Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild Shouldn't Offload Rossi To Clear A 2026 Cap Logjam


    Image courtesy of Nick Wosika-Imagn Images
    Justin Hein

    The Minnesota Wild have an underreported problem coming up. 

    Its name is 2026-27 cap space

    It’s clear why that’s not the A-topic in Wild circles right now. There are juicier stories that will pay off much sooner: Kirill Kaprizov’s extension, Marco Rossi’s RFA status, and Danila Yurov's arrival, to name a few. 

    More than that, Wild fans just don’t want to hear about another cap crunch in only the 2nd season after the Parise/Suter buyout penalties. 

    As a bit of relief, note that this crunch is only projected; it isn’t yet on the books. The looming issue can be identified on the second line. Marco Rossi needs an extension or a replacement, Mats Zuccarello will need a replacement in ‘26-27, and Marcus Johansson is not an acceptable solution on the 2nd line. Even if Danila Yurov and Liam Ohgren both can produce second-line quality by 2026, that still leaves one expensive hole in the top six. 

    So, why not make your cost-controlled second-line center part of the solution to that cap crunch? 

    It’s no secret that Rossi is on the outs with the organization. NHL insider Michael Russo has been hinting at it for months, and now he’s putting it in print. This isn’t just rumors and opinions. The team offered Rossi a five-year, $5 million AAV contract, which is cheap enough to be borderline insulting. Even given his RFA status, I estimated Rossi’s annual market value on a four-year deal to be around $7 million. 

    Adding his first UFA year into the deal (not to mention his age-28 season, one of his prime producing years) should only increase the AAV. 

    To take this offer more professionally than an insult, perhaps Rossi’s agent could consider it less of an offer than a jumping-off point for negotiations. However, Russo also reported that “Rossi’s camp countered with a shorter-term bridge deal at a larger AAV, which went nowhere.” That makes $5x5 look less like a jumping-off point and more like a suggestion to jump off the team. 

    What’s especially maddening about a shorter-term offer going “nowhere” is that it’s precisely the creative maneuver that could solve the Wild’s upcoming salary cap crunch. A two-year deal would set Rossi up for life and allow Minnesota to return to the table with him in the 2026 offseason. More importantly, that’s probably the best method of lowering Rossi’s ‘26-27 cap hit, since it only buys Rossi’s age-24 and -25 seasons. 

    A two-year deal would schedule Rossi for another extension that starts in the middle of his prime; furthermore, he could sign it as early as July 2026. That would provide Rossi with security within a calendar year while reducing his ‘26-27 cap hit. He'd return to the table under a totally new salary cap environment. 

    Instead, negotiations have stalled. That seems to be the nail in the coffin for a player who has never found his footing in this organization. 

    Then again, footing is hard to find when one’s legs keep getting kicked out from underneath. It’s difficult to imagine what Rossi could have done to ingratiate himself with this organization. He’s spent offseasons away from home training with Minnesota’s coaches. That’s not required of any player, but perhaps Minnesota feels that’s part of setting a championship standard. So, he at least meets expectations in that regard. 

    How about this for exceeding expectations: dragging an aging, injured roster through the season from hell and into the playoffs? 

    Sure, he didn’t do it alone. Brock Faber and Matt Boldy took on huge roles before the return of Kirill Kaprizov and during Jonas Brodin and Jared Spurgeon’s absences. Even still, Rossi stepped into a top-line center role on a team with little help on either of the top two lines, and he produced significantly better than in his 2023-24 season

    rossi 2023-24 player card athletic dom.png

    rossi 2024-25 player card athletic dom.png

    The only good-faith explanation to the Wild’s rumored intention to trade Rossi is that they think this season was an outlier. It actually explains five years at a $5 million AAV quite nicely. If Rossi was running unsustainably hot this season, and factoring in the team’s leverage during his next four seasons as an RFA, perhaps that offer is an acceptable starting point. 

    If that’s their logic, selling high on Rossi in a trade makes sense. 

    However, that’s an aggressive strategy if the goal is a Stanley Cup window. Not only are the Wild betting against their own asset, but they’re introducing the risk of an offer sheet. While they could be in line to acquire a first- and third-round pick in a Rossi offer sheet, those picks won’t align with their aspiration to open a championship window. 

    By the time those 2026 draft picks make significant contributions, Spurgeon and Brodin will be well past their primes. Paydays will be due for Danila Yurov, Zeev Buium, and David Jiricek (if those players pan out). They’ll need replacements for Joel Eriksson Ek, Mats Zuccarello, Ryan Hartman, and Jake Middleton. An offer sheet would essentially subtract Marco Rossi from any championship window and push that value into the next GM’s tenure. 

    In other words, if Guerin’s potential trade partners in a Rossi trade prefers to spend the offer sheet compensation, they can wait him out. If the Wild lose that game of chicken, they may have to kiss that Cup window goodbye. 

    Still, moving on from Rossi presents an opportunity. Packaging Rossi with another roster player or a prospect such as Liam Ohgren could open a serious two- or three-year window to chase a Stanley Cup. Packaging all three could reshape the entire roster. 

    Perhaps that’s the bottom line on Rossi’s story in Minnesota. He’s not part of a larger vision, and even the most creative short-term deals don’t leave enough cap space to realize that vision. 

    That still raises questions about Minnesota’s management over the past several seasons. Why bring in Judd Brackett to draft undersized producers like Rossi, Buium, and Riley Heidt if that doesn’t fit into management’s vision for a championship? 

    Credit Bill Guerin for making the pick and giving Rossi a chance, but what more could Rossi have realistically accomplished to stick around? 

    I’m not the first person to ask these questions. If Rossi reaches new heights in his prime as a second- or first-line center, or if the Wild continue to exit the playoffs early, they’ll be raised again. 

    On July 1, Marco Rossi will become eligible for an offer sheet. Four days before, all 32 NHL GMs will be together in Los Angeles for the 2025 draft. If Rossi isn’t extended or traded by the end of draft weekend, Guerin could find himself at the mercy of his 31 colleagues and Rossi’s agent. That would be a tangible failure. 

    Trading Rossi could become just as great a failure, but at least it allows Guerin to realize his vision for a championship-caliber roster. It could also create enough flexibility under the ’26-27 salary cap to keep that team together for more than one year. 

    The 2026-27 cap crunch won’t keep Minnesota from making the playoffs, but it’s the lens through which every move this offseason should be examined. It’s also the last obstacle between this franchise and a long championship window. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    If Rossi isn't traded for an equal player, or used as high leverage to get a better one, it is a complete waste.  If names start falling off the board, or people aren't interested in a trade, just keep the guy.

    The Wild have way too many holes behind Kap and Boldy scoring wise to say, "give us a first back."

    That first round pick coming back, could be anything, even a boat!

     

     

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Tough to envision a trade where we get a player that puts up equal points as Rossi that fits BGs vision of big, burly and scoring.  BG has often traded a player away for assets that contribute to a secondary trade.  I think this is more likely.  He trades away Rossi for draft picks and uses that for his secondary trade.   I would sure like to see BG hold on to some of that cash so the TDL can be fun.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Whenever I see more issues with the cap space all I can think is how do other teams do this, like Florida? Our biggest cost is the blue line. The Panthers D core make 7, 5.75. 2.5 1.15 and 850 k. The Wild at 8.5, 7.58, 6, 4.35, and 1.25.  Having guys like Ek and Boldy locked in at 5.25 and 7 currently and hopefully continues to look like a steal. While we constantly look at Moose and Harts at 4 each, and Trenin at 3.5 as being the issues, together they account for 11.5 for 3 spots and all fill a role of 3rd or 4th line. That together would get you a mid high end 1st or 2nd line guy with a few bucks left over. Yes losing those 3 would get you a Brady T cap space wise but still need to fill out a roster and have room for injuries.

    All that to say with Kap getting a raise, Gus probably getting a raise, is the back end where we need to start looking to get rid of guys? Some champion dropping Faber and his 8.5, though his projected value as a defender is over 8.5, especially with raising cap space. He is also young, plays a ton of minutes, been relatively healthy and lines up against top lines of other teams relatively effectively. Spurge has a 10 team no trade list, so might be able to make a move. Brodin is full NMC so he stays but Zucc has a 10 team nmc, so another option. 

    With the Rossi chatter seems there is a theme of having the hard convo's about needs and who should go. So lets take it a step further, Zucc and Spurge are not getting younger and account for almost 12 mil. Moose and Hartman aren't going anywhere due to NMC so Trenin can be added, Midds with 4.35 as well. This opens up spots for the young guys to back fill for cheap thusly opening spending room in FA. May not be popular but these dump the most cap space with minimal detriment to the team as a whole and running with 2 line of AHL players who may not be ready or may not preform. This will also allow younger guys to get a tryout and if they don't preform see if someone else will step up. Get an honest evaluation of the prospect pool.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, IllicitFive said:

    Spurge has a 10 team no trade list, so might be able to make a move. Brodin is full NMC so he stays

    Brodin NMC is over, he has no trade protection, which worries me. When out of the lineup, I'd say the Wild miss Brodin more than Spurgeon, and Brodin is younger. I wouldnt give him up, but can see it happening if the right situation were to arise, given his games played per season the last few years. If Chisholm is re-signed, watch for Brodin to be moved. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...