Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild Are Slipping Down the Central Division Rankings


    Image courtesy of Jerome Miron-USA TODAY Sports
    Justin Wiggins

    Publicly, the Minnesota Wild's brass are saying the right things.

    Following just their second season in a decade of failing to make the playoffs, the Wild didn’t have much cap or roster space this summer to meaningfully improve their team. Returning almost the same roster next year does not exactly excite their rabid fan base, which is hungry for a long playoff run.

    Even with mostly the same roster, head coach John Hynes seems optimistic that plenty of internal candidates can improve their chances this year with bounce-back seasons. He's not entirely wrong, whether that be through improved health or performance. But a quick look around the Central Division makes you wonder if that will even be enough.

    The Central looks to be turning into a gauntlet for the Wild. A wild card playoff berth is always an option, but there’s a reason coaches and GMs put so much stock in their standing within the division. Each division in the Western Conference receives three automatic bids to the playoffs, with the remaining ten teams vying for the final two wild card spots.

    The math is easy: focus on the three spots available for the eight teams within the division versus the randomness that can be the two wild card spots available for the remaining ten teams in the conference.

    It’s easy to see why the focus starts within your own division. However, while the Wild mostly treaded water this summer, nearly everyone around them improved their outlook or remained a Stanley Cup contender.

    Let’s start at the top, where the Colorado Avalanche and Dallas Stars look again to be the cream of the crop in the division. Even if you want to scrutinize the merry-go-round of the blue line situation in Dallas, the Wild are not close to challenging them for a higher finish within the division.

    And with a single two-sentence paragraph, the Central division playoff locks are down to one. Last season, the Wild were among the favorites to finish in the top three. But this year? It’s quickly becoming a different story.

    Let’s start with the other three teams the Wild finished behind last year. They plummeted to a sixth-place finish in the division. The Winnipeg Jets and Nashville Predators qualified for the playoffs, and while both were first-round exits, they were far and away better teams than Minnesota.

    Winnipeg finished 23 points ahead of the Wild. While some key pieces departed in free agency this month, it’s difficult to see the Wild bridging that gap, even if their vets stay healthy and improve.

    The Predators might have been the biggest winner in free agency, inking Steven Stamkos, Jonathan Marchessault, and Brady Skjei to long-term contracts. While those deals may start to sour towards the end, Nashville is a much-improved team now compared to the one that finished 12 points ahead of Minnesota.

    Suppose Minnesota gets a bounce-back season from Ryan Hartman, Marcus Johansson, and Frederick Gaudreau, plus better injury luck for Jared Spurgeon and Marcus Foligno. Still, does anyone think it would be enough to bridge that 12-point gap and then some? For a team that will likely be a favored dark horse Stanley Cup contender, most likely not.

    The St. Louis Blues are the only team that finished ahead of the Wild in the Central last year that Minnesota could reasonably believe they have a shot at catching.

    But it’s not just the teams who finished ahead of them who improved their chances this summer. For almost a decade, the Arizona Coyotes were a near lock on the calendar to secure at least one point, most likely two. However, with their move to Utah, new owner Ryan Smith has signaled those days are over. With the trade for top-pair defenseman Mikhail Sergachev and a slew of other notable free-agent signings, Utah seems poised to take a big step this season.

    And while Chicago remains a bottom-five team going into the season, it’s difficult to see them repeating their 52-point campaign with their additions to surround phenom Connor Bedard with an NHL-caliber roster.

    Hynes is publicly saying the right things. Just last week, during his appearance on KFAN radio station, Hynes pointed to the disappointing offensive seasons of a few veteran forwards as evidence that they can bounce back.

    “We still believe in the guys," he said. "The guys that we have on the roster, they’ve got to be better. And I’m excited to have some conversations with guys now that our team is basically through free agency.”

    Hynes highlighted Hartman’s past success with Kirill Kaprizov and Mats Zuccarello and his return to being a top-line center, giving them the potential to diversify their offensive options. However, Hartman hasn’t produced like a top-line center each of the past two years, even with ample opportunity to remain there. It's tough to say whether returning to playing alongside Kaprizov alone will revitalize his game. 

    Then there are the recurring injury concerns with the heavily relied-on veterans on the roster. Hynes can hope Spurgeon, Jonas Brodin, and Foligno can put together a full season. However, the odds of all three doing so are extremely low.

    Spurgeon missed 66 games last year due to injury, which was a trend more than a blip. The Wild captain has missed at least 17 games due to injury in four of the past five seasons. Foligno also missed at least 17 games in that same period. Jonas Brodin’s injury history is even more concerning, as the recently turned 31-year-old has missed at least 20 games in four of the last five seasons.

    Relying on improved play from three players who have experienced short stints of success over the past decade is a tough sell. Add to that the avalanche of injuries their veteran roster is saddled with, and the task looks nearly impossible.

    But even in a scenario where everything goes right for Hynes and the Wild this year, the Central division is only getting deeper and more difficult to compete in. It’s more likely the Wild will find themselves slipping further down the standings this year than climbing back into contention.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Haha 1
    • Confused 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    12 minutes ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    Yes. It could. That's just 6 more wins. 

    If they played closer to the 34-23-6 Hynes record versus the 5-10-4 Evason start, that's a good chunk of your 12 points right there. 

    Its funny to me how we love to gang up on Geurin for loading up on 'aging vets' in their early/mid-30s 'who will only get worse' but when the Preds sign dudes the exact same age then its suddenly a great idea that turns them into an immediate contender.. 

    The players Nashville signed have much more talent than what Guerin has been signing. Nashville was a good team last year and those signings made them a better team, while the Wild's signings have them standing pat at best.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    Yes. It could. That's just 6 more wins. 

    If they played closer to the 34-23-6 Hynes record versus the 5-10-4 Evason start, that's a good chunk of your 12 points right there. 

    Its funny to me how we love to gang up on Geurin for loading up on 'aging vets' in their early/mid-30s 'who will only get worse' but when the Preds sign dudes the exact same age then its suddenly a great idea that turns them into an immediate contender.. 

    are you saying Stamkos and Foligno are in the same league?

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, Willy the poor boy said:

    The players Nashville signed have much more talent than what Guerin has been signing. Nashville was a good team last year and those signings made them a better team, while the Wild's signings have them standing pat at best.

    True for the most part, but they have more money to spend AND their window is gonna look different. Greater money dedicated to aging guys than MN with some higher profile guys like Stamkos. Injuries or a bad year could really damage a season there. Not totally different from last season where MN dropped off but NSH and WPG especially were better than projected for the prior off-season. 

    Sure it would have been cool to see MN sign Stamkos or Guentzal. I just don't think that is much different than what we're talking about now which is being caught up in contracts for too much. It's like MN puts modest players on a pedestal sometimes, let's not pretend 4M contracts are 7M contracts. It's not that bad other than NoJo cause he's lazy.

    It would be cool to add C.Stephenson who we discussed but he had been making around 2M and got 7x6M. From that perspective MN had to budget and select a player to sign. I thought it was smart to get Trenin, I had been saying that for months. 

    I think the balance is gonna be better and MN will get back into the playoffs. I have high hopes, based on what I've seen that Buium and Yurov will have a great year. If Heidt goes back to Jr. he'll probably get 100pts again too. The Wild's biggest problem coming up is signing Kirill to an extension. 

    Guerin has been a better than average GM so far.(Consensus-wise.) I would have likes Pius Suter better than NoJo if you're goin the Euro route. I would have liked him to fire Dean after the Dallas series. I wasn't a fan of letting Bjugstad go for a middle-six role. I especially didn't approve of 14min TOI for NoJo late last season. Personally, I think he's done way more good than bad with zero, really bad transactions. 

    My .02 cents on the Wild's "lackluster' off-season. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Willy the poor boy said:

    The players Nashville signed have much more talent than what Guerin has been signing. Nashville was a good team last year and those signings made them a better team, while the Wild's signings have them standing pat at best.

    At best? So you don't expect any improvement from a guy like Faber or Rossi or Ohgren or Khusnutdinov? What they were last year is all they'll ever be, huh? 

    Guess we better just blow the whole thing up now then. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    At best? So you don't expect any improvement from a guy like Faber or Rossi or Ohgren or Khusnutdinov? What they were last year is all they'll ever be, huh? 

    Guess we better just blow the whole thing up now then. 

    Way to move the goalposts...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    56 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    are you saying Stamkos and Foligno are in the same league?

    Not at all, but the Preds don't have a Kucherov for him to play with either. 

    I'm just pointing out how we expect our 30 year olds to only decline over the length of their deals but seem to expect their 30 year olds to continue playing at the same level, possibly even better if you consider them Cup contenders, even with entirely new teammates. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    56 minutes ago, Protec said:

    True for the most part, but they have more money to spend AND their window is gonna look different. Greater money dedicated to aging guys than MN with some higher profile guys like Stamkos. Injuries or a bad year could really damage a season there. Not totally different from last season where MN dropped off but NSH and WPG especially were better than projected for the prior off-season. 

    Sure it would have been cool to see MN sign Stamkos or Guentzal. I just don't think that is much different than what we're talking about now which is being caught up in contracts for too much. It's like MN puts modest players on a pedestal sometimes, let's not pretend 4M contracts are 7M contracts. It's not that bad other than NoJo cause he's lazy.

    It would be cool to add C.Stephenson who we discussed but he had been making around 2M and got 7x6M. From that perspective MN had to budget and select a player to sign. I thought it was smart to get Trenin, I had been saying that for months. 

    I think the balance is gonna be better and MN will get back into the playoffs. I have high hopes, based on what I've seen that Buium and Yurov will have a great year. If Heidt goes back to Jr. he'll probably get 100pts again too. The Wild's biggest problem coming up is signing Kirill to an extension. 

    Guerin has been a better than average GM so far.(Consensus-wise.) I would have likes Pius Suter better than NoJo if you're goin the Euro route. I would have liked him to fire Dean after the Dallas series. I wasn't a fan of letting Bjugstad go for a middle-six role. I especially didn't approve of 14min TOI for NoJo late last season. Personally, I think he's done way more good than bad with zero, really bad transactions. 

    My .02 cents on the Wild's "lackluster' off-season. 

    You're not wrong about a lot of that. I've said all along that I think BG has fallen into a lot of luck along the way. My big gripe is how he has gone about a lot of the trades and moves. I think/believe there is a lot of fallacy in the BG legend.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Willy the poor boy said:

    Way to move the goalposts...

    lol says the guy who completely avoids acknowledging the main point of the post. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    are you saying Stamkos and Foligno are in the same league?

    Like the NHL?  😛

    Preds scored big time with Stamkos.  In the last two years they signed what ROR, Nyquist, Stamkos, Marchesault?  Damn that is good.

    Our turn next year.... oh wait.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A dumb question: a bounceback season from Hartman? Didn't he just have the 2nd/3rd best season of his 8-season career? What's he supposed to bounce back to - to his fluke career year? I wouldn't count on that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Jakub K. said:

    a bounceback season from Hartman? Didn't he just have the 2nd/3rd best season of his 8-season career?

    Agree.  Hartzy plays with heart and has NHL level skill and finish in my opinion.

    I'd say he needs less javalon throwing, less frustration penalties, overall more disciplined veteran play from Hartzy and he's a solid middle 6 NHL'r who can spot fill-in top 6 if necessary.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...