Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild Have Made A Strong Case For An Active Trade Deadline


    Image courtesy of Matt Blewett-USA TODAY Sports
    Aaron Heckmann

    The Minnesota Wild have faced plenty of adversity this season, with an injury-riddled first half like a year ago.

    However, while injuries, firing Dean Evason, and missing the playoffs for the first time since 2018-19 defined last season, the Wild have been one of the league’s toughest matchups this season. 

    The Wild are second in the Central and fourth overall with a 26-11-4 record. Better yet, they have even found success in times of adversity.

    There’s no better example of that than their current stretch. 

    Minnesota was 1-5-1 without Kirill Kaprizov last year, faltering without their best player. However, the Wild are 5-0-1 in Kaprizov's absence, proving they can win without him.

    Entering their tilt with the Dallas Stars on Dec. 27, the Wild had suffered their first cold stretch of the season, losing five of their past seven. Nobody would have been surprised if that continued when the Wild announced Kaprizov would miss the game with an injury. 

    Instead, Minnesota beat the Stars on the road and have won four out of five since. The Wild also lost captain Jared Spurgeon to injury in their New Year’s Eve tilt with the Nashville Predators. They immediately responded with impressive road wins over the Washington Capitals and the Carolina Hurricanes and a come-from-behind win at home against the St. Louis Blues on Tuesday.

    “It can go one of two ways when you hit adversity,” veteran defenseman Zach Bogosian said, "and we’re choosing to rise to the occasion."

    In their latest stretch, the Wild beat top teams and secured wins without Kaprizov, Spurgeon, and other injured players, which speaks volumes and highlights their potential this season. Considering their injuries this season and a lack of scoring from the bottom of the lineup, the Wild have overcome the odds to be where they are right now.

    Despite having only played two games with their full regular lineup, they have proven to be a difficult team to play against.

    “The most impressive thing for me is that they’re able to still be good with some of the injuries they’ve had,” NHL Network analyst Mike Rupp told The Athletic. “They look a certain way all the time. They just have that ‘it’ factor.”

    Losing Kaprizov could have been detrimental. However, it hasn’t and has reinforced that this Wild club may be different this season. That's hard to believe for an organization that still has $15 million in dead cap on the books.

    In the first half of the season, especially this latest stretch without Kaprizov, the Wild continue to make a strong case to be active buyers at the March 7 trade deadline.

    There is no better argument for that than beating good teams without some of your most important players in the lineup.

    Considering how dry their forward depth has been, Minnesota's current stretch has especially highlighted their potential. 

    Furthermore, Joel Eriksson Ek (seven goals in 27 games) and Ryan Hartman (five goals in 36 games) have seen a dip in scoring. Freddy Gaudreau, Marcus Foligno, and Marcus Johansson haven’t made a difference offensively either, with seven, six, and five goals, respectively. 

    If the team’s forward depth can get going and start producing more, the Wild could become an even more formidable force in the West.

    Despite injuries and a lack of depth scoring, the Wild's accomplishments this season are impressive and reveal how good they can be at full strength.

    The players have made a strong argument for the front office to buy at the trade deadline. They have earned an addition. The Wild don’t have a first-round pick this year, but they could pair a second-rounder with a prospect to make a deal.

    Taylor Hall is likely too costly, but the Wild might be interested in Brock Nelson, Kyle Palmieri, or Yanni Gourde. They might also consider bringing back Mikael Granlund, who has 35 points in 41 games.

    Next season is highly anticipated, with the dead cap mostly gone and the potential influx of more young players. However, this season's importance can’t be overstated. The Wild must prove to Kaprizov that they can become a contender and that the plan is working. 

    That's why buying at the trade deadline may make sense without giving up significant assets to see what kind of run the Wild can go on.

    We still don't know if the Wild are bona fide contenders. However, this team is better built to face adversity this year. They have proven they can win games even with their top players sidelined.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Tuch is priority number 1. Then if we can can get him Brock Nelson.  We are going to need both for a deep playoff run but going to need help brokering these deals to get under the cap for this year.  Untouchables are Yurov and Zeev.  If we can convince spurgeon to stay hurt or go somewhere that would help a lot. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Heckmann just became ODC's favorite writer

    ODC has some good ideas and wants to go for it over the next couple of years.  I also want us to go for it.  Nothing wrong with that.  Just be smart about going for it.  25 years of being in the middle sucks. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like the way Aaron just glossed over our cap situation. Just mentioning the $15m shortfall doesn't do justice to the pit we're in. Let this sink in:

    Lauko had to go on LTIR just to get Jiricek here. Think about this for a minute. To get a guy here on an ELC, one of our IR players had to go on LTIR just to field a full team. 

    This means we have no cap space, whatsoever. 

    I think I've found a way to get Tuch here financially, but I'm not sure if we can meet the compensation requirements. If it's our 2nd tier prospects and our 2nd rounder in 2025, I can live with that. Of course my plan has several assumptions and since I won't be talking with Johansson's agent or the Capitals, I'm not sure that one would work out. I'd put it in the possibly category. And here's the hard part about doing this to Johansson: He has pretty much done what he's been asked to do. Simply put, that still wasn't good enough.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    While i agree with being buyers (and let's assume for a bit that we can make it work financially through retention, player movement and/or otherwise), i would lean against going after the players mentioned by Aaron for one simple reason - they do not fit Kaprizov's timeline. They are all old and would likely just be rentals.

    Hanzal type = Hall, Palmieri, Nelson, Granlund. Gourde = Hartman, and we need Top 6 player more than bottom 6. We need MJ's replacement. 

    That really leaves going all in on players from Sabres and Nashville (Vancouver is just too rich and would likely cost us our figure skater.....).

    I know I know - we are at zero capacity, but maybe we can get creative, can incorporate another team?  and bring in a player that fits both from the skill and longevity standpoint. 

    Let's say we get Tuch. He is about the same age as Kap. He has plenty left in him unlike Hall/Palmieri/Nelson/Grandlund. Have Tuch and Kap grow together during this PO run. Get that bond going. Whoop Stars or Avs and get into second round (worry about winning the first battle). Get them t-shirts printed with Kap and the beard man (call Alex Tuch = Sasha Tuchov) - 🤔

    So main pts - Yes we are buyers, but buyers with specific requirements. 

    Edited by OldDutchChip
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, Lern2spell said:

    Voronkov for Wallstedt, prospect, & 2nd....or whatever it takes close to that.

    I think letting Wallstedt go would be a mistake. We're going to need a backup goalie next year so we'd need to backfill the position. This would cost us more money than Wallstedt is getting (by pursuing a tender already in the NHL), or bringing up one of our AHL guys (scary).

    Despite Wally's lack of success so far this year, I am still high on him as a prospect. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Enforceror said:

    I think letting Wallstedt go would be a mistake. We're going to need a backup goalie next year so we'd need to backfill the position. This would cost us more money than Wallstedt is getting (by pursuing a tender already in the NHL), or bringing up one of our AHL guys (scary).

    Despite Wally's lack of success so far this year, I am still high on him as a prospect. 

    #2 goaltenders can be found. The Wild need a top six producer who won't break the bank this year. Voronkov fits the bill, but won't be cheap. Columbus needs a future in goal, and might be willing to give a deal like this some thought, although at this point Blue Jackets are borderline playoff team, and have some top-six injuries, so might need to be patient.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Tuch is interesting and I would seriously consider trading a lot to get him.  We have a lot of players that are prospects that might not make it in the NHL and at the same time they could turn out to be stars.  

    Buffalo is looking to overhaul.  If they want to keep most of or all the salary for this year in exchange for two prospects and a pick. I would do it.

    If Spurgeon goes on LTIR until the end of the season that would be a way to get Tuch here.

    If Tuch shows up that instantly makes the team better.  Depth would go Kirill, Rossi, Boldy, Ek, then Tuch or Zucarello.  So two solid lines.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, that was a horrible outing. I was prepared for it but it still hurts. Would liked to have seen us healthy against the AVS. 

    Trade them all for Arnold Schwarzenegger and the guy that played the Mountain in Game of Thrones!!!!!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Don't worry Blunder Billy only wants old and slow players for our good old and slow boys club.  Like I said  Krill and Rossi should become free agents because you can't trust Blunder Billy also they can always resign here

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...