Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild Must Develop A Joel Eriksson Ek Contingency Plan


    Image courtesy of Robert Edwards-Imagn Images
    Kalisha Turnipseed

    It's time to worry about Minnesota Wild center Joel Eriksson Ek's health. Eriksson Ek is on pace for 43 points in 68 games. He plays a demanding role as the team's garbage man in grueling matchups. Opponents constantly cross-check him in the back when he's in front of their net. 

    Eriksson Ek has never played 82 games in a season. However, Eriksson Eik played all 56 games during the 2020-21 COVID-19 season. Imagine if there wasn't a shortened season. Would Eriksson Ek have played all 82 games? 

    His injury history shows Eriksson Ek has mostly dealt with lower-body injuries

    The Wild must find a new role for Eriksson Ek

    Eriksson Ek's availability is the most important factor. He has played more than 18 minutes a night since the 2020-21 season. The Wild have been overusing Eriksson Ek and need a backup plan to reduce his minutes and cover for him when he gets injured. He plays so well in a crucial role when healthy that everyone can take him for granted. 

    What if the Wild kept Eriksson Ek's time on ice between 15 and 17 minutes? Would he have been healthier and more productive?  John Hynes should regulate Eriksson Ek’s minutes until his contract ends after the 2028-29 season. 

    The Wild should consider reuniting Eriksson Ek with Kirill Kaprizov and Matt Boldy. That’s how they got the best out of Eriksson Ek, and he completed both Kaprizov and Boldy. Minnesota needs Eriksson Ek’s production to make a playoff run. Keeping him healthy and productive is vital.

    Below are the Wild’s options for an Eriksson Ek contingency plan.

    1. Trade for Sam Bennett and extend him for no more than five years 

    Bennett may not be a trade option because the Florida Panthers are on track to make the playoffs and defend their championship. However, Bennett is a rental player in Florida, so what if the Panthers were willing to listen to offers? Should the Wild get involved in trading for Bennett? The Dallas Stars and Colorado Avalanche are reportedly interested.

    The Panthers forward is 28 and plays a ruthless, agitating game that opponents can't stand. He's a better agitating force than Ryan Hartman

    Bennett may prevent opponents from targeting the Wild’s star players. He is a great physical factor against opposing stars. Bennett is the kind of player the Wild need if they face heavy teams like the Winnipeg Jets, Vegas Golden Knights, or Los Angeles Kings in a playoff round. 

    Is this where the Wild can move someone like Yakov Trenin and possibly Liam Ohgren

    The Wild just signed Trenin for four years, and it's unlikely they'll move him right after. Trenin and Hynes have ties. Trenin played for the Nashville Predators from 2019-20 to 2023-24, and Hynes coached in Nashville from 2019-20 to 2022-23. However, Bennett's production is a meaningful upgrade over Trenin's. If anything, Bill Guerin must consider improving his secondary scoring depth. 

    The Panthers are closer to contending than the Wild. Their championship window is already open. They signed Anton Lundell long-term to take over the second-line center role behind Aleksander Barkov. He will likely replace Bennett's production. 

    The Panthers can also use Sam Reinhart as a center, allowing them to have Barkov, Reinhart, and Lundell as its three centers down the middle. Trenin will likely take over the fourth-line center spot or play the wing. 

    Trenin is a versatile, bottom-six forward with physicality and grit. The Wild signed him to a $3.5 million cap hit. Trading for him would allow the Panthers to manage their cap situation. The Wild would have to figure out how to extend Bennett while extending Kaprizov, Marco Rossi, and Filip Gustavsson. Doing so will be challenging, especially with Brock Faber's $8.5 million cap hit starting in 2025-26. 

    Bennett has also proven he can score in the playoffs. Ohgren’s not ready for a top-six role yet. However, he could play an immediate top-nine or middle-six role for the Panthers, supplementing Trenin’s lack of offense. Rossi can move to wing, and Bennett can center Rossi and Danila Yurov. Once Marcus Johansson gets healthy, he'll join Hartman and Zuccarello on the third line, creating three scoring lines for the playoffs. 

    2. Trade for Brock Nelson and sign him to a bridge deal 

    New York Islanders center Brock Nelson is 33 years old, and Wild fans have heard enough of bringing in players pushing 35 years old. However, what if putting Nelson into a sheltered role brings out the best in Eriksson Ek, where he's back at producing 60-plus points in a season? Would it matter if Nelson's production regresses to 40-plus points but still registers 20-plus goals? 

    Nelson had three straight 20-goal seasons from 2014-15 to 2016-17, averaging 15 minutes a night as New York’s third-line center. The Wild should aim to play Nelson for 14 minutes but no more than 15 minutes a night. The rest of the minutes will go to Rossi, who's made the most of his opportunities. Freddy Gaudreau can also take on backing up Nelson, playing checking minutes that will round out 13 minutes a night or less. 

    The Wild should extend Nelson for two to three years. Nelson grew up in Warroad and would be playing out the end of his career where it all started. He'll serve as a fan favorite and someone who will score crucial goals. 

    Signing Nelson sets him up as a stopgap as more prospects develop. The Wild may have to part ways with Ohgren, Heidt, Haight, or perhaps Charlie Stramel. Could the Wild also interest the Islanders in future draft picks plus a lower-rated prospect, much like the Wild used to trade for David Jiricek? The Islanders will likely ask for any of these assets if they're moving on from Nelson, who plays top-six minutes for them. 

    3. Sign Charlie Stramel to an Entry-Level Contract (ELC) 

    This option is the least likely. Stramel is thriving in his junior year at Michigan State. He should spend his senior year in East Lansing, allowing head coach Adam Nightingale, Stramel's US National Development Program coach, to develop his game further. Staying for another season sets up Stramel to sign his ELC with the Wild later next season. 

    Stramel may start in Iowa because Minnesota has a few players blocking him. Hartman, Marcus Foligno, Gaudreau, and Trenin will be on the team until Hartman departs in 2027-28. Bringing in Stramel earlier than expected means Guerin will either bring back Marat Khusnutdinov or Jakub Lauko, who will be Restricted Free Agents (RFAs). 

    Stramel will turn 21 in October. Eriksson Ek played his first full season at the same age. Bringing in Stramel will bring size and speed to the bottom six. Stramel can take some of the load off of Eriksson Ek. 

    The Wild need to find a better plan for Eriksson Ek to stay healthy. Can the Wild land Bennett? Could the Wild use Nelson as a stop-gap option? Is Stramel NHL ready? The Wild placed Kaprizov on Long-Term Injured Reserve (LTIR), with more cap room for an active deadline. Which option is the most suitable, or should they do nothing and keep the core intact? 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Thanks 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Bennett will cost a lot to pry from Florida, right?  Besides he will be 2X more than Nelson to extend. 

    Nelson trade for maybe just a 2nd or 3rd?  Bridge deal value at around 3 years x 4M?

    Maybe if it's that cheap.  I could be way off.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, OldDutchChip said:

    I'm not a fan of Nelson but....

    This may not be a popular opinion, but maybe look to snag Miller from Canucks for Ek....

     

     

    Just saw something about Russo mentioning Rossi for Miller. Locker room issues would be my fear as I think that our current locker room is a strength. Also Miller ain't a spring chicken. Personally I'd rather keep Rossi and get a Mojo replacement who has some FU and scoring ability but that'll be expensive....sigh

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    26 minutes ago, Enforceror said:

    Just saw something about Russo mentioning Rossi for Miller. Locker room issues would be my fear as I think that our current locker room is a strength. Also Miller ain't a spring chicken. Personally I'd rather keep Rossi and get a Mojo replacement who has some FU and scoring ability but that'll be expensive....sigh

    Miller is a stud though. I don't know, i think if there is a possibility - Billy jumps on it. That opens up your window right NOW. and gives Kap a reason to be here 3-4 years. 

    I think Miller is also a rock in FO% which would be helpful with PK.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    38 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    Miller is a stud though. I don't know, i think if there is a possibility - Billy jumps on it. That opens up your window right NOW. and gives Kap a reason to be here 3-4 years. 

    I think Miller is also a rock in FO% which would be helpful with PK.

    Isn’t Miller the guy with all those personal problems or whatever? No thanks..

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, Sam said:

    Isn’t Miller the guy with all those personal problems or whatever? No thanks..

    That's what I was thinking. I watch a lot of the player interviews and they always talk about how tight knit they are. I honestly think that's part of the key to their success.

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, Sam said:

    Isn’t Miller the guy with all those personal problems or whatever? No thanks..

    That seems to be one of Billy's core philosophies is a good locker room. I mean why do we think Suter & Parise got bought out pretty early in Billy's tenure? Would they still be serviceable players? Yeah probably but Suter especially was known to be toxic and I'm sure Billy has been in a few of those types of rooms in his career. That's one of the advantages of a former very successful player as a GM. He's been through it all.

    Makes buy-in a whole lot easier when everyone is on the same page and playing for each other. Like Rossi said it's like a "brotherhood". 

    • Like 7
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    36 minutes ago, M_Nels said:

    That seems to be one of Billy's core philosophies is a good locker room. I mean why do we think Suter & Parise got bought out pretty early in Billy's tenure? Would they still be serviceable players? Yeah probably but Suter especially was known to be toxic and I'm sure Billy has been in a few of those types of rooms in his career. That's one of the advantages of a former very successful player as a GM. He's been through it all.

    Makes buy-in a whole lot easier when everyone is on the same page and playing for each other. Like Rossi said it's like a "brotherhood". 

    might be just a clash of ego between miller and pettersen that is over blown?

    but i think i'd jump on Ek for Miller trade. Miller is amazing. Yeah he is aging, but maybe he'll age more gracefully than ZP.....💩 Very tempting.  

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    J.T. Miller has an $8M cap hit through the 29-30 season, when he'll be 37 years old. I don't know that the Wild want him after age 35 and I'm not sure how they would fit him into their cap. Good player who might not be the right fit.

    Possible the Wild trade for JT in the summer, but I can't see an in-season trade.

    Also, Erikson Ek blocks a lot of shots and sometimes hard shots break bones. I don't know that he's overly injury prone and he's one of the most well conditioned players on the ice. He's fine.

    • Like 6
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    38 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    J.T. Miller has an $8M cap hit through the 29-30 season, when he'll be 37 years old. I don't know that the Wild want him after age 35 and I'm not sure how they would fit him into their cap. Good player who might not be the right fit.

    Possible the Wild trade for JT in the summer, but I can't see an in-season trade.

    Also, Erikson Ek blocks a lot of shots and sometimes hard shots break bones. I don't know that he's overly injury prone and he's one of the most well conditioned players on the ice. He's fine.

    Sure, the hit is going to be a bit much towards the later years as he ages, but i don;t think he hits the drop off for 3-4 years, and remember the cap will go up so it will be easier to digest. And this is a move for the now. Reality - Miller is an elite talent. He plays everywhere on the ice, is great at FO, and coming off 3 years of superstar play. His numbers are a down, but i don't buy that he is cooked or lost his way. 

    If traded for - he would legitimize Wild immediately as a threat and more importantly gives Kaprizov another superstar, while taking a bit of pressure off Boldy and Rossi. 

    If you can pull it off, you do it. The salary is not that much more than Ek, so you can work around that. L1 of Kap/Zuccy/Miller would be something....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Eriksson Ek has missed no more than 5 regular season games in the 4 years prior to this one. Is it more common for players to reach 82 games or miss a few? He's one of the guys I'd be least worried about.

    It certainly would be nice to have more 2-way centers like JEE. Stramel is probably at least 2 years away from being useful in the NHL as a 3rd/4th liner.

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If we are that worried about Ek's health pull him off the PK.   Knut, Foligno, Trenin and Lauko have been pretty good PK players and it keeps our top 6 healthier when not blocking shots. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    the hit is going to be a bit much towards the later years as he ages, but i don;t think he hits the drop off for 3-4 years

    Ahhh why do I feel like I’m in an old Arnold S. Movie? Total Recall. Didn’t we literally just try this approach for over a decade? 13 years maybe half of which felt like being on the Titanic. Is JT Miller a lifeboat or soon to become anchor? I’m not sure if the Kaptain wants to go down with that ship. Do I want to win now? Absolutely. I don’t think trading Ek away for JT is going to make it happen. To a certain degree this team has been built around Ek. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Burnt Toast said:

    Ahhh why do I feel like I’m in an old Arnold S. Movie? Total Recall. Didn’t we literally just try this approach for over a decade? 13 years maybe half of which felt like being on the Titanic. Is JT Miller a lifeboat or soon to become anchor? I’m not sure if the Kaptain wants to go down with that ship. Do I want to win now? Absolutely. I don’t think trading Ek away for JT is going to make it happen. To a certain degree this team has been built around Ek. 

    I think Ek may not have long left, so he may become an anchor soon (speaking of his accumulating injuries - just a reality with the way he plays, how much he plays through those injuries...) but i think it's at least a discussion point. these type of players do not become available all the time. But i did acknowledge that it may age as ZP in one of the posts. somewhere haha

    also - greaaat movie

     

     

    spacer.png

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    52 minutes ago, MNCountryLife said:

    If we are that worried about Ek's health pull him off the PK.   Knut, Foligno, Trenin and Lauko have been pretty good PK players and it keeps our top 6 healthier when not blocking shots. 

    This is a great point and makes too much sense not to do.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 hours ago, Will D. Ness said:

    Nelson trade for maybe just a 2nd or 3rd?  Bridge deal value at around 3 years x 4M?

    Maybe if it's that cheap.  I could be way off.

    Nelson for maybe a 3rd in a later draft. And a bridge deal needs to be under $3m. His cap hit is $6m this year but his actual salary is $4m. This would be a good team for him to come to, but he'll probably get trade protection and have to give a serious hometown discount. I like Nelson for what he can provide, but he's like Zuccy and starting to wind it down. Plus I don't really like trading with Lou. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Looks like I caught up to the Ek-Miller discussion. What I don't like about trading Ek is that he does so much dirty work while sacrificing points. I do not believe this would be a smart move. Ek is also on one of the team friendlier deals right now when we need the cap break. 

    I'm still not sold on Miller as a superstar, but he'd probably excel in a top line role with Kaprizov and Zuccarello. 7 years is a long contract. I still think I'd rather have Pettersson. Now, if we're working something out with Spurgy instead, I'd be open to listen. Rumors I've read they're looking for a top 4 defender and Spurgy fits that mold. Do we then put our full faith in Jiricek?

    But, it is true that these opportunities do not come up often. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Nelson for maybe a 3rd in a later draft. And a bridge deal needs to be under $3m. His cap hit is $6m this year but his actual salary is $4m. This would be a good team for him to come to, but he'll probably get trade protection and have to give a serious hometown discount. I like Nelson for what he can provide, but he's like Zuccy and starting to wind it down. Plus I don't really like trading with Lou. 

    Not a bad price for a depth C.  I like him with Trenin and Foligno.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Looks like I caught up to the Ek-Miller discussion. What I don't like about trading Ek is that he does so much dirty work while sacrificing points. I do not believe this would be a smart move. Ek is also on one of the team friendlier deals right now when we need the cap break. 

    I'm still not sold on Miller as a superstar, but he'd probably excel in a top line role with Kaprizov and Zuccarello. 7 years is a long contract. I still think I'd rather have Pettersson. Now, if we're working something out with Spurgy instead, I'd be open to listen. Rumors I've read they're looking for a top 4 defender and Spurgy fits that mold. Do we then put our full faith in Jiricek?

    But, it is true that these opportunities do not come up often. 

    I may not know a lot about the Wild and hockey in general, but Ek is like the most irreplaceable and hardest working guys on the team. It’s kinda dumb to even entertain the idea of trading him for a player who may have a little more scoring ability, but emotional issues that will probably hurt this team.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We are not going to see Ek or Spurgeon get moved. Spurgeon to LTIR maybe if he gets injured again but certainly not moved. This franchise has never operated in that way where they sell off players who have been faces of the franchise for years. They held onto Koivu like grim death.  Billy had to be the guy to come in and shoot Ol Yeller. But he isn't going to do it Ek or Spurgeon. 

    Moving either of those two would be disruptive to the team at this point. I mean really guys this team is playing pretty damn well and through a lot of long term injuries to our top players. Lets let this thing roll and try not to shoot ourselves in the foot with blowing up the chemistry. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, MacGyver said:

    This franchise has never operated in that way where they sell off players who have been faces of the franchise for years. They held onto Koivu like grim death.

    Yet, the 2 locals Billy came in and bought out. This may not have been the way things have happened in the past, but, I think Guerin is more interested in contending shortly. He planned for this by wording his contracts in a certain way. NMCs up front with M-NTCs in the back. 

    I think you're right about Ek, he's 28 and gave a huge hometown discount. His play is aggressive and he leaves everything he's got out on the ice. However, Spurgy is up there and his injury sheet is growing. Since the kids are about ready, he may get traded off or offered the chance to retire. I think he'd make a great defensive coordinator inside the organization, but I think his playing days here may be numbered. I wouldn't mind in the least if he did call it a career, but I really think he wants the 1,000 game legacy. If he did retire and move into management, I think Guerin could find a spot for him and make up the rest of the contract. In my book, Spurgeon has earned every penny of that contract. 

     

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...