Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild Must Get Cap-Savvy and Bring Brock Boeser Home


    Image courtesy of Bob Frid-Imagn Images
    Luke Sims

    Brock Boeser would look so sick in Forest Green, wouldn’t he? 

    Two years ago, I wrote a piece outlining why the Wild should bring the Burnsville native back to the State of Hockey. Ultimately, Minnesota traded for Gustav Nyquist and Marcus Johansson instead. 

    However, this year is different. This is the year when the pieces fall into place. The year Boeser starts scoring goals for a Minnesota team again. 

    I also recently wrote an article about how the Wild have no cap space or assets they should move at this year’s trade deadline.

    Throw that to the wind. This is Brock Boeser we are talking about! A soon-to-be 28-year-old right-handed goal-scoring maniac. Boeser is on pace for 30 goals this season after potting 40 the year prior. He’s got 35 points through 48 games this season on a Vancouver Canucks team starving for offense. 

    Boeser would complement Minnesota’s group of current and future forwards exceptionally well. With the cap rising and the Wild getting roughly $14 million in relief from the Zach Parise and Ryan Suter buyout penalties off the books, an extension looks increasingly more possible. 

    Minnesota also desperately needs a reliable right-shot power play option. Boeser is an anchor on Vancouver’s power play and would give the Wild a huge boost in power play production and the guys-who-are-righties department. 

    This is not fanboy hearsay, either.

    The odds of Boeser sticking around in Vancouver are becoming bleak. The Canucks have already traded J.T. Miller to the New York Rangers. Their other star center, Elias Petteson, could be on the move. There’s a ton of dysfunction and disarray surrounding the team in Vancouver at the moment, and the Wild should take advantage. 

    Vancouver recently agreed to a five-year, $22.5 million deal with goaltender Kevin Lankinen. They recently extended their trade deadline acquisition, Marcus Petterson, for six years, $33 million. 

    The Canucks seem to be locking up the players they want in their future. Yet, they haven’t extended Boeser. 

    The Wild are also in a unique situation: They have limited assets and draft capital this season, but they have the second-best prospect pool in the NHL. Therefore, they can start moving prospects for players ready to contribute immediately. 

    Kirill Kaprizov’s injury could also keep him out longer than the Wild’s team doctors initially expected. Maybe, just maybe, tell the start of the NHL playoffs. 

    The Wild could take a page from the Vegas Golden Knights’ Stanley Cup-winning playbook and put Kaprizov and his $9 million contract on long-term injured reserve (LTIR). Then, they could activate him once the playoffs begin, where his cap hit won’t count against the cap. Besides, Minnesota would be wise to allow Kapriov’s lingering injury to heal before the playoffs. 

    A potential trade could look something like this: 

    To Minnesota: Brock Boeser, 2026 sixth-round pick

    To Vancouver: Liam Ohgren, 2026 second-rounder, Ryan O’Rourke, Marcus Johansson, 2025 fifth 

    In Ohgren, the Canucks get a similar player to Boeser, a solid draft pick, and a veteran player they can flip for more at the deadline. They also get a rugged prospect who could play NHL games soon and needs a change of scenery and an additional fifth to sweeten the pot. 

    Trading for Boeser would deplete Minnesota’s roster, and losing Ohgren hurts, especially with no guarantee that Boeser would re-sign. Letting go of Ohgren at such a young age and with so much potential is hard. However, if you want to bring in a player like Boeser in his prime with no first-round pick, it will cost you. Wheeler ranked Ohgren as the Wild’s fifth-best prospect. 

    For comparison, Tyler Toffoli has bounced around the league but is a similar scoring forward to Boeser. Various trades with similar assets to what I just proposed worked for the teams that traded Toffoli in years past. 

    The Montreal Canadiens traded Toffoli to the Calgary Flames for a conditional first-rounder and a mid-level prospect in 2022. I’d argue the package I’ve presented is better for a slightly better player. 

    The Canucks may demand more for Boeser. In that case, the Wild could upgrade the 2026 second-rounder to a first. However, they’d have to be sure they will re-sign Boeser to get fair value. Otherwise, I'd probably decline the trade if the price is much more than I proposed. Maybe give up a prospect like David Spacek or Carson Lambos instead of or in addition to O’Rourke, but that’s it.

    Still, look at Minnesota’s lines with Boeser:

    Boeser - Marco Rossi - Kirill 

    Matt Boldy - Joel Eriksson Ek - Mats Zuccarello

    Marcus Foligno - Ryan Hartman - Yakov Trenin 

    Vinnie Hinostroza - Marat Khusnutdinov - Jakub Lauko 

    If seeing No. 6 Boeser jerseys inserted into that lineup doesn’t make you want to grab a seat at the Xcel Energy Center to cheer on this team in the playoffs, then I don’t know what will. 

    It’s time. Bill, pick up the phone.

    Bring Brock home. 

    All stats and data via Evolving Hockey, Hockey DB, and CapWages unless otherwise noted.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    28 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    Oh my.  Can’t wait for some of the comments on this one.  
     
     

    He doesn’t do anything creative, he’s simply a coattail rider.

     

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    no, stay away from him

    he is not the right piece to pair with kap and would eat away at the cash available to sign more impactful player

    imagine we get him, pay him 8MM to stick around and then loose out on a chance at Ranty. yeap smart! 

    but i guess if you want to make Freddy happy go for it. trade for boeser. then trade yurov for nelson. and celebrate the addition of three brocks ....that's about all there's going to be to celebrate here should that happen.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Didn't Tony write an article about both Brocks being kinda dreadful fits for the price they'd take to get here?  Pass.

    Agreed.  Not sure if it is true, but read he wants an extension of 8 years at $8 mil per.  If somehow they could get him for cheap , like really cheap, and don’t resign him then sure if there are no other options and it is one minute before the trade deadline. But not sure how that would even be possible.  Only way to afford him this year is for Kap to be out the rest of the year anyway. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am expecting a move by BG....he commented that Kirill will be out longer than expected basically placed a sign on the door "Open For Business".  The question becomes:  Is he looking for a player to run for the playoffs?  Or is he looking to adjust the roster for signings this summer?  I'm hoping for the latter of the two. Pass on Brock. 

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, Dango said:

    Also do you go for 1 Ranty at 11-14 mill or do you try for 2 guys at that price .  They wouldnt have to be brocks necessarily .   

    Saw a Skeet the other day that said the Canes offered Ranta a "nine-digit" contract but didn't really go into any other specifics and he hasn't accepted anything yet. I'm guessing it was an 8yr extension at $12.5/yr but that's just a guess. I just don't see money working out.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    39 minutes ago, Dango said:

    Also do you go for 1 Ranty at 11-14 mill or do you try for 2 guys at that price .  They wouldnt have to be brocks necessarily .   

    exactly. and should you tie money into one of Brocks, that's less money to spend on both Kap and Ranty (let's assume he is a target). I think you go hard after Ranty. 

    what IF we throw the most $ at him and Kap and get both for 15MM?

    i know that's a ton of money and would likely be the richest deal(s) out there BUT they would only be the richest deals until next star is signed. the prices and cap are going up significantly - i think we should jump on this.....having two studs on the books in their prime is not that bad of a move if you ask me. you offset that with Zeev, Yurov, Jiri, Marat, Lauko very light $ contracts plus already great Ek value, and 15 for Kap/Ranty is going to be fine. 

    This should help with Rossi's negotiation. His camp will realize that should they re-up for a bit less $ and term - his production will increase and so will his next contract. We may price ourselves out for his service in the long term but we may get Rossi for the next 3-4 years at a fair cost. 

    Realistic? Probably not. But i think it makes sense and sets us up for (a) keeping Kap and the core intact and (b) becoming a SC contender immediately and for the next 5 years. 

    Edited by OldDutchChip
    • Like 3
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, MNCountryLife said:

    I am expecting a move by BG....he commented that Kirill will be out longer than expected basically placed a sign on the door "Open For Business".  The question becomes:  Is he looking for a player to run for the playoffs?  Or is he looking to adjust the roster for signings this summer?  I'm hoping for the latter of the two. Pass on Brock. 

    Longer than expected could just mean the 6 week timeline instead of the 4 weeks they thought. (His injury has a 4-6 week timeline for recovery.)

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    exactly. and should you tie money into one of Brocks, that's less money to spend on both Kap and Ranty (let's assume he is a target). I think you go hard after Ranty. 

    what IF we throw the most $ at him and Kap and get both for 15MM?

    i know that's a ton of money and would likely be the richest deal(s) out there BUT they would only be the richest deals until next star is signed. the prices and cap are going up significantly - i think we should jump on this.....having two studs on the books in their prime is not that bad of a move if you ask me. you offset that with Zeev, Yurov, Jiri, Marat, Lauko very light $ contracts plus already great Ek value, and 15 for Kap/Ranty is going to be fine. 

    This should help with Rossi's negotiation. His camp will realize that should they re-up for a bit less $ and term - his production will increase and so will his next contract. We may price ourselves out for his service in the long term but we may get Rossi for the next 3-4 years at a fair cost. 

    Realistic? Probably not. But i think it makes sense and sets us up for (a) keeping Kap and the core intact and (b) becoming a SC contender immediately and for the next 5 years. 

    I did some math around our cap space next year, assuming all the young players that come in and getting no one signed at the deadline.  We would have around 14-16 mil, prior to signing Rossi.  Depends on his deal, but would not have to shed much (hartman) and maybe one more to make it work?  
     

     

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Brocks that is. I hope Guerin does refrain from much trading and let's get the Wild team we saw in the early weeks of the season. Healthy #97 especially. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here is the breakdown of our cap space for next year in case anyone is interested.  We currently have 16 players signed, 10 forwards, 5 Dmen, and 1 goalie, leaving us with $21,771,668 in space.  Our forwards are Kap, Boldy, Ek, Zucc, Hartman, Foligno, Trenin, Freddy G, Ohgren, and Vinny.  Our D is Faber, Spurge, Brodin, Midds and Bogo, and obviously Gus at goalie.

    The Wall is signed for $2.2M, leaving us with $19,551,668.  Assuming we have 13 forwards and 7 defensemen, we need to sign 3 more forwards and 2 D.  

    Assuming it is Jiricek at $918,333 and Zeev at roughly $1mil, that gets us down to $17,633,335.

    Three forward positions will most likely be Yurov at $1M?  Then they resign Khus for $1.5M?  Would leave us with $15,133,335.  Last player is Rossi, gonna say 7 since most are assuming a bridge or modified bridge or full contract of between 6 and 8.  Would leave us with $8,133,335 to play with.  The last available roster spot would be someone on a two-way contract.

    Would almost have to get rid of one or two contracts if they want to sign anyone as a forward.  I can't see them wanting to send Ohgren back to the or scratching him.  Unless they plan on starting Yurov there.  

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    Here is the breakdown of our cap space for next year in case anyone is interested.  We currently have 16 players signed, 10 forwards, 5 Dmen, and 1 goalie, leaving us with $21,771,668 in space.  Our forwards are Kap, Boldy, Ek, Zucc, Hartman, Foligno, Trenin, Freddy G, Ohgren, and Vinny.  Our D is Faber, Spurge, Brodin, Midds and Bogo, and obviously Gus at goalie.

    The Wall is signed for $2.2M, leaving us with $19,551,668.  Assuming we have 13 forwards and 7 defensemen, we need to sign 3 more forwards and 2 D.  

    Assuming it is Jiricek at $918,333 and Zeev at roughly $1mil, that gets us down to $17,633,335.

    Three forward positions will most likely be Yurov at $1M?  Then they resign Khus for $1.5M?  Would leave us with $15,133,335.  Last player is Rossi, gonna say 7 since most are assuming a bridge or modified bridge or full contract of between 6 and 8.  Would leave us with $8,133,335 to play with.  The last available roster spot would be someone on a two-way contract.

    Would almost have to get rid of one or two contracts if they want to sign anyone as a forward.  I can't see them wanting to send Ohgren back to the or scratching him.  Unless they plan on starting Yurov there.  

     

    Are you thinking both Lauko and Nojo do not get re-signed?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Enforceror said:

    Are you thinking both Lauko and Nojo do not get re-signed?

    Nojo better not be on this team next year at any cost.  Lauko... hell yeah.  

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Enforceror said:

    Are you thinking both Lauko and Nojo do not get re-signed?

    Yes, basing my thought on that. Can't see a world where Nojo is re-signed.  If they had not picked up Vinny, I would have figured they would have re-signed Lauko.  But since Vinny is signed for $775,000, I just don't see the room for Lauko.  If they do re-sign him, then I would bet that either Hartman and or Trenin's day would be numbered.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    Yes, basing my thought on that. Can't see a world where Nojo is re-signed.  If they had not picked up Vinny, I would have figured they would have re-signed Lauko.  But since Vinny is signed for $775,000, I just don't see the room for Lauko.  If they do re-sign him, then I would bet that either Hartman and or Trenin's day would be numbered.

    There is also our captain (and his 7.5MM) that we can ship out! 

     

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    • Confused 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...