Kaprizov missed roughly half the season, playing in only 41 games, yet still finished with 25 goals and 31 assists for 56 points, a testament to his dominance when available. Even in a “lost” year, he produced at a 122-point pace over 82 games, reinforcing just how far above replacement level his game sits when he is healthy and in rhythm.

    The injury didn’t just rob him of games. It disrupted his timing, interrupted his conditioning curve, and forced him to rebuild his explosiveness and confidence in tight spaces. All are areas central to how he attacks off the rush and manipulates defenders on the half wall.

    Fast forward to 2025-26, and Kaprizov’s counting numbers still look strong, but they lack the same shock-factor as last year’s pre-injury explosion. Through 42 games, he has 24 goals and 48 points. That’s excellent by most standards, but clearly a step down from the 56 points he had through only 41 games a year ago. 

    One notable pattern: Kaprizov needed time to heat up, with only eight goals over his first 29 appearances before finding the net more consistently as the schedule wore on. The “slow start” label fits relative to expectations, not reality. Kaprizov is the same player who once started with three goals in 15 games and still finished with 47 on the year has a history of building as seasons progress. 

    His volume and usage suggest the underlying engine remains intact. Kaprizov continues to log heavy minutes, drive the top power-play unit, and generate a high number of attempts, even if the puck has not exploded off his stick quite as ruthlessly as it did before the injury disrupted his trajectory.

    Kaprizov’s early 2024-25 heater reset what normal looks like for him, and that context is doing a lot of work this season. When a winger spends three months on a 50-plus-goal, Hart Trophy pace, anything short of that can be read as underwhelming, even if the actual numbers are still star-level. 

    Fans are no longer comparing Kaprizov to the rest of the roster; they’re comparing him to his peak. The version who had 7 goals and 14 assists in his first 11 games of last year and seemed to create something dangerous every shift. The memory of that dominance makes this season’s streaky finishing and quieter stretches feel somewhat magnified, especially in games where Minnesota’s offense still runs almost entirely through him.

    There is also the residue from last year’s injury. Any time a player has surgery and misses months, the focus naturally shifts beyond box scores to questions about burst, edgework, and whether he looks “like himself.” That lens has colored much of the discussion around his 2025-26 start.

    History suggests this version of Kaprizov, more streaky than overpowering, but still productive, is more of a phase than a new baseline. He has shown before that early-season lulls do not prevent him from finishing among the league's elite scorers. Nothing in his usage or role suggests Minnesota will dial back expectations anytime soon. 

    As Kaprizov’s confidence in his post-surgery body continues to grow, so should his willingness to attack off the rush, cut inside more aggressively, and lean into the deceptive release that made last fall such a nightmare for goalies. 

    If his recent scoring bump holds, this “slow start” may ultimately look more like a delayed ignition in the first truly normal season after a major disruption, not a sign that last year's form was a one-off spike. In other words, last year's pre-injury heater established the ceiling; this year's early grind reflects the reality of recovery and expectation. The rest of this season will determine how quickly Kaprizov can climb back towards the standard he set when everything was clicking.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Kaprisov will catch  fire when he will be surrounded by the better players. zucarello is still good but u definitely can see his age. And Yorov is promising but as of now not even close to be first (and probably) second center. So aside from power plays he basically working and scoring at 70 % along . And it is easy to see if u look how Boldy -Ek work. Johansson play definitely helps as well. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I notice his line gets shut down a lot, and when I am noticing this, I am often noticing the defensemen on this ice with him are not Hughes and Boldy.  

    I have no problem with Zucc because they work so well together, but he could really use a big center who has to draw attention in front of the net, or a highly skilled center that draws a little more heat.  I almost feel Ek might be the best option right now, but that probably screws up the lines a bit.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    he is saving it for conn smythe run while acclimating to a new center and a new D1 force (both need to iron out some timing and roles before becoming best version of themselves) and yes that injury is still fresh on his mind. 

    i still think he finishes the year at 100 pts mark

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    41 minutes ago, Dis-allowed display name said:

    he could really use a big center

    This is my hope for the Trade Deadline. Just get the best available willing to come to MN. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This isn't a knock on Yurov, but with the current roster I think Hartman needs to slot in between Kaprizov and Zuccarello, leave Ek-Boldy-Johansson in tact, go back to the Red Army line of Yurov, Tarasenko and Trenin, and finish with Sturm, Foligno and Hinostroza.

    Hartman elevates his game on the top line and has a better read of the game than Yurov does at this point of his young career. Kaprizov's numbers would be better IMO with Ek or Rossi centering,  but those aren't options.

    Put the Red Army line either before or after Kaprizov's line and let him take Trenin's spot a few shifts a game to give that line a little more offensive pop.

    I haven't looked at the stats and crunched numbers, but the anemic first PP unit of Kaprizov, Boldy, Ek, Zuccarello and Hughes are not helping Kaprizov's numbers right now. No sense of urgency and too much perimeter puck movement. I would replace Zuccarello with either Faber or Hartman. Hartman gives an additional net front presence and is a good face off option with Ek. Faber ran the point prior to Hughes arrival and was very successful.

    The Olympic roster freeze and the TDL are approaching quickly. There doesn't appear to be any great 1C options on the horizon. HCJH and GMBG better figure out how to make the current roster work. The back-to-back in LA was like the first two games of a playoff series and we know how that went. Sadly, it's beginning to look a lot like deja vu all over again. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    IMHO, Kirill's lower body injury dates back nearly three years, when Winnipeg's Jolly Green Giant, Logan Stanley, flopped into him, smashing Kirill flat with his leg splayed into the splits.  There's your groin injury, AKA the lower body injury that recurred and cost Kirill half of last season.  Last January's operation for the "lower body injury" must not have fully healed with Stanley did to him.  That's just my take, of course.  I'd be grateful to be disabused of this notion, if factual statements to the contrary have been issued by the Wild or by Kirill.  Alternate theories to mine are welcome also.    

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    43 minutes ago, Rohn said:

    IMHO, Kirill's lower body injury dates back nearly three years, when Winnipeg's Jolly Green Giant, Logan Stanley, flopped into him, smashing Kirill flat with his leg splayed into the splits.  There's your groin injury, AKA the lower body injury that recurred and cost Kirill half of last season.  Last January's operation for the "lower body injury" must not have fully healed with Stanley did to him.  That's just my take, of course.  I'd be grateful to be disabused of this notion, if factual statements to the contrary have been issued by the Wild or by Kirill.  Alternate theories to mine are welcome also.    

    The Logan Stanley incident combined with an aging Zuccarello, are the primary reasons I continually advocate for Bill Guerin to swing a trade for Brady Tkachuk or someone like him. A Kaprizov - Tkachuk combo addresses both issues, it gives Kaprizov a new dynamic partner for when Zuccarello retires, while also adding a big body to ward off any future repeats of the Logan Stanley incident.

    If we had Brady Tkachuk on the roster back when the Stanley incident occurred, either it might be avoided altogether, or Brady Tkachuk would respond to Stanley.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...