Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • What Would A JJ Peterka Trade Look Like For the Wild?


    Image courtesy of James Guillory-Imagn Images
    Luke Sims

    Rumors have been swirling about a young winger named JJ Peterka who plays in Western New York. Joe Smith and Michael Russo of The Athletic have mentioned that Peterka could be a Minnesota Wild trade target. It's not that the teams have been in discussions or anything like that, but it would make sense for the Wild to go after a player of his caliber.

    Peterka is only 23 and has two seasons of over 25 goals and 50 points, including his best season last year. He was second on the Buffalo Sabers in scoring last season with 68 points in just 77 games. I don’t understand why Buffalo would want to move off Peterka, but Rossi may intrigue them.

    Part of the reason the Sabres are shopping Peterka is that he is due for a big bump, likely around $7-8 million, in his salary. He is a restricted free agent, and the Sabers don’t want to commit to him long-term, so he’ll be on the trade block this summer. 

    The Wild desperately need a scoring winger to replace Marcus Johansson and Gustav Nyquist’s production, or lack thereof. No more cardio minutes on the second line for the Wild veterans. Peterka has been in Buffalo’s top six for the past few seasons and has played well with Tage Thompson and Dylan Cozens.

    The German winger is solidly built at 6-foot-0, 190 lbs. Still, he’s not as big as Bill Guerin would like his players to be, but he’s got the same tenacity as Kirill Kaprizov and Joel Eriksson Ek.

    Peterka is a tough customer who will be aggressive and assertive on loose pucks and board battles. He’s got a motor that quickly makes his home fans fall in love with him. Peterka won’t be up for the Selke trophy anytime soon, but he’s not a liability in his own zone. He’s a smart player who can work within any system.

    His next contract is projected to be around $7.5-8 million, similar to what Marco Rossi and his camp are asking. The Wild can take that on that salary because they are projected to have ample room to add a winger of that caliber.

    So, how would the Wild acquire a player like Peterka?

    Until recently, it appeared that Rossi had a lot more trade value than he seemed to have. Still, a late first-round pick or a middle-six winger rejected trade offers from the Philadelphia Flyers in return for Rossi.

    Peterka and Rossi are similar players on paper. It would make sense for the Wild to include Rossi in a Peterka deal. However, Minnesota will have to add a bit to this deal to make it worth it from Buffalo’s perspective.

    The Sabers have many draft picks and young prospects. They want to get over the hump and will be looking for players who can make an impact on an NHL roster. Rossi is one of those players. However, the addition of defense prospect David Spacek, who is ready to battle for an NHL spot and get more playing time in Buffalo, could be an enticing option for the Sabres. Still, he alone probably won’t be enough to get it done.

    I’d consider prospect Danila Yurov untouchable in this deal. If the Wild think Peterka would take Liam Ohgren’s spot in the lineup, maybe they’d include him in a trade. However, Peterka and Ohgren are similar players, and the Wild would much rather hold onto Ohgren.

    A deal that looks something like this might be able to get the trade done: 

    BUF: Marco Rossi, David Spacek, Michael Milne, 2026 3rd round pick, 2027 4th round pick

    MIN: JJ Peterka

    The Sabers get an instant impact player in Rossi, two prospects on the cusp of the NHL who can affordably add key depth to a team, and some extra draft pick value. 

    Minnesota and Buffalo would still have to sign their respective restricted free agents, but the Sabers will probably save a little money with Rossi rather than Peterka. Maybe Rossi takes a cheaper deal in Buffalo with a bigger opportunity in front of him.

    The Wild lose out on some key depth prospects and Rossi. Still, ultimately, it would be worth it for a player like Peterka. Adding some value to Rossi for Peterka makes the most of a situation Minnesota handled poorly.

    So what would the lines look like adding Peterka to the Wild’s forward core?

    Kaprizov - Eriksson Ek - Mats Zuccarello

    Peterka - Yurov - Matt Boldy

    Marcus Foligno - Ryan Hartman - Ohgren

    Yakov Trenin - Freddy Gaudreau - Justin Brazeau/other UFA

    Peterka fills Johansson's spot on the second line, making Minnesota’s top group of forwards deadly. With Ohgren and Hartman in the bottom six, the Wild still has some play drivers that can help spur the secondary scoring.

    Wild fans should be excited if the team can find a way to bring the Sabers winger to the state of hockey in a trade that centers around Rossi. It may be sad to see a homegrown center be traded, but Peterka would be a worthy reward.

    All stats and data via HockeyDB, Evolving Hockey, and CapWages unless otherwise noted.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Thanks 2
    • Confused 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    In what world does a defensively responsible 60 point CENTER have less value than a defensively average 60 point WING?

    I swear BG has created a legion of bobblehead fans that will swallow ANYTHING he claims.

    Rossi is TWO!!!!! pound lighter than Peterka! 

    This entire article is INSANE!

    • Like 10
    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Nah i'll pass on Peterka

    Remember there are two teams left standing - the rest will need to go back to the drawing board - especially with FL likely locked into Eastern Dominance - so other teams (PO teams included) may consider some major moves. 

    If Sabres don't want to talk Tage, hang up and move on. 

    Go talk to Canes. They have a leaky G situation (and we have a number one phenom prospect - wally - just finished marinating!!) and some old D (burnsy and orlov) to replace? you are in luck, we have a not-so-old spurge! so how about Spurge, Wally and Rossi for Svech? 

    or

    Go talk to the kings - maybe bring back FiFi for Rossi?

    or

    Go to Leafs and say - you know you have to do something different so let's help each other - TOR get Spurge/Zeev/Rossi for Nylander

    or

    Go to Boston and say - you guys need a rebuild cause you ain't going no where in the east for the next few years - so here is top G prospect (give them some phenom ranking of Wally from previous years) and top D prospect (do the same for Zeev until he devalues himself) and Rossi (superstar) and fine a first round pick whenever for Pasta

    or

    Go to OTT and pitch some package around Fat Ass and Rossi for Brady

    Expand your search Bill. Do not settle. Teams that lack innovative thinking and never take calculated risk - remain at the same place - mediocracy*

    *see MN Wild

    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    0.8 M/year for Johanson? There must be extensive bonuses they do not make public. Any details? And do bonuses count for the cap space? If not its a good deal for MIN.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just a no-trade.  The goal now is to find a trade partner or free agent that forces Hynes's hand to not put Mojo on the 2nd line unless in injury concerns.  Cause as of right now, you only really have Foligno to challenge that.

    I'm ok if that is Peterka, but not for the extreme price the article suggests.  It is pretty weird to want to go from a offensive and defensive center to a purely offensive winger for the same price tag...but they may have to.  Philly already signed Foerster to a bridge.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't understand why we need to include anything extra in a trade for Peterka. 

    Why wouldn't it just be a hockey trade, player for player? Peterka has better size, sure, but he plays wing. Rossi plays C and they both just had 60-point seasons as 23-year olds. 

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    40 minutes ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    I don't understand why we need to include anything extra in a trade for Peterka. 

    Why wouldn't it just be a hockey trade, player for player? Peterka has better size, sure, but he plays wing. Rossi plays C and they both just had 60-point seasons as 23-year olds. 

    It’s because Rossi is Australian and P-terks is German. They probably think he’s a distant relative of Leon Draisaitl.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    Nah i'll pass on Peterka

    Remember there are two teams left standing - the rest will need to go back to the drawing board - especially with FL likely locked into Eastern Dominance - so other teams (PO teams included) may consider some major moves. 

    If Sabres don't want to talk Tage, hang up and move on. 

    Go talk to Canes. They have a leaky G situation (and we have a number one phenom prospect - wally - just finished marinating!!) and some old D (burnsy and orlov) to replace? you are in luck, we have a not-so-old spurge! so how about Spurge, Wally and Rossi for Svech? 

    or

    Go talk to the kings - maybe bring back FiFi for Rossi?

    or

    Go to Leafs and say - you know you have to do something different so let's help each other - TOR get Spurge/Zeev/Rossi for Nylander

    or

    Go to Boston and say - you guys need a rebuild cause you ain't going no where in the east for the next few years - so here is top G prospect (give them some phenom ranking of Wally from previous years) and top D prospect (do the same for Zeev until he devalues himself) and Rossi (superstar) and fine a first round pick whenever for Pasta

    or

    Go to OTT and pitch some package around Fat Ass and Rossi for Brady

    Expand your search Bill. Do not settle. Teams that lack innovative thinking and never take calculated risk - remain at the same place - mediocracy*

    *see MN Wild

    Agree on this.  Let’s look and think outside the box

     

    Rossi for Rasmus Anderson straight up then find a team that will take Spurgeon and Brodin.  Then go get a couple more top 6 Fwds.  Flames need a top 2C badely and Rasmus is a great and mean player that irritates other teams.  He dominated us when we played against them end of last year.  We could use some meanness on the blue line 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 minutes ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    find a team that will take Spurgeon and Brodin

    We lose both Spurgeon and Brodin and we don't have a D that will even get us to the playoffs.  Brodin still has years left as a high end D man.  We should keep him.  I understand the Spurgeon trade.  He has 1, maybe 2 years of quality play left in him.  Let him go while he can still play and get something in return.  It will still hurt us but is necessary as we move younger.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Quote

    Part of the reason the Sabres are shopping Peterka is that he is due for a big bump, likely around $7-8 million, in his salary. He is a restricted free agent, and the Sabers don’t want to commit to him long-term, so he’ll be on the trade block this summer. 

    How would trading for Rossi fix that? Rossi is going to get similar money and a long term.

    Sounds like another Walmart GM like Guerin.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, MNCountryLife said:

    We lose both Spurgeon and Brodin and we don't have a D that will even get us to the playoffs.  Brodin still has years left as a high end D man.  We should keep him.  I understand the Spurgeon trade.  He has 1, maybe 2 years of quality play left in him.  Let him go while he can still play and get something in return.  It will still hurt us but is necessary as we move younger.

    Putting in Rasmus Anderson for Spurgeon is a positive upgrade.  I don’t think spurgeons trade value is high so that would be more for Cap space for a FWD.  Understand on Brodin but we are deep at LHD and I think Brodin could bring a very solid top 6 player.  Ideally keep Brodin and move Spurgeon and bring in Anderson for some RHD meanness.  Rossi would bring in Rasmus or close to it in a 1x1 trade. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm looking at the Buffalo salary structure and Norris is their most expensive forward. Yes, that's right, he's making more than Tage. So, exactly what is the better opportunity for Rossi here?

    Rossi and Peterka's numbers are fairly similar. Would Rossi have more points if he were kicked out to wing? More goals? It would seem as if his responsibilities would be less and he could focus more on being down low in this system. If there were injuries, he could easily slot back in as center. So, why exactly would we get rid of him for a similar player 3" and a few pounds heavier at the moment? 

    Rossi sounds like he wants that longterm deal now. But, outside of an offersheet that is accepted, he has little choice in the matter. I would think at bridge at 2 x $4.5m, $4m this year, $5m next year is probably the way to go. Rossi may want to play on a 1 year deal so he can get to arbitration, and if I were Guerin, if that's how they're playing it, I'd probably merely qualify him and try to work something out next season.

    But, let's say Rossi comes in at 195 and is super motivated. That might be enough for management to believe in him. It might take some protein shakes and some elements that you hope he's not tested for. But, what if he comes in and seals the deal as our #2C. What if his shot suddenly has range outside the home plate area, and he can win most of his faceoffs? Seems to me that is what we wanted. I would not be upset if he had performance bonuses built into his deal that were a challenge to make.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, fikifuka said:

    0.8 M/year for Johanson? There must be extensive bonuses they do not make public. Any details? And do bonuses count for the cap space? If not its a good deal for MIN.

    Bonuses do count for cap space, and none included in the deal.

    Russo mentioned his value on the free agency market would be in the $2M range, MoJo was being courted by his Swedish club, but MoJo & Family made decision that they liked MN and wanted to stay here.  I believe that both his children are school age, so that might have played an impact in the decision.  This is a very team friendly deal.

    It did have a full NTC, and I'm sure, knowing SillyG, it has a handshake NMC attached too.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, MrCheatachu said:

    Bonuses do count for cap space, and none included in the deal.

    Russo mentioned his value on the free agency market would be in the $2M range, MoJo was being courted by his Swedish club, but MoJo & Family made decision that they liked MN and wanted to stay here.  I believe that both his children are school age, so that might have played an impact in the decision.  This is a very team friendly deal.

    It did have a full NTC, and I'm sure, knowing SillyG, it has a handshake NMC attached too.

    Where did you read it has a full NTC?  I have been looking for confirmation on that but only saw that it was reported by a league source

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    56 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    Where did you read it has a full NTC?  I have been looking for confirmation on that but only saw that it was reported by a league source

    Per the Athletic article released by Russo.

    "However, Johansson, 34, also would likely have received NHL offers in the $2 million range.

    Nevertheless, Johansson and his family like Minnesota, so he agreed to a contract that the Wild could fit comfortably within their salary cap structure. The contract comes with a full no-trade clause, according to a league source."

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, RazWild said:

    Per the Athletic article released by Russo.

    "However, Johansson, 34, also would likely have received NHL offers in the $2 million range.

    Nevertheless, Johansson and his family like Minnesota, so he agreed to a contract that the Wild could fit comfortably within their salary cap structure. The contract comes with a full no-trade clause, according to a league source."

    Yea, saw the same thing.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, MrCheatachu said:

    Bonuses do count for cap space, and none included in the deal.

    Russo mentioned his value on the free agency market would be in the $2M range, MoJo was being courted by his Swedish club, but MoJo & Family made decision that they liked MN and wanted to stay here.  I believe that both his children are school age, so that might have played an impact in the decision.  This is a very team friendly deal.

    It did have a full NTC, and I'm sure, knowing SillyG, it has a handshake NMC attached too.

    Thank you very much for this upgrade, 'Mister'! So MJ probably re-signed as a perfect, cheap healthy scratch, allways ready to make pressure on Ohgren, Yurov or in case of injuries. Sounds like a good deal. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...