Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild Have A Looming Identity Crisis


    Image courtesy of Matt Krohn-USA TODAY Sports
    Justin Hein

     

    Forged in the fires of Jacques Lemaire’s defense-first philosophy, the Minnesota Wild spent nearly two decades with a well-earned reputation for stingy defense. They also had an even better-earned reputation for being boring. Since Kirill Kaprizov arrived in 2020, they’ve bucked that trend to a degree, ranking 9th in goals per game in 2020-21 and 5th in 2021-22. 

    It was something special when the Wild combined that defensive reputation with superstar scoring in 2021-22. Kaprizov, Kevin Fiala, and Mats Zuccarello poured offense over their opponents, ranking 16th in goals allowed per game. They finished in the top five in the NHL with 113 standings points. 

    In the following seasons, the pillars of Minnesota’s defensive identity have eroded. Alex Goligoski and Jon Merrill were key role players on that ’21-22 roster, but now they spend most of their time in the press box. Matt Dumba left in the 2023 offseason and took his physical presence with him. Going back further, the Wild bought Ryan Suter out in 2021. While he isn’t the most popular name in town, Suter’s buyout was for the good of the team’s culture and salary cap more than his on-ice performance. 

    Zach Bogosian, Declan Chisholm, and Brock Faber became Minnesota’s defensive replacements. Chisholm is fun to watch and executes his role well, but he’s mostly a role player. While he put on a good showing in his first full-time action, he’s already 24. It’s rare for a player to join the NHL that late and grow into a top-four defenseman. 

    Bogosian was also serviceable in his minutes this season. However, his 2023-24 performance was his best of the past three years, and he turns 34 in July. 

    That typically indicates regression is coming, and his play between 2021-23 barely met the threshold of an NHL roster. This type of long shot usually becomes a lightning rod for fan criticism. Examples from ‘23-24 include Goligoski, Merrill, and Marcus Johansson

    That leaves a lot of slack for Faber to pick up. But even if he grows into a player who can make up for what the Wild have lost in its role players, that’s not enough. Minnesota’s other top-four defensemen appear to be regression candidates. 

    Each of Brodin, Middleton, and Spurgeon has a story that makes them seem eternal. Spurgeon is the unstoppable underdog. He’s probably the best active NHL defenseman to play at or below 5’9” and one of the top 20 defensemen in the league, regardless of height. Jake Middleton is the throwback. His parents raised him blue-collar, and he used to work as a bricklayer in the offseason. Maybe that’s why he’s built like a brick outhouse. Then there’s the smooth-skating Swedish wunderkind Jonas Brodin

    Minnesota’s top three feel like an institution, but it’s nearly reached its shelf life. Next season, Brodin will be 31, Middleton 29, and Spurgeon turns 35 in November. That may not sound very old, but these guys will almost certainly regress. Based on research from HockeyViz.com, defensemen’s offensive, defensive, and shorthanded peak comes at age 22, 25, and 27, respectively.

    Hein1.png

    Hein2.png

    Hein3.png

    There’s little hope that these three players will age gracefully. Each has already had injury problems. 

    Brodin suffered two injuries last season. He had an upper-body injury, which kept him out for about a month, and an apparent leg injury where his knee twisted up beneath him. Speculatively, this is concerning over the long term due to the potential for ligament damage, which could impact his skating. 

    Spurgeon started last season with a shoulder injury he sustained in a preseason game. Then, far more concerning was hip and back surgery. As exceptional as Spurgeon was playing before the procedure, major surgery for any athlete at this age is a concern now and in the future. 

    It’s tough to guess how recurrent Middleton’s upper-body injury from late last season might be, but The Athletic reported that he had “a knee injury that was cleaned up after the season.” Knee problems often have lingering effects after treatment, and they flare back up more often than the average injury. Furthermore, his physical brand of hockey doesn’t bode well for avoiding the nicks and bruises that come with his lunch-pail style of play. 

    Injuries are a double-edged sword. Not only is it harder to return from injuries at a later age, but there’s some indication across sports that injuries are the primary cause of age-related decline. 

    Running back a late-stage defense corps wouldn’t be an issue if the Wild were in the throes of a Stanley Cup window. However, they’re coming off an 87-point season with a roster consistently lost in the first round. 

    Even with the additions of a second-line winger and better health, the Wild aren’t a Stanley Cup contender in 2024-25. By the time this roster has a chance to compete, this top-four won’t be the Infinity Stones anymore. They’ll be Brock Faber and some old guys. 

    The chances of reinforcements arriving by that time aren’t great either. Minnesota has only drafted two defensemen in the first round in the past decade: Carson Lambos in 2021 and Filip Johansson in 2018. Even more shockingly, they’ve only drafted three other defensemen in rounds two or three: Ryan O’Rourke (2nd round, 2020), Louie Belpedio (3rd round, 2014), and Daemon Hunt (3rd round, 2020). None of these players project to become top-pairing defensemen, leaving a gaping hole on Faber’s left long-term. 

    All this puts a real damper on the exciting forward group poised to break out in the next two to three seasons. Even if the front office bats 1.000 by re-signing Kaprizov, adding a second-line forward this offseason, bringing over Danila Yurov, and developing Marat Khusnutdinov and Liam Ohgren, somebody has to defend the net front. Jesper Wallstedt also would have to become an elite goalie. 

    Don't believe me? Let’s examine the playoff teams that a cornerstone defenseman carries. The best-case scenario is the New York Rangers with Adam Fox. After Fox, their six best players are five forwards and goaltender Igor Shesterkin, one of the five best goaltenders in the NHL. 

    There isn’t another perfect analogy, although the Boston Bruins and Vancouver Canucks are close. They have three or four elite forwards, and each had a goaltender play incredibly well through the regular season in Linus Ullmark and Thatcher Demko, respectively. 

    Each of these playoff contenders has a match fighting for their lives in the basement. Jake Sanderson of the Ottawa Senators, Vince Dunn of the Seattle Kraken, Zack Werenski of the Columbus Blue Jackets, and Noah Dobson of the New York Islanders posted great all-around numbers in The Athletic’s player analysis model. However, none had any real shot at a Stanley Cup by the time April rolled around. 

    At this point, it seems impossible for the Wild to reclaim that boring defensive identity. Why would they? The 2020s have brought fans probably the best hockey in franchise history. However, without that identity, Minnesota doesn’t just need to nail a series of front-office moves. 

    They need to reinvent their identity.

     

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    They should definitely focus on defense in the draft.  I'm not saying people like Lambos, Hunt, etc. aren't going to make weight eventually, but the Wild need someone on the left who matches or at least come closes to Faber.  My hope is someone Ottawa to Philly is willing to take Gus+13, or even Rossi+13 to get into the Silayev/Buium/Dickinson range of choices.  If no one does, there's hope Yakemchuk is still on the board.

    The Wild defense need an overhaul.  Brodin and Spurgeon aren't spring chickens.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I remember watching Jack Peart in college (playing for St. Cloud St.) and he was a pretty “shut down” defender. I have hopes that maybe he could play on the blue line with Faber.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm betting Lambos makes a leap and passes Hunt. Definitely could use some RHD depth, and I'm guessing they'll select one early if they don't trade for one.

    Kalem Parker, RHD, did just win the WHL championship, but as a 2023 6th round pick, I will not be expecting too much from him.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Quote

    Chisholm is fun to watch and executes his role well, but he’s mostly a role player. While he put on a good showing in his first full-time action, he’s already 24. It’s rare for a player to join the NHL that late and grow into a top-four defenseman. 

    I simply can't agree with this statement as if it were fact. 24 is indeed about the year you would expect a 5th round pick to be coming into the league. He can still develop into whatever he wants to. 

    If Chisholm pays attention to detail, bulks up 10-15 lbs. this offseason, spends time with Andy Ness and cleaning up his edges, he can very well be a top 4 defender. He's still got gap nuances to close, but he's also learning the NHL speed. 

    The graphs are fun to look at, but really, the only guy we need to be worried about is Spurgeon. At 35 with Shoulders, Knees, Back injuries, it's nearing the end of the line for the guy. However, a larger bodied defender like Middleton can perform fine up to 35 or higher. What he loses in physical ability, he generally gains in anticipation. They end up balancing out. Same thing with Bogosian, and he plays a more physical brand, he'll be able to battle just fine and he still has wheels. 

    Brodin may be a different story. The comparisons he had with Nic Lidstrom were probably good. Lidstrom played well into his 30s and was effective. However, Brodin does get pushed around too much, and his skating speed is declining a little. His anticipation should be up, but it's the beating he takes at 195. Reinventing himself to 205 would help a lot, especially if he gains most of it with upper body muscle. 

    Jaromir Jagr played so long because, according to him, he constantly reinvented himself. When his speed slowed down, he got stronger and more of a beast. This is important for Brodin to take in. He can do the same thing, and if he does, he's a good enough athlete to play into his 40s. But, he's got to reinvent himself. 

    I am not as worried about the pipeline. I thought they had disappointing seasons, but the defenders coming up need to think NHL, not AHL. They need bulk. They need strength. They already are good skating, puck moving defenders. Yes, the identity will change as we go from a boring defensive team into a far more aggressive offensive team. We'll have good support coming from the defense. What can't change is the commitment to the 200' game, and we've got forwards willing to come back. We always knew a change in identity was going to have to come, let's embrace it and see where these guys can take us!

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, Sam said:

    I remember watching Jack Peart in college (playing for St. Cloud St.) and he was a pretty “shut down” defender. I have hopes that maybe he could play on the blue line with Faber.

    I think this is a very good point. Peart is small, so he needs to add a lot of strength, and he's a good skater and puck mover. Both Lambos and Peart could fill that #1 left side role. But, for now, we've got Brodin there.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    I'm betting Lambos makes a leap and passes Hunt. Definitely could use some RHD depth, and I'm guessing they'll select one early if they don't trade for one.

    Kalem Parker, RHD, did just win the WHL championship, but as a 2023 6th round pick, I will not be expecting too much from him.

    I'm with you here, but, Parker was only drafted a round behind Chisholm, so let's let him develop. I wouldn't expect a top 4 out of him, but maybe he can make the squad. I'm probably more focused on Spacek for that slot.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, Protec said:

    Take the best player available. No drafting for needs or position.

    One thing I always found interesting was Rick Spielman's draft board. He somehow married need, talent, and position into some sort of a grid, and I thought he was a pretty good drafter (outside of the QB position). But what he was able to do was find players that graded out about equal, but fit either our system better or position better. 

    I have no idea how Judd does his, I'm pretty sure, smooth skating, puck handling, high hockey IQ are high on his list of items. Since larger players generally don't skate too well, he kind of doesn't go in that direction. But, I think a size projection is also important, and so is the speed element. Those 2 things aren't really coachable. 

    For Pewter:

    #quadpost

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    They should definitely focus on defense in the draft.  I'm not saying people like Lambos, Hunt, etc. aren't going to make weight eventually, but the Wild need someone on the left who matches or at least come closes to Faber.  My hope is someone Ottawa to Philly is willing to take Gus+13, or even Rossi+13 to get into the Silayev/Buium/Dickinson range of choices.  If no one does, there's hope Yakemchuk is still on the board.

    The Wild defense need an overhaul.  Brodin and Spurgeon aren't spring chickens.

    I don't think Buium is large enough for what we need, he certainly is crafty enough though. The problem isn't really Buium himself, it's what else we've got, and size is not what we got. Brodin at 31 isn't a spring chicken, but it's still quite aways from fall on him. Spurgeon is headed into the winter season.

    But, what we do have, and have coming, are not complete defenders. They do many things well, but are missing a key component, whether it's dynamic offense, or the ability to lay someone out. We simply don't have one of those monsters that can affect every part of the game, and it looks like we need to pick up one. Of course, I'm still on the Lindstrom bandwagon.

    Picking up Skjei in UFA would be nice. I'm not sure what kind of room we'd have cap wise for him, but he would go a long way in plugging a hole and dropping some other defenders a notch into better situations for their skill sets. I think what we saw last season were a lot of guys playing a slot or 2 above where they should have been playing. And, nobody was really able to come in and solidify the bottom. 

    #quintpost

    Edited by mnfaninnc
    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 hours ago, Protec said:

    Take the best player available. No drafting for needs or position.

    Also be sure you know who the best player is?

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm trying to think outside of the box a little bit. Next season is the last season we have to deal with the heavy lifting cap penalties. Then, the floodgates open for us with an extra $13m in cap space. Couple that with a projected cap of $92m, up $4.3m from this next season. It also appears that we only have 11 guys signed at that point.

    Many of our guys will be coming off of ELCs. We've had them marinating in the minors for seasons, so they will probably get a standard qualifying offer and then contract negotiations for future years could begin. 

    The 2017/18 drafts are probably the guys we'd be looking at becoming eligible for UFA. K'Andre Miller is one of those. I feel like our rebuild/retool/reload is about over as far as obtaining players, but we're still going to have a couple of holes. It will be about developing what we've already chosen, and it appears that Matt Hendricks will now be in charge of doing just that. 

    As many probably already know, I am in favor of poaching players from other teams. It's especially effective when it comes within the division, because then you are weakening the opposition while strengthening yourself. It's like the 4 point games. 

    The Guerin/Brackett duo obtained extra 1st and 2nd round picks in '20, '21, '22, and '23. They also traded for Faber from the '20 draft. What it looks like is that this cluster of players is going to be the core of what's to come. Yet, in '25, it's a little aggressive to think your '22s are going to be ready and at least not still acclimating. 

    So, what would show Kaprizov that the window is opening and he can win here? How about an offersheet? Plugging a hole with a young good player that was plucked off another team. GMs do not like to use this tool since it usually gets used against them. We saw the retaliation with Carolina against Montreal when they tried to pluck Aho, and Carolina successfully grabbed Kotkaniemi in a vengeance move. There are dangers with this, but it's not so bad when you have a team in cap trouble that simply can't pay a guy, and if they lose him, can't really retaliate due to cap constraints. And, if a team is in that position, they've got 1 week to react.

    There's essentially 1 more season for us to look at some of these players to see if 

    1. they can effectively plug one of our holes
    2. their team has cap problems (and a rising cap)
    3. they are young enough to fit into our core
    4. we can spend that money wisely

    I thought Carolina did a great job with Kotkaniemi. A large 1 year deal that Montreal could not match followed by a handshake of a long term deal that would be for less. Has Kotkaniemi panned out for the Canes? Not really as a 2nd line C, but the team now has 2 elite 3rd line Cs. 

    I think I'd be targeting that '20-21 drafts to find a guy who we can poach. He'd need to be a difference maker, and move some other guys down the lineup, maybe to positions they are better suited for. It doesn't have to be the most expensive guy out there, it could be a very solid guy who's not going to cost you 4 1sts. '25 and '26 drafts, we still have our own 1,2,3 picks so we would qualify for that range. 

    Would we go defense in this scenario, or go center? Would people even be open to such an idea? What it would do is completely jolt our approach. It would signal to the fans and the players that the future is now, we are playing for the present, not reloading. It may also help us retain our superstar!

    I'd encourage everyone not to think about the fear of someone retaliating, but to think of the repositioning of our team as in win now mode and using future assets to help us in the present.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    46 minutes ago, Protec said:

    Also be sure you know who the best player is?

    At #13 it should be the guy who falls and not the unknown long shot.  Not that I think the Wild are the type to swing for the fences and typically do pick the (usually undersized but talented... or Russian) guy who falls down into their position (Rossi, Hoos, Yurov).  

    The one exception I do think was the Stramel pick last year.  That was definitely a not a BPA pick but rather one for need because we definitely need size, and it is looking like it is the most bust worthy pick... although it is still way premature.  I think Stramel just needs a more opportunity to be honest.

    I don't think we need to target D in this draft due to narrative that Brodin and Spurg are cooked.  Spurg does have question marks but I have the philosophy that you just don't write off people because of the circumstances of other people.  (ie stats)

    Brodin is one of the best defensive defenseman in the league.  He just doesn't get the shiny gold star for being a scorer.  Perfect guy to pair with an offensive guy (too bad Chisholm is a lefty).  He doesn't have question marks, so f* all this nonsense that he is cooked.

    Besides this pick is probably trade bait in the near future anyways.  We don't have time to develop the guy most likely... especially a D guy.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Blunder Billy  won't do anything  he's in love with his GOOD OLD AND SLOW BOYS CLUB  that is always getting hurt  he refuses to let the young kids/ de men  get experience at the nhl level   I said that about dumba back when they drafted him. Hunt, O'rourke, Lambos, should up here playing on the 3rd de pair and maybe one in the tol 4  they need the experience  what was so bad about Hunt this year  he played pretty damn good for a rookie with limited minutes? It just the fact that Blunder Billy  likes the old and slow guys, You watch he'll sign Dumba this summer. Spurgeon and Brodin have been hurt the last 2 years almost more then the been playing, the same goes with Foligno, Blunder had last season and this up coming season to get the young kids the experience before Krill leaves but he refuses to do it. You watch Olgren will be in Iowa next year and Heigt will be in the jrs again. My advice to Krill is don't sign and become a free agent because Blunder Billy you can't trust.

    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 5/18/2024 at 9:22 AM, Citizen Strife said:

    They should definitely focus on defense in the draft.  I'm not saying people like Lambos, Hunt, etc. aren't going to make weight eventually, but the Wild need someone on the left who matches or at least come closes to Faber.  My hope is someone Ottawa to Philly is willing to take Gus+13, or even Rossi+13 to get into the Silayev/Buium/Dickinson range of choices.  If no one does, there's hope Yakemchuk is still on the board.

    The Wild defense need an overhaul.  Brodin and Spurgeon aren't spring chickens.

    Teams very rarely trade picks that high. I would like Yakemchuk a lot but I don’t think he’s going to be there. I have a feeling Jiricek will be there but I’m not exactly thrilled with that pick.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 5/18/2024 at 10:08 AM, Sam said:

    I remember watching Jack Peart in college (playing for St. Cloud St.) and he was a pretty “shut down” defender. I have hopes that maybe he could play on the blue line with Faber.

    He seems to have regressed this year and I think he’s only 5’11 or 6ft at most unless he somehow grew. We need someone big.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 5/18/2024 at 10:27 AM, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    I'm betting Lambos makes a leap and passes Hunt. Definitely could use some RHD depth, and I'm guessing they'll select one early if they don't trade for one.

    Kalem Parker, RHD, did just win the WHL championship, but as a 2023 6th round pick, I will not be expecting too much from him.

    Hunt had a solid year in the ahl this year. I’ve been waiting for Lambos to take a big jump but it really hasn’t happened yet. It’s still early but I’m not so sure that’s happening.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Will D. Ness said:

    The one exception I do think was the Stramel pick last year.  That was definitely a not a BPA pick but rather one for need because we definitely need size, and it is looking like it is the most bust worthy pick... although it is still way premature.  I think Stramel just needs a more opportunity to be honest.

    I'm not so sure that they saw Stramel as a reach. I think it's pretty clear they were going large forward, although, they may have want Oliver Moore, I sure did. 

    I'm not sure how Brackett adjusts his draft board, and with the covid interruption, Stramel was a top 15 pick going into the season. So, it could have been viewed as a large center who was dropping. I think the issue is we as fans never had Stramel in the top group. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Mateo3xm said:

    Teams very rarely trade picks that high.

    You're right about this, they rarely do. However, if your guy is there, you simply need to overpay. I think we're at the stage now with this team that we start zeroing in on the guy(s) we really want, not the guy that drops to us.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...