Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild May Regret Not Playing the Long Game With Marco Rossi


    Image courtesy of Robert Edwards-Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    In the end, all it took to bridge the seemingly unbridgable gap between the Minnesota Wild and Marco Rossi was... another bridge. After neither side made ground on a long-term deal, the two parties kicked the can down the road for three years, with a contract that will carry a $5 million cap hit.

    Both sides get to save a bit of face here. Bill Guerin and the Wild secured the sort of low-cost "second contract" that's rapidly becoming extinct in the NHL. Meanwhile, Rossi got the AAV the Wild initially wanted for a five-year deal, but without having to sell off any of his UFA years.

    But for the short term, there's not much doubt who gets the better end of the deal, and that's the team. $5 million per season actually comes beneath the $5.26 million projection that Evolving-Hockey's contract model estimated for a three-year term at the beginning of the offseason. Heck, just yesterday, the Chicago Blackhawks paid Frank Nazar III for seven years at a $6.60 million cap hit, and Nazar has just 27 career points!

    Beyond the raw numbers and comparables, Rossi's cap hit of $5 million, rather than, say, $7 million, has practical benefits for the Wild this season. They've now got their full 23-man roster locked in, with $4.41 million in cap space. As things stand, the Carolina Hurricanes and New Jersey Devils are the only teams that made the postseason last year that have more cap space than Minnesota.

    After sitting on the sidelines at the trade deadline these past few years, the Wild are finally poised to make a splash. It'd still be possible to swing a big trade had Rossi made $7 million, but the Wild undeniably have more flexibility with him at a $5 million price point.

    These short-term benefits make the "second contract" appealing to GMs like Guerin. To refresh your memory on the old economics of the NHL, the "second contract" was in its heyday during the first decade or so of the salary cap era. Teams had players under control coming off their entry-level contracts, and the threat of offer sheets was mild. So teams would give their star players a bump on a short-term deal that walked their big payday closer to free agency, giving the team some time to stagger the financial hit.

    The "second contract" isn't dead yet, but those are largely reserved for mid-tier players, not stars. For example, Alex Laferriere (19 goals, 42 points last season), got a three-year, $4.1 AAV deal earlier this month. But for star-caliber players, it's almost gone, even in Minnesota. Kirill Kaprizov got his $9 million AAV after one season. Matt "49 Sheets" Boldy got his payday coming off his ELC, as did Brock Faber following his rookie season.

    But in aggressively pursuing the "second contract" for Rossi, Guerin ignored one critical fact: The "second contract" kind of sucks for star players. 

    Teams don't give these massive paydays out of the goodness of their hearts. They're trying to get a deal. They're buying high now, but in the long run, they believe that they're paying a player as little as possible for as long as possible.

    That's why we've seen an explosion in cap hits for players who haven't shown to be as good as Rossi. There is undeniably sticker shock when, say, Gabriel Vilardi gets a $7.5 million cap hit, or Matt Coronato gets $6.5 million, or Logan Stankoven gets $6 million. But as Rossi's contract expires, the league salary cap will sit at $113.5 million. Over the long haul, those prices will become normal, and probably even bargains.

    The same would likely have played out for Rossi. Had he gotten Boldy's seven-year, $49 million deal, he would have made $7.3% of the salary cap for next season. By Year 3 of the contract, $7 million would already be just 6.1% of the cap, the equivalent of $5.9 million today. There'd be four more years of growth following that!

    But now, at the end of those three years, there is going to be a payday for Rossi. Let's assume that Rossi's production stays relatively steady over that time, with no growth. He's a 60-point center. That's already worth about $7.7 million (8.1% of the 2025-26 cap) on the open market, according to Dom Luszczyszyn's Player Cards

    Assuming the cap jumps $6.5 million in 2028-29 to the $120 million range, we can estimate that Rossi's market value will be approximately $9.68 million. And that's if the growth we've seen over the last two seasons levels off, or if the cap increases start to slow. 

    Had Minnesota opted to go long-term with Rossi, his price point would have remained at $7 million, which, under a $120 million cap hit, would be equivalent to around $5.6 million today. Remember, they'd have also bought three UFA years with that salary!

    The Wild have gotten a lot of mileage out of their limited dollars, largely due to being proactive and securing key players on deals that age well. Underpaying Kaprizov, Boldy, and Joel Eriksson Ek made a team with $15 million of dead money a playoff squad last season. That's the power of cheap deals, and Minnesota still has five years remaining of Boldy at $7 million, and four seasons of Eriksson Ek at $5.25 million. 

    Guerin had an opportunity to add Rossi to that collection of eventual bargains, but either prioritized maximizing flexibility for the next three seasons or didn't believe in Rossi enough to bet on a windfall of future savings. It might look great for these next three seasons, but the bill is going to come due eventually, and the Wild might wish they'd have played the long game when 2028 rolls around.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 4

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    I'm not so sure I would put Rossi up there with Ek, Boldy and Faber.  

    The gamble is higher and the payout just isn't as certain.  The tools aren't quite there.

    I do think he will get better though and this could be the perfect contract for him to prove it.  

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The issue is what kind of "star" Rossi becomes.  If he improves even more, (70-75+ pt player, or even PPG), Guerin should be doing cartwheels to get him for $9-10m per year.  I don't know why Guerin hasn't been utterly convinced, but Rossi isn't a Boldy level slam dunk star yet.  He's the next step down.

    I am just happy they got SOMETHING done.  It gives the team time for three different things:

    1. See if Rossi, Yurov, etc is that elusive elite centerman the system has never had.

    2. Wait and see if some team is dumb enough to part with theirs, or at least an elite winger.

    3. Save money for Kap, plus a Gus extension or huge payday for Buium if he is anywhere close to his hype describes.  Same holds true if any of the prospects somehow explode.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A few notes from a long article in The Athletic:

    Quote

    Rossi had no interest in a contract dispute that would keep him from arriving to training camp on time. If you’ve paid attention to his social media, he has bulked up significantly this offseason with countless hours in the gym and climbing the mountains of Austria. He also has been working on his faceoffs, at one point training with recently elected Hall of Famer Joe Thornton.

    Quote

    Last winter, he rejected a five-year, $25 million extension offer from the Wild, according to league sources. The comparables were centers like Dylan Strome, who signed for five years and $25 million in 2023, and Anton Lundell. who signed for six years and $30 million in 2024.

    Quote

    As for how this got across the finish line, Guerin indicated Friday that Rossi’s camp re-engaged with them a month ago, with the player showing his willingness to get a deal done.

    The GM said he agrees with Rossi’s belief that he’s a top-six player and indicated he appreciates when a player bets on himself.

    “I think he’s just scratching the surface,” Guerin said. “And I think this three-year contract gives him a good runway to turn into the player he can eventually become.”

    As for Rossi...

    Quote

    When asked whether he’s happy where things are right now — considering the summer trade rumblings and his desire to be in a top-six role — Rossi said, “100 percent.”

    “I’m excited now that a deal is done,” he said. “I can’t wait to get back on the ice with the guys.”

     

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Good article Tony.  I was one of them that was hoping for a longer term deal around 6.5-7, mainly because of what you mentioned in the article, that it could become a bargain in 4 years.  Time will tell, but at least it is done.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    He should have gotten 4x$6M, IMO. What he actually got is less valuable than the original 5x5 offer. He gets 4, then 5, then 6. That only favors the Wild as the cap increases each year, but it limits Rossi's purchasing power and investment opportunities. Some of you may laugh, but that extra million up front could make a huge difference when your career only lasts around 15 years.

    He'll be making bottom six money this year so they can easily demote him and will be justified. This is exactly what Rossi didn't want. If he can repeat last year's performance, he'll be in the top 20 bargains of the NHL and easily tradeable, which is Billy's ultimate plan.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's a nice contract for the Wild for sure BUT...

    Rossi's floor is likely around 50-60 points while playing solid defense. At 7x7 that's fair value and probably good value by the end

    Rossi's ceiling is completely unknown. He is a hard worker, coachable and student of the game.  I think he will end up as a 70 point guy while playing excellent defense.  At 7x7 that is INSANE value. 

    I'm going to be sad when he is gone in 2.5 years. (Unless BG is fired he will be traded because he isn't resigning here)

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am glad it is done.  I wouldn’t be surprised to see Rossi traded to a team who saw his value before this contract as being higher, but either couldn’t do an offer sheet because of lack of picks or didn’t want the double whammy of picks and money.  Billy is going to have a difficult time convincing another team that Rossi’s value is 7M+ when he just signed him for 5M AAV.  If he is traded, he will likely be part of a multiple player deal with the Wild not getting his full value.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, ArizonaWildFan said:

    Good article, Tony. Glad to see a deal get done. Time will tell if this was good or bad.

    Now what are you and your cohorts going to be writing about?

    We don't have to write about anything else. We *get* to write about anything else.

    • Like 6
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Scalptrash said:

    He should have gotten 4x$6M, IMO. What he actually got is less valuable than the original 5x5 offer. He gets 4, then 5, then 6. That only favors the Wild as the cap increases each year, but it limits Rossi's purchasing power and investment opportunities. Some of you may laugh, but that extra million up front could make a huge difference when your career only lasts around 15 years.

    This is because of qualifying offers. The QO is set based on the player's salary in their last season of their contract.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think part of the Wild prioritizing a lower AAV for Rossi is the appeal to KK that we’re entering into “win now”. That’s opposed to a likely payoff in 4 years contract/value wise with Rossi. With other key pieces locked up long term I like the flexibility this contract brings to the team. I’m confident Rossi will be bringing it this year. I’m not sure if it’ll be on “Our Ice” or as a supremely affordable trade piece. Rossi is handling a very difficult part of the NHL game with class. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think Tony is right in his judgement. Guerin won, Rossi & his agent lost the bargaining. Shortterm. R is playing for cheap the next 3 years. There will be suitors in 2028 to pay him around 10 M AAV. If MIN wants to sign him they will have to pay the 6 M extra he lost, otherwise he will sign somewhere else. I'm pretty sure he will proof his true value in the next 3 years. And of course MIN would be silly to trade him before. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 8/22/2025 at 11:09 PM, WildNotMild said:

    Billy is going to have a difficult time convincing another team that Rossi’s value is 7M+ when he just signed him for 5M AAV.

    This is not true at all. Rossi is an RFA who had negligible leverage on a contract. The other team will do their analysis and determine what they think his value is. Billy won't have to do anything as far as convincing. He's not trying to drop the player. He is trying to use the player to get an even better one. 

    Perhaps Rossi is that better player? He bet on himself. Maybe he gets something long in the $10m range with consistent showings of 70+ pts? We can only hope for that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like the deal, think it's fair for both sides. I put little stock in the algorithm the estimate sites put up. I think it was riskier for Guerin to sign Rossi longterm, probably riskier than Faber, Kaprizov, and Boldy. He wants more from Rossi and a bridge deal is the way to get it. 

    Which gets us to this point. What was Rossi really worth on a longterm deal? I disagree wholeheartedly with the 7 x $7m. I do think this is a time to let the cap grow and bridge just about everyone we can when the time comes, let the dust settle and find out what the capflation prices are. Is it done off of cap %? Is it done off of analytic estimates? Is it done by throwing darts at a dartboard? I don't know, but I do know that the cap skyrocketing is only part of a cycle and won't keep going up that quickly forever.

    What is so great about a bridge deal? If you look at player's age, you get this: 

    If a player doesn't take the college route, a normal ELC happens when they're 20, younger if they make the N and stick in their teens. Some players, Europeans can actually start that clock a little later if they stay in their home country until they're ready. 3 years in, they are 23. Depending on NHL time of service, they can get bridged until 27, but you want them coming off at 26. I would assume year 20 is at least in the A.

    That's 4 years of bridges. But, you don't want a bridge to expire when they are becoming an UFA, you want a year left so you can negotiate a longterm deal with them, or trade them out. This is the last season we see 8 year deals, but if you take 7 years from age 26, the player is in his age 33 year. Likely that year is a 3 year extension if he's holding up ok. Bridging gives the player 1 huge payday opportunity for the really good players.

    As a hockey team, you are not worried about how a player feels about this, or that he didn't get 2 paydays. You worry about your bottom line, and cap management. Some players will plateau during the bridge and not get much better. Others will get injured and not perform as well. It is in the best interest of the Wild to use the bridge regardless of how the rest of the league does it. It also makes sense to present the bridge deal before the player goes home for the summer of his RFA year. 

    I projected this bridge deal to be 2 x $4.5m. $3.5m in year 1, $5.5m in year 2. Going $4, 5, 6m is about the same but actually better. As Tony said, the $6m is all about the QO at the end of the deal. Think of the QO as a way to save the rights and the floor of the next negotiation. 

    I also recommended bridges for Boldy and Faber. Kaprizov, I thought, was old enough to just go straight to the big deal. Boldy's deal looks like it will work out and I'd say the same for Faber's. But, we all saw what happened with Dumba, and that could happen to any player, and that's why the longterm big deal is a risk. 

    Tony started the article off by saying we might wish we had done a longterm deal instead. The only way this works is with 20/20 hindsight. Yes, you may regret if a bit, but at the same time, if you are more risk averse as a GM, that is the path you take. There still isn't much of a risk of getting offersheeted in this league. The only time it works is when a GM is in a cap pickle. The vast majority of the time, it may cause some pain, but it will get matched, and GMs will have prepared a defense for such a thing. How do you stop from the offersheet speculation? You make sure to bridge these guys before July 1. If they don't want to take it, you plan a defense in case there is one, or, with most GMs, they will approach you about a trade before they spring the offersheet on you. 

    If anyone was paying attention, this is exactly what happened between Carolina and NYR with K. Miller. Carolina had the offersheet hammer ready to go, but they worked out a deal when NYR caught wind that Carolina was interested in him. The deal was slightly less than an offersheet, but it was a trade 1st. Carolina got to put up a player instead of picks and lottery protect their 1st. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I might turn into a bad decision but right now his 5 million contract is exactly what he has earned.  He was a ghost for the last half of the season last year.  It was a difficult season so it might not be him, yet it could be a sign that he can't maintain his effort for 82 plus games.   If he plays well the next contract might be humungous but right now it might just be what he is worth. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...