Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild May Have To Learn From the Matthew Tkachuk Trade's Mistakes


    Image courtesy of Sergei Belski - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    Everyone knows that the Florida Panthers absolutely stole Matthew Tkachuk from the Calgary Flames. The Panthers have been to the Stanley Cup Final in each of the three years since, and lifted it in the last two. The Flames lost a superstar power forward who has put up 88 goals and 254 points in his ages 25-to-27 seasons.

    And all they got for their troubles was Jonathan Huberdeau and MacKenzie Weegar. Huberdeau bounced back in 2024-25 after a disappointing two seasons, but "bouncing back" meant "scoring 28 goals and 62 points instead of 15 and 55." Weegar has been the Flames' top defenseman, but if a blueliner logs 24 minutes a night on a team that hasn't made the playoffs in the past three years, does he make a sound?

    Nope, this trade is a laugher for Calgary. They got pantsed. At least, in 2025.

    In 2022, the Flames took an awful situation and got way more out of the deal than anyone ever thought. Tkachuk made it clear that he was not going to sign in Calgary. Money wasn't going to do it, nothing would. He was gone. In most cases, a superstar player who leaves town brings a standard package of an NHL player, a pick, and a prospect. That's a rebuilding move, which wouldn't have worked for a team that had just advanced to the second round of the playoffs.

    At the time, what the Flames got blew everyone's mind. Huberdeau had just scored 30 goals, 115 points, and finished in the top-five in Hart Trophy voting. Weegar gained national attention -- in Florida, no less! -- for being a top defenseman. He finished eighth and 14th in Norris Trophy voting over his past two seasons. 

    ESPN gave the Flames an A grade for the trade. A five-person panel at The Athletic gave Calgary an A-plus, A-minus, A, A-plus, and an A. You couldn't have made a trade more well-received.

    And that's got to be something the Minnesota Wild have in mind as they (perhaps) approach doomsday. Kirill Kaprizov reportedly turned down a contract worth $128 million from the Wild. It's essential to note that it's not the same as wanting out of Minnesota, but it's not a great sign when a player says No thanks to being the highest-paid in the league. Until we find out more, the State of Hockey has to at least think about what Life After Kaprizov looks like.

    One thing's for sure: It can't look like the Tkachuk Trade.

    The Flames, weirdly enough, made a similar mistake to what the Wild did in 2012: They locked themselves into two aging players who raised the talent level of their team, but didn't quite elevate them into contenders.

    There's obviously some hindsight with both. Like Huberdeau, Zach Parise also had a season where he finished fifth in Hart voting. Like Weegar, Ryan Suter was also an elite two-way defenseman. It's hard to fault either team for making the moves they did, even if they were wrong about their ultimate ceiling.

    But in hindsight, the Flames would want more for Tkachuk, and the Wild would still buy out Parise and Suter.

    And the Wild will have regrets if Kaprizov leaves in free agency. It might be tempting to stick to the Wild's five-year plan for contention. Matt Boldy, Marco Rossi, Zeev Buium, Danila Yurov, and Brock Faber make for a ready-made Under-25 core of players. Meanwhile, veteran core pieces like Joel Eriksson Ek, Jared Spurgeon, and Jonas Brodin aren't getting any younger. It'd be tempting for Guerin to grab a life raft and bring in a solid veteran player or two to help fill the Kaprizov hole.

    We already know what the problem is. Let's say the hated Vegas Golden Knights want Kaprizov and hypnotize Tomas Hertl and Shea Theodore (as they do with all their unmovable players) to waive their No-Move Clauses to make it happen. Suddenly, the Wild have a big center and a top-flight power play quarterback. What does that mean, without Kaprizov to elevate the rest of the roster? That's a team that's definitely making the playoffs, and definitely not making the Conference Finals.

    At the same time, we also know the Player/Pick/Prospect model isn't likely to work, either. You have to nail the pick, or uncover another Faber -- a prospect an organization knows pretty well, but ultimately underestimates. Without that, you're the Buffalo Sabers after trading Jack Eichel: With no superstar, and on Year 3 of hoping that this will be the year for Peyton Krebs and Noah Östlund (SPOILER: it won't be).

    So, what then?

    Bill Guerin and the Wild can't fool themselves: There's no winning a Kaprizov trade. The Flames did their damn best and couldn't win the Tkachuk trade. If you're giving up a consistent MVP-level force, you automatically are getting less value.

    But what the Wild can do is try to turn Kaprizov into a player who can help build around the Boldy/Rossi/Buium/Faber/Yurov core. "A" is the keyword. Not a collection of lottery tickets. They need to identify the best Under-25 player or prospect they can possibly get for Kaprizov and get them.

    Teams aren't going to hand over their best players and prospects, even for Kaprizov. If Kaprizov wants to go to Chicago, you can bet that their tippy-top tier of Connor Bedard or Artyom Levshunov is untouchable, and probably even 2025 third-overall pick Anton Frondell. But if Frank Nazar III is the price of admission to give Bedard a superstar teammate, are the Chicago Blackhawks going to say no?

    That's the line of thinking the Wild are going to have to pursue. They aren't getting someone else's Kaprizov, whether for right now or in the future. But they can perhaps target someone's Matt Boldy -- a high-end player with youth and upside.

    Continuing to use the Blackhawks and Nazar as an example, one of them is going to be more valuable than a package of B/B-plus-tier prospects like Sam Rinzel and Oliver Moore. The Wild's history, and the Kaprizov years especially, prove that winning is about having high-end talent. If they can't have Kaprizov, they have to target the highest-end talent they can land.

    Granted, it's a lot to ask of a player to be Adam Larsson -- the one guy a team got back for a superstar. Whether it's Nazar, or to spitball, Matthew Knies of the Toronto Maple Leafs, Cutter Gauthier/Mason McTavish in Anaheim, or William Eklund/Will Smith in San Jose, whoever fills Kaprizov's shoes is going to have a ton of pressure on them.

    Still, that's the best chance the Wild would have of not letting Kaprizov's departure doom them to eternal mediocrity. We've seen what doesn't work with the Tkachuk trade, and we've seen what rarely works with countless Player/Pick/Prospect deals. For Guerin to keep his core on track, he'd have to break out of that thinking and identify the best single player he can get.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I thought it was interesting that he elected the surgery in second half of last season when team was rolling.  Was it to have him at 100% (and game tested) so the agent could hold an auction in September 2025. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For the crowd that wants 97 at any cost it’sa positive the he’s at captains practice.  
    Do you want him at $18M AAV?  I think the answer is yes and we just pray for his health

    97 doesn’t want to be dreseitl who’s 8 yr contract already looks like a steal considering the rising cap

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the sticking point is that the Wild didn't switch to the reverse retro jerseys for both home and away. He wanted to look really sharp when he potted 50 and it just wasn't there. 😉 for Pewter.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    I thought it was interesting that he elected the surgery in second half of last season when team was rolling.  Was it to have him at 100% (and game tested) so the agent could hold an auction in September 2025. 

    Not exactly.  How you come up with this stuff I'll never know.

    He was out for a while, tried to come back and play, but it was clear it would take more and he couldn't play like he usually does without doing something more than letting it heal on its own and so he had surgery. 

    It sure seemed like he wanted to come back, and everyone seemed pretty deflated when he couldn't, Kaprizov included.

    The team did make sure he was fully healthy before having him come back after the surgery, but that seemed to be more to make sure that they didn't have him come back to early again and aggravate anything since if that would happen, the Wild wouldn't have him for the playoffs.

    Kaprizov seemed a little frustrated towards the end of that since he wanted to be playing, but it seemed more like the team trying to ensure their superstar was fully healthy.

    There is every indication that it was the Wild holding him and Ek out so they would be good for the playoffs and absolutely zero indication that Kaprizov and his agent wanted to get some payday.  Was Ek out too because he was getting a cut?

    You seem to be looking for any bit of negativity to toss on a smoldering flame just because you get some childish kick out of it.  I used to think some of your posts were interesting, but with ODC gone, you seem to feel the need to bring in some of the off-the-wall antagonism he would slam down on the table just to rile people up.  Maybe stop and confirm stuff or take a moment and think about it before slinging around statements that don't have a shred of truth to them.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    28 minutes ago, raithis said:

    Not exactly.  How you come up with this stuff I'll never know.

    He was out for a while, tried to come back and play, but it was clear it would take more and he couldn't play like he usually does without doing something more than letting it heal on its own and so he had surgery. 

    It sure seemed like he wanted to come back, and everyone seemed pretty deflated when he couldn't, Kaprizov included.

    The team did make sure he was fully healthy before having him come back after the surgery, but that seemed to be more to make sure that they didn't have him come back to early again and aggravate anything since if that would happen, the Wild wouldn't have him for the playoffs.

    Kaprizov seemed a little frustrated towards the end of that since he wanted to be playing, but it seemed more like the team trying to ensure their superstar was fully healthy.

    There is every indication that it was the Wild holding him and Ek out so they would be good for the playoffs and absolutely zero indication that Kaprizov and his agent wanted to get some payday.  Was Ek out too because he was getting a cut?

    You seem to be looking for any bit of negativity to toss on a smoldering flame just because you get some childish kick out of it.  I used to think some of your posts were interesting, but with ODC gone, you seem to feel the need to bring in some of the off-the-wall antagonism he would slam down on the table just to rile people up.  Maybe stop and confirm stuff or take a moment and think about it before slinging around statements that don't have a shred of truth to them.

    Hey friend, 

    I will give it to you that your recollection of the 97 surgery is more accurate than mine.  I will genuinely redact mine.  

    Yes, I'm here for the fun of it all.  It is a game that i enjoy watching and yes I'll take some liberties from time to time in the interest of entertainment (my entertainment) but I have/will never say garbage to stoke conspiracies or false narratives.  It's all just for fun for me.

    If my posts tie your underwear in knots, as it seems might be happening, please block me and you won't have to bother with them anymore.   

    I have no interest in slap fighting with you every couple weeks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    I can hear Russo, "i had this information but didn't report b/c i couldn't confirm my sources bob loblaw"

    Listen to the most recent Worst Seats pod.  Russo claims to know who the leaker is but can't release it...bob loblaw

    Memo to Russo: you're getting repeatedly scooped by out of market reporters.  Time for you to stop being a tease and earn back some credibility.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    💣TRUTH BOMB 💣 

    I read somewhere the Leo’s first year of ownership was Gabby’s last year (that true?). Either way we all know what that felt like and how that blew a super star sized hole in the Wild lineup.  I like that we’ve asked for a trade list so we can start shopping him and have it done before season, rather than fiddle ourselves for six months until his January abdomen surgery and we get nothing for him

    We all know that the team will be fantastic and Kirill will be playing at an MVP level right up until the game after the trade deadline where he blows out his hip again.  Then the team is in a shambles going into the playoffs and they get bounced.  July 1st Kirill is in New York with his best friend waiting to sign a contract with the Rangers.  

    That is about how it will go. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...