Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild Are Slipping Down the Central Division Rankings


    Image courtesy of Jerome Miron-USA TODAY Sports
    Justin Wiggins

    Publicly, the Minnesota Wild's brass are saying the right things.

    Following just their second season in a decade of failing to make the playoffs, the Wild didn’t have much cap or roster space this summer to meaningfully improve their team. Returning almost the same roster next year does not exactly excite their rabid fan base, which is hungry for a long playoff run.

    Even with mostly the same roster, head coach John Hynes seems optimistic that plenty of internal candidates can improve their chances this year with bounce-back seasons. He's not entirely wrong, whether that be through improved health or performance. But a quick look around the Central Division makes you wonder if that will even be enough.

    The Central looks to be turning into a gauntlet for the Wild. A wild card playoff berth is always an option, but there’s a reason coaches and GMs put so much stock in their standing within the division. Each division in the Western Conference receives three automatic bids to the playoffs, with the remaining ten teams vying for the final two wild card spots.

    The math is easy: focus on the three spots available for the eight teams within the division versus the randomness that can be the two wild card spots available for the remaining ten teams in the conference.

    It’s easy to see why the focus starts within your own division. However, while the Wild mostly treaded water this summer, nearly everyone around them improved their outlook or remained a Stanley Cup contender.

    Let’s start at the top, where the Colorado Avalanche and Dallas Stars look again to be the cream of the crop in the division. Even if you want to scrutinize the merry-go-round of the blue line situation in Dallas, the Wild are not close to challenging them for a higher finish within the division.

    And with a single two-sentence paragraph, the Central division playoff locks are down to one. Last season, the Wild were among the favorites to finish in the top three. But this year? It’s quickly becoming a different story.

    Let’s start with the other three teams the Wild finished behind last year. They plummeted to a sixth-place finish in the division. The Winnipeg Jets and Nashville Predators qualified for the playoffs, and while both were first-round exits, they were far and away better teams than Minnesota.

    Winnipeg finished 23 points ahead of the Wild. While some key pieces departed in free agency this month, it’s difficult to see the Wild bridging that gap, even if their vets stay healthy and improve.

    The Predators might have been the biggest winner in free agency, inking Steven Stamkos, Jonathan Marchessault, and Brady Skjei to long-term contracts. While those deals may start to sour towards the end, Nashville is a much-improved team now compared to the one that finished 12 points ahead of Minnesota.

    Suppose Minnesota gets a bounce-back season from Ryan Hartman, Marcus Johansson, and Frederick Gaudreau, plus better injury luck for Jared Spurgeon and Marcus Foligno. Still, does anyone think it would be enough to bridge that 12-point gap and then some? For a team that will likely be a favored dark horse Stanley Cup contender, most likely not.

    The St. Louis Blues are the only team that finished ahead of the Wild in the Central last year that Minnesota could reasonably believe they have a shot at catching.

    But it’s not just the teams who finished ahead of them who improved their chances this summer. For almost a decade, the Arizona Coyotes were a near lock on the calendar to secure at least one point, most likely two. However, with their move to Utah, new owner Ryan Smith has signaled those days are over. With the trade for top-pair defenseman Mikhail Sergachev and a slew of other notable free-agent signings, Utah seems poised to take a big step this season.

    And while Chicago remains a bottom-five team going into the season, it’s difficult to see them repeating their 52-point campaign with their additions to surround phenom Connor Bedard with an NHL-caliber roster.

    Hynes is publicly saying the right things. Just last week, during his appearance on KFAN radio station, Hynes pointed to the disappointing offensive seasons of a few veteran forwards as evidence that they can bounce back.

    “We still believe in the guys," he said. "The guys that we have on the roster, they’ve got to be better. And I’m excited to have some conversations with guys now that our team is basically through free agency.”

    Hynes highlighted Hartman’s past success with Kirill Kaprizov and Mats Zuccarello and his return to being a top-line center, giving them the potential to diversify their offensive options. However, Hartman hasn’t produced like a top-line center each of the past two years, even with ample opportunity to remain there. It's tough to say whether returning to playing alongside Kaprizov alone will revitalize his game. 

    Then there are the recurring injury concerns with the heavily relied-on veterans on the roster. Hynes can hope Spurgeon, Jonas Brodin, and Foligno can put together a full season. However, the odds of all three doing so are extremely low.

    Spurgeon missed 66 games last year due to injury, which was a trend more than a blip. The Wild captain has missed at least 17 games due to injury in four of the past five seasons. Foligno also missed at least 17 games in that same period. Jonas Brodin’s injury history is even more concerning, as the recently turned 31-year-old has missed at least 20 games in four of the last five seasons.

    Relying on improved play from three players who have experienced short stints of success over the past decade is a tough sell. Add to that the avalanche of injuries their veteran roster is saddled with, and the task looks nearly impossible.

    But even in a scenario where everything goes right for Hynes and the Wild this year, the Central division is only getting deeper and more difficult to compete in. It’s more likely the Wild will find themselves slipping further down the standings this year than climbing back into contention.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Haha 1
    • Confused 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    19 minutes ago, IllicitFive said:

    And the players you wanted to surround Kap with, while filling a roster and staying under the cap? What would ME have done so different in your mind? From the stuff you post pretty hard to know what's sarcasm and what's not. All of it seems to be under the same nonsense category of "the wild are a trash organization" that you type every time. 

    there are ways to navigate any situation as shown by Kings dealing away an anchor. you just have to give up something to get something. we did nothing. nothing. there is no sarcasm here - just reality. 

    nice job quoting me saying "wild are a trash organization" when i have never said that. cheers! you are brilliant. 

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    there are ways to navigate any situation as shown by Kings dealing away an anchor. you just have to give up something to get something. we did nothing. nothing. there is no sarcasm here - just reality. 

    nice job quoting me saying "wild are a trash organization" when i have never said that. cheers! you are brilliant. 

    Yet you keep ducking answering the question. What ways, if so easy then show and explain. And just giving a summary of your works with the quote, a paraphrase if you will. I couldn't find the Kings with 15 mil in a cap hit. So I will make it easy for you, remove Kopitar and Fiala, together its almost 15 mil. Think they got a cup winning team now? Didn't last year with them.

    So lets try this again since you wont answer. What moves should they have made. What moves do YOU want them to make. Who to drop, who to sign/trade for? Since all you have to do is "you just have to give up something to get something" you should be able to lay it out easily and quit avoiding an actual answer, instead of your incessant complaining.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, IllicitFive said:

    Yet you keep ducking answering the question. What ways, if so easy then show and explain. And just giving a summary of your works with the quote, a paraphrase if you will. I couldn't find the Kings with 15 mil in a cap hit. So I will make it easy for you, remove Kopitar and Fiala, together its almost 15 mil. Think they got a cup winning team now? Didn't last year with them.

    So lets try this again since you wont answer. What moves should they have made. What moves do YOU want them to make. Who to drop, who to sign/trade for? Since all you have to do is "you just have to give up something to get something" you should be able to lay it out easily and quit avoiding an actual answer, instead of your incessant complaining.

    i forgot that Parise was our Kopitar and Suter was our Fiala. make sense when comparing. I was more thinking Parise was our washed up 4th liner and Suter was over hyped, not too physical, goon, that could be easily replaced and was by Middleton. If Parise was in fact a Kopitar then yes, it would be hard - but the that is another variable to the pie - the issue is not just the cap hit, the issue is the player. Would you stop crying if Parise was still on the team and the cap hit was only half the size? But then Parise would do as much benefit to the success of the team as you would. So the player that you loose in the cap hell matters too. I'll let you think this through a bit. 

    Fine an example if you need it - 

    • Give Captaincy to Kaprizov
    • Discuss future plans with Spurgeon, get his list of teams
    • Identify players that could help (Tuch, Tkachuk B, Buch, Guentzel, Marchy, Zegras) - each situation is different but you lay out the plan and begin execution
    • Along with Spurgeon you need assets. Your assets are (i) current prospects (ii) current and future picks) (iii) young assets that have yet to diminish in value (Rossi)
    • For trading - you create a desirable package and go after -- Tuch, Tkachuk, Zegras
    • For signing - you do NOT sign Middleton and Trenin and instead use it on Marchy. You may even be able to trade or loose MJ which would mean enough to perhaps get Geuntzel

    Does that help? 

    Edited by OldDutchChip
    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    i forgot that Parise was our Kopitar and Suter was our Fiala. make sense when comparing. I was more thinking Parise was our washed up 4th liner and Suter was over hyped, not too physical, goon, that could be easily replaced and was by Middleton. If Parise was in fact a Kopitar then yes, it would be hard - but the that is another variable to the pie - the issue is not just the cap hit, the issue is the player. Would you stop crying if Parise was still on the team and the cap hit was only half the size? But then Parise would do as much benefit to the success of the team as you would. So the player that you loose in the cap hell matters too. I'll let you think this through a bit. 

    Fine an example if you need it - 

    • Give Captaincy to Kaprizov
    • Discuss future plans with Spurgeon, get his list of teams
    • Identify players that could help (Tuch, Tkachuk B, Buch, Guentzel, Marchy, Zegras) - each situation is different but you lay out the plan and begin execution
    • Along with Spurgeon you need assets. Your assets are (i) current prospects (ii) current and future picks) (iii) young assets that have yet to diminish in value (Rossi)
    • For trading - you create a desirable package and go after -- Tuch, Tkachuk, Zegras
    • For signing - you do NOT sign Middleton and Trenin and instead use it on Marchy. You may even be able to trade or loose MJ which would mean enough to perhaps get Geuntzel

    Does that help? 

    Ok I you clearly cant follow a basic straight line thought. The comparison was cap space, you know that thing you use to pay players. Start off with the close to 15 mil dead cap, thats just fact. Math is hard so we can hold hands. When you have 15 mil dead cap, that is unusable money that you could use to sign players the caliber of Kopitar and Fiala. The release was a move that needed to be made but you have to navigate the repercussions. Pretty simple concept I believe even you can understand. 

    Here are the salaries

    Tuch 4.75 mil - Also need to be traded for.

    Tkatchuk B. 8.2 mil- Also needs to be traded for

    Buch - 8 mil - Need to trade for

    Guentz - 9 mil

    Zegras  - 5.75 - Going to probably need a bigger contract.

    Now spurge does have 8 mil hit and mids is 4 so can get tuch and zegras, but now you have 2 open spots on defense you didn't address and again 0 cap space. I will assume you mean J Marchy here who is at 5.5. Well he can replace one of the other 2 but defense is now gutted fully. Trading MJ sounds great, would you take him if another team? I wouldn't so looks like more assests being lost there to unload the contract. You also want to trade for big name players using picks and young guys. Well congrats you have completely gutted the best young talent we have that may turn out to be contributors for a team that has 4 defenders. Well done, you are right, so much smarter than everyone else. Thanks for playing. Play stupid games win stupid prizes I guess. Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about in general. Good for me and anyone else who cares to know going forward.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    wild are guaranteed bottom  3 place in their division, perhaps as i pointed out before - they will battle for last place. anyone who is predicting 100+ season is a moron. we are bringing the same goal tending tandem this year. the same horrible pair of goal tenders that yielded below 900 saving percentage. and given that we only have 1.5 lines that can play offense, our goalies will be tested often, so yeah.....

    I simply can't accept this and fully disagree. 2 seasons ago we had a pretty good roster and success in the regular season. Playoffs, not so much. But last season we had a lot of injuries and they especially piled up by position at one time which happens but is odd. 

    Your analysis is only 1 year deep, and accordingly the goalie tandem sucks because of last year's sv%. I don't think that Fleury will get much better, he may be worse, but Goose should get to .910 in a bounce back year. It's not the .930, but it's also not the .898 either. 

    For this team to be successful, down $15m in cap, they will need better than average health, and not have compiled injuries taking out depth at 1 position. They will also need for their guys to hit at cap value or a little above. This is not a big ask. We're not talking career years, we're talking above average. Finally, we need the kids in the lineup to light it up. This is where the risk comes in and as ODC is normal to say- they haven't done anything yet at this level. 

    So, what would this look like? Starting from the goalie, he needs to perform like a $4.5m cap 'tender. We need big years out of Faber and Chisholm, and we need above cap years from Brodin (probably defensively), Bogosian, Middleton, and Spurgeon. And, it would be great to minimize the use of Merrill.

    From the forwards, Ogie, Dino, Rossi need to kill it. Zuccarello needs to perform better that a $4.2m player. The bottom 6 need to perform (defensively) better than their salaries. Boldy needs to have a $9m season. Health will be important.

    A couple of more items are needed: Fix the PK (this is where we make up points ground) and do better in the dot. 

    These are very obtainable goals and will put us in the upper 90s in points. Stolen points was the way we got to 100 points the 2 previous years. Last year, points were stolen from us, especially down the stretch coughing up 3rd period leads. This also is a key to getting us in the upper 90s. 

    All is not lost here, it doesn't need to be negative. But, if this team comes out and plays similar to last season and deals with the injuries the same way, yeah, the negative outcome is most likely.

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    jared is 34 i believe so he is getting up there, add to that uncertainty that comes with big injury and other aging benefits - that means he is likely a geezer now

    This right here is a correct take. It's not just that Spurgeon is 34, it's that he had 2 major surgeries and is playing at 163. You may not like it, but competitive large players are going to test and see just how good that surgery was. 

    Personally, I don't think we're going to get the same Spurgeon back, and it's kind of a shame. I anticipate we will have Spurgeon on LTIR plenty of the rest of this contract and he will come back more a shell of himself. I hope I am wrong.

    • Like 2
    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I simply can't accept this and fully disagree. 2 seasons ago we had a pretty good roster and success in the regular season. Playoffs, not so much. But last season we had a lot of injuries and they especially piled up by position at one time which happens but is odd. 

    Your analysis is only 1 year deep, and accordingly the goalie tandem sucks because of last year's sv%. I don't think that Fleury will get much better, he may be worse, but Goose should get to .910 in a bounce back year. It's not the .930, but it's also not the .898 either. 

    For this team to be successful, down $15m in cap, they will need better than average health, and not have compiled injuries taking out depth at 1 position. They will also need for their guys to hit at cap value or a little above. This is not a big ask. We're not talking career years, we're talking above average. Finally, we need the kids in the lineup to light it up. This is where the risk comes in and as ODC is normal to say- they haven't done anything yet at this level. 

    So, what would this look like? Starting from the goalie, he needs to perform like a $4.5m cap 'tender. We need big years out of Faber and Chisholm, and we need above cap years from Brodin (probably defensively), Bogosian, Middleton, and Spurgeon. And, it would be great to minimize the use of Merrill.

    From the forwards, Ogie, Dino, Rossi need to kill it. Zuccarello needs to perform better that a $4.2m player. The bottom 6 need to perform (defensively) better than their salaries. Boldy needs to have a $9m season. Health will be important.

    A couple of more items are needed: Fix the PK (this is where we make up points ground) and do better in the dot. 

    These are very obtainable goals and will put us in the upper 90s in points. Stolen points was the way we got to 100 points the 2 previous years. Last year, points were stolen from us, especially down the stretch coughing up 3rd period leads. This also is a key to getting us in the upper 90s. 

    All is not lost here, it doesn't need to be negative. But, if this team comes out and plays similar to last season and deals with the injuries the same way, yeah, the negative outcome is most likely.

    I simply can't accept this and fully disagree. 2 seasons ago we had a pretty good roster and success in the regular season. you don't have to accept it or even agree with it, but its a fact. there are a lot of unknowns and over hyping for this season. our goalie tandem is the worse one we EVER had and one injury to the big three (Ek, Kap, Boldy) and we immediately become THE worst team in the league. So yeah if all breaks right then maybe we can go for that 2nd wild card, if there are some hiccups - then we plummet

    • Haha 3
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    42 minutes ago, IllicitFive said:

    Ok I you clearly cant follow a basic straight line thought. The comparison was cap space, you know that thing you use to pay players. Start off with the close to 15 mil dead cap, thats just fact. Math is hard so we can hold hands. When you have 15 mil dead cap, that is unusable money that you could use to sign players the caliber of Kopitar and Fiala. The release was a move that needed to be made but you have to navigate the repercussions. Pretty simple concept I believe even you can understand. 

    Here are the salaries

    Tuch 4.75 mil - Also need to be traded for.

    Tkatchuk B. 8.2 mil- Also needs to be traded for

    Buch - 8 mil - Need to trade for

    Guentz - 9 mil

    Zegras  - 5.75 - Going to probably need a bigger contract.

    Now spurge does have 8 mil hit and mids is 4 so can get tuch and zegras, but now you have 2 open spots on defense you didn't address and again 0 cap space. I will assume you mean J Marchy here who is at 5.5. Well he can replace one of the other 2 but defense is now gutted fully. Trading MJ sounds great, would you take him if another team? I wouldn't so looks like more assests being lost there to unload the contract. You also want to trade for big name players using picks and young guys. Well congrats you have completely gutted the best young talent we have that may turn out to be contributors for a team that has 4 defenders. Well done, you are right, so much smarter than everyone else. Thanks for playing. Play stupid games win stupid prizes I guess. Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about in general. Good for me and anyone else who cares to know going forward.

    you clearly cant follow a basic straight line thought

    Math is hard so we can hold hands

    Pretty simple concept I believe even you can understand

    Play stupid games win stupid prizes I guess. Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about in general. Good for me and anyone else who cares to know going forward.

    GO F#CK OFF GENIUS 🍻 or learn to read, analyze, and only then comment. it'll help you in life too. 

    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    So yeah if all breaks right then maybe we can go for that 2nd wild card, if there are some hiccups - then we plummet

    That pretty much sums it up.  I guess you are an optimist.  😀

    • Haha 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, OldDutchChip said:

    Fine an example if you need it - 

    • Give Captaincy to Kaprizov
    • Discuss future plans with Spurgeon, get his list of teams
    • Identify players that could help (Tuch, Tkachuk B, Buch, Guentzel, Marchy, Zegras) - each situation is different but you lay out the plan and begin execution
    • Along with Spurgeon you need assets. Your assets are (i) current prospects (ii) current and future picks) (iii) young assets that have yet to diminish in value (Rossi)
    • For trading - you create a desirable package and go after -- Tuch, Tkachuk, Zegras
    • For signing - you do NOT sign Middleton and Trenin and instead use it on Marchy. You may even be able to trade or loose MJ which would mean enough to perhaps get Geuntzel

    Ok, if I'm reading this right, you are going down a step path where not everything can be done, but the priority is on the upper dot. So, you would 1st need to figure out Spurgeon and his contract. I think the identifying players that can help already happened and they were just too expensive or the other team wouldn't even listen (B. Tkachuk). 

    Marchessault was the only free agent option after everything cleared. Could Guerin have been in on that? Maybe, but he would eventually have to waive Johansson and Gaudreau and not sign Trenin. For what we really needed, was Trenin or Marchessault the better fit? I would say Trenin might be with the caveat of Heinzy knowing him, and him knowing the new system. 

    Would Marchessault have had chemistry with a line? You could have tried the minions line with Marchy-Rossi-Zuccy. I think that is unknown. Also, would you have to sign Marchy for too long? That is a definite possibility! Leipold is not a guy with the same payroll drive as the Vegas owner. He doesn't bury a lot on LTIR. In fact, he's used to only having to pay the basement when the cap suggests he's spending all the way to the ceiling.

    I am in on Tuch completely, and perhaps we can still make that happen. He is a missing piece that would really help out line 2. I would make Yurov untouchable, same with Buium and The Wall. Who else do you like? They might take Heidt, and I think that's a fair deal, we probably have to add some draft capital or another lower prospect. Hunt might also be that guy. Do they have a large bodied defensive prospect in Buffalo, or could you pry Mattias Samuelsson loose? To me, that would be a blockbuster.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Ok, if I'm reading this right, you are going down a step path where not everything can be done, but the priority is on the upper dot. So, you would 1st need to figure out Spurgeon and his contract. I think the identifying players that can help already happened and they were just too expensive or the other team wouldn't even listen (B. Tkachuk). 

    Marchessault was the only free agent option after everything cleared. Could Guerin have been in on that? Maybe, but he would eventually have to waive Johansson and Gaudreau and not sign Trenin. For what we really needed, was Trenin or Marchessault the better fit? I would say Trenin might be with the caveat of Heinzy knowing him, and him knowing the new system. 

    Would Marchessault have had chemistry with a line? You could have tried the minions line with Marchy-Rossi-Zuccy. I think that is unknown. Also, would you have to sign Marchy for too long? That is a definite possibility! Leipold is not a guy with the same payroll drive as the Vegas owner. He doesn't bury a lot on LTIR. In fact, he's used to only having to pay the basement when the cap suggests he's spending all the way to the ceiling.

    I am in on Tuch completely, and perhaps we can still make that happen. He is a missing piece that would really help out line 2. I would make Yurov untouchable, same with Buium and The Wall. Who else do you like? They might take Heidt, and I think that's a fair deal, we probably have to add some draft capital or another lower prospect. Hunt might also be that guy. Do they have a large bodied defensive prospect in Buffalo, or could you pry Mattias Samuelsson loose? To me, that would be a blockbuster.

    right so each had their own path perhaps but those are some names i would at least try to go for. Marchy was a free agent and perhaps needed a bit more to entice him to join us, but i think he would make for an amazing trip with EK and Kap. 

    Tuch would also be wonderful addition. 

    Guentzel is expensive but thats where you can actually use some out of norm thinking which may require a spurge "dump" for minimal take back and we need to potentially sweeten it up with a pick. 

    overall it was doable, it just wasn't even tried. Your targets are great too, but it would require a smart GM with progressive, aggressive and agile thinking - Billy is none of that, hence we are stuck with Trenin, similar extensions (midds) and no change to Goalie tandem (remember - worse in the league and MAF is now 54?)

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    So yeah if all breaks right then maybe we can go for that 2nd wild card, if there are some hiccups - then we plummet

    This is the definition of competitive. Competitive is within a playoff seeding with 5 games to play. That is exactly what Guerin promised us through the dead cap years. A Competitive team. A competitive team is somewhere between 13-17 in NHL rank. 

    So, if injuries happen, or if our goalie tandem impersonates Swiss cheese, yeah, we're in trouble. It did work for 3 years, however!

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    no change to Goalie tandem (remember - worse in the league and MAF is now 54?)

    His shoulders are slumping, he now stands 5'2".

    • Haha 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, mnfaninnc said:

    This is the definition of competitive. Competitive is within a playoff seeding with 5 games to play. That is exactly what Guerin promised us through the dead cap years. A Competitive team. A competitive team is somewhere between 13-17 in NHL rank. 

    So, if injuries happen, or if our goalie tandem impersonates Swiss cheese, yeah, we're in trouble. It did work for 3 years, however!

    unfortunately i feel like we are below 17th this season. but maybe a miracle run happens. 🍻

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Wild Are Slipping Down the Central Division Rankings

    Whose rankings?

    We WAY outperformed our talent 2 years ago. That set up the front office and national media for the letdown last year. 

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    you clearly cant follow a basic straight line thought

    Math is hard so we can hold hands

    Pretty simple concept I believe even you can understand

    Play stupid games win stupid prizes I guess. Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about in general. Good for me and anyone else who cares to know going forward.

    GO F#CK OFF GENIUS 🍻 or learn to read, analyze, and only then comment. it'll help you in life too. 

    Haha name calling all you got left? Pretty sure my math is sound and following your plans you created a team of 4 defenders and 0 cap and all your best future assets gone. My brother in christ you'd be disaster as a GM. Break out a calculator and add some numbers, take a breath, and try again. Big numbers but it's only addition and subtraction, I have faith in you rubbing two synapses together to make maybe 1 coherent thought. Well maybe not, but you can try it. Couldn't show where, by numbers and current contracts, I am wrong here so resort to telling me that. Haha I hear the circus music but look like you showed up in clown makeup early. 

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/13/2024 at 12:21 PM, Will D. Ness said:

    Secondary scoring is TBD.

    Special teams is TBD.

    Neither can be any worse, am I right?? We'll improve those and lose in the 1st round to one of the teams that plays in the Western finals.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, IllicitFive said:

    Haha name calling all you got left? Pretty sure my math is sound and following your plans you created a team of 4 defenders and 0 cap and all your best future assets gone. My brother in christ you'd be disaster as a GM. Break out a calculator and add some numbers, take a breath, and try again. Big numbers but it's only addition and subtraction, I have faith in you rubbing two synapses together to make maybe 1 coherent thought. Well maybe not, but you can try it. Couldn't show where, by numbers and current contracts, I am wrong here so resort to telling me that. Haha I hear the circus music but look like you showed up in clown makeup early. 

    i think you were a bit fiesty first buddy. so again go [FLY A KITE]. 

    Edited by Tony Abbott
    Heated Language
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    i think you were a bit fiesty first buddy. so again go F#ck off. 

    Grow up kid (based on how you seem to handle yourself, mentally anyway) I greet idiocy and pure complaining with feistiness because there is nothing there to respect. I call it like I see it, and gave you every opportunity to prove yourself, but couldn't rise to that occasion. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, IllicitFive said:

    Grow up kid (based on how you seem to handle yourself, mentally anyway) I greet idiocy and pure complaining with feistiness because there is nothing there to respect. I call it like I see it, and gave you every opportunity to prove yourself, but couldn't rise to that occasion. 

    i appreciate it father. again go F#ck yourself. 

    • Haha 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is what I keep thinking, we can't afford to bring in a big-$$, big-name... Well, we could, but most scenarios lead to a rental d/t cap space. Hard pass on that. I liked Tuch alot, but overpaying to get him back would torch me personally, regardless of which regime idiotically sent him packing as an insurance-piece.

    & for every Vegas example (a team that got exceptional benefits for expansion) there are probably 5 teams that don't fair so well with that strategy, odds are not in your favor if you want the Wild to copycat them.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/13/2024 at 11:21 AM, Will D. Ness said:

    Coaching should be implemented better and outside of Zucc and Fleury, we don't have any aging talent in decline.

    Foligno? Gaudreau? Bogosian? Merill? Spurg? Brodin? Mojo?

    All these guys are over 30 and should be expected to decline. Not saying none of them will bounce back this year just saying that the typical trend is for a regressive decline after 30. Expecting these players to have their best seasons or match them is a losing bet.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, TheGoosesAreLooses said:

    Foligno? Gaudreau? Bogosian? Merill? Spurg? Brodin? Mojo?

    All these guys are over 30 and should be expected to decline. Not saying none of them will bounce back this year just saying that the typical trend is for a regressive decline after 30. Expecting these players to have their best seasons or match them is a losing bet.

    While they may not have their best seasons or match them I think the hope is a progression back to the mean. With the injuries that everyone but Bogo, Merill, and Mojo had, I think its fair to hope that they won't have that again this year and hopefully be more productive. Hopefully as they decline, which I am hoping is slower than last years injury mess may show. I believe most can agree the best option would be young guys coming in, earning a spot in the NHL, and pushing some of these aging guys down the line up to 3rd and 4th line roles. A 4th line a Moose, Gaudreau and TBD doesn't seem to bad. Less minutes, can play physical, and not expected to add as much offensively. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, IllicitFive said:

    While they may not have their best seasons or match them I think the hope is a progression back to the mean. With the injuries that everyone but Bogo, Merill, and Mojo had, I think its fair to hope that they won't have that again this year and hopefully be more productive. Hopefully as they decline, which I am hoping is slower than last years injury mess may show. I believe most can agree the best option would be young guys coming in, earning a spot in the NHL, and pushing some of these aging guys down the line up to 3rd and 4th line roles. A 4th line a Moose, Gaudreau and TBD doesn't seem to bad. Less minutes, can play physical, and not expected to add as much offensively. 

    Genius is back! Oh let's see what he has for us kids - 

    • progression to the mean - for who? for the team for a specific player or for this group? assuming its these guys -> Foligno? Gaudreau? Bogosian? Merill? Spurg? Brodin? Mojo? What is the "mean" for them? please tell us what is the mean for Bogosian? is that being one of the worse Defenders in history? what is the mean for Merill haha seriously what is it? or Gaudreau 😜? or maybe expand on what you meant re Spurge? you know he was injured so it wasn't a down year due to performance, it was injury that limited his play, so maybe expand how the injuries + age may contribute to his return to you mysterious mean or perhaps failure to return to that mean? Brodin had an off year or did you just list him by accident? i thought he was good? but ok. Mojo's mean is what exactly - i think he is as consistent as he always been for us? You are surprising me with a lot of noise without substance! i thought better of you papa
    • Guadreau playing 4th line because he is physical? do you actually watch the game or just pick the players at random and assign them to a role? maybe try Guadreau with Kap next? seems like something you would suggest!

    🍻 :classic_love:

    • Haha 1
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, TheGoosesAreLooses said:

    Foligno? Gaudreau? Bogosian? Merill? Spurg? Brodin? Mojo?

    All these guys are over 30 and should be expected to decline. Not saying none of them will bounce back this year just saying that the typical trend is for a regressive decline after 30. Expecting these players to have their best seasons or match them is a losing bet.

    Generally speaking, I think the big decline comes in the late 30's vs a relatively small decline in the early 30's.  Biggest exception is probably running backs in the NFL.  You don't see too many RB's in their late 30's these days.  Higher contact sports obviously will have higher decline rates with such a high wear and tear.

    I've seen graphs posted around here used to support many writers gripes about age related decline, but they were slanted somewhat by not isolating injuries.  

    The decline I am talking about is basically just Father Time and not injury related decline but it is hard to isolate the two.  (ie Spurg might be one of these double whammies)

    As far as your list goes, Spurg and Foligno are questionable because of wear and tear.  You may be right but let's hope not.

    Bogosian plays a physical game but he kind of had a renaissance last season.  Will it continue?  I think so.  He looked on top of his game and is what 33?

    Brodin got boarded by Kane.  It was a cheap shot.  We need Trenin to rectify it.  I'm not worried about Brodin declining.

    Freddy got demolished by Reavo.   Not only did it injure him physically, but I think it also got in his head.  I don't think he will decline... can't get worse than last year.  I think he significantly improves actually.

    Merrill and NoJo?  Do we care?

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...