Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild's "Five-Year Plan" Has A Core Contradiction


    Image courtesy of Matt Blewett - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    On Monday, Minnesota Wild fans got a big peek behind the curtain at the franchise's long-term plans. In an extended interview with Joe Smith and Michael Russo on The Athletic, Wild owner Craig Leipold confidently laid out his vision for the team's future. Mr. Leipold announced that the 2024-25 season is Year 2 of general manager Bill Guerin's five-year plan to win a Stanley Cup in Minnesota.

    It's a bold declaration, partly because revealing such timelines tends to put a clock on a team's progress. The media and fanbase now can judge Minnesota's progress based on standards they have set for themselves. "Five-year plan" is a snappy, grabby phrase to hold onto if things don't work out.

    An example of this almost backfiring in this market was the heat Minnesota Vikings GM Kwesi Adofo-Mensah took after a disappointing season last year. His famous "competitive rebuild" became a punchline when a 7-10 record didn't look particularly competitive.

    So, yes, the "five-year plan" might live on in infamy one day. But for now, it's easy to see why Mr. Leipold would find it necessary to put it into the world. He must ensure Wild fans stay on board with the team heading into a year of unknowns. His plan also appears to be part of an all-out effort to keep Kaprizov, their superstar player, bought into the long-term vision enough to sign an extension next offseason.

    "He's the most important part of our five-year plan," said Mr. Leipold, "I think I can say that."

    The plan buys a significant amount of time for Guerin, who's entering his sixth year as GM with "no heat" on his seat, according to ownership. That's good for the franchise's outlook. Having a hot seat usually inspires GMs to make moves geared toward keeping their job rather than creating a sustainable winner.

    However, a crucial contradiction is at the core of Guerin's plan. In Smith and Russo's article, the GM is quoted as saying that the end of the five-year plan is when the real competition will begin for Minnesota. "It's about becoming a true contender," Guerin told The Athletic about his plan. "I don't want to try to fool anybody. I don't think we've been serious contenders in the past. I just don't. And we're trying to get there." (Emphasis mine.)

    No one can argue that Minnesota has dealt with unique financial hardships over the past few years. The ongoing weight of the Zach Parise and Ryan Suter buyouts has been the story in St. Paul for the past three seasons and will be again in 2024-25. Having around $15 million less in cap space to play with than most other teams is a legitimate handicap, and Guerin's front office has done well to stay competitive in two of those three seasons.

    Guerin often speaks openly and honestly, eschewing GM-speak more than most of his peers. That's admirable at times. But "I don't think we've been serious contenders in the past" is a red flag when much of his five-year plan relies on that core of players.

    We're not talking about Joel Eriksson EkMatt BoldyBrock Faber, or Jonas Brodin, who will still be under contract by Year 5 of the plan. Those players are franchise cornerstones who will be necessary to complement and elevate on a team alongside Kaprizov. But those aren't the only names slated to be in Minnesota by Year 5.

    In that pivotal 2027-28 season, 31-year-old Jake Middleton ($4.35 million), 36-year-old Marcus Foligno ($4 million), and 34-year-old Freddy Gaudreau ($2.1 million) will still be under contract. Smith and Russo correctly point out that long-term contracts to those veteran players must be viewed in a new light with the revelation of Mr. Leipold and Guerin's plan, as was this offseason's signing of Yakov Trenin, which also extends to Year 5.

    If Kaprizov re-signs according to plan, that gives the Wild nine players who currently form the core of a team that Guerin doesn't consider "true contenders." Good management fosters stability, and the idea is that free-agent signings and prospects will complement these players. Still, seven members of this group (all but Faber and Trenin) have had multiple postseasons together and were unable to advance, even with good players like Kevin Fiala, Mats Zuccarello, Jared Spurgeon, Matt Dumba, and Ryan Hartman in the fold.

    It's reasonable to keep the franchise cornerstones around for the plan's duration. Still, is prioritizing aging role players like Middleton, Foligno, and Gaudreau keeping too much of the non-contender version of the Wild DNA around? That's a worry.

    Another huge concern is that the plan is five years long, starting with last season. The plan feels like it started about two seasons too late. Granted, Minnesota's done a good job of getting in premium young talent before hatching "the plan," giving them a head start with Boldy, Faber, Marco Rossi, Jesper Wallstedt, Marat Khusnutdinov, Liam Öhgren, Danila Yurov, and more. That somewhat helps their timetable.

    Still, the Wild don't have three more years to convince Kaprizov to stay. Next fall is the conservative deadline, and it may be much closer to July 1. Mr. Leipold is prepared to make a big splash then. "Next July 1 is going to be like Christmas," he promised on October 1. "We're going to have money available. We're going to have the resources available to do what we need to do to get back to Wild hockey."

    The extensions mentioned above, in addition to contracts the Wild gave Zuccarello ($4.13 million) and Hartman ($4 million) as part of their plan, somewhat constrict Minnesota's flexibility. They're still projected to have around $20 million in cap space, but they must spread that money around eight roster spots. It's an open question as to how big of a splash they can make.

    Unless The Plan involves jumping to "True Contender" status in Year 3, that might be a tough sell to Kaprizov. The Wild can offer him the most money, but will they offer him the best chance to win? Telling him next offseason, We're in Year 3 of a five-year plan is a significantly different message than telling him on July 3, Sign now, we're ready to contend.

    Can you convince Kaprizov to stay while implicitly telling him he must wait two more years until Minnesota's ready to compete?

    The hope is that they can. The State of Hockey has waited so long to see a talent like Kaprizov come along. It's desperate to see him stay and for the team to give him the tools he needs to compete in St. Paul. Mr. Leipold and Guerin are taking this seriously, but it remains to be seen if their plan can withstand its core conflict.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    11 hours ago, 1Brotherbill said:

    His extension is going to be somewhere in the 12 to 14 million

    If he does sign here it will be for at least $14M he will become the highest paid player in the league. CL will over pay because he already said he would.

    I think we have a tendency to over value Kaprizov's skills here in Minnesota because he is the best thing we have seen since Gaborik. There has not been much in between the two. He stands out on a mediocre team. For all that he is there are things he is not. He is no longer dekeing his way through defenseman. Not that he ever did much of that ala McDavid. Twice last night he carried the puck in the zone only to turn his back to the defenseman and the goal looking for the trailer to pass to. He is a known factor around the league now and as always teams will adjust to a opposing players tendencies.

    His first year or two everyone marveled at his ten and two position of his skates. The announcers were acting like it's the first time they have ever seen such a thing when in fact many NHL'ers can do it. I'm not hearing much of that anymore. He still has a tendency to throw blind passes that either go the other way or never develop into a play.  Yes in fact he's human. I'm not ripping on him he's still a top tier player. But I don't deny what I see either.  The Wild could find themselves in a better position if they can find a team to overpay for him in trade value rather than CL over paying for him. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, 1Brotherbill said:

    Yess he can.  25 players in the league last year were a point per game player.  Kiril was 10th in the league.  Seems like a lot but reality is he just scores with an occasional assist.  He is a 50 50 player.  Once again seems like a lot but he is making 9 Million right now which is 36th in the league.  His extension is going to be somewhere in the 12 to 14 million range now that Driasital is signed to a rediculous contract.  That would put him in the top 5 of the league in salary.  I personally wouldn't want to pay a player on my team money equal to someone who scores 50 points more on average.

    Now if he rattles off a 150 point season I would change my mind but he will probably be around the 100 point mark again.  Boldy will be about 10 behind him and 4 years younger and making half of what Kiril will make in his next contract. 

    Two players at 7 million who are point per game players are better than 1 who is just over a point per game player.  

    Once again I would miss the Russian a lot but it is a business at the end of the day. 

    I think you are oversimplifying things a bit here by inducing all value is boiled down to a single (and inherently flawed) statistic.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, MacGyver said:

    If he does sign here it will be for at least $14M he will become the highest paid player in the league. CL will over pay because he already said he would.

    I think we have a tendency to over value Kaprizov's skills here in Minnesota because he is the best thing we have seen since Gaborik. There has not been much in between the two. He stands out on a mediocre team. For all that he is there are things he is not. He is no longer dekeing his way through defenseman. Not that he ever did much of that ala McDavid. Twice last night he carried the puck in the zone only to turn his back to the defenseman and the goal looking for the trailer to pass to. He is a known factor around the league now and as always teams will adjust to a opposing players tendencies.

    His first year or two everyone marveled at his ten and two position of his skates. The announcers were acting like it's the first time they have ever seen such a thing when in fact many NHL'ers can do it. I'm not hearing much of that anymore. He still has a tendency to throw blind passes that either go the other way or never develop into a play.  Yes in fact he's human. I'm not ripping on him he's still a top tier player. But I don't deny what I see either.  The Wild could find themselves in a better position if they can find a team to overpay for him in trade value rather than CL over paying for him. 

    ODC will not share your opinion, but I do to an extent.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/13/2024 at 9:30 AM, Need4speed99 said:

    Raithis,

    All the teams winning or in contention drafted a LEGIT superstar and built around that. Both in the draft and free agency. Yes each team endured a few down years but they spent wisely and didn't invest heavily in aging players. 

    The problem with the wild, they have employed the same strategy for as long as liepold is the owner. Always a "competitive" rebuild, never a full rebuild. And all the wild have done is become the kings of one and out.  I forget what they call it when you do the same thing over and over expecting a different result.

    This year they need all the vets to stay healthy and play at a high level. If they can't and the team is mediocre as always you think kap is going to stay. 

    That what they have done though.  The difference is that we didn't have much for prospects in the pipeline and we had two huge contracts hanging over the team.

    So we went into rebuild mode and continued to tear out the old core and got rid of our old "stars", focusing more on the young, good players we had at the time Eriksson Ek, Kaprizov, and a still-rising Boldy.

    We added lots of good prospects to build around those players, but due to recapture penalties, we could not go out and get the occasional free agent will lots of high end like most rebuilding teams do.  Keep in mind that the successful teams still sign a few aging vets to help those young players learn and grow during that time in the transition of the team.  The ones that put almost everything on the youngsters tend to struggle to reach their potential (such as Buffalo).  This is what a lot of rebuilding teams do.

    Since we did not have the cap space to outbid teams and did not have much for prospects at that point that were good enough for the NHL (you can thank Fletcher and to a certain extent Fenton for that one), we used what he had to turn that into more high picks and signed/acquired a few more veterans as placeholders to while those picks developed - and called it competitive rebuild even though it was essentially a rebuild.  We might have even had to sell Kaprizov on the idea that we would be competitive to even get him to sign for 5 years to begin with.

    Yes, it may look a little different, but once the prospects are ready and heading into their primes, almost all of those aging veterans start to fall off.  As soon as next year we can start being a little more aggressive in free agency, and as prospects pan out or don't, we can identify the holes we need to fill from free agency for those as well.  Like any rebuilding teams though, some of those prospects HAVE to pan out or it will fall apart.  That's why a lot of teams that rebuild fail.  They either draft poorly, are too quick to try to get back to contention, or they go to free agency too often and can't afford their prospects later on.  We are doing the right thing in all those areas.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, MacGyver said:

    If he does sign here it will be for at least $14M he will become the highest paid player in the league. CL will over pay because he already said he would.

    Current top is 13.5 in Matthews.  Next year Draisaitl comes into the mix at 14.  The same year Kiril's extension kicks in Connor McJesus is due to kick in.  You would assume that he will be top paid player in the league by a million or more.  So we are looking at 15.5. These are all people who score 120 plus a year.  Kiril barely can score 100.  

    No way that the Wild pay him 14 plus.  Well they can and probably will but reality they shouldn't. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, 1Brotherbill said:

    Well they can and probably will but reality they shouldn't. 

    This is the spot CL put himself into with his nobody will offer him more money than we will statement. Why a owner would publicly say something like that is mind boggling. Sometimes I wonder if this team is run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it. 

    Edited by MacGyver
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...