Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild Are Fully In Control Of Their Playoff Destiny


    Image courtesy of Christopher Hanewinc-USA TODAY Sports
    Justin Wiggins

    Do you want the good news or the bad news? It’s the holidays, and I’m feeling joyfully optimistic, so let’s start with the good news.

    Even after a slow start that led to a coaching change and many wondering if it was time to tank for a high draft pick, the Minnesota Wild’s small turnaround lately has them in a perfect position to challenge for a playoff spot in the wide-open West.

    The bad news? The West doesn’t seem as wide open as it did when general manager Bill Guerin made his coaching change in late November.

    At the time, the Edmonton Oilers and Minnesota were labeled as Western Conference playoff hopefuls who were severely under-performing. Their struggles opened the door for early-season surprises in cities like Arizona and Nashville. Even the Winnipeg Jets seemed to rebound from a poor season last year to reclaim their position in the top three of the Central Division. But the growing theme was a handful of those teams were paper tigers and would eventually come down to Earth for the Oilers and Wild to climb back into the race.

    The real problem for the Wild is that the Western Conference playoff picture might have only one spot left. And that’s a dangerous game of musical chairs to be playing. But it’s the reality of their current situation.

    The top three in the Pacific Division are all but locked down, barring a monumental meltdown from three teams that look to be serious Stanley Cup Contenders: the Las Vegas Golden Knights, Vancouver Canucks, and Los Angeles Kings. The same could be said for the Central Division, too, but with a little more hesitancy. The Colorado Avalanche, Winnipeg Jets, and Dallas Stars have their warts, but they have also clearly separated themselves from the rest of the division. Even a minor slipup by either team would still be an almost impossible hill to climb in the standings for Minnesota.

    And that leaves the two wild card spots. When Edmonton and Minnesota made their coaching changes a few weeks ago, it was done in the hopes of sparking a struggling team into climbing back into an open wild-card race. Minnesota looks stronger and more consistent under John Hynes. Still, they're nowhere near the dominant turnaround their friends to the north are experiencing.

    To nobody’s surprise, Edmonton is surging up the standings. The entire hockey world knew once Connor McDavid was healthy and their goalies made a few saves, they’d become a horse once again. Winners of eight of their last ten, it’s safe to say the thoroughbred has finally left the starting gate.

    What does this mean for the Wild? Let’s assume neither of those three at the top of the Pacific standings will fall on their face – a very assumption. Edmonton may chase down the Kings, for example. But the Wild likely won’t, not with an extra game played and ten fewer points. Those four teams will likely occupy the top three spots in the division, plus the first wild card.

    Back to the Central. It’s difficult to imagine the Wild catching Dallas, the current 3-seed, with the same games played and nine fewer points. Not to mention, the Stars are simply a better team. Maybe Winnipeg slips in the next few months with All-Star sniper Kyle Connors out with an injury, but they have yet to slow down with him out of the lineup, so that seems unlikely.

    You can see where this is going. With the Pacific all but locking up four spots and the top-3 in the Central also penned in, only one wild card spot remains. One. And it looks daunting with five teams currently positioned between the Wild and that final spot.

    Yet, there is a light at the end of the tunnel. Remember when I promised there was good news and bad news? Here’s where the good news comes into play. Even with only one spot left up for grabs, the Wild have an extremely good chance at grabbing that seat when the music finally ends in April. A nice scheduling quirk has afforded them such a chance.

    Due to their trip to Sweden and the fact that the NHL cannot create a schedule that makes the standings look accurate week to week, the Wild are positioned better than you'd think. They have anywhere between one and five(!) fewer games played than those other contenders for the final playoff spot. The Nashville Predators, St. Louis Blues, Arizona Coyotes, Calgary Flames, and Seattle Kraken have all played more games and the Wild are looking up at each of them. However, points percentage catapults the Wild ahead of Calgary and Seattle.

    The Wild’s Eastern Conference heavy schedule to start the season helps their case, too. They’ve played 15 of their first 27 games against the East, more than any of the teams they’re competing with for the final spot in the West. That leaves them with more opportunities for the all-important head-to-head matchups against those other five teams.

    Here are how many games each of the five contending teams have remaining against each other:

    Minnesota

    12

    Arizona

    12

    Nashville

    10

    St. Louis

    9

    Calgary

    9

    Seattle

    9

    While the NHL is a crazy league where some astonishing comebacks up the standings have happened, this year’s version of the Wild seems to be stuck in a very simple playoff race: one spot remaining and six teams jostling for it. As long as they take care of business with their games in hand, Minnesota has clawed their way back into control of their playoff destiny for the first time this year.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    I just don't think that Winnipeg is that strong of a team. Down the stretch last year, they looked like a solid playoff team and then collapsed, barely getting in. We haven't even played them yet this year, but that comes up at Christmas time. I do agree with the top teams in the Pacific, and while Vancouver has been playing well, they are fully capable of collapsing too.

    The formula is there, same as the last few years: Win the games you're supposed to win, win some of the games you're not supposed to win, and take partial credit (loser points). That means that teams with power rankings in the 20s and 30s, they have to be automatic wins and it should be in regulation. Teams ranked in the teens should be 2/3 wins, maybe with a loser point on the 3rd game. In the top 10, those should be 1/3 wins with a loser point tacked on. 

    This also means you need to show up for every game. No more bad performances against teams you should beat! Really, under Evason, this was his strength. He had, what I believe, to be the best record against competition that should be beaten in Wild history. It was uncanny how he could get them through those games. Perhaps Hynes can navigate that ship too. But the main thing is, we are not scoreboard watching yet, it's simply a take care of business mentality and worry about our success. Climbing the standings will follow. 

    I still think we should be 3rd in the division by season's end.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Athletic currently projects Minnesota to miss the playoffs with Nashville in the #8 spot. The Wild won their only contest against Nashville so far, and the remaining 3 games between them could be crucial in determining who ends up in the postseason.

    They project Arizona and St. Louis to fall off quite a bit, which would not be overly surprising. They Project Calgary just behind the Wild. Tons of hockey ahead yet, but seems like it could be a tight race through the end of the season.

    Also, the LA Kings have been on fire with Kopitar, Kempe, and Fiala all at 1 point per game. Strong play from Cam Talbot has been helping as well, with him ranked 4th in save percentage(.927) among all goalies who have played in at least 8 games. Their backup is only at .870 in save percentage.

    The Kings have played one of the toughest schedules and may challenge for the conference lead given they have statistically the easiest remaining schedule and fewest games played so far amongst Western conference teams.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    37 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    the LA Kings have been on fire with Kopitar, Kempe, and Fiala all at 1 point per game.

    For those who think we won the Fiala trade because we got faber i beg to differ.  Even though faber is a legit D1, Fiala is proving to be a gd unicorn.  Hoping Ohgren(or yurov)becomes a Kempe type power forward.  If that happens we win the trade

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    For those who think we won the Fiala trade because we got faber i beg to differ.  Even though faber is a legit D1, Fiala is proving to be a gd unicorn.  Hoping Ohgren(or yurov)becomes a Kempe type power forward.  If that happens we win the trade

    There wasn't a way to win that trade. We got more than I thought we would though.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We lost Fiala but i think there could be some opportunities ahead  ,ofcourse they wont be easy .

    Maybe Jake Guentzel sees the pens rebuilding with the 2 top dogs reaching 40s ,  37 and 38 when his contract expires maybe he sees greener pastures elsewhere ,  or Nylander , Marshasault ,  long shots i know but we can get a good player if we wanted .  Mn isnt a terrible organization and theyre always a pretty good team  proving they arent cheapskates  .

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, FredJohnson said:

    There wasn't a way to win that trade. We got more than I thought we would though.

    Im not exactly sure if what im saying is correct but had they offered fiala an offer sheet of what they ended up paying him 7.875.000  the Wild would have gotten a 1st,2nd,3rd round picks ,  I think  anyways  .  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8th place Arizona has played 2 more games and are only 4 points ahead now, so now that the Wild moved 1 point ahead of Edmonton, if the Wild win their next two, the Wild would be in 8th place. Arizona may hold tie breakers currently, but Wild will face them eventually--January 13th for the first meeting.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/16/2023 at 7:02 PM, Dango said:

    Im not exactly sure if what im saying is correct but had they offered fiala an offer sheet of what they ended up paying him 7.875.000  the Wild would have gotten a 1st,2nd,3rd round picks ,  I think  anyways  .  

    No other team would've picked up that offer sheet. They all would've waited for us to drop it anyway as we couldn't fit the contract under the cap at the time. (Or we'd have had dump, a.k.a. trade other contracts to be cap compliant.)

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/16/2023 at 11:34 AM, Pewterschmidt said:

    For those who think we won the Fiala trade because we got faber i beg to differ.  Even though faber is a legit D1, Fiala is proving to be a gd unicorn.  Hoping Ohgren(or yurov)becomes a Kempe type power forward.  If that happens we win the trade

    This is how I think we won the deal (and that doesn't mean that LA lost the deal). We did get what looks to be a legit D1, but more importantly, we got a D1 on the right side, something we did not have in the organization coming up. 

    We were also able to draft Ohgren which allowed us to swing at Yurov. Just getting Faber meant we traded positions and both organizations got excellent players. However, somehow we must make up for Fiala's scoring. That is non-existent right now. 

    But, should Yurov and/or Ohgren come in as a solid player who can contribute on the score sheet, that would make it a huge win for us. But, LA got Fiala at least a year early and has enjoyed his production, so they get a win too. In fact, they have another RHS D1 defender in Brandt Clarke. So, they traded from a strength. We traded from desperation, so for us to get a player of Faber's calibre, and possibly other help, our hedge will take time. 

    The other thing that must be looked at in this, however, is the immediate cap savings the organization got. We'll have Yurov on an ELC, and we've got Faber currently there. Those positions will end up being overperformed to contract status. If we get long and prosperous careers out of them, we definitely win, but LA had the money and they had the centers to make Fiala very productive. 

    And, Fiala wins, because he got to take his wife to a nice climate to help out her career and they get to spend far more time together. Faber wins because he gets to play in his hometown where he always wanted to play. Yurov wins getting to play with Kaprizov and Ohgren wins because he plays in a place closest resembling his home. 

    I feel like Oprah now: you get a win, and you get a win, wins for everyone!

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    The other thing that must be looked at in this, however, is the immediate cap savings the organization got. We'll have Yurov on an ELC, and we've got Faber currently there.

    Great point.  Someone might look real smart from a navigating cap hell standpoint if Yurov pans out and becomes a contributing nhl'r (even 3rd liner).  If Yurov goes full Firstov we lost the trade.  

    80+ pt forward > D1's all day, every day.

    If Faber evolves into more of a Cale Makar offensive contributor in 2-3 yrs well then I'd be willing to change my mind.  If he remains a younger, faster Brodin then we need Yurov to call this a win.  The reason I can't let this one go is because this was one of Benito's first impactful moves so he will get judged on this.

    Speaking of Benito, the Suter/Parise releases are starting to make more sense.  Benito wanted no doubt who was the new sheriff in Wild town.  This personality trait (aka leadership/alpha/control freak/Fenton-tastic?) plays in Pokipsee if you're a gladiator wearing the pads against other gladiators.  Not so much in the more gentile suit and tie environment.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    This is how I think we won the deal (and that doesn't mean that LA lost the deal). We did get what looks to be a legit D1, but more importantly, we got a D1 on the right side, something we did not have in the organization coming up. 

    We were also able to draft Ohgren which allowed us to swing at Yurov. Just getting Faber meant we traded positions and both organizations got excellent players. However, somehow we must make up for Fiala's scoring. That is non-existent right now. 

    But, should Yurov and/or Ohgren come in as a solid player who can contribute on the score sheet, that would make it a huge win for us. But, LA got Fiala at least a year early and has enjoyed his production, so they get a win too. In fact, they have another RHS D1 defender in Brandt Clarke. So, they traded from a strength. We traded from desperation, so for us to get a player of Faber's calibre, and possibly other help, our hedge will take time. 

    The other thing that must be looked at in this, however, is the immediate cap savings the organization got. We'll have Yurov on an ELC, and we've got Faber currently there. Those positions will end up being overperformed to contract status. If we get long and prosperous careers out of them, we definitely win, but LA had the money and they had the centers to make Fiala very productive. 

    And, Fiala wins, because he got to take his wife to a nice climate to help out her career and they get to spend far more time together. Faber wins because he gets to play in his hometown where he always wanted to play. Yurov wins getting to play with Kaprizov and Ohgren wins because he plays in a place closest resembling his home. 

    I feel like Oprah now: you get a win, and you get a win, wins for everyone!

    Exactly this.  The cap savings is huge actually.  It wasn't that we chose not to pay Fiala, it was that we chose to pay Boldy.  In order to have kept both (assuming Fiala was willing to re-sign at all), we would have had to gut the rest of the team, and a couple players would have needed to waive clauses or been willing to go to a team with cap space (and likely not a good team) just to make it happen.  Even then, we'd have a lot of league minimum or ELC contracts on our roster, burning years that could be staggered better to absorb them easier as the salary cap climbs and other player's contracts end.  That, and filling the developmental gap with Faber helps us a lot.

    Given the circumstances, this worked out well for both teams.  There's no way Fiala Looks as good on this team as he does in LA.  LA can surround him with better players than we could have had we chosen to keep him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    43 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    The other thing that must be looked at in this, however, is the immediate cap savings the organization got. We'll have Yurov on an ELC, and we've got Faber currently there. Those positions will end up being overperformed to contract status.

    giphy.gif

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, raithis said:

    There's no way Fiala Looks as good on this team as he does in LA.  LA can surround him with better players than we could have had we chosen to keep him.

    I sure would have liked to have seen a Boldy-Ek-Fiala line before seeing this conclusion. Coupling that with a Zuccarello-Rossi-Kaprizov line might have been special....offensively.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Speaking of Benito, the Suter/Parise releases are starting to make more sense. 

    Parise is without a job and will retire if he cannot find one. If he did that after a Wild trade the Wild would be on the hook for huge cap recapture penalties. They would be looking for ways to cut multiple big buck players. Yes, the buyouts were needed.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...