Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • The Kings May Be Ideal Trading Partners For Minnesota This Summer


    Image courtesy of Gary A. Vasquez-USA TODAY Sports
    Kalisha Turnipseed

    The Minnesota Wild are going into the summer with an opportunity to build around Kirill Kaprizov, Matt Boldy, Joel Eriksson Ek, and Brock Faber. In recent days we've discussed ways Bill Guerin can build a bigger blue line, but he also needs to upgrade their size and talent at the forward spots, as well.  

    The Los Angeles Kings have expendable young talent and the Wild can use it for special teams' purposes. Riley Heidt, Danila Yurov, and Liam Öhgren are prospects who could make the Wild roster next fall, but they’re inexperienced young players. Minnesota should seek experienced youth to support Kaprizov, Boldy, and Eriksson Ek in the trade market.

    The Wild should target Arthur Kaliyev (6-foot-2, 209 lbs.) and Mikhail Maltsev (6-foot-3, 200 lbs.) to improve their youth, size, and depth at forward. Kaliyev played with Boldy and Faber in the Under-18 United States National Development Program (U-18 USNDP). Kaliyev is ready to dominate the power play with Kaprizov and can develop into the Wild’s version of prime Thomas Vanek

    LA selected Kaliyev 33rd overall in the 2019 NHL Draft. He was rated a top-ten prospect by some due to his offensive skills, but his defensive game held him back. However, there’s room for improvement

     

    Maltsev is a less-known commodity, but is intriguing as well. The New Jersey Devils selected Maltsev 102nd overall in 2016, but they traded him to the Colorado Avalanche for Ryan Graves in July 2021. Maltsev then signed with the Kings as a free agent in July of 2023.

    So far, Maltsev has played 56 NHL games over three seasons and only has produced 9 points out of it. He’s playing top center for the Spartak Moskva of the KHL as a loan and has 11 points in 16 games. He'll be a Restricted Free Agent (RFA) this summer. He can fulfill a bottom-six role but can play on the power play because he does possess offensive skills. 

    Minnesota wants to build around Kaprizov as much as possible, and Kaliyev’s shot could be lethal with Kaprizov passing to him. As deadly as a goal-scorer as Kaprizov is, we also need to remember that he's a great playmaker. He had a career-high 61 assists in 2021-22 and has 170 assists in 277 games overall. Kaliyev’s presence could help Kaprizov reach a new career high. Kaliyev is known for playing along the half wall on the power play, where he loves to shoot

     

    By placing Kaliyev on the power play, the Wild can take attention off Kaprizov. Eriksson Ek’s net-front presence will help weaponize Kaliyev’s shot more. Mats Zuccarello can be along for the ride. Kaliyev would move Boldy to the second power-play unit alongside Heidt, Yurov, Öhgren in the long-term, giving Minnesota a lethal second unit. 

    At 5-on-5, Kaliyev can play with Boldy, who could use a sniper with a lethal release on his line. Yurov could eventually center Kaliyev and Boldy, which should make up a dangerous scoring line. Perhaps Boldy and Yurov could potentially duplicate Kevin Fiala and Boldy's chemistry. But once you add a sniper like Kaliyev to the mix, you're suddenly looking at a line that John Hynes can rely on for scoring. Yurov and Boldy are two-way forwards, which only helps Kaliyev improve his defensive game. 

    Maltsev has underrated offensive talent who can help bring versatility and perform on the power play if needed. He is a transition player with offensive talent to complement his 6-foot-3, 200-pound frame. He plays a mix of Eriksson Ek and Boldy’s styles. Maltsev has the skill to play with Kaprizov if needed, which could make him another Ryan Hartman-like player at a bargain price in his second NHL stint. 

    Maltsev is making $775,000 and will be an RFA. Guerin can sign Maltsev to a contract similar to Frederick Gaudreau's $1.2 million cap hit during his first term, which helps more prospects develop instead of being rushed. Maltsev is capable of playing on the power play as a net-front presence or playmaker from the half wall. He can also be reliable injury insurance on the power play and play on the penalty kill

    Maltsev can center Marat Khusnutdinov and Ohgren, who are becoming a dynamic duo. Khusnutdinov and Ohgren play similar styles built around forechecking to get pucks on net. Adding a big center like Maltsev can create a new shutdown line for the Wild. The Wild’s average age in the top-nine is 23, which includes Heidt playing with Kaprizov. 

    Having this kind of depth at center would allow Heidt to slot in in as a winger, helping him translates his WHL production to the NHL on a top line. Playing with Eriksson Ek, who can do the dirty work around the net and boards to complement Kaprizov and Heidt offensively, only makes Heidt more of a dangerous threat to score because Kaprizov will empower him. 

    The Wild would have to roll a line of Zuccarello, Hartman, and Marcus Foligno as their safety net of veterans who can be a fourth scoring line. That helps reduce their ice time because it allows Hartman to play more disciplined hockey, Foligno to play 82 games, and Zuccarello to add offense. Hartman and Zuccarello have shown good chemistry, and Foligno will protect Zuccarello. 

    The Wild can convince Marcus Johansson to waive his No-Trade Clause and Gaudreau to waive his Modified No-Trade Clause. However, the Kings aren’t going to surrender young talent to get Johansson and Gaudreau. The Wild will likely have to give up multiple young players and prospects like Declan Chisholm, Vladislav Firstov, Rieger Lorenz, or Adam Beckman to balance things out. But it’s worth it to reunite Boldy and Faber with Kaliyev and for Maltsev to provide center depth. However much you like Firstov, Lorenz, and Beckman, they can’t play center. 

    The Kings can be the Wild's ticket to getting a bigger team to support Marc-Andre Fleury and Jesper Wallstedt. Their core four of Kaprizov, Boldy, Eriksson Ek, and Faber would remain in place. Adding that size up front would make that core more comfortable to produce against the bigger teams in the NHL. Accomplishing that may mean they can surprise the NHL and compete with the top teams in the West.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Confused 4

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    The argument about age isn’t a great one, as the teams that are younger than the Wild didn’t make the playoffs except the Kings and Canucks. Once Fluery retires, they he average age will sink by nearly one year. Next year won’t be that great, however by ‘25 we will be really good and young, for the guys that matter. It’s not like are fourth-line players need to be 21, they won’t see much ice-time.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks for the time and effort you put into the article. Some interesting proposals. However, one thing I think we need to be careful of is the idea of packaging a bunch of players we don't want to another team for some value in return. I mean, if we or the Wild don't see much value in these players, why would other teams see it? I can't see just about any team having any interest in Gaudreau now, at least unless he can show he still has something left in the tank. The same goes for Johansson. Of course, there's nothing wrong with speculating about our favorite team, but the mentioned proposals are not realistic in my opinion

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 4/20/2024 at 8:30 AM, Patrick said:

    Who? Spurgeon and Zuccarello are the only ones I can think of. That's hardly a lot.

    Our players over 30:

    Gaudreau, Zucc, Foligno, Spurg, Brodin, Mojo, Bogosian, Merrill, Goligoski, Mermis and Fleury.

    Letteri and Hartman are both 29. 

    We are not on the right side of the aging curve as a team. 11/25 over 30 is not a great look.

    24/25 roster will be 11/19 signed players over 30(barring additions).

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 4/19/2024 at 9:10 AM, Mateo3xm said:

    Gabe Perreault had 60pts out of 36 games at Boston college I think he lead all of college in points or close to it. Size is extremely important in the playoffs. Of these so called high profile teams, are any of them highly successful in the playoffs?

    So of alot of the skill teams I was speaking of and several are stanley cup winners once or multiple time in the last 13 yrs the height and weight avg was 6'0 to 6'2 although 6'0 and 6'1 were the most common an weight ranging 190 to 205.

    23 wild come in at 6'0 193lbs... so I think my point stands. You don't need to be giant anymore to win, skill is everything. Yes you need size but smaller guys can easily become major factors( Brayden point, brad Marchand, johnny g) just to name a few. Ohh and 2 of those guys have either won the Stanley cup or competed in the finals a time or 2 in their careers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 4/19/2024 at 9:34 PM, Need4speed99 said:

    Yea the avalanche, early Tampa Bay. The Blackhawks owned us years ago while being smaller but they went with skill over anything.

    I would have to look that up. I think all those teams you mentioned were at least in the top half as far as size and weight is concerned. Might even be in the top 1/3. I don’t think they’re as small as you think but I need to confirm.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 4/20/2024 at 4:41 PM, Bigreed said:

    The argument about age isn’t a great one, as the teams that are younger than the Wild didn’t make the playoffs except the Kings and Canucks. Once Fluery retires, they he average age will sink by nearly one year. Next year won’t be that great, however by ‘25 we will be really good and young, for the guys that matter. It’s not like are fourth-line players need to be 21, they won’t see much ice-time.

    I don’t think that’s how it works. Age is definitely a factor. Hockey has definitely become a younger man’s game. It’s actually pretty hard to argue that it isn’t a big factor.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 4/23/2024 at 7:47 PM, Need4speed99 said:

    So of alot of the skill teams I was speaking of and several are stanley cup winners once or multiple time in the last 13 yrs the height and weight avg was 6'0 to 6'2 although 6'0 and 6'1 were the most common an weight ranging 190 to 205.

    23 wild come in at 6'0 193lbs... so I think my point stands. You don't need to be giant anymore to win, skill is everything. Yes you need size but smaller guys can easily become major factors( Brayden point, brad Marchand, johnny g) just to name a few. Ohh and 2 of those guys have either won the Stanley cup or competed in the finals a time or 2 in their careers.

    I agree with that somewhat. If you’re extremely skilled and more skilled than most teams then you don’t need to be bigger but still need decent size. If you don’t have the skill as some of these top teams you better be bigger than most (St.Louis). Size absolutely can be an important part of winning in the playoffs. 
    the Wild aren’t particularly big or skilled and a large part of their roster is 30 or older. What I’m concerned about is the gap of players that are old and on the end of their career and the amount of players that need to be ready to come in and step up into those positions. Maybe I’m overthinking it but I see a few crappy years coming up until  our prospects start reaching their prime which is usually between 24-26 years of age.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 4/25/2024 at 12:48 PM, Mateo3xm said:

    I agree with that somewhat. If you’re extremely skilled and more skilled than most teams then you don’t need to be bigger but still need decent size. If you don’t have the skill as some of these top teams you better be bigger than most (St.Louis). Size absolutely can be an important part of winning in the playoffs. 
    the Wild aren’t particularly big or skilled and a large part of their roster is 30 or older. What I’m concerned about is the gap of players that are old and on the end of their career and the amount of players that need to be ready to come in and step up into those positions. Maybe I’m overthinking it but I see a few crappy years coming up until  our prospects start reaching their prime which is usually between 24-26 years of age.

    And I agree with the age portion and your projections on the next few years. I just want to see what kind of skill the prospects have and if they provide a better chance at winning than the vets, regardless of size.

    It just seems billy is more concerned with having vets and size than overall skill. 

    I know the need for size and grit in the playoffs and we were a much more physical team years ago but the Blackhawks kept bouncing us and just played a skill/speed game we could never match.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...