Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild Will Regress If They Can't Improve Their Anemic Offense


    Image courtesy of Matt Krohn-Imagn Images
    Tom Schreier

    Even at the tail-end of a seven-game win streak that probably saved John Hynes’ job, the Minnesota Wild can’t help but lose to one of the worst teams in the league for the past 15 years.

    In their last four games heading into tonight’s matchup with the Edmonton Oilers, the Wild: 

    • Beat the Winnipeg Jets 3-0.
    • Scraped by the Chicago Blackhawks 4-3 in overtime. 
    • Had a cathartic 3-2 shootout win over the Colorado Avalanche.
    • Lost to the Buffalo Sabres 3-2 in a shootout, snapping their seven-game winning streak.

    It’s easy to focus on the positives. Jesper Wallstedt had a shutout in Winnipeg, and the Wild beat a divisional foe who had won nine straight games against them! Colorado has more points than any other team in the league! Kirill Kaprizov is an Avs killer, Matt Boldy is looking like Robin to Kaprizov’s Batman, and Brock Faber is scoring again!

    That’s all well and good, but consider that the San Jose Sharks have beaten the Wild twice this year, including immediately before Minnesota’s seven-game win streak. They’re a bubble team looking to break out of their rebuild phase. Chicago also nearly took one from the Wild. 

    Teams like the Sharks and Blackhawks tanked rather than rebuild, sneaking into the playoffs and losing in the first round, as the Wild did during the worst of their cap penalties. San Jose and Chicago are led by dynamic superstars, Macklin Celebrini and Connor Bedard, and they will likely have more dynamic talent come up through their system because they’ve been drafting higher than the Wild.

    Chicago eliminated the Wild in the second round of the playoffs in 2013-14 and 2014-15. San Jose represented the Western Conference in the 2015-16 season. Once they realized that their old cores had aged out, they tanked and rebuilt while the Wild dithered in the first round with no chance to truly contend because of the Zach Parise, Ryan Suter buyout penalties.

    The Blackhawks and Sharks likely will be waiting for the Wild by the end of Bill Guerin’s five-year plan, threatening to eliminate them from the playoffs as bona fide contenders.

    What about the Sabres? They haven’t made the postseason since 2010-11, and they have the fewest points in the Eastern Conference this year. The Wild chalked that loss up to an emotional letdown after beating Colorado the day before.

    “It’s hard I think from a mental aspect, but that’s the challenge in this league to come from a game where there’s hype before the game, two of the best teams, two of the hottest teams in the league, and you’re amped up and then the next time you gotta play a team that doesn’t look good in the standings,” Nico Sturm said after losing to Buffalo.

    “But as you saw today, there’s no easy teams in the NHL. We all know that, but that’s a challenge in this league to show up 24 hours or less sometimes when your emotions come from the highest highs to the lowest lows. 

    There’s no easy teams in the NHL, but there are teams that win more often than they lose and vice versa. Then there’s the Wild, perpetually stuck in the middle. 

    They can tell themselves that they’re on the Avs’ level after beating them in a shootout to win their seventh-straight game. But they’re not. Colorado scores 4.12 goals per game and gives up 2.08 – that’s a winning formula.

    Meanwhile, Minnesota scores 2.85 goals per game, slightly more than the Philadelphia Flyers (2.83), San Jose Sharks (2.81), and Columbus Blue Jackets (2.80). The New York Islanders and Detroit Red Wings (2.88) score more than the Wild. So do the Vancouver Canucks, Utah Mammoth, and Buffalo Sabres [italics] (2.96). 

    Philadelphia, Columbus, and Buffalo are some of the worst teams in hockey. The rest reside on the bubble with Minnesota. The Wild may have won seven straight, but they’re only a .500 team now (14-7-5, or 14-12 in other sports). They’re likely nothing more than a bubble team and probably will lose in the first round again. 

    Even if the Wild win a playoff series this year, they don’t look like a true contender. Their stellar goaltending is masking their lack of scoring. Marcus Johansson is their third-leading scorer, and he’s 35, liable to regress, and shouldn’t be part of Guerin’s five-year plan. Faber is their next-highest leading scorer.

    Losing to Buffalo isn’t a mystery or a fluke. It’s the product of Minnesota’s lack of offense and a harbinger for what’s to come. Cathartic victories and epic letdowns. The Wild can beat anyone on any given night, but they can also lose ot the worst teams in the league. They’re not talented enough to sustain success.

    The Wild are always stuck in the middle because they refuse to leave it.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Hmmm...  I don't believe a team has to tank for several years to be good in the future.  If that was the case then teams wouldn't be stuck in the cellar for decades.   It also wouldn't explain how some teams seem to find ways to be competitive contenders almost every year.  

    I would argue that recognition of potential talent and ability to harness that talent plays a much larger role in being an annual contender than higher draft picks.  

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Come on Tom.  

    The Wild may have won seven straight, but they’re only a .500 team now (14-7-5, or 14-12 in other sports)

    You do know that is good for being tied with the 5th best points percentage in the league?

    Philadelphia, Columbus, and Buffalo are some of the worst teams in hockey. 

    Philadelphia is tied for 8th in points percentage and Columbus is 16th, I would not call them the worst teams in hockey.

    Meanwhile, Minnesota scores 2.85 goals per game, slightly more than the Philadelphia Flyers (2.83), San Jose Sharks (2.81), and Columbus Blue Jackets (2.80). The New York Islanders and Detroit Red Wings (2.88) score more than the Wild. So do the Vancouver Canucks, Utah Mammoth, and Buffalo Sabres [italics] (2.96). 

    Sure, we sit at 25th in goals for per game, but since the Utah game, or the last 17 games, we are 12th in goals per game played and 4th in goal differential.  Also, there is more to the game than just goals per game.  Toronto is 6th in goals per game and sits at 27th in points percentage.

    The Wild can beat anyone on any given night, but they can also lose to the worst teams in the league.

    Yes, the Wild lost in OT to Buffalo where the game tying goal was a fluke.  The Wild have played 6 games against teams with a .500 points percentage or lower this year and are 4-1-1 for nine points. It's the NHL. Good teams lose to bad teams sometimes.  Dallas has played 7 games against the same teams and is 4-2-1 for nine points.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What happened to the phrase:  "Defense wins championships".  This team needs depth scoring  and defense to win.  I still think we are short 2 high end wingers for the top 6 to really be cup contenders.  But whoever we bring in... they must adhere to our defense first mentality.  It is how we are built.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...