Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild Have Corrected A Longstanding Self-Inflicted Burden


    Image courtesy of Matt Blewett-Imagn Images
    Jonathan Ryan

    As the dynamics of an NHL season continue to evolve, trends and patterns start to form.

    Only ten or so games into the year, early trends may not hold through an 82-game season. What’s true now may not be true later, and vice versa. However, the Minnesota Wild would be wise to stay out of the penalty box all season. 

    A major ingredient to the Wild’s formula driving their fast start has been their disciplined approach to limiting pointless penalties, which had put them at a disadvantage.

    Through nine games in 2024-25, the Wild have spent the least time in the penalty box in the NHL. They’ve only sat 41 minutes through eight games, a stark contrast from last season.

    The team had yet to commit a major penalty until they visited Pittsburgh, where Brock Faber thought he’d have some words with Sidney Crosby. However, he had to drop the gloves with Jack St. Ivany as payment. 

    The Wild were one of six teams in the league without a major until Faber’s five for fighting. They added nine additional penalty minutes on three penalties during an uncharacteristic night. Still, Minnesota’s intent is clear this season. They want to limit penalties to maintain full strength and take advantage of the power play. That’s simple enough, and it's working at 6-1-2 in the first month.

    Last spring, The Athletic reported that “the Wild have coughed up seven one- or two-goal third-period leads for 11 lost points in the standings.” 

    By the end of the year, they missed a playoff spot by exactly 11 points. Last season, the Wild were the third-highest penalized team in the NHL with 938. They had the third-worst penalty kill at 74.5%. A combination that can derail a season and contributed to the Wild’s disappointing year.

    Several teams in the league prefer to keep their opponents honest. The New Jersey Devils, Boston Bruins, and Utah are all pushing 120 PIM in 10 games or less this season. Still, there are several reasons the Wild’s new-found approach makes sense. 

    First, it indicates discipline. That comes from Hynes, a details-oriented coach. It’s no coincidence that the Wild ended last season as the third-most penalized team. They also started this year's first ten games tied as the least penalized team, largely with the same group. That reveals their intent, and they are reaping the early results of their disciplined approach. 

    The Wild completed a seven-game road trip and committed only 31 penalty minutes while winning five of the seven games – one in overtime. That’s just 4.4 penalty minutes per game, including their nine minutes in Pittsburgh. Last week, they beat the defending champion Florida Panthers on their rink 5-1 while committing no penalties.

    Many Western Conference teams are disciplined, and those are the teams the Wild are competing against now and could likely face in the postseason. As of Wednesday, the Dallas Stars, Vegas Golden Knights, St. Louis Blues, and Winnipeg Jets are among the top 10 lowest-penalty minutes this season.

    The Wild are also trying not to leave their atrocious penalty kill exposed. A concerning area of the team from last season has carried over to this campaign. The team’s PK% sits at 70.6%, the fifth-worst in the league, and below last year’s unit was third-worst. Ultimately, the team can’t afford to sit in the penalty box.

    Conversely, the Wild have been elite when they can get on the power play. With eight power play goals entering Tuesday, they sat tied for sixth in the league with a 30.8% success rate with the extra man. That number dropped to 25.8% and seventh overall after failing to score with the man advantage in Pittsburgh. Still, seeing the team find chemistry on their power play is a good sign.

    The Minnesota Wild are doing a lot well early in the season. Now that they have proven they can win with a disciplined approach, they must engrain it into the team’s identity and rely on it. 

    Hynes wants the team to play fast and organized. That requires discipline and consistency to execute effectively, and they are. They want to escape their zone quickly and use speed to spring their wingers into the offensive zone. However, they can’t execute that style of play from the penalty box.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Kaprizov, JEE, MoJo, Hartman, and all of the recent line 4 have zero penalty minutes on the season. Gaudreau has 2 from a tripping call in the October 15th game in St. Louis, which may have been on line 4.

    Faber(5 minute major) and Chisholm also have zero minor penalties for the defense.

    Trenin is the leader by far with 8 penalty minutes and nobody else above Faber's 5.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If this trend continues and we keep rolling 4 solid lines, we will be in an excellent position come playoff time. But it can’t just be a short string of organized play. The real challenge is making this the norm for this team. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    With Hartman returning so will additional penalties. Unfortunately he doesn't seem capable of playing otherwise.  I thought Trenin was supposed to fix our PK? How will he do that when he is always the guy in the box? Funny that our elite PP and atrocious PK are inverse of each other % wise.

    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not all penalties are equal. For instance, so what, Faber had a fighting major. He took someone with him who also accrued another 2 minute infraction. It should have been an instigator, but he avoided that due to a technicality. 

    I have not problem with coincidental penalties, and based upon the statistics shown above, it does not take that into account. I will agree that reducing our short handed time is a good goal, and especially working on earning penalties instead of the weeny stick infractions. To this, the Wild has done a good job this year. 

    It also might be helpful to talk about drawn penalties. Certain players, like Hartman who has been called out, take a lot of penalties due to their play. However, they may be a net positive in taken vs. drawn penalties. One would expect that the defense would be a huge - in this category. It also might be helpful to compare this with their career. Is it a small sample size that could implode at any time? Or, is it part of a trend that they've been working on?

    One would also think that a team that is working harder is going to draw more penalties, so looking at the team wide collective is also a good comparison (noting the small sample size). So far, I like the results. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...