Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • What If Minnesota Goes All-Out On Drafting Big Defensemen?


    Image courtesy of Christopher Hanewinckel-USA TODAY Sports
    Tony Abbott

    Certain NHL player types can't be found anywhere but in the draft. Or at least, unless you're willing to overpay for a player that you might not necessarily want. Just look at the history of the Minnesota Wild trying to pursue a center. They've had just a handful of actual, top-line-quality centers. They drafted Mikko Koivu and Joel Eriksson Ek, are hoping they've drafted others in Marco Rossi and Danila Yurov, and once got pleasantly surprised by signing a seemingly over-the-hill Eric Staal.

    That's it. Free agency? The Wild struck out every time. Trades? None of Minnesota's GMs wanted to trade their collection of wings and defensemen for a pivot. You've got to draft those guys, or hope you get extremely lucky. That's why Bill Guerin and Judd Brackett went so hard after centers in the 2023 Draft, picking Charlie Stramel, Rasmus Kumpulainen, and Riley Heidt with their first three picks.

    The big defenseman is another prototype that doesn't seem to be readily available. Everyone wants to have someone big, mobile, and physically imposing on the blueline, so if you don't end up drafting that player, you're not getting a good one. The Wild are desperate enough for size in their defense corps that they're apparently contemplating signing Jake Middleton (likely a bottom-pair defenseman on a great team) to a four-year extension... on top of the remaining year on his contract. That's probably not going to end well!

    But how do you get a bona-fide, big, top-four defenseman? You've got to draft them, or you're overpaying the Middletons of the world, or spending massive dollars for a massive player who brings little else to the ice, like free agent Tyler Myers

    We know that the Wild are willing to target a premium position of need. So what happens if they do that this year and target size on the blueline?

    If so, 2024 is probably the year to do it. According to Elite Prospects' 2024 Consolidated Draft Board, seven of the top-20 players are defensemen. Of those, all are 6-foot-0 or taller, with Anton Silyaev (6-foot-7), Sam Dickinson, Carter Yakemchuk, and Adam Jiricek all listed at 6-foot-2. An eighth name, Norway's Stian Solberg, has a combination of mobility and bone-crushing hitting that's making him a late riser.

    The fun doesn't stop in the first round. Round 2 figures to be deep with large defensemen, giving Minnesota the perfect opportunity to beef up their blueline. So, let's ask ourselves: What would the top part of this draft look like if the Wild targeted big defensemen as aggressively as they did with centers last summer?

    Let's go a bit nuts and use Draft Prospects Hockey to simulate the first two rounds of the Draft. We're using Bob McKenzie's rankings for the exercise, then turning up the Randomness factor slightly and nudging up the Team Need factor a touch. How does the board shake out?

    More or less, how we'd expect. The top, top names among defensemen are gone, with the run kicking off with the Columbus Blue Jackets snagging Silayev at fourth overall, Artyom Levshunov going fifth to the Montreal Canadiens, Zayne Parekh landing in Utah at Pick 6, Zeev Buium joining the Seattle Kraken at Pick 7, and Sam Dickinson going to Buffalo at Pick 11. 

    That's five defensemen off the board in the first 12 picks, and it leads us to make a difficult call. Top offensive talents Tij Iginla and Berkly Catton are still on the board. If we pick a defenseman in this spot now, we're going to get creamed in the media and with the fans. It's a similar situation to what happened in 2023 when the Wild passed on the offensively gifted Gabe Perreault to draft a big center. What do we do here?

    The solution: We're sticking to our plan, but we're getting paid for doing so.

    TRADE:
    Minnesota sends No. 13 overall to Chicago for No. 18 overall and two second-round picks (No. 34 and 50).

    The Chicago Blackhawks have already shown aggression in being willing to trade up, sending Picks 20, 54, and 61 to the New York Islanders to move up to 18th overall. That's insane value for the Islanders, and it signals that Chicago (or a team like them) may be willing to pay a hefty price to move up even further in the top half of the first round.

    That means Chicago is ultimately willing to sell off four draft picks for that No. 13 pick, but there are two reasons to think this is possible. Reason 1: Iginla and Catton are top-10 talents who are in no way falling down to Pick 18. Reason 2: There's no way Minnesota's gifting the Blackhawks one of those guys without getting the price they want. The Wild are now armed at the draft table with four picks (18, 34, 45, 50) through the mid-second round, giving them much more ammunition to load up on defense.

    What does the move cost the Wild? It depends on how much you wanted one of the top, top guys. Iginla goes to Chicago at 13, giving another generation of Iginlas a chance to haunt the Wild. Forward Beckett Sennecke goes 14, followed by Jiricek, Yakemchuk, and Catton. So, locked out of a top-20 (by consensus) defenseman, can the Wild accomplish their goals to a satisfying degree, considering the opportunity cost they left on the table?

    Pick 18:
    Stian Solberg, Left Defense, Norway, Vålerenga

    It's time to get nasty, and that's what Solberg brings to the rink. Solberg doesn't have the sheer height of someone like Silayev: he's listed at 6-foot-1.5. But for a player who plays as physically as he does, that might not matter. He'd been on the radar for most of the season as a second-to-third-round pick, but his excellent play for a surprisingly good Norway team at the World Championships has him rising to first-round status.

    "[Solberg leverages] his strong physicality to effectively check opponents into the boards and eliminate them from the play without compromising his team's defensive structure," writes FC Hockey in their Draft Guide, which ranked him 17th in his draft class. "His skating is smooth and agile, allowing him to close in on loose pucks quickly."

    Solberg merges what Minnesota wants in a defensemen (bigger, physical, with a mean streak) with the traits they've historically valued (great skating, good hockey sense). He may or may not have the offensive upside of a Brock Faber. But then again, we didn't know Faber had a high level of offensive upside until he made the NHL. 

    No doubt, the Wild will get a scouting report on him from fellow Norwegian Mats Zuccarello, who watched Solberg score two goals and three points in seven games at the World Championships. But if Minnesota is looking for a long-term replacement for Jonas Brodin, there's some of that DNA in Solberg, with the ability to lay the hammer on his opponents. Coincidentally, Solberg is slated to spend next season with Färjestad, the team that developed Brodin.

    After Solberg, we sit through the end of the first round and start our day early on Day 2, picking 34th overall. Here, we have some more offensive players to pass on, including Prince George Cougar (and Heidt teammate) Terik Parascak and Medicine Hat Tiger winger Andrew Basha. But, we're sticking to the plan here, and taking another big defenseman to fill out our organization.

    Pick 34:
    EJ Emery, Right Defense, US National U-18 Team

    We're doubling down on defense first in taking Emery 14 picks after selecting Solberg. It's also a nice surprise to get Emery, who could easily go in the first round, with this selection. Emery is a 6-foot-3.25, right-shot defenseman whose superpower is his feet. Elite Prospects compares Emery's game to Brandon Carlo in their Draft Guide and talks about how he uses his skating and hockey sense to shut down opponents completely.

    "Emery absorbs and erases opposing rushes with smooth backward strides and a stable, perfect posture," they describe. "Attackers can't shake him. A high-end skater, Emery follows their every maneuver with perfect footwork."

    Despite having the Brodin/Jared Spurgeon skating gene, Emery doesn't shy away from unleashing his physical side. "[Emery takes] away space below the goal line and near the crease," reads McKeen's Hockey's Draft Guide. "As his frame fills out, he projects as a physical beast who can be an insanely difficult player to match up against." The outlet lists him as the second-best defensive defenseman, only behind Silayev. 

    That's gotta be music to Guerin's ears, and the Wild would be able to watch and monitor his development from close to home. He's committed to playing college hockey at the University of North Dakota. 

    Now we're on to Pick 45. 6-foot-4 USA product Will Skahan is off the board (No. 37 to the Winnipeg Jets), as is 6-foot-3 Dominik Badinka, who went to the Calgary Flames at No. 41. But we're not tapped out on big defenseman quite yet. 

    Pick 45
    Harrison Brunicke, Right Defense, Kamloops Blazers, WHL

    After two "high-floor" candidates at defense, we're taking a bigger swing for upside with Harrison Brunicke. Brunicke has all the tools, he just needs to put them together. Whether he can or not is a big enough "If" that it can have him slide to the second round. However, at this point, it's worth a flier.

    "In transition, Brunicke is capable of some of the best plays in the draft," Elite Prospects' Draft Guide says of him, weighing his positive traits. "Brunicke activates as much as possible, trying all sorts of creative plays in the process. ... There are highlight reel moments."

    That's what Brunicke can bring to the table, and even has some defensive skill due to his high-end skating and 6-foot-2.5 frame. But he has his notable critics. "He occasionally holds onto the puck too long, leading to turnovers, even when simpler options are available," charges FC Hockey. "Additionally, Brunicke sometimes attempts high-risk, cross-ice breakout passes that are easily intercepted, creating opportunities for his opponents."

    Is that a matter of low Hockey IQ, or a player on a bad team trying to do too much? If it's the former, the Wild probably aren't so keen on making this pick. But if they think it's the latter, and his decision-making can be corrected, this could be a great addition to two higher-floor, perhaps lower-upside defenders. 

    Now we're at Pick 50, and here comes an opportunity to go for a skilled, offensive forward, and we'll do that by drafting... Nahhhhhh, we're sticking to the plan.

    Pick 50
    Jesse Pulkkinen, Left Defense, Liiga, JYP

    We wrap up our giant defenseman shopping spree with our biggest pick yet: 6-foot-6 Jesse Pulkkinen. Thirty-two teams already passed over Pulkkinen in last year's draft, but the Wild aren't afraid of taking intriguing over-age prospects. In the last three drafts, Brackett's draft table grabbed over-agers Aaron Pionk (fifth-round, 2023), Mikey Milne (third-round, 2022), and David Spacek (fifth-round, 2022), and Josh Pillar (fourth-round, 2021).

    Pulkkinen got on the map this season by being one of the better defensemen on a bad JYP squad. He had just two goals and eight points in 29 games, which doesn't jump off the page but is respectable enough. He controlled just 46.7% of the shot attempt share last season, but that still was the second-best among defensemen on JYP, making him above-average relative to his team.

    The sudden jump from Pulkkinen, combined with his gigantic frame and emerging skill set, has scouts on notice. "He plays like a player six inches smaller," says McKeen's. "Other than his physicality, which is exactly what you'd want."

    His offensive skills give him a level of upside that you don't find in 6-foot-6 defensemen outside of the top-10 or so. "Pulkkinen has boundless creativity and confidence with the puck," says Elite Prospects. "A credible dual-threat scorer, the 19-year-old can hammer pucks around defenders and beat goalies clean from range, or find a teammate through layers with a perfectly weighted pass."

    The Wild would have to hope that he has more progression in his game, despite his older age, and that this season wasn't a flash in the pan. But to round out a, frankly, crazy day where the Wild added 25 feet and one inch of defenseman to their system in the first two rounds, Minnesota can take a second lottery ticket in Pulkkinen and hope he or Brunicke works out.

    Selling out this hard to add big defensemen isn't likely. However, working through this exercise highlights what kind of players Minnesota can target if they want to load up on the blueline. And if the Wild do trade down, take another look at the options that could be going with an early-to-mid second-round pick. Minnesota could land a player they're quite high on in the first round and pick up an extra selection to add size and depth to their organziation.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 4

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    I like the drafting big d idea. I agree with Tony that Middleton is a bottom pairing d man on a good team.  His upcoming contract extension has me concerned. Billy obviously overvalues his guys versus what the league thinks of them . I like middles but as a 3 rd pair d on a very reasonable contract . Not another 5 yr clause laden handcuff contract. Spurgs contract isn’t going to age well so to have another overpaid d man locked up for 4-5 years isn’t moving us forward. Just more mushy middle. 
         Dean hasn’t been hired as a coach with all the job opportunities this year . Obviously the league doesn’t see him like Billy does.  Just like the rest of the leauge wouldn’t give Freddy g that contract term and clauses . So my concern is once again Billy will over pay in money , term and clauses .  I like middles but Billy’s contracts makes me not like the players . Hopefully Billy does something smart. But I doubt it. Haha. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    38 minutes ago, Dean said:

    So my concern is once again Billy will over pay in money , term and clauses .  I like middles but Billy’s contracts makes me not like the players . Hopefully Billy does something smart. But I doubt it. Haha. 

    If you believe Russo, Guerin will re-sign Midzy for term @ $4M+ per.  And I like Midzy as a player and person, but we've extracted all the value from him (got quality TOI at a value price).  Let someone else overpay him for his injury riddled 30+ years.

    #dontbedumbbill

    Edited by Pewterschmidt
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think I would go offense with pick #18 in this scenario, but going large defense with the next 3 picks makes sense. Someone around the level of Greentree is going to still be there at #18, and the drop off could be bigger on offense than defense after that.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    If you believe Russo, Guerin will re-sign Midzy for term @ $4M+ per.  And I like Midzy as a player and person, but we've extracted all the value from him (got quality TOI at a value price).  Let someone else overpay him for his injury riddled 30+ years.

    #dontbedumbbill

    Middleton is your ideal bottom-6 defenseman imo. Big, defensively sound, and tough. He is exactly the kind of guy you want as high quality depth throughout the blue line. Especially for the post-season where the ability to play a heavy game is a necessity. 

    A future Chisholm-Middsy 2nd pairing wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. 

    And if one of the young defensemen step up and turn out to be better than Middleton, he easily slides into a 3rd pairing role as your enforcer defensive defenseman. 

    That's worth keeping around for a Cup team imo. Even if you overspend a little. 

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ugh I knew you were gonna say Solberg. And I get why. I just question the ceiling based on what I've read about him. It sounds like he'll top out as a 2nd pairing guy. 

    And while that is 'safe,' it definitely doesn't hurt to try and take a swing on a potentially top-line forward or defenseman who might be available. #13 is definitely worth having more than #18 in this draft. That's about the tail-end of the top-end talents. 

    Admittedly, I'm also always nervous about late-risers. They're usually just based on the size of the guy. Sort of like Sennecke. 

    If its between Solberg at #18 or, somehow, Parekh at #13 who would you prefer? 

    Edited by B1GKappa97
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    If its between Solberg at #18 or, somehow, Parekh at #13 who would you prefer? 

    I would grab Parekh at 13. If I were deciding in this mock based only on my preferences, I would have taken Catton and been done with it.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    Middleton is your ideal bottom-6 defenseman imo. Big, defensively sound, and tough. He is exactly the kind of guy you want as high quality depth throughout the blue line. Especially for the post-season where the ability to play a heavy game is a necessity. 

    A future Chisholm-Middsy 2nd pairing wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. 

    And if one of the young defensemen step up and turn out to be better than Middleton, he easily slides into a 3rd pairing role as your enforcer defensive defenseman. 

    That's worth keeping around for a Cup team imo. Even if you overspend a little. 

    Good point. I guess I won’t be mad if he stays.  It’s as much about team culture as mid’s on ice play

     that said we don’t have luxury of stashing middling players (and that’s what miszy is w/o spurge), so I’d rather convert mid s into a 25 yo bertuzzi 

    Edited by Pewterschmidt
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Fun article—people suggesting that we take a forward with one of the picks are kind of missing the point. I read this article as imagining (not suggesting) that we take a whole fleet of big Dmen and what that could look like.

    One question though, can we squeeze Charlie Elick in there somewhere? He’s projected to go late first round (mid to late 20’s) so he doesn’t really fit where we’re picking, but he’s a 6’3” right-shot D and some reports I’ve seen say he might be the hardest hitter in the draft.

    Edited by Secord Sucks
    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, Secord Sucks said:

    Fun article—people suggesting that we take a forward with one of the picks are kind of missing the point. I read this article as imagining (not suggesting) that we take a whole fleet of big Dmen and what that could look like.

    One question though, can we squeeze Charlie Elick in there somewhere? He’s projected to go late first round (mid to late 20’s) so he doesn’t really fit where we’re picking, but he’s a 6’3” right-shot D and some reports I’ve seen say he might be the hardest hitter in the draft.

    Elick was a guy who was on my short list to profile in this piece, I think I just had to make a call. If they got him in the second-round, I'd get it. 

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, Tony Abbott said:

    I would grab Parekh at 13. If I were deciding in this mock based only on my preferences, I would have taken Catton and been done with it.

    Catton would be ideal imo, I just don't see how he slips past Philly unless Yakemchuk is also there and they decide they like a bigger defenseman over a smaller top-line forward. 

    I'm hoping that somebody overdrafts the late-risers in the picks ahead of us and somebody unexpectedly falls! 

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This was a really good article, Tony. One thing that you nailed is the size of the player paired with their skating. Brackett loves the skating quality and if he is being directed to look at bigger players, I could see these being terrific candidates for him. 

    Would Chicago give up 2 seconds and 18? I'm not sure they do, but this would be quite a haul if they did. It would also give us a nice mix of defenders in the pipeline. 

    I didn't see an ODC post here, so what would this do to Kaprizov's view? Rossi would be staying, and I believe that Kaprizov would look at the monsters drafted thinking that was a really good draft. Is it enough for him to stay? 

    This is where ODC and I differ. I don't think it really matters how the Wild do next season, it's in '25 that matters and he's got to see a realistic shot at being a contender. That many big defenders helps make his goals far more substantial. 

    ODC also doesn't like to count chicken's in egg form. But, I am pretty high on both Heidt and Yurov being top 6 players. They've proven nothing to date in the N. I get that, but I also like the potential they have for the N. 

    As for Berkly Catton as a pick, honestly, if you want to set the franchise back, you pick another little guy, guys we just have too many of. Speed kills until the playoffs role around. Then, suddenly, size matters more. I just think the risk of Catton is finding another Tyler Ennis, and that did not end well. I know he'll fill out some, but 5'11" 163 is a long ways to go.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    As for Berkly Catton as a pick, honestly, if you want to set the franchise back, you pick another little guy, guys we just have too many of. Speed kills until the playoffs role around. Then, suddenly, size matters more. I just think the risk of Catton is finding another Tyler Ennis, and that did not end well. I know he'll fill out some, but 5'11" 163 is a long ways to go.

    I think the Wild were a fast team when Fiala was in the picture. I don't think this has been a fast team since. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    ODC also doesn't like to count chicken's in egg form. ...  They've proven nothing to date in the N. I get that, but I also like the potential they have for the N. 

    Except Sammy Walker for some reason.  To him, all the youngsters are unproven and should be traded for someone to keep Kaprizov (I'm starting to wonder if ODC is really Chuck Fletcher the way he is so quick and willing to move on from prospects), but for some reason Sammy Walker is going to make an impact this year even though he is more unproven than others have already shown in less chances.  Hell, maybe he's Sammy Walker.

    I'm on board with not trading known commodities for unknowns in the draft.  I'm also onboard with not getting so attached to a player and to be willing to trade a player if they either become a problem or if it improves the team.  And honestly if Kaprizov started demanding that the team do x or y, I'd rather they move him just like they would to anyone.

    That said, I don't believe Kaprizov is that type of player.  I think he wants to win and this last year has been as frustrating to him as it has to the other players and the fans.  If we don't have the same trouble with injuries this year, I think we do much better.  We still need more to advance in the playoffs, but things are improving.  I think we will need to get a player or two from free agency or trade to fill certain voids that we just don't seem to draft for, but overall the trajectory is positive and we can start accelerating more as this next season progresses.

    Guerin needs to resist the urge to sign another veteran over 30 to a 3 or 4 year deal.  I'm not opposed to it down the road a couple years if the right person is available and some of the existing contracts age out, but right now we have enough of those unless it's a short term plug in a role we don't currently have until a prospect or other younger player is capable of filling it.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, raithis said:

    Except Sammy Walker for some reason.  To him, all the youngsters are unproven and should be traded for someone to keep Kaprizov (I'm starting to wonder if ODC is really Chuck Fletcher the way he is so quick and willing to move on from prospects), but for some reason Sammy Walker is going to make an impact this year even though he is more unproven than others have already shown in less chances.  Hell, maybe he's Sammy Walker.

    I haven't known ODC to be a Sammy Walker champion. If he has commented on Walker, I believe it's in sarcasm. Walker's another one of those Iowa guys who have proved nothing.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, Tony Abbott said:

    I think the Wild were a fast team when Fiala was in the picture. I don't think this has been a fast team since

    My eye test sees the same thing. But, Fiala was pretty thick with that speed and shiftiness. Catton at 163 has a lot of growing to do. 30-35 lbs. is a lot of filling out. I did that, but not in the way an athlete would do it 😉

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 hours ago, raithis said:

    If we don't have the same trouble with injuries this year, I think we do much better. 

    this team really needs to start planning for injuries. They have too many guys on the wrong side of 30 who will be increasingly prone to injury. Quality depth players need to be identified and groomed. Hopefully all the injuries won't strike  at the same time again but they certainly can be cumulative. Development in Iowa needs to be ramped up bigly.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...