Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild Should Add Some Spice By Signing Matt Duchene


    Image courtesy of Jerome Miron-USA TODAY Sports
    Adam Overby

    With limited roster maneuverability and still hampered by an almost $15 million dead cap hit, the Minnesota Wild will have difficulty adding secondary scoring to next year's team. They possess one of the league's youngest, most dynamic cores led by the electrifying Kirill Kaprizov, a stifling defense anchored by Brock Faber -- two Calder trophy finalists -- and a pipeline of exciting prospects who will aggressively be making a push for roster spots next season. 

    However, one key ingredient remains missing: a proven, high-caliber scorer to bolster their secondary scoring and push them toward being legitimate contenders. Enter Matt Duchene, the veteran unrestricted free agent currently plying his trade for the Dallas Stars. Duchene could be a perfect fit for the Wild, propelling them toward a period of sustained success.

    While the Wild's young core is brimming with talent, they lack experience navigating the grueling playoffs and high-pressure situations. Duchene is a seasoned veteran with over 800 NHL games under his belt and a trip to the Stanley Cup Finals two years in a row. He will bring invaluable experience to a locker room that hasn’t gotten out of the first round since Two and a Half Men was still on the air.

    Duchene can mentor and guide the young players, fostering a winning mentality within the locker room. Whether on the same line or not, imagine someone as tested as Duchene sharing his playoff experience with Matt Boldy and Marco Rossi, helping them elevate their game to new heights in the postseason.

    The Wild's reliance on Kaprizov's offensive brilliance is a double-edged sword. Opposing teams can often focus their defensive efforts on shutting him down, leaving the rest of the offense stagnant. Duchene is a former No. 3 overall draft pick and a three-time 30-goal scorer (with a 43-goal season under John Hynes in Nashville, by the way). 

    By adding Duchene, Minnesota would divide opponents’ attention, forcing them to choose who to focus on in their game plan. A line featuring Duchene and Rossi or possibly Riley Heidt flanked by a talented winger like Boldy could become a nightmare for opposing defenses, spreading the scoring load and creating more offensive opportunities.

    Duchene possesses a versatile skill set and is comfortable playing center and wing. Duchene was a beast along the walls in the Stars series against the Edmonton Oilers. He can drive the play, create space, and find open teammates in pressure situations.  

     

    Duchene’s flexibility allows him to seamlessly fit into the Wild's lineup, potentially creating numerous scoring line combinations. He can play alongside Kaprizov on the top line, mentor Rossi at center, or provide a scoring boost on a second line with Liam Öhgren or Ryan Hartman. His adaptability gives Hynes valuable options to deploy Duchene depending on the matchup and team needs.

    Duchene, 33, is still at the tail end of his prime. He posted 25 goals and 40 assists for Dallas last year. His offensive prowess can translate into immediate results for the Wild, propelling them toward not just a spot in the postseason, but a higher seed in the playoffs. His experience and veteran leadership could be the difference in a series win.

    The Wild have a reputation for strong defensive systems since their inception and rarely gamble on players who don’t play a 200-foot game. Duchene has recently embraced a more defensively responsible role and thrives in a system that prioritizes both ends of the ice. He can contribute offensively without compromising the team's defensive structure. Duchene’s two-way play adds another dimension to Minnesota’s game, strengthening their roster in a league that increasingly values balanced teams.

    Acquiring Duchene wouldn't just be a hockey move but a savvy marketing decision. Fans are drawn to established stars, and Duchene's name recognition would generate excitement and boost ticket sales. Imagine the Xcel Energy Center erupting with "Duchene!" chants after a highlight-reel goal. 

    Duchene has the consistent scoring touch Ryan Hartman lacks and the creativity Marcus Johansen never had. He also has the board battle skills that could garner a ‘career year’ playing against the league's second-tier lines because of the attention Kaprizov and Boldy will command. He could become a fan favorite, inspiring young players across Minnesota and adding another layer of star power to the Wild's roster.

    While Duchene possesses significant upside, there are factors to consider. Duchene is reportedly willing to take a discount to stay with the Stars because he believes it's the most talented team he’s ever been on. 

    Because of that, not to mention several other teams vying for his services, Minnesota must offer a competitive contract to convince Duchene to wear a Wild sweater. They can present a strong case for their championship aspirations, creating a scenario where Duchene will have a legitimate shot at the Cup and offer more meaningful shifts. If Bill Guerin approached Duchene with a Joe Pavelski-type, three-year, $21 million deal, one would think he could be wearing a Wild sweater next year. 

    Ultimately, the benefits of acquiring Matt Duchene outweigh the potential drawbacks. His experience, offensive prowess, and versatility make him the missing piece for a Wild team hungry for a championship. Alongside Kaprizov and the Wild's talented prospects, Duchene could form a nucleus for a dynasty, captivating fans and bringing the Stanley Cup to Minnesota.

    The Wild are on the cusp of something special. Adding Matt Duchene would be one of the missing variables in the equation needed for the dawn of a new era of success for Minnesota hockey.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    what a horrible plan!!! sorry mate but it really is!

    have we not learned anything from Danny Heaters decline? maybe Thomas Vanek? Parise after few years here?

    Do we need another winger approaching a decline to drag down our team? and pay him 7 mil per? oh my WE DO NOT  

    YIKES - what is that variable that you are working off? 

    The Wild are on the cusp of something special. Adding Matt Duchene would be one of the missing variables in the equation needed for the dawn of a new era of success for Minnesota hockey.

    HOLD the parade! And please pass on Duchene. Shit i'd instead target Radulov, he is also an X Star, has two front teeth missing (always good) and is 37 years young! Mentor Rossi a bit and give him that edge too! 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    what a horrible plan!!! sorry mate but it really is!

    have we not learned anything from Danny Heaters decline? maybe Thomas Vanek? Parise after few years here?

    Do we need another winger approaching a decline to drag down our team? and pay him 7 mil per? oh my WE DO NOT  

    YIKES - what is that variable that you are working off? 

    The Wild are on the cusp of something special. Adding Matt Duchene would be one of the missing variables in the equation needed for the dawn of a new era of success for Minnesota hockey.

    HOLD the parade! And please pass on Duchene. Shit i'd instead target Radulov, he is also an X Star, has two front teeth missing (always good) and is 37 years young! Mentor Rossi a bit and give him that edge too! 

    Another truth bomb from ODC

    #yahyouknowme,whosdownwithODC

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I can only imagine the comments if Billy G gave a 34 year old Matt Duchene a multi-year deal with a m-NTC. 

    Honestly in the short-term he wouldn't be an awful pick up. He'd have an impact similar to Ryan O'Reilly with Nashville I think, if we could get him. Question is also the price. We've got $6M to play with, I think?

    Duchene likely eats up all that. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I've always liked Duchene's game. He had speed to burn and I had hoped we'd acquire him.....at 26. At 33, I'm wondering if that top gear can still get hit. Was Duchene successful under Heinzy? I don't think he really was.

    Adam, however, brought his A game, writing an article worthy of an Amway convention! This was a great sales job on the player while briefly mentioning the 33. His proposal would mean we would get Duchene for years 33, 34, 35. He'd make an impact if he wanted to play hard, but there have been years and teams he's played on where he hasn't.

    At $7m X 3, I'm thinking this isn't the deal or player we need. However, at 6'1" 210 he would suddenly become one of our larger players.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chisholm is really the only in house FA  we need to sign what 2 mill or so , im not sure what he will require  .   im guessing 2 atleast  .

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No thank you. Please find some younger up and comers with decent AAV and term. Sure we want to compete next year but 2025 is the year the gloves come off. If Wild Management needs to ice a long shot playoff team next year to appease the owner ( allegedly) fine. On the other hand if they really want to impress, wait a year, save some assets and then go all in. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    I can only imagine the comments if Billy G gave a 34 year old Matt Duchene a multi-year deal with a m-NTC. 

    Honestly in the short-term he wouldn't be an awful pick up. He'd have an impact similar to Ryan O'Reilly with Nashville I think, if we could get him. Question is also the price. We've got $6M to play with, I think?

    Duchene likely eats up all that. 

    I think the Duche only made like $3m last year.  Was that likely a discount to play on a deeper roster of the Stars, expecting a legit shot at the cup?

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, PiranhasOnIce said:

    I think the Duche only made like $3m last year.  Was that likely a discount to play on a deeper roster of the Stars, expecting a legit shot at the cup?

    100% 

    I mean if we could get him for that much he'd be a damn steal, but does he view us as being close to a Cup? Likely not this coming season. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Was Duchene successful under Heinzy? I don't think he really was.

    Depends on how you define success. He had the best point total(43+43=86), top goals and 2nd best assist season, of his career in his age 31 season with Hynes. He followed that up with a season he was on pace for 63 points in 80 games. Last season, he collected 65 points in 80 games.

    He had some injuries the first 2 seasons in Nashville and they were eliminated first round of the playoffs each year in Nashville, so you can argue the success was limited even though the points were good his last 2 years.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    An article from the Athletic has Eiserman dropping to us at 13.  I would risk it and take him there.  30-40 goals is 30-40 goals, all other game factors be damned.  If he hits big, it can be worth it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How about we draft a 5’9” 175lb winger, let him toil away in Iowa for 3-4 years while constantly claiming he is part of a top 5 prospect pipeline. After 4 years bring him up for 10 games played with the 4th line grinders and expect him to be the next Foligno. After an unsuccessful tryout in big leagues dump him for a 7th rounder. Rinse and repeat

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    49 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Depends on how you define success. He had the best point total(43+43=86), top goals and 2nd best assist season, of his career in his age 31 season with Hynes. He followed that up with a season he was on pace for 63 points in 80 games. Last season, he collected 65 points in 80 games.

    This is what I get for not looking anything up and going on a faded memory! Thanks for the stats, this changes things in my opinion a little more in favor of signing him. However, Adam's $7m X 3 suggestion, to me, is way off of market. What I'd like to do is go on a 1 year deal and see how that goes. He could see that a 1 year deal, inexpensive, makes sense because there's a lot more in the bank for the Wild the following year.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, Citizen Strife said:

    An article from the Athletic has Eiserman dropping to us at 13.  I would risk it and take him there.  30-40 goals is 30-40 goals, all other game factors be damned.  If he hits big, it can be worth it.

    CS, who was also available at 13? And who was reaching in the top 10?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, Dango said:

    Chisholm is really the only in house FA  we need to sign what 2 mill or so , im not sure what he will require  .   im guessing 2 atleast  .

    Chisholm should be getting something in the area of $1m and a 1-way deal. He has little to no leverage.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    100% 

    I mean if we could get him for that much he'd be a damn steal, but does he view us as being close to a Cup? Likely not this coming season. 

    But, like I said earlier, Duchene could see us that way and want to get in before the cap relief takes place. If he bets on himself and has a really good year, he could get a nice raise after the penalties are over. 

    Here is one benefit of Shooter extending the trio right before camp last year: Other players see this, and promises that were made either orally or handshake were honored. This happened in Goligoski's case too, even though it ended poorly. Same for Fleury. Veteran free agents have this in the back of their minds when they are deciding between offers. If the offer is competitive, this can be a tie breaker.

    I'm not saying I liked the extensions, but along with the negativity and underperformance of the contracts, there is the benefit of cost certainty and there is the benefit of the above. Silver lining? Maybe, but even Fenton had some bright moments proving that a broken clock is right twice a day.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

     

     

    16 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    CS, who was also available at 13? And who was reaching in the top 10?

    Sennecke in the top 10, and Helenius dropping to 14-16.

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Sennecke in the top 10, and Helenius dropping to 14-16.

    I was a big Kieffer Bellows supporter over Kunin. While neither have had remarkable careers (and I'd support the Iowa Wild going after Bellows), how does Eiserman compare with Bellows? I believe Bellows' downside was skating. Is Eiserman shot only, or can he keep up with play? I think 200' can be taught, but a blazing shot can't be.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    52 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I was a big Kieffer Bellows supporter over Kunin. While neither have had remarkable careers (and I'd support the Iowa Wild going after Bellows), how does Eiserman compare with Bellows? I believe Bellows' downside was skating. Is Eiserman shot only, or can he keep up with play? I think 200' can be taught, but a blazing shot can't be.

    The impression i got on Eiserman from the Athletic article was that it was not a lack of ability on his part playing a 200' two way game but a lack of desire. I inferred that he saw himself as a shooter and was content with that. Perhaps i was wrong. I have not seen him play.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Chisholm should be getting something in the area of $1m and a 1-way deal. He has little to no leverage.

    I was thinking he might get a little more to protect against an offer sheet from maybe Nashville if they wanted him back and they have 3- 2nd round picks  so a 2.4 offer they would lose 1  ,  or even just  1.4  they would lose a 3rd  .   but i dont really know all the rules  .

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Dango said:

    I was thinking he might get a little more to protect against an offer sheet from maybe Nashville if they wanted him back and they have 3- 2nd round picks  so a 2.4 offer they would lose 1  ,  or even just  1.4  they would lose a 3rd  .   but i dont really know all the rules  .

    If it were $2.4m, you'd let him go. If it were $1.4m you'd probably match it. 

    Capfriendly says that he is arbitration eligible as an RFA. He's got 9 pts. in 33 career games. I don't think he wins much in an arbitration hearing. It shouldn't be more than $1m. While he has arbitration rights, it did not say he was able to take an offersheet, but I think he likely could. 

    While you might say Nashville could make an offer, Winnipeg is where he came from. I simply don't think Chisholm gets much more than a QO from the Wild. This is not a player you burn bridges with in an offersheet.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    47 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    If it were $2.4m, you'd let him go. If it were $1.4m you'd probably match it. 

    Capfriendly says that he is arbitration eligible as an RFA. He's got 9 pts. in 33 career games. I don't think he wins much in an arbitration hearing. It shouldn't be more than $1m. While he has arbitration rights, it did not say he was able to take an offersheet, but I think he likely could. 

    While you might say Nashville could make an offer, Winnipeg is where he came from. I simply don't think Chisholm gets much more than a QO from the Wild. This is not a player you burn bridges with in an offersheet.

    My bad i forgot it was the Jets,  looks like they dont have a #2  ,  i was thinking we nabbed him in waivers and they'd want him back  possibly but without a 2nd rounder makes it more difficult  .  but then again im going off how i think that system works and not sure exactly if im even way off or not . 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...