Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • There's Nothing "Wrong" With Filip Gustavsson


    Image courtesy of Nick Wosika-USA TODAY Sports
    Justin Wiggins

     

    Playing goalie in the NHL is hard. Like, really hard.

    Today's game is moving faster than ever, and the skaters are more skilled than ever. Nowhere does this ring true more than when you analyze goaltending statistics of the last ten years as league-wide save percentages have dropped consistently year over year.

    And the position has never been more difficult to project. Every year, there’s a goalie who is typically viewed as a top goaltender but struggles. Conversely, there’s almost always a mid-range goalie who comes out of nowhere to compete for the Vezina trophy. Knowing that, why did we not see this season from Filip Gustavsson coming?

    It’s been a trying season for the “Gus Bus.” Following his breakout campaign last year, which resulted in a fancy new contract extension, Gustavsson hasn’t been the same player in goal for the Minnesota Wild. Gustavsson was one of the top goaltenders in the league last year. He finished second in save percentage, just behind Vezina trophy winner Linus Ullmark.

    He also produced strong advanced metrics, placing himself in the top-10 in goals saved above expected (GSAx), even with far fewer games played than the rest of that group. It was a magical season for Gustavsson, and the Wild rewarded him with a three-year, $11.25 million extension.

    However, this season has been markedly worse for Gustavsson across all metrics. His save percentage has plummeted to below .900, and his GSAx has gone from +24.54 a year ago to -9.94 this season in nearly as many games played.

    Beyond the statistics, the eye test has also revealed the downturn in his game. Gustavsson has struggled to track pucks in certain games. Remember that epic comeback against the Vancouver Canucks on Presidents' Day? Gustavsson might be the only member of the State of Hockey who would rather forget it ever happened.

     

    Sure, I’d be remiss not to point out that Gustavsson missed a chunk of the season due to injury, and perhaps that injury is still hampering him. Still, the rumblings have begun with his last couple of performances and the Wild fighting for a playoff spot. But is that fair?

    Because if you compare the teeter-totter nature of Gustavsson’s past two seasons to the rest of the league, it’s pretty par for the course. Goaltending has become an impossible guessing game over the past decade in the NHL. League-wide save percentages are down to levels we haven’t seen since the beginning of the post-lockout era. In 2016, the average save percentage was still holding at .915, but that number had plunged to .904 by 2022-23.

    Even the most recognizable names in the sport have not been immune to such volatility from year to year. Jacob Markstrom finished second in the Vezina trophy voting two years ago, posting a .922 SV% and a league-high nine shutouts. A year later, Markstrom finished with a save percentage below .900 and a GSAx hovering at zero.

    More perplexing is how Markstrom’s game has returned to Vezina-level this year. A year after being unable to stop nine of ten pucks coming his way, Markstrom is back toward the top of the league in save percentage and GSAx.

    Even one of the league’s best and most consistent netminders, Igor Shesterkin, is stuck in inexplainable season-to-season goaltending regressions. Ever since he arrived in New York and Henrik Lundqvist passed him the torch, Shesterkin has planted himself as a top-3 goalie in the league. He finished first in Vezina voting in 2021-22 and was a finalist again last year. But Shesterkin finds himself in goalie purgatory this season. His save percentage is down to .907, and his GSAx has gone from otherworldly to slightly above average.

    His tandem partner, Jonathan Quick, is having a resurgent season, but nobody believes it’s time to move on from Shesterkin. Why? Because that’s where we are in the NHL landscape of goaltending today. It’s an extremely difficult position to play today due to the decades-long rule changes to promote more scoring.

    These inconsistent seasons have become the norm in the NHL. Just ask the likes of Jordan Binnington, Sergei Bobrovsky, and Andrei Vasilevskiy, who have experienced tough seasons sandwiched between all-time great performances.

    While Gustavsson’s recent performance has made life difficult for a team attempting to get back into a playoff position, it’s certainly understandable. The best in the world have a few seasons of mortality. Therefore, it’s probably fair to expect the same from Gustavsson, who the Ottawa Senators recently cast aside.

    Not to mention, his contract also reflects such results. Gustavsson is 29th in AAV this year among all goaltenders. The Wild aren’t paying him for Vezina-level production.

    So, while Gustavsson’s season has been disappointing compared to last year, his inconsistency year to year is common in the rest of the league. It speaks to how crucial it is to have two goaltenders who can occasionally help each other carry the load.

    The hope is Gustavsson can rebound next year to provide results falling somewhere in the middle of these past two seasons. The Wild are counting on it because immediately turning the crease over to an emerging but inexperienced Jesper Wallstedt would be a tough ask. In the meantime, patience is the game with Gus Bus.

     

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Don’t look now but we have a legit NHL first line with Bo-Kap-Ek.  They were snapping the puck around the o-zone like they were on PP.  Add to that Brock-a-doodle-doo jumping into the play and this wild fan was getting tingles last night.

    i also like the 36+38 special+The Noodle line

    The Italian stallions (your name ends in an “I” you’re Italian, capische?) also look ok. 
    #icehockey

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Don’t look now but we have a legit NHL first line with Bo-Kap-Ek.  They were snapping the puck around the o-zone like they were on PP.  Add to that Brock-a-doodle-doo jumping into the play and this wild fan was getting tingles last night.

    i also like the 36+38 special+The Noodle line

    The Italian stallions (your name ends in an “I” you’re Italian, capische?) also look ok. 
    #icehockey

    Check that Rossi on Zuc-noodle line

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Gustavson has had stretches of pretty good play this year, and one stretch of really strong play, but has had some really rough nights mixed in.

    The first month, when the Wild were somewhat in disarray and injured, Gus only posted an .872 save percentage, despite an amazing opening night shutout.

    Since that time, starting with the game in Sweden, he's gone 14-9-2 with a .905 save percentage. That's nearing average. Fleury was similarly bad in the first month(.879 save%), with a .908 save% starting in Sweden and a 9-6-2 record.

    Gustavsson is still the 1A in this pairing, in my opinion(the ice time suggests that), and they'll need him to be if they make the playoffs. Fleury has played fairly well much of the season.

    Gus needs to step up with more strong games like the Edmonton game and the Florida game and have fewer bad nights, but they are rather close in overall play, and last season suggests(including the .921 save percentage and never more than 3 goals allowed in the playoffs) that Gus can play better.

    Chisholm seems to be helping the defense the last few games as well. He's been getting top 3 defensemen minutes the last few, ahead of Middleton due to his work on the PP, and the Wild have done well with him on the ice.

    Wild have outscored opponents 2.4  to 1.6 goals per 60 even strength, and have not allowed any goals in the few penalty kills Chisholm has gotten in on. I'm not suggesting that Chisholm is driving winning, only that he's playing solidly. The Power Play has been strong with him on the ice as well--not clear yet whether that's simply timing due with the forwards getting hot, 5-3 PPs, or if he's making a real difference, but he's a pretty decent offensive D-man.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Gustavson has had stretches of pretty good play this year, and one stretch of really strong play, but has had some really rough nights mixed in.

    The first month, when the Wild were somewhat in disarray and injured, Gus only posted an .872 save percentage, despite an amazing opening night shutout.

    Since that time, starting with the game in Sweden, he's gone 14-9-2 with a .905 save percentage. That's nearing average. Fleury was similarly bad in the first month(.879 save%), with a .908 save% starting in Sweden and a 9-6-2 record.

    Gustavsson is still the 1A in this pairing, in my opinion(the ice time suggests that), and they'll need him to be if they make the playoffs. Fleury has played fairly well much of the season.

    Gus needs to step up with more strong games like the Edmonton game and the Florida game and have fewer bad nights, but they are rather close in overall play, and last season suggests(including the .921 save percentage and never more than 3 goals allowed in the playoffs) that Gus can play better.

    Chisholm seems to be helping the defense the last few games as well. He's been getting top 3 defensemen minutes the last few, ahead of Middleton due to his work on the PP, and the Wild have done well with him on the ice.

    Wild have outscored opponents 2.4  to 1.6 goals per 60 even strength, and have not allowed any goals in the few penalty kills Chisholm has gotten in on. I'm not suggesting that Chisholm is driving winning, only that he's playing solidly. The Power Play has been strong with him on the ice as well--not clear yet whether that's simply timing due with the forwards getting hot, 5-3 PPs, or if he's making a real difference, but he's a pretty decent offensive D-man.

    I like Chizzy as well. Solid Dman so far and I like his slapper. I don't see any reason for it not to continue.

    Both goalies can play solid, but far to often they're prone to giving up an easy one or two. A lot of times those easy ones come when the Wild are building momentum. Really they both remind me of Doobs in that respect. Gus is young so I'm hoping he can work through it, I have to believe it's a mental issue with him. And Flower is just long in the tooth  and likely it's just a slight loss of quickness and agility. Flower seems to not let it get to him so much, but sometimes I think it gets to Gus. JMO...

     

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, Willy the poor boy said:

    Both goalies can play solid, but far to often they're prone to giving up an easy one or two. A lot of times those easy ones come when the Wild are building momentum. Really they both remind me of Doobs in that respect. Gus is young so I'm hoping he can work through it, I have to believe it's a mental issue with him. And Flower is just long in the tooth  and likely it's just a slight loss of quickness and agility. Flower seems to not let it get to him so much, but sometimes I think it gets to Gus. JMO...

    This is a decent take. What it looks like to me, though, are 2 separate issues. With Fleury, to me, it looks like his are misplays often caused by guessing wrong. As a shorter goalie, he's got a little bigger window upstairs to nail, and sometimes, he goes down and gives players that window and they hit it. 

    For Goose2, his issue isn't guessing wrong, it's picking up the puck. There are a lot of easy ones that get through him because he failed to locate where the puck was coming from. To be absolutely fair, he had this same problem last season too. Sometimes, it's defenders screening him, other times it's a puck that has been deflected somewhere that he just doesn't pick up until it's too late. I would say this is a major difference between Goose2 and The Wall. 

    The Wall's problem last season seemed to be not getting ready quick enough for different angles. Shooters here were much more comfortable shooting from weird angles or outside than maintaining possession like they would do in Sweden, so he wasn't ready and had to adjust. Goose2 just isn't picking up the puck. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...