Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • The Wild’s Hot Streak Is More Than Just A New-Coach Bump


    Image courtesy of Brad Rempel-USA TODAY Sports
    Justin Wiggins

    John Hynes is pressing all the right buttons just over a month into his tenure as Minnesota Wild head coach. The results speak for themselves – an 11-3-0 record and renewed belief among Wild fans this team can make a run to the playoffs and possibly further.

    At the beginning of December, it was easy to write off the Wild’s improved play as the traditional “new-coach bump” that seemingly always follows a change at the helm. But now it’s late December, and the wins are still pouring in. It’s time to start removing the “new-coach bump” from our rhetoric when explaining what is happening in Minnesota.

    This version of the Wild is what fans were hoping for coming into the season: a fun, exciting product that can score with talent and defend with depth.

    There are a bunch of fun stats you could dive into to discover what’s working. It’s more than improved shooting percentages and vastly improved goaltending. Simply put, Hynes has given the Wild their identity back.

    It starts with his lineup configuration. Hynes came to Minnesota, a team in complete flux, discovered what each player does best, and put them into a position to maximize their use. His ability to make a top-line of his best forwards work together was the start. Hynes did not come in with years of preconceived thoughts on players like Evason had become prone to at the end of his tenure. And so, Hynes removed Kirill Kaprizov from Mats Zuccarello’s hip and placed him next to Matt Boldy and Joel Eriksson Ek instead. They have one goal when on the ice: control the puck and score.

    A second line of the remaining high-end scorers, Zuccarello, Marco Rossi, and Marcus Johansson, were also clicking. No longer playing with superstars on their wings, each player on the second line has felt no pressure to feed one person. Instead, they are a perfect complement to the top line.

    For the first time all year, the Wild also seem to have a line with a checking identity. Hynes put Marcus Foligno with Frederick Gaudreau and Pat Maroon to do the dirty work. Hynes’ greatest contribution has been creating a specific role for each player without deviating from it.

    At the end of his run, Evason consistently placed players into roles that didn’t fit their strengths. When the Wild’s top-6 suffered injuries early in the season, Evason occasionally made Maroon a winger on the second line. He did fine in that role, but it doesn’t allow Maroon to play to his true strengths. Therefore, not only did Minnesota's second line lose a player to injury, but its checking line no longer carried the same punch. Same with Foligno. He’s best when forechecking an opponent’s top forwards, not trying to set up the Wild’s top forwards in a top-6 role.

    Hynes has clearly identified the roles he wants his players to fill. When Zuccarello departed the lineup last week with injury, Hynes turned to fourth-line winger Ryan Hartman to fill his void on the second line. Sure, it seems like a no-brainer to replace your top scorer with a former 30-goal scorer, but it’s the kind of move that speaks to Hynes’ acute ability to place the right players in the correct roles. Keeping Foligno, Maroon, and Gaudreau together as a bruising shutdown line has allowed all three to thrive.

    Perhaps nowhere has this attempt to place players into specific roles been more noticeable or impactful than on the penalty kill. Under Evason, the Wild preferred a rotating cast of forwards on the kill. It’s tough to say if Evason did so in an attempt to even out the minutes played or if the thought was fresh legs are the best legs. Regardless, it didn’t work. Miscommunications were everywhere, and a league-worst penalty kill converting under 70% of their opportunities was a primary contributor to Minnesota dismissing him.

    Hynes chose a different route, rotating between two sets of forwards and placing the onus on those four to lead the way. When it’s not the Brandon Duhaime and Connor Dewar pairing on the ice, it’s been Eriksson Ek with Foligno. In their first game following the Christmas break, those four accounted for 96% of the short-handed time-on-ice among all forwards. The only other forward to record any time on the kill was Gaudreau’s 0:24. However, that was late in the game, and Hynes wanted a right-handed face-off option on the ice.

    It's worked. They’ve jumped from killing less than 70% of opposing powerplays to slightly below 80% under Hynes.

    The Wild were lacking an identity for most of the season. Were they going to be a high-octane offensive team like they were two years ago? Or were they going to depend on a deep blue line and elite goaltending like they did in the second half of last season?

    The answer to both questions was no. Identifying what this team does best and what each player brings to the lineup was difficult. Hynes has changed that. That sense of identity has been one of the biggest reasons for their turnaround, perhaps enough to get the Wild back into a secure playoff position.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    2 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Another WJC of meh for Ohgren on the scoresheet.

    Yet, isn't he captaining the Swedes? There must be some intangibles to his game that we are missing. I don't know what they are.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Isn't it interesting that Hynes has found correct roles for the players on this team. Perhaps this is the way that Guerin was thinking when he constructed the roster? I think Evason lost track of that the closer he got to his expiration date. 

    When a coach identifies what a player does well and sticks him in that role, a player's confidence grows. Why? Because he does that well! And when he does well he gets more confident in what he's doing. 

    This looks like a very confident team right now. 

    One other thing I've noticed: Hynes has been known as an offensive killer. Yet, it seems like we're getting a lot more breakaways under his reign. Does anyone else notice this?

    Also, note to Marco Rossi- you're taking your breakaways in too tight and eliminating your angles. Shoot from a little farther out. Zucker had the same issue.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Another WJC of meh for Ohgren on the scoresheet.  

    Ohgren has 1 assist in 3 games. Yet, he's got 13 shots on goal in that span. Looking at the shots leaders, he would be in the middle of the front page on the stat line. Is he just snakebit, or is there something else? 

    I haven't been able to see him with the eye test yet.

    Kumpulainen didn't look terrible in the game I saw vs. Canada. He didn't look great either, just kind of meh. He did make a couple of nice passes that amounted to nothing, though. I haven't gotten a chance to see Petrovsky. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    haven't been able to see him with the eye test yet.

    You tube/tsn/

    can watch goals & highlights from all the games.  Ohgren is going to be Charlie Coyle 2.0

    Petrovsky is the player that has consistently driven offense in this tourney (over the years)

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     I watched the Sweden - Canada game, thought Ohgren had a good game in Sweden’s 2-0 win. He almost scored on a tap in and almost had a nice assist on a tap in, both stopped by great saves. Yeah, he doesn’t look like the best player on the ice, but he is ours and we will see how he melds when he gets here. It sounds like he will be here for sure next year, if it means a year in Iowa so be it.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    can watch goals & highlights from all the games.  Ohgren is going to be Charlie Coyle 2.0

    Petrovsky is the player that has consistently driven offense in this tourney (over the years)

    I am excited about Petrovsky. I remember listening to NHL Radio when we drafted him, one announcer said he was the steal of the draft and loved the pick, couldn't believe he was still there. They also loved the Spacek pick!

    Would a Charlie Coyle 2.0 be all that bad? So Ohgren is a 3rd line player? You need 3rd line players! He was the safe pick so we could swing for Yurov. If both make the roster, we win regardless of the role Ohgren plays. There is a possibility of an Ohgren-Stramel-Kumpulainen 3rd line that sounds pretty mean.

    Could we have gotten more out of Coyle if we'd just been happy sticking him as 3rd line C? Well, we had that in Haula too, and a Niederreiter-Haula-Coyle 3rd line would have been a pretty good line.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As for today's game, the Jets were ready, the Wild were not. I'd expect a far more spirited game from the Wild tomorrow afternoon. 

    Goose2 left with LBI after 2. Is this the time for The Wall to debut?

    Kaprizov left early too, my bet is that the crosscheck that landed started to stiffen up. I hope he can go, but losing 2 guys like that is big. In my book, you just run through the team tomorrow leaving tons of carnage. 

    I wouldn't mind a nice '80s afternoon! Also, if I'm Ehlers, I'd make sure my head was up all game long.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Ohgren is going to be Charlie Coyle 2.0

    Charlie had a lot of value. The team just kept moving him into positions he was not suited for. If that is what Ohgren becomes I would call that a win.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mnfaninnc said:

    and I forgot to mention I hated the Goligoski/Spurgeon pair. Goligoski and Bogosian were a decent pair together. Could it be time for Hunt to get paired with Spurgeon for a bit?

    Goligoski was horrible after being relatively decent for the last couple games.  Spurg looked rusty too.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think Coyle had alot more expectations to produce quicker than Ohgran will because we traded  Burns for him where as a draft picks value wont be valued by the same  measure  .  

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Anyone hearing anything on Kaprizov and Goose2? 

    I think Hynes got some bad information on pairing Goligoski and Spurgeon together. Goligoski needs a large body next to him, and I think that's why he and Bogosian were a decent pair. 

    Could Daemon Hunt draw in and play next to Spurgy? That might be a decent combination. 

    If it were me, I'd be scratching Merrill who wasn't good, drawing in Hunt or even Mermis, and putting Goligoski/Bogosian on the 3rd pair. If Kaprizov is out, I sure hope they can bring up a replacement and don't try the idiotic 11/7.

    This should be an absolute smashmouth game, and if it isn't I will be hugely disappointed. We definitely need Crazy Eyes to show up!

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...