Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild Must Think Bigger Than Brock Nelson


    Image courtesy of Ron Chenoy - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    The Minnesota Wild have made it no secret that they were interested in pending free agent Brock Nelson. People have identified the Warroad native as someone the Wild would love to give a homecoming to for some time. On some level, you get it. Nelson's a big, fast center who's scored 25 goals or more in every season (except for the 56-game COVID season) since 2017-18. 

    Now that we're T-minus-8 weeks until free agency -- the State of Hockey's promised Christmas Morning -- the rumors of the Wild and Nelson will continue to intensify unless Nelson re-signs with the Colorado Avalanche, or a team that trades for his rights. While fans may have been disappointed that the Avs swooped in to swipe Nelson while the Wild stood still at the deadline, it wound up being a best-case scenario.

    Instead of Minnesota paying through the nose for a Nelson rental, their biggest rival gave up top prospect Calum Ritchie and a first-round pick for his services. The Wild also avoided the Avs in Round 1 of the playoffs, so Colorado's deadline splash didn't affect them. Instead, Bill Guerin and Co. got to watch from afar as Nelson got thrust into a tough playoff matchup with the Dallas Stars.

    And you know they were watching closely, because Guerin declared his intentions to find centers at his end-of-season press conference. "I think [Joel Eriksson Ek] needs a little help. He's in a battle every single night; there's no easy nights for him, you know? So I think... we could create some help, there."

    It's hard to develop a better scenario for another team to test-drive Nelson. Dallas is here to stay as a force in the Central Division. Roope Hintz, Mikko Rantanen, Thomas Harley, and Wyatt Johnston are under 29 and still in their prime. So is Jake Oettinger, 26, who is a top goalie in the NHL. And of course, that doesn't even mention 25-year-olds Miro Heiskanen and Jason Robertson, who were both absent in Round 1. 

    So, how did Nelson do?

    Not great. The vaunted goal-scorer finished his series with zero goals and four assists on 12 shots on goal. Relative to his teammates, his possession numbers were negative at 5-on-5. And in big, big moments, he came up empty. He failed to block Mikko Rantanen's first goal, which sparked a comeback from down 2-0, and was rated as the Avs' worst player in Game 7. If you care about faceoffs (and you shouldn't), he went 44.1% in the dot for the series.

    You must be careful not to judge a player's worth by a single playoff series. Nelson has 27 goals and 54 points in 85 career playoff games, which basically matches his regular-season output on a per-game basis. He's scored two series-winning goals, a striking feather in his cap. He's no choke artist and has helped multiple New York Islanders teams make deep playoff runs.

    Still, Guerin's job now is to ensure the Wild get past the Stars, and the Colorado Avalanche, and the Winnipeg Jets, and the Vegas Golden Knights, and whatever Eastern Conference juggernaut shows up in the Stanley Cup Final. Targeting Nelson would be declaring that he's part of the secret sauce the Wild need to achieve that goal.

    Well, Nelson just showed he wasn't part of that secret sauce for Colorado. And that's on a team with Nathan MacKinnon, one of the best playoff performers of all time, Cale Makar, and more. 

    Why would it be better on the Wild, especially as Nelson (who turns 34 in October) enters his mid-30s?

    One way it might be is if Minnesota used Nelson as a third-line center. He had the third-most 5-on-5 ice time with the Avs in the playoffs, behind only MacKinnon and Martin Necas. It stands to reason that he'd be more effective lower in the lineup, slotting behind Eriksson Ek and Marco Rossi.

    But that's a huge part of the problem: If Nelson arrives in Minnesota, it's almost definitely not going to be a move that bolsters their center depth. Signing Nelson won't be additive; it'll be part of (potentially) the worst move in franchise history. 

    You may have noticed: The Wild look fairly done with Rossi for... reasons? With Rossi an RFA and needing a new contract, and the Wild showing no faith in him during the playoffs, it feels inevitable that the two sides will move on this offseason.

    If Nelson is a replacement for Rossi at center, it's a big downgrade, plain and simple. Is Nelson bigger and faster than Rossi? Absolutely. Does it translate to a greater on-ice impact? It does not.

    Screenshot 2025-05-06 at 5.12.53 PM.png

    That's no knock on Nelson, who is a solid offense-driving player. But Rossi's impact is simply too big to ignore... or at least, it should be. There are just five centers (500-plus faceoffs) who rate higher in Offensive and Defensive Goals Above Replacement (GAR) this season, per Evolving-Hockey. Here's the list:

    Meanwhile, Nelson doesn't replicate what Rossi does on either side of the ice. The same is also true for pending Florida Panthers UFA Sam Bennett, the other top center who's likely to change teams. 

    If the Wild have indeed burned their bridges with Rossi and need to replace him, the bar to do so is much, much higher than Nelson. That center replacement will have to be at the level of an Elias Pettersson, or another center who no one can argue isn't a legitimate No. 1. If the Wild donate Rossi to Goodwill, all they have to open on Christmas Morning is Nelson, that's a massive step back from the organization, whether the front office believes it or not.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    And here we go again.  Marco small and average, Nelson big and fast.

    I feel like one of those underpants gnomes in South Park.  Step 1: Get rid of asset.  Step 2: ??? Step 3: Profit?

    I'm still more hopeful the Wild go after Ehlers or Peterka.  They need to solve winger depth behind Kap and Boldy too.

    Marner's a pipedream.  Same money offer everywhere, and he'd come HERE?  Not gonna buy it.

     

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Like 6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Absolutely agree, if we're parting ways with Rossi, we need Brock Nelson or Boeser four years ago.  JT Miller, Trocheck, Barzal, or Dylan Larkin would be terrific, Elias P absolutely not, he's soft.  Rossi and Ohgren are likely trade fodder this offseason.  I would sell high on Freddie G after this season too, if we seek playoff performers, then he ain't it and we don't even use him for shootouts anymore.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sam Bennett would be a major win for bill, but sounds like he'd be very expensive.

    Looks more and more like Do You Smell What the Brock is Cookin' (34 yr old)

    Will he move the needle?  I'm thinking he'll be Ek 2.0 but better at draws.  Maybe a little more offense too. 

    We all pray that Yurov arrives and plays bottom six C thru 41 games and then gets promoted to top 6 C, pushing Hartmann to bottom six.

    I'm guessing the splash will be a grown ass top 6 winger added to the mix with Peter Brock-lington. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Too good to be true.  But I'd vote yes.

    Yeah you're probably right but it is the time of year we start bickering about who to pick up. I wonder what it would take to get him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Enforceror said:

    Yeah you're probably right but it is the time of year we start bickering about who to pick up. I wonder what it would take to get him.

    I'd guess Rossi + Ogzy wouldn't get it done.  Add Harty and/or Foligno and maybe they'd listen.  But pray that bill doesn't start dealing 2026/7 1st, 2nd and 3rd's.  If so, we can call this the beginning of his Fletcher era.

    If we could offload some of Beckett's dead wood defensive prospects along with any/all the names above I'd vote yes.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This will never happen, but if the Wild are looking to get rid of a smaller player in the top 6 (or top 9), I would be in favor of moving Zuccy.  He is older, isn’t suited for the 3rd line, etc.  He is best at being a distributor on the PP.  I think the top 4 wingers will be Kaprizov, Boldy, Ohgren (based on Hynes and GMBG’s comments this week) and hopefully an upgrade over Zuccy.  And yes, I know he is Kaprizov’s buddy.  Many hate on Rossi because of his size (and I really think he will be gone this summer), but I would much rather keep him based on his position, age, etc. than Zuccy if the Wild are trying to improve the top 6 (or top 9).

    If GMBG is stupid and stubborn enough to sign Brock Nelson, I at least hope it is for 3 years or less, no protection and no more than 7M per year.  Unfortunately, a player at his age is likely looking at his last bigger contract and will want security (protection clauses), more term and probably more money (might be his last big contract).

    Also, if players 5 years younger than Kaprizov don’t fit into his window, why would players 5 years older?

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Sam Bennett would be a major win for bill, but sounds like he'd be very expensive.

    Looks more and more like Do You Smell What the Brock is Cookin' (34 yr old)

    Will he move the needle?  I'm thinking he'll be Ek 2.0 but better at draws.  Maybe a little more offense too. 

    We all pray that Yurov arrives and plays bottom six C thru 41 games and then gets promoted to top 6 C, pushing Hartmann to bottom six.

    I'm guessing the splash will be a grown ass top 6 winger added to the mix with Peter Brock-lington. 

    Sam would be my ideal grab for center, his antics against the leafs aside. Can the Wild please try to make a better play than Brock, just look how he preformed with the Avs, not worth it. From the little I have seen from Yurov's game, he should slot in top 6, and keep Hartman, Moose, and TBD (maybe Ohgren if his end of year AHL surge translates to next year NHL levels) together on line 3. Top 6 of Ek, Boldy, Kap, Yurov, Zucc and maybe a signed center or wing depending where you want to slot in Yurov.

    Looking more at who is probably going to be on the team and where, Rossi might be a moveable piece. I know betting on Yurov or another young player stepping up is not great but, maybe I am starting to talk myself into him leaving or moving to wing? 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So just trying to have some fun figuring out what the wild have for lines for next year and what possible fits. So here is what I see as locks, or as close to locks as we can have, lines tbd but doing my best.

    Kap - Ek - Boldy

    (X) - Yurov - Zucc (Yurov shown as C and RW so I figured C was best fit)

    Moose - Hartman - Ohgren

    Trenin - Freddy - (X) (Might be Vinnie as he has another year left)

     

    Brodin - Faber

    Middleton - Spurge

    Zeev - Jiri

    Gus

    Wall

    I think Chisholm's time is done, lost favor towards the end of the year. Bogo maybe 7th D/Pross Box. Maybe an AHL player will surprise and show themselves ready knocking him off. For offense, guys like Haight, Heidt, Bankier or who knows may pop as well. Rossi may be signed and slide in somewhere. Perhaps they are able to package Freddy and prospects, picks, or another player to open up room and cap space to get a higher impact player back or open up space for a bigger FA move. If Rossi is also included that add that much more oomph to a trade possibility. With age of roster I think its time to invest younger who may be long term fits versus just recycling shorter term/aging rentals like Brock unless they are 1 year cheap deals because nobody else seems ready to grab a spot.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    47 minutes ago, Enforceror said:

    How about Trochek?

    Based on the rumor mill, it seems like the Rangers might more likely to want to move Zibanejad than Trocheck.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I could be okay with Bennett or Nelson as long as we aren't overpaying to get either one.  We can't get reckless with spending money on free agents just because most of the cap penalties are going away.  Out of the two I think Bennett would be the better choice, but if Nelson really wants to play here and will take a team-friendly deal to make it happen, that's still a win.

    If we do get one of those two, I could also be okay with packaging Rossi in a trade for a star winger. 

    Hartman can play center well enough.  And if Yurov does live up to the hype and pushes up the depth chart, then all the better.

    If Rossi is traded, I'd love to get Pastrnak, but I don't see that happening without also trading Boldy, Yurov, or both AND picks - and I think it would be stupid for the Wild to get rid of more than one of those three given that they will need them to fill out their team like Dallas has done with their younger players.  That's why they are in the position they are, and presenting it that way gives Kaprizov a huge reason to re-sign.

    Bennett or Nelson could help, but neither moves the needle a lot without another scoring winger to help too.  Marner would be nice, but I don't see that happening.  I also don't see Bennett happening either.  Nelson is likely who we end up with, and we won't get enough to make the inevitable Rossi trade a good one.  I'm hoping I'm wrong, but I'm not optimistic.  Had the cap stayed flat another year, I'd be thrilled since we could make moves that a lot of other teams would struggle to, but we won't get that advantage.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Agree that it cannot be Nelson and needs to be in the upper tier 

    I think you need to be willing to dangle not only Rossi 

    Rossi won’t get you Elias or any other top line players

    It will need to be either Zeev or Faber (Yurov is a mystery at this point, while Zeev is a #2 ranked prospect and has been on everyone’s radar for some time) 

    Remember - to get something, you need to pay (Rossi, Ohgren, Lambos - won’t be enough)

    would including Zeev or Faber in a package get you a Tkachuk? Probably

    In theory you can ship out Faber and Trenin for Tkachuk and still have $ for Marner 

    Bam

    tkachuk marner kap

    ek Boldy Yurov Rossi (who’d be a fool not to bet on himself and not take bridge deal)

    Edited by OldDutchChip
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just saw Kyrou might be available.  I’m would go after him very hard. I would give up Faber for Kyrou.  Go after Larkin as well. I would sign Brock Nelson as a third line center at 3x5.  Get rid of Faber, Spurgeon and Zucc, Rossi,  Ohgren and this can happen.  These lines are a cup winning lines

    boldy Larkin kap

    yurov Ek Kyrou

    Foligno Nelson Hartman

    Trenin Freddie Braz

     

    https://www.nhltraderumors.me/2025/05/nhl-trade-rumors-blues-star-jordan.html

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, WildNotMild said:

    If GMBG is stupid and stubborn enough to sign Brock Nelson, I at least hope it is for 3 years or less, no protection and no more than 7M per year.  Unfortunately, a player at his age is likely looking at his last bigger contract and will want security (protection clauses), more term and probably more money (might be his last big contract).

    If they sign Brock Nelson, it should easily be for less than $7M, more in the $5M range, but I think that might be possible for the home-town discount. He's definitely not going to be the player he was 2-4 years ago.

    I believe they may trade Rossi for a high-end wing rather than a C. Centers in the Wild organization include, JEE, Hartman, Rossi, Gaudreau, Yurov, Heidt, Bankier, Haight, Stramel, Kumpulainen. If they sign Brock Nelson, they may still be without top end centers, but will not be struggling for C depth.

    Obviously, you always want more, but what if Yurov is instantly a capable 2nd line C, with Zuccarello setting up him and the other wing?

    Trade Rossi for the high-end Johansson replacement and the Wild suddenly have 2 scoring lines. Maybe Brock Nelson plays between Foligno and Trenin? If not, maybe Yurov plays there.  Gaudreau can play in his 4th line C position, possibly with Hinostroza and any other low cost options that make the team.

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Its hard to see how they get materially better with the money they’ll have left after signing Kaprisov and the names I’m hearing thrown around.  They’ll still be weighed down by guys like Zucc and Hartman.  Spurgeon and Brodin aren’t getting any younger or healthier.  Middleton just isn’t a top pairing d man.  Ek and Kaprisov can’t seem to stay on the ice.

    I think they’ll have to bring in a goalie.  Gustavsson seems to play well every other year and Wallstadt doesn’t appear to be ready at the moment.  They can’t possibly go into the season with only those two options.

    It'll come down to some ELC guys taking a huge leap. If multiple of Ohgren, Yurov, Buium, Wallstadt don’t contribute in a big way, it’ll just be more of what we’ve seen.  Pretty good regular season team that doesn’t have the juice to get over the playoff hump.  Bringing in a Boeser, Nelson, etc. will just be another deadweight contract in a couple of years when the team should really be hitting their stride.

    Im not against making some moves and attempting to bring in some solid scoring depth.  But not if it means having another Zuccarelo type player eating top 6 minutes and a good percentage of the cap two or three years from now.

    The most logical thing in my mind is trading some of the prospect capital.  Not sure a guy like Kyrou is the answer, but I’d rather turn some of these prospects (that almost never turn out like you would hope) into a proven commodity.  That includes Ohgren, Buium, Yurov, Jiricek, Wallstadt, Heidt, etc.  If they’re not willing to part with 2 or 3 of them, in addition to draft capital for a bonafide to center, we’re stuck in a holding pattern.  I’m fine with that, if that’s the case, but they need to commit to that.  Don’t go sign Boeser or Nelson to a multi year deal.

     

     

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    I just saw Kyrou might be available.  I’m would go after him very hard. I would give up Faber for Kyrou.  Go after Larkin as well. I would sign Brock Nelson as a third line center at 3x5.  Get rid of Faber, Spurgeon and Zucc, Rossi,  Ohgren and this can happen.  These lines are a cup winning lines

    boldy Larkin kap

    yurov Ek Kyrou

    Foligno Nelson Hartman

    Trenin Freddie Braz

    Kyrou would be a good get. Wonder if we could pull it off without totally decimating the lineup though. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    If they sign Brock Nelson, it should easily be for less than $7M, more in the $5M range, but I think that might be possible for the home-town discount. He's definitely not going to be the player he was 2-4 years ago.

    I believe they may trade Rossi for a high-end wing rather than a C. Centers in the Wild organization include, JEE, Hartman, Rossi, Gaudreau, Yurov, Heidt, Bankier, Haight, Stramel, Kumpulainen. If they sign Brock Nelson, they may still be without top end centers, but will not be struggling for C depth.

    Obviously, you always want more, but what if Yurov is instantly a capable 2nd line C, with Zuccarello setting up him and the other wing?

    Trade Rossi for the high-end Johansson replacement and the Wild suddenly have 2 scoring lines. Maybe Brock Nelson plays between Foligno and Trenin? If not, maybe Yurov plays there.  Gaudreau can play in his 4th line C position, possibly with Hinostroza and any other low cost options that make the team.

     

    With the cap rising, it will be interesting to see what some of the FA deals are.  7M might be too much, but I would be surprised if he signs for 5M unless it is a longer term and clauses.

    The centers you listed are just center potential since most have never played in the NHL.  I am okay with trading Rossi, but in your proposal, the Wild would only have potentially 5 centers, including Gaudreau (not likely a center on a true contender), Hartman (who is probably a better winger) and that is counting on a major contribution from Yorov.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Are you moving Bogosian to 1st defensive pair there?

    With the lineup I listed and brodin, Middleton, jiricek, Zeev left as D and Gus and Wally as goalies that puts us at $80mm and then dead cap of $2mm.  So $82mm.  If salary cap is $95mm we then have $13mm more to go get the remaining D.  A guy like Rasmus Anderson would be a good fit.  Then find another.  This all is possible Billy just has to think outside the box.  Our biggest trade chip is Faber.  We need forwards way more than D.  We need 3 new top 6 type guys. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, Enforceror said:

    Kyrou would be a good get. Wonder if we could pull it off without totally decimating the lineup though. 

    We could get him by dealing Faber and prospect. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, Enforceror said:

    Kyrou would be a good get. Wonder if we could pull it off without totally decimating the lineup though.

    Seriously doubt the Blues would trade him to the Wild without decimating the Wild lineup--they'll want to come out far ahead in a trade inside the division. Larkin would probably be more likely, but he could easily cost more than Kyrou in assets--both have averaged over 70 points in the last 4 seasons. I imagine Detroit is going to be pushing to get into the playoffs, not reset--they have $21M in cap space, so they might try to land a key FA addition or two.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Did anyone else get a laugh from Tony’s title for this article?  All I could think is that it is a play on words while calling Nelson too small, as in Rossi is too small, so Nelson isn’t big enough.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

     

    Obviously, you always want more, but what if Yurov is instantly a capable 2nd line C, with Zuccarello setting up him and the other wing

     

    What do people see in Zucc?  He got absolutely cratered by Vegas.  He wasn't great in the regular season either.  He stacks up points on the PP and that has value but for how long will it outweigh his 5 on 5 liability.  He isn't going to get better next year either....

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...