Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild Shouldn't Offload Rossi To Clear A 2026 Cap Logjam


    Image courtesy of Nick Wosika-Imagn Images
    Justin Hein

    The Minnesota Wild have an underreported problem coming up. 

    Its name is 2026-27 cap space

    It’s clear why that’s not the A-topic in Wild circles right now. There are juicier stories that will pay off much sooner: Kirill Kaprizov’s extension, Marco Rossi’s RFA status, and Danila Yurov's arrival, to name a few. 

    More than that, Wild fans just don’t want to hear about another cap crunch in only the 2nd season after the Parise/Suter buyout penalties. 

    As a bit of relief, note that this crunch is only projected; it isn’t yet on the books. The looming issue can be identified on the second line. Marco Rossi needs an extension or a replacement, Mats Zuccarello will need a replacement in ‘26-27, and Marcus Johansson is not an acceptable solution on the 2nd line. Even if Danila Yurov and Liam Ohgren both can produce second-line quality by 2026, that still leaves one expensive hole in the top six. 

    So, why not make your cost-controlled second-line center part of the solution to that cap crunch? 

    It’s no secret that Rossi is on the outs with the organization. NHL insider Michael Russo has been hinting at it for months, and now he’s putting it in print. This isn’t just rumors and opinions. The team offered Rossi a five-year, $5 million AAV contract, which is cheap enough to be borderline insulting. Even given his RFA status, I estimated Rossi’s annual market value on a four-year deal to be around $7 million. 

    Adding his first UFA year into the deal (not to mention his age-28 season, one of his prime producing years) should only increase the AAV. 

    To take this offer more professionally than an insult, perhaps Rossi’s agent could consider it less of an offer than a jumping-off point for negotiations. However, Russo also reported that “Rossi’s camp countered with a shorter-term bridge deal at a larger AAV, which went nowhere.” That makes $5x5 look less like a jumping-off point and more like a suggestion to jump off the team. 

    What’s especially maddening about a shorter-term offer going “nowhere” is that it’s precisely the creative maneuver that could solve the Wild’s upcoming salary cap crunch. A two-year deal would set Rossi up for life and allow Minnesota to return to the table with him in the 2026 offseason. More importantly, that’s probably the best method of lowering Rossi’s ‘26-27 cap hit, since it only buys Rossi’s age-24 and -25 seasons. 

    A two-year deal would schedule Rossi for another extension that starts in the middle of his prime; furthermore, he could sign it as early as July 2026. That would provide Rossi with security within a calendar year while reducing his ‘26-27 cap hit. He'd return to the table under a totally new salary cap environment. 

    Instead, negotiations have stalled. That seems to be the nail in the coffin for a player who has never found his footing in this organization. 

    Then again, footing is hard to find when one’s legs keep getting kicked out from underneath. It’s difficult to imagine what Rossi could have done to ingratiate himself with this organization. He’s spent offseasons away from home training with Minnesota’s coaches. That’s not required of any player, but perhaps Minnesota feels that’s part of setting a championship standard. So, he at least meets expectations in that regard. 

    How about this for exceeding expectations: dragging an aging, injured roster through the season from hell and into the playoffs? 

    Sure, he didn’t do it alone. Brock Faber and Matt Boldy took on huge roles before the return of Kirill Kaprizov and during Jonas Brodin and Jared Spurgeon’s absences. Even still, Rossi stepped into a top-line center role on a team with little help on either of the top two lines, and he produced significantly better than in his 2023-24 season

    rossi 2023-24 player card athletic dom.png

    rossi 2024-25 player card athletic dom.png

    The only good-faith explanation to the Wild’s rumored intention to trade Rossi is that they think this season was an outlier. It actually explains five years at a $5 million AAV quite nicely. If Rossi was running unsustainably hot this season, and factoring in the team’s leverage during his next four seasons as an RFA, perhaps that offer is an acceptable starting point. 

    If that’s their logic, selling high on Rossi in a trade makes sense. 

    However, that’s an aggressive strategy if the goal is a Stanley Cup window. Not only are the Wild betting against their own asset, but they’re introducing the risk of an offer sheet. While they could be in line to acquire a first- and third-round pick in a Rossi offer sheet, those picks won’t align with their aspiration to open a championship window. 

    By the time those 2026 draft picks make significant contributions, Spurgeon and Brodin will be well past their primes. Paydays will be due for Danila Yurov, Zeev Buium, and David Jiricek (if those players pan out). They’ll need replacements for Joel Eriksson Ek, Mats Zuccarello, Ryan Hartman, and Jake Middleton. An offer sheet would essentially subtract Marco Rossi from any championship window and push that value into the next GM’s tenure. 

    In other words, if Guerin’s potential trade partners in a Rossi trade prefers to spend the offer sheet compensation, they can wait him out. If the Wild lose that game of chicken, they may have to kiss that Cup window goodbye. 

    Still, moving on from Rossi presents an opportunity. Packaging Rossi with another roster player or a prospect such as Liam Ohgren could open a serious two- or three-year window to chase a Stanley Cup. Packaging all three could reshape the entire roster. 

    Perhaps that’s the bottom line on Rossi’s story in Minnesota. He’s not part of a larger vision, and even the most creative short-term deals don’t leave enough cap space to realize that vision. 

    That still raises questions about Minnesota’s management over the past several seasons. Why bring in Judd Brackett to draft undersized producers like Rossi, Buium, and Riley Heidt if that doesn’t fit into management’s vision for a championship? 

    Credit Bill Guerin for making the pick and giving Rossi a chance, but what more could Rossi have realistically accomplished to stick around? 

    I’m not the first person to ask these questions. If Rossi reaches new heights in his prime as a second- or first-line center, or if the Wild continue to exit the playoffs early, they’ll be raised again. 

    On July 1, Marco Rossi will become eligible for an offer sheet. Four days before, all 32 NHL GMs will be together in Los Angeles for the 2025 draft. If Rossi isn’t extended or traded by the end of draft weekend, Guerin could find himself at the mercy of his 31 colleagues and Rossi’s agent. That would be a tangible failure. 

    Trading Rossi could become just as great a failure, but at least it allows Guerin to realize his vision for a championship-caliber roster. It could also create enough flexibility under the ’26-27 salary cap to keep that team together for more than one year. 

    The 2026-27 cap crunch won’t keep Minnesota from making the playoffs, but it’s the lens through which every move this offseason should be examined. It’s also the last obstacle between this franchise and a long championship window. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    12 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    None of us have any real evidence on anything - but a team athlete knows when others slack or tune out. The team know, the captains know and management knows. Not one player checked out but Rossi. Even Nyquist tried! Yes he failed, but that’s another topic

    I know teams and kaptains know, but without any actual evidence, do we really know what went on? Teams and kaptains also know when the team's 3rd leading scorer is demoted to the 4th line, and while they played limited minutes, I thought they performed better than the next line up, Gaudreau's line. I thought they deserved a few more minutes than they got. 

    On the Rossi topic, I still believe that he was hampered by the puck to the knee and it reduced his speed. He'll probably never use it as an excuse as he gutted his way through it. From the play, though, what I saw was Rossi was very conservative and typically hung out in the offensive zone about 5 ft. higher than normal knowing the big guys were doing the dirty work. Yet he also knew he was responsible for getting back because they didn't have the speed to get back. I didn't think he played checked out, but I do think he wasn't playing like his normal self. 

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    i bold the response for clarity purposes and hopefully it is helpful to the original poster,

    This was helpful to me even though I wasn't the original poster. I just try to break down the quotes in pieces to do the same thing. I feel the color block works better.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    not necessarily - what if Billy has a deal for a better fit and just needs room.

    Offloading Rossi should only be done if it makes the team better. Anything else is unnecessary. Giving him away does not make the team better, because his cap hit would be negligible compared to someone like Spurgeon. 

    If 5 x $5m was offered at the end of this season, I could see that being too long of term. I'm thinking a bridge in the neighborhood of 2x$4.5m is appropriate, breakdown would be $4m 2025, $5m 2026. This would mean the next qualifying offer would be $5.5m in 2027, which I believe would be his last. But, I wouldn't rush to sign this, I would qualify him and allow him out of respect for the player to look for an RFA offersheet, see where it fits, the term, the compensation from who, and make my decision then. It worked great for Aho and the Canes and made Waddell's some easy peasy as he went on a nice vacation after that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Offloading Rossi should only be done if it makes the team better. Anything else is unnecessary. Giving him away does not make the team better, because his cap hit would be negligible compared to someone like Spurgeon. 

    If 5 x $5m was offered at the end of this season, I could see that being too long of term. I'm thinking a bridge in the neighborhood of 2x$4.5m is appropriate, breakdown would be $4m 2025, $5m 2026. This would mean the next qualifying offer would be $5.5m in 2027, which I believe would be his last. But, I wouldn't rush to sign this, I would qualify him and allow him out of respect for the player to look for an RFA offersheet, see where it fits, the term, the compensation from who, and make my decision then. It worked great for Aho and the Canes and made Waddell's some easy peasy as he went on a nice vacation after that.

    I just meant as a way to rid of salary spot (Rossi ~ 7-9 MM save) and using it for another “under-the-radar” signing 

    Many options other than just throw money at Nelson 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    I just meant as a way to rid of salary spot (Rossi ~ 7-9 MM save) and using it for another “under-the-radar” signing 

    Many options other than just throw money at Nelson

    The situation is very sticky for Rossi. He has no arbitration rights, only an offersheet for leverage. Any offersheet <$7.1m with a bunch of term isn't going to get him out of here. If it comes in at 7 x $6.5m, I think the Wild match, and it will be a tremendous bargain. I think both parties benefit from a 2 x $4.5m deal, as Rossi still has much to prove outside of his points. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    The situation is very sticky for Rossi. He has no arbitration rights, only an offersheet for leverage. Any offersheet <$7.1m with a bunch of term isn't going to get him out of here. If it comes in at 7 x $6.5m, I think the Wild match, and it will be a tremendous bargain. I think both parties benefit from a 2 x $4.5m deal, as Rossi still has much to prove outside of his points. 

    Yes I agree a short term bridge can work for both

    but ship has sailed

    rossi will be gone

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    26 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Any offersheet <$7.1m with a bunch of term isn't going to get him out of here. If it comes in at 7 x $6.5m, I think the Wild match, and it will be a tremendous bargain.

    This is basically the crux of it, and why it is so perplexing to me that Rossi held out.

    He probably could have signed at the beginning of the year for 6M.  Instead he went through all of this negative shit and got thrown on the trade block and potentially derailed his entire career before it really started... all for a marginal gain.

    What was his agent thinking?  It's not like Marco was this undeveloped singular talent.  He was/is a blue collar player.  It makes no sense.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    but ship has sailed

    I don't know that it has. A trade, at this point, has to be started by Guerin, or at least listened to by Guerin. I think they worked things out in their end of year meeting, and, simply put, Rossi has got to get stronger. He needs another big offseason. Maybe hanging with Ek and OgZ would help him. He can't keep getting knocked down. Strength with his leverage should get him above average in this department.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Will D. Ness said:

    He probably could have signed at the beginning of the year for 6M.

    Honestly, I don't think that offer was there, then. But I do think he could have signed for $5.5m in January. I don't think the offer would have been more than what Ek was making. It probably would have been a 5 year deal. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I don't know that it has. A trade, at this point, has to be started by Guerin, or at least listened to by Guerin. I think they worked things out in their end of year meeting, and, simply put, Rossi has got to get stronger. He needs another big offseason. Maybe hanging with Ek and OgZ would help him. He can't keep getting knocked down. Strength with his leverage should get him above average in this department.

    We shall see

    my predictions -

    Kap does not sign

    Rossi is traded

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, ArizonaWildFan said:

    One day your boss tells you that you are being demoted because your numbers are down recently. You explain that your numbers are down because you've been covering for another guy while he's out with an injury and you're not getting any help. Doesn't matter, your boss's boss, the big guy, decided that's the way it's going to be so buck up.

    You know what this sounds similar to? Talbot for Game 1 in the St. Louis series. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, OldDutchChip said:

    We shall see

    my predictions -

    Kap does not sign

    Rossi is traded

    I hope your gut is wrong here and you just had spicy Mexican last night causing the discomfort! 😎

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Koivu averaged 50-60 points on shitty or kinda good teams for a decade and Ek trades Koivu's offensive production for being pissed off defensively all the time.  The main issue is he has durability concerns.

    Rossi may have better offensive instincts, but saying he's better or going to be better than Ek and Koivu is a stretch.  Also, Granlund put up 70 points once.

    Rossi offers a good balance that favors "good enough" defensive awareness with sneaky good offensive instincts you can't teach.  But I don't know if that is what Guerin wants in players: hence the endless impasse.

    I love both Koivu and Ek! I also don't think Rossi will be their equal. (I could be wrong)  But at this point in their careers Rossi is the better player.  Also, you are underselling Rossi's defense.  He is in the top 25% defensively.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    The situation is very sticky for Rossi. He has no arbitration rights, only an offersheet for leverage. Any offersheet <$7.1m with a bunch of term isn't going to get him out of here. If it comes in at 7 x $6.5m, I think the Wild match, and it will be a tremendous bargain. I think both parties benefit from a 2 x $4.5m deal, as Rossi still has much to prove outside of his points. 

    How does Rossi have much to prove? 

    I do agree with your assessment outside of the bridge number.  That is stupid low. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, Enforceror said:

    I think he should sign ME!

    6'3 210, 40 years old. Can't skate well but have years of grappling and kickboxing experience.

    I'll stand in front of the net for 1mil. Team friendly deal. 

    Enh?

    No worse than Brazz or Trenin. Maybe even better than Jojo!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 5/19/2025 at 11:19 AM, MNCountryLife said:

    I would sure like to see BG hold on to some of that cash so the TDL can be fun.

    Impossible. He acts like a drunken sailor on shore leave with the team's money. Even picks aren't safe anymore.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    But what I don't get is Judd constantly drafting undersized guys especially on defense when it is not the vision of Guerin. Where is the disconnect? Why isn't the draft board constructed to Guerin's vision? Why are we drafting players that appear to have "soft skill?" I simply don't understand this.

    It's simple. Judd is following Billy's directive, draft the best available player. Billy doesn't see young potential, and obviously doesn't want to develop it in Iowa, he sees trade capital. He can trade those higher ranked players from the draft for what he really wants. Old, slow, no skill veterans. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 hours ago, MacGyver said:

    I think Billy low balled him with intent to insult.

    He low balled him because he doesn't recognize talent or feels that it is less important. He can't manage the team finances either, but that's been known since almost day one.

    He would rather overpay Nelson than get Rossi for a deal. Rossi will outperform Nelson in every statistical category except faceoffs from this point forward. For half the price and a much longer future, no matter what teams they end up on.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    You know what this sounds similar to? Talbot for Game 1 in the St. Louis series. 

    I absolutely love Fleury, one of the GOATs. The last 23 games of the 2021-2022 season Talbot went 10-3 and Flower was 8-2 in a somewhat alternating rotation. Guerin went with Flower in game 1 at home against the Blues and lost 4-0. Fleury started games 2 and 3 and won both. He also started games 4 and 5 and lost both. Finally in game 6, with the Wild down 3-2 in the series, Talbot got the nod.

    Hockey players are human and have emotions. Talbot had a heck of a season before Fleury signed and the tandem had a great stretch run. What was Cam's reward? Play the Billy guy and crap on one of the horses that got you there. Billy already had his plan in mind for the following season and it was going to be Fleury and not Talbot.

    Very similar to the Rossi situation this postseason and the same results, up 2-1 in a series and lose three straight to get eliminated. As was the case both now and then, a valid argument could be made that Guerin sacrificed an opportunity to win a playoff series in favor of unjustly shaming and humiliating a player he didn't want to have on his team in the future.

    Maybe someday soon ownership and some of the Guerin worshipers will see the real problem in the organization and understand why the team can't get past the first round in the playoffs. It wasn't Talbot then or Rossi now.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Patrick said:

    How does Rossi have much to prove? 

    Rossi had a 60 point season which was a nice improvement over last season. I thought he played with more confidence, especially in the first 60 games of the season. However, those last 22 when he was needed the most he disappeared. Not only was he not getting points, but he was also getting knocked down a lot. 

    I realize that most top 6 players run hot and cold, but when you have to carry the team, you cannot have that be your cold streak. We are strictly talking Rossi here, and I realize that this also happened to Boldy. 

    There was a streak where he started winning faceoffs late in the year, but it just wasn't enough. It was his turn to be the star, and he just didn't have it. But, he is young, and he can still be that guy. 

    To me, seeing that, I'm not ready to cough up 7 x $7m for him. Now, I thought his line in the playoffs deserved more minutes, and I thought they were better than the Gaudreau line. Yet, there are still more rungs on the ladder for him to climb up. He's a hard worker so I do have confidence he can get there, but he needs another big offseason of strength training to do it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I've been out of the loop for awhile, when was the 5 x $5m deal offered, at the end of the year, middle of the year, beginning of the year?

    I believe the 5X5 offer was in early December

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Rossi had a 60 point season which was a nice improvement over last season. I thought he played with more confidence, especially in the first 60 games of the season. However, those last 22 when he was needed the most he disappeared. Not only was he not getting points, but he was also getting knocked down a lot. 

    I realize that most top 6 players run hot and cold, but when you have to carry the team, you cannot have that be your cold streak. We are strictly talking Rossi here, and I realize that this also happened to Boldy. 

    There was a streak where he started winning faceoffs late in the year, but it just wasn't enough. It was his turn to be the star, and he just didn't have it. But, he is young, and he can still be that guy. 

    To me, seeing that, I'm not ready to cough up 7 x $7m for him. Now, I thought his line in the playoffs deserved more minutes, and I thought they were better than the Gaudreau line. Yet, there are still more rungs on the ladder for him to climb up. He's a hard worker so I do have confidence he can get there, but he needs another big offseason of strength training to do it.

    So you were expecting a sophomore to carry the team, by himself, down the stretch? I seriously can't figure out why some people expect Rossi to be Kaprizov in only his second year. Again, what else can this guy do? Seriously. He is literally one of the best players the Wild have ever drafted and developed, but it's still not enough for some people. I actually look forward to the games when he lights up the Wild and wipes that smug smirk off of Billy's face. It's going to be one of the main reasons Billy eventually gets fired.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Rossi had a 60 point season which was a nice improvement over last season. I thought he played with more confidence, especially in the first 60 games of the season. However, those last 22 when he was needed the most he disappeared. Not only was he not getting points, but he was also getting knocked down a lot. 

    I realize that most top 6 players run hot and cold, but when you have to carry the team, you cannot have that be your cold streak. We are strictly talking Rossi here, and I realize that this also happened to Boldy. 

    There was a streak where he started winning faceoffs late in the year, but it just wasn't enough. It was his turn to be the star, and he just didn't have it. But, he is young, and he can still be that guy. 

    To me, seeing that, I'm not ready to cough up 7 x $7m for him. Now, I thought his line in the playoffs deserved more minutes, and I thought they were better than the Gaudreau line. Yet, there are still more rungs on the ladder for him to climb up. He's a hard worker so I do have confidence he can get there, but he needs another big offseason of strength training to do it.

    1) You realize every player in the NHL except the superstars go through slumps don't you?  Especially when their more talented linemates are injured.

    2) 7x7 is very middle of the road for a 2nd line center in todays NHL.  Crazy to think but its absolutely true.

    3) In the 22 games prior to KK returning.  Rossi had 11 points.  Hardly disappeared. Importantly,  Rossi, Boldy and Foligno were playing like one of the top lines in the NHL at that time.  Without Rossi the Wild don't make the playoffs. That's a fact.

    The objective stats don't support anything you are saying.  Subjectively you can say he got knocked down a lot...but what does that mean?  If you are looking for something you will see it. 

    Yeah, he isn't a star... yet, and he may never be a star but at this point in his career he is already a solid 2nd line center and he is only 23.  The year BG signed Boldy to his big contract Boldy had 63 points.  Nearly identical to Rossi this year. 

    Go read some Rossi trade proposals from other teams perspectives and you will get a fresh appreciation for him.  BG and Russo have decided they don't like him for some reason.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Scalptrash said:

    So you were expecting a sophomore to carry the team, by himself, down the stretch?

    The opportunity presented itself for both Rossi and Boldy, and to some extent Faber. Were these guys ready to carry the load? I would conclude that they were not. At least not yet. Yes, I expected it. It wasn't just the last 22 games either. I saw some multipoint games against lower competition and nothing against the higher teams. 

    I appreciate Rossi gutting it out, he could have taken a few games off to try and heal up his knee, but he played through it. That also has to be put into the equation. Was he at 80%? I'd suggest more like 60%. 

    The point is that you never know when your number is called to lead the team, and his number was called. He was not yet ready for the challenge. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Patrick said:

    1) You realize every player in the NHL except the superstars go through slumps don't you?  Especially when their more talented linemates are injured.

    2) 7x7 is very middle of the road for a 2nd line center in todays NHL.  Crazy to think but its absolutely true.

    3) In the 22 games prior to KK returning.  Rossi had 11 points.  Hardly disappeared. Importantly,  Rossi, Boldy and Foligno were playing like one of the top lines in the NHL at that time.  Without Rossi the Wild don't make the playoffs. That's a fact.

    The objective stats don't support anything you are saying.  Subjectively you can say he got knocked down a lot...but what does that mean?  If you are looking for something you will see it. 

    Yeah, he isn't a star... yet, and he may never be a star but at this point in his career he is already a solid 2nd line center and he is only 23.  The year BG signed Boldy to his big contract Boldy had 63 points.  Nearly identical to Rossi this year. 

    Go read some Rossi trade proposals from other teams perspectives and you will get a fresh appreciation for him.  BG and Russo have decided they don't like him for some reason.

    1) Yes I do, and admitted it in the post

    2) 7 x $7m may be middle of the road for a 2nd line C, and I have admittedly not done well with capflation. But, to me, points are not the end of the story. Boldy has always been a more complete player than Rossi has, and in my mind Rossi is not a solid 2nd line C yet. Far earlier, I had speculated that Rossi would get a longterm extension offer around the end of January if his 1st half of the year was good, which it was. I don't know if anything was proposed at that time, but I do know he didn't sign.

    3) In the 22 games before Kaprizov came back, that is an average of .5 ppg. With Kaprizov being out, this wasn't even close to good enough. He needed to be producing at around 1 ppg. But, looking at those numbers, how many games did he end up with goose eggs? He had some multipoint games against trash teams. We needed a point a game from him. It didn't help that Boldy went cold too, and as I remember it, Rossi probably should have had a few more apples than he got.

    But here comes the true point of the whole conversation: Objective stats. Just like analytics, objective stats have to suggest a narrative. The eye test then either confirms or denies the narrative. Earlier in the year, I thought Rossi was skating stronger and not getting knocked off pucks or to the ground. Later in the year, he looked worn down and was getting knocked to the ground. It wasn't subjective, it just was happening. In his column, though, he'd get right back up. 

    This would suggest that his lower body still needs some strength improvement. He will struggle against larger players in the corners or along the boards, and I'll never expect him to deliver heavy bodychecks, but he still needs weight gain and strength to be that 2nd line C. He needs to be better at faceoffs, he needs to still work on his shot as it is average at best. 

    I'm not a Rossi hater, and have a long history of not being in favor of trading him out due to size. I have no problem with his height. He's got really good vision, nice timing for skating through the slot and a lot of determination. The stuff he needs improvement in are fixable things. 

    But, then again, if the conclusion is that he needs to be traded out, my hope is we get plenty for him to help us win now. I've read the Bleacher Report trade proposals, and a few made some sense. Which ones are you talking about? I wouldn't want anything from the '25 draft, but could see a 1st from a struggling team in the '26 draft. 

    Honestly, I think the best possible scenario here is for Rossi to come back with an offersheet showing his market worth. If it's $12m x 7, then take the 4 1sts. If it's something like $6.5m x 5, there you go, just match it. If it's $7.5m x 5, you look at the team and project where they're going to be next season, compensation is not lottery protected. A high 1st, 2nd & 3rd round pick would be hard to pass on in '26. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...