Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • The Wild Must Start Preparing For An Inevitable Expansion Draft


    Image courtesy of Christopher Hanewinckel-USA TODAY Sports
    Kalisha Turnipseed

    The NHL is eyeing the possibility of adding another team in the upcoming couple of years, with reports suggesting potential expansion to cities. NHL commissioner Gary Bettman is not in a rush to expand, but there is notable interest from multiple locations, including Atlanta, Houston, Salt Lake City, and Quebec City. Studio analyst Kevin Weeks recently reported on the South Forsyth Project, which includes plans for an ice arena in suburban Atlanta. That indicates a growing interest in expanding the league again. 

    For Minnesota Wild general manager Bill Guerin, potential NHL expansion and his willingness to give veterans long-term contracts and trade protection clauses could present a significant challenge. Guerin has made a habit of offering veteran players multi-year contracts with clauses like Moderate No-Trade (M-NTC), No-Trade (NTC), and No-Move (NMC). However, this approach could hinder the development of younger talent because it offers a high level of protection to players whom emerging prospects might otherwise replace. 

    If Guerin continues to prioritize veterans, he risks making the same mistake the Wild made with Alex Tuch, where the focus on veterans hampers the team's flexibility and growth. Recently, Guerin has been responsible for signing and extending various players with contract protection, including Mats Zuccarello, Ryan Hartman, Freddy Gaudreau, Marcus Johansson, Marcus Foligno, Jonas Brodin, Jared Spurgeon, Alex Goligoski, and Marc-Andre Fleury. These signings and extensions show a trend that could limit the team's ability to bring in younger talent and adapt to potential changes. 

    Guerin's habit of prioritizing veteran players over developing prospects could lead the team into a difficult situation. Guerin could continue the trend even after Johansson, Goligoski, and Fleury’s contracts expire. He may extend similar trade protection clauses to other veterans. Zach Bogosian lives in Minnesota, and Guerin may give him an extension with trade protection, further limiting the team's flexibility. Could Jake Middleton receive trade protection in his next contract? Anything is possible with Guerin.

    If Guerin were to extend Middleton and Bogosian with NMCs, the team's defensive core would have four players holding no-move clauses and three forwards. Looking ahead, Joel Eriksson Ek is expected to have both an NMC and an M-NTC in the 2024-25 season because of his importance to the team. However, this pattern could restrict the team's ability to adapt to future changes and create room for emerging young talent. 

    Guerin's approach may need to shift to focus more on developing prospects, especially considering the arrival of promising young players like Danila Yurov, Marat Khusnutdinov, Liam Öhgren, Carson Lambos, and Jesper Wallstedt in the next couple of years, which avoids acquiring veteran forwards in the trade market. Instead, the Wild should prioritize young talent while eschewing the continuing trend of awarding extensive trade protection to veterans.

    To protect the team's prospects in an expansion draft, Guerin may stash players in Iowa to allow more development time, as he did successfully with Marco Rossi. That strategy would minimize the risk of exposing promising talent during the expansion draft. Another approach involves bringing up prospects within the next few years, capitalizing on the expansion draft rules, which protect first- to second-year professionals. Players like Yurov, Khusnutdinov, and Öhgren would be safe from exposure.

    Looking ahead to a potential 2025-26 expansion draft, players like Foligno, Zuccarello, and Eriksson Ek will have no-move clauses. Despite Zuccarello's pending free agency, his NMC gives him protection. Would he waive his clause in what could be his last season with the Wild? The Wild will probably extend Kirill Kaprizov before the next expansion draft. Therefore, he would already have an NMC in place, making him one of the four forwards protected.

    The Wild must use the 7-3-1 draft strategy to best protect its assets. That approach would allow Minnesota to shield promising young talent like Boldy and Rossi. The final slot becomes a choice between Hartman and Gaudreau, with Hartman's greater contributions positioning him as the preferred choice despite his M-NTC. In this case, the Wild would leave Gaudreau exposed.

    Brock Faber's stellar performance has cemented his status as one of the league's top defensemen under 23, positioning him as a player who deserves protection. While he may not be in contention for the Calder Trophy because of Connor Bedard, he undeniably has the potential to secure multiple Norris Trophies.

    However, the Wild will have to make a critical decision on whether to expose Jonas Brodin, particularly because his NMC status expires after the 2024-25 season. If emerging prospects or acquiring a high-caliber left-shooting defenseman to pair with Faber arise, it may make sense to consider exposing Brodin, especially given his susceptibility to injuries.

    Jared Spurgeon's M-NTC in the 2024-25 season presents a similar situation to Brodin, given his injury-prone history and the challenge of another NHL team absorbing his $7.575 million cap hit. Daemon Hunt's role on the roster, anticipated to be on the third pair, positions him as a player to protect. If the Wild extend Middleton, his durability and physical presence make a convincing case for him as the final protected player.

    Filip Gustavsson is a pending free agent, so deciding to protect or expose him becomes crucial. Given Jesper Wallstedt's exemption from the draft, the Wild may protect Gustavsson, aiming to put him and Wallstedt between the pipes. That strategy might lead to signing a more cost-effective goaltender to improve cap flexibility. 

    Prioritizing the protection of young talent over veterans is crucial for the Wild. The increasing distribution of NMCs poses a threat, leaving prospects like Boldy and Rossi vulnerable. Minnesota must be more discerning when handing out NMCs, or they risk repeating the Tuch mistake. With the possibility of NHL expansion, including the return of the Atlanta Thrashers, Guerin has an opportunity to retain a competitive roster. He’ll have to change his approach to NMCs to do so, though. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    I’m not mad if Bogo gets extended.  Why?  He seems like he’s on the back nine of his career right?  Correct.  But after watching Merrill and Goose play the position poorly AND bring zero physically I'll take Bogo as third pair D.  He’s got Alpha to spare and every team needs that

    Edited by Pewterschmidt
    • Like 7
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Good for Shaw.  He's the definition of not letting any issue stopping you from achieving goals.  It's also good that the Wild kept him on the roster after what has been happening.  

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Can’t wait to serve up a bunch of our young players and prospects because Bill “In Over My Head” Guerin signed a bunch of over 30 year olds to long extensions and NMC/NTC.

    • Like 3
    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Tuch was sacrificed to protect Dumba iirc they had a choice of who to protect and they chose poorly.  Rather than growing the number of teams the NHL should be devising ways of growing the fan base. Just putting a team in a city does not mean they will come. Been to Atlanta and failed once already. Get more games on network tv where people can see them. Don't play hockey in June. I won't even watch hockey when it's 70 degrees outside. Summer days are too few up here in the hinter land. 

    I have often wondered why Wisconsin does not have an NHL team. They are as ripe with hockey as Minnesota. They would draw from Minnesota, Chicago, Detroit, Columbus, and Winnipeg. I have never even heard them mentioned when it comes to expansion. Just flyover country as far as the NHL is concerned I guess. 

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A return of the Houston Aeros? Houston does have some hockey history as some may already know. Even Gordie Howe played in Houston for a time. 
    I’m not convinced hockey will work in Atlanta for the third time but maybe a third time’s the charm as they say.
    I thought I heard Kansas City was a potential spot at one point but didn’t see that mentioned here. I wonder if they’d return the Scouts or try a new brand of hockey.
    A Nordics return would be fun to see again.  I also thought I remembered hearing a group working to bring a team to Hamilton Ontario. 
    I know Portland OR probably isn’t in a position to have an NHL team but would love to see one there in concept. It’d be fun to see hockey in the PNW between Vancouver, Seattle and Portland as they’re all pretty driveable between the three cities. 
    I hate to see AZ lose their team but wish they’d figure that situation out by now. Losing a team never feels great to the fans. 
     

    Edited by Cole_Train
    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My son lives about 2 miles away from the proposed Atlanta/Alpharetta site. I drove by it back in the summer. There is nothing there and the infrastructure for getting in and out of the area isn't there either. I would suggest this is more than 2 years away. 

    Atlanta has a pretty good beer hockey league at least compared to Charlotte, but they don't even have an A team right now. The site is a good place outside of Atlanta and several miles NE of the i-285 loop. There are at least 3 rinks in the vicinity which doesn't sound like much in MN, but is pretty good in the South. 

    Personally, I like getting out of the city proper and being more on the outskirts of town. Possible logistic problem? The airport is on the SW side of the city so that's a pretty long bus ride to the arena area. Couple that with Atlanta traffic and it's brutal. It's about an hour away in moderate traffic. 

    The good news would be for Western Conference teams being able to plan a 5 game road trip with Atlanta, TBL, FL, Carolina, and Washington all together. For the Pacific teams, it gets extended going up past Philly and the NY area teams + Boston. Once again, though, the Eastern Conference gets travel priority, getting to stay in the Eastern time zone with very short travel. 

    If it were me, I would think that Bettman would make an announcement about it in a couple of years. I'd also think it would have to be more than 1 team, as we've got great schedule balance in the league right now. I'd prefer to have more divisional games and play one division in the other conference each year, if that's how it balances. 

    3 hours ago, MacGyver said:

    Get more games on network tv where people can see them. Don't play hockey in June.

    I like getting more games on network tv. Exposure is what this league needs, and it needs to be at least as high as the NBA. Disney has the rights to both, and could easily do more with the NHL on ABC.  

    I do disagree with the take on no hockey in June. My bet is that you'd watch if the Wild were on, but we haven't had that luck in 20 years. I do like hockey later because I believe the season should start later, sometime in November to let the World Series get done, and the NFL somewhat sort itself out. I think with games in October, you are missing revenue having to choose between the 3. I also think it's good to have the NBA finals done with before the SCFs. That last series should be broadcast heavily on network tv. 

    Schedule wise, if Bettman were to announce expansion in 2 years, it would take at least another 2 before a team would be drafted. So, you'd be looking at 4 years in the future. A lot can happen in 4 years, but one thing that would happen is that our 30 something designated players will have their contracts over, The Wall will need protection, and so will most of the draft picks from 2022 and earlier. We only have to lose 1 player, the key will be not pulling a Fletcher. Just know you are going to lose 1 good player, make it the best possible outcome. Losing an overperforming center (to his contract) with a sweetener of a non-eligible player was just plain dumb and firable. I thought Guerin had a much better plan with Seattle. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just looking into the prospects, in the K

    • Yurov and Firstov pick up apples

    In the A

    • Beckman scores
    • Lambos picks up an apple

    In other news, Lucchini and The Wall have been recalled for today's game. Hunt gets sent back down and Dewar heads to IR. Both callups are on an emergency basis. I think The Wall is backing up today as Fleury hasn't gone on IR. While I didn't believe that Hunt should be sent back down, he doesn't have to pass waivers and that's what happens to ELC guys. I imagine he'll be back up shortly, but he needs to play. I hope he rips up the A over the next couple of weeks!

    Why Lucchini over Beckman? Dewar is a C and Lucchini is too. While we could put Duhaime at C, which I think happened late in FL, having the extra C could be important. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, MacGyver said:

    Tuch was sacrificed to protect Dumba iirc they had a choice of who to protect and they chose poorly.  Rather than growing the number of teams the NHL should be devising ways of growing the fan base. Just putting a team in a city does not mean they will come. Been to Atlanta and failed once already. Get more games on network tv where people can see them. Don't play hockey in June. I won't even watch hockey when it's 70 degrees outside. Summer days are too few up here in the hinter land. 

    I have often wondered why Wisconsin does not have an NHL team. They are as ripe with hockey as Minnesota. They would draw from Minnesota, Chicago, Detroit, Columbus, and Winnipeg. I have never even heard them mentioned when it comes to expansion. Just flyover country as far as the NHL is concerned I guess. 

    Atlanta actually failed twice with the Thrashers and Flames. Also, Milwaukee is being kept out because of Blackhawk area rights.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    46 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    While I didn't believe that Hunt should be sent back down, he doesn't have to pass waivers and that's what happens to ELC guys. I imagine he'll be back up shortly, but he needs to play. I hope he rips up the A over the next couple of weeks!

    In his first game back in Iowa he got into a pretty good scrap and did well.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, MacGyver said:

    I have often wondered why Wisconsin does not have an NHL team. They are as ripe with hockey as Minnesota.

    I assumed that too, but I grew up in the Twin Cities and had 'season tickets' to the MN HS State Tourney. When I moved, I tuned into the WI equivalent and was floored by the lack of support. There were less fans than a regular season MN HS game - and most of those arenas don't fit many people. TBH, I don't remember when I've last tuned into WI Tourney, but nowhere near the numbers of MN.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The NHL already has 32 teams, why do they need more? If you add new teams, how would you balance the divisions? Would they go back to 3 divisions per conference, or would we get something like 9 team divisions?

    The current schedule is only 82 games, so more teams means fewer games between opponents, which is bad for competition. I also do not believe there is enough talent to warrant more teams. Fewer teams produces higher quality competition.

    Expansion will get the owners more money, but the on ice quality will suffer. 

    Best league sizes are 16, 24 or 32. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    My bet is that you'd watch if the Wild were on,

    You would lose. Summers I'm up at the lake. Evenings are spent around the fire or over at the neighbors. Don't have wifi up there so no streaming or cable. I might check my phone for scores but that's about it. That's how I like it.  Hockey should be finished by May. But because the NHL is a gate receipt driven entity they need lots of games and long drawn out playoffs. I have become a casual observer of Minnesota sports teams. I have taken all the emotion out of it sometime ago and it's given me a different perspective. Expansion is about the $$$ and not much more. The NHL gets their instant gratification up front from the city and the buyer of the team. If it fails 5 to 7 years down the road so what? They have showed us that's how it works a number of times already. 

    Good game last night. The Wild are going to fight their way into the playoffs. They will come in tongues dragging and limping across the line and get that 21st pick in the draft. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm sick of these expansion teams. No more for a while, geeze. We already lost a top-6 power forward and a top-4 quality defenseman who we haven't been able to replace. 

    At the very least, we should be friggin' exempt since as an expansion franchise we didn't get these same benefits!!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, Quebec1648 said:

    The NHL already has 32 teams, why do they need more? If you add new teams, how would you balance the divisions? Would they go back to 3 divisions per conference, or would we get something like 9 team divisions?

    The current schedule is only 82 games, so more teams means fewer games between opponents, which is bad for competition. I also do not believe there is enough talent to warrant more teams. Fewer teams produces higher quality competition.

    Expansion will get the owners more money, but the on ice quality will suffer. 

    Best league sizes are 16, 24 or 32. 

    Why do they need more? Simple answer: the new franchise fee goes directly into the owners pockets. I don't say that in a derogatory way. they invested their money in order to make more money. This is income that the owners do not have to share with the players as it is not hockey related revenue.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 1/21/2024 at 6:09 AM, MacGyver said:

    Get more games on network tv where people can see them.

    I sure wish they would listen to that sentence.  If people can't see the games they won't be fans.  Period.  They need to be nationally televised as often as possible.  There were a lot of open seats when we played at Florida.  That is awful.    

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Vegas has it figured out. They broadcast all their games over the air on Scripps tv network. I get Scripps over the air on my antenna but it's the Scripps news channel. So if you are in the Vegas area all you need is an antenna to get the Knights games. 

    Currently I don't have any cable or satellite. Dumped them a couple years ago. I got tired of playing the price increase game. I pay $20 a month for the Bally's app which is about all I'm willing to pay. The app can have buffering problems much of the time and is almost impossible to watch. I hope the rumor is true that Amazon Prime will be broadcasting games as soon as next year. I have had Prime for years and their streaming is pretty much flawless. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, MacGyver said:

    Vegas has it figured out. They broadcast all their games over the air on Scripps tv network. I get Scripps over the air on my antenna but it's the Scripps news channel. So if you are in the Vegas area all you need is an antenna to get the Knights games. 

    If Diamond goes under, I wonder what it would take for a local station to seize the opportunity and broadcast all games to be picked up via antenna? Could they generate enough commercial revenue? Would it also be streamed out of market?

    This is probably more important in non-traditional hockey markets. In our market, at least the Hornets make it easy to watch something else!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I believe it would work here in Minnesota. They already broadcast over the air high school and college games. So there must be advertising revenue to be had. The Wild would certainly draw advertisers to a network. From what I've read Diamond is already in bankruptcy and Amazon has already stepped in as a minority investor. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Couple things.

    I hate the term apple for assists.  Don’t know why.  But, it’s awful.  The hockey community can do better.

    Can we just move the Wild to the City awarded a team and start over here?  Give them everybody, from top to bottom.  The recent expansions teams have had more success in a couple of years than the entirety of Minnesota’s professional hockey history.  And we can redo the naming.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 1/21/2024 at 11:23 AM, WIWild said:

    I assumed that too, but I grew up in the Twin Cities and had 'season tickets' to the MN HS State Tourney. When I moved, I tuned into the WI equivalent and was floored by the lack of support. There were less fans than a regular season MN HS game - and most of those arenas don't fit many people. TBH, I don't remember when I've last tuned into WI Tourney, but nowhere near the numbers of MN.

    There are strong youth programs pumping out hockey players everywhere now.  Many places that didn’t have the game until recent decades and can’t grow ice naturally.

    California and Florida each have as many NHL players (12) as Wisconsin (13).  Most recent stats I could find.

    Many in Minnesota consider hockey a part of the culture.  Wisconsin isn’t in the same universe when it comes to its passion level for hockey vs. Minnesota.  And I’m not talking about Maple Grove and Edina.  You get into parts of northern MN, It’s life.  You skate before you can walk.

    A huge section of their population is basically a Chicago suburb.  Another big chunk is basically a Minneapolis/St. Paul suburb.  Fans in thos areas are already invested in thr Blackhawks or Wild.  A hockey team may work there, but I can’t imagine the NHL would want to crowd the market like that.  They’d get a better return where they’re the only show in town, so to speak.

    Edited by Beast
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...