Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Kings May Be Ideal Trading Partners For Minnesota This Summer


    Image courtesy of Gary A. Vasquez-USA TODAY Sports
    Kalisha Turnipseed

    The Minnesota Wild are going into the summer with an opportunity to build around Kirill Kaprizov, Matt Boldy, Joel Eriksson Ek, and Brock Faber. In recent days we've discussed ways Bill Guerin can build a bigger blue line, but he also needs to upgrade their size and talent at the forward spots, as well.  

    The Los Angeles Kings have expendable young talent and the Wild can use it for special teams' purposes. Riley Heidt, Danila Yurov, and Liam Öhgren are prospects who could make the Wild roster next fall, but they’re inexperienced young players. Minnesota should seek experienced youth to support Kaprizov, Boldy, and Eriksson Ek in the trade market.

    The Wild should target Arthur Kaliyev (6-foot-2, 209 lbs.) and Mikhail Maltsev (6-foot-3, 200 lbs.) to improve their youth, size, and depth at forward. Kaliyev played with Boldy and Faber in the Under-18 United States National Development Program (U-18 USNDP). Kaliyev is ready to dominate the power play with Kaprizov and can develop into the Wild’s version of prime Thomas Vanek

    LA selected Kaliyev 33rd overall in the 2019 NHL Draft. He was rated a top-ten prospect by some due to his offensive skills, but his defensive game held him back. However, there’s room for improvement

     

    Maltsev is a less-known commodity, but is intriguing as well. The New Jersey Devils selected Maltsev 102nd overall in 2016, but they traded him to the Colorado Avalanche for Ryan Graves in July 2021. Maltsev then signed with the Kings as a free agent in July of 2023.

    So far, Maltsev has played 56 NHL games over three seasons and only has produced 9 points out of it. He’s playing top center for the Spartak Moskva of the KHL as a loan and has 11 points in 16 games. He'll be a Restricted Free Agent (RFA) this summer. He can fulfill a bottom-six role but can play on the power play because he does possess offensive skills. 

    Minnesota wants to build around Kaprizov as much as possible, and Kaliyev’s shot could be lethal with Kaprizov passing to him. As deadly as a goal-scorer as Kaprizov is, we also need to remember that he's a great playmaker. He had a career-high 61 assists in 2021-22 and has 170 assists in 277 games overall. Kaliyev’s presence could help Kaprizov reach a new career high. Kaliyev is known for playing along the half wall on the power play, where he loves to shoot

     

    By placing Kaliyev on the power play, the Wild can take attention off Kaprizov. Eriksson Ek’s net-front presence will help weaponize Kaliyev’s shot more. Mats Zuccarello can be along for the ride. Kaliyev would move Boldy to the second power-play unit alongside Heidt, Yurov, Öhgren in the long-term, giving Minnesota a lethal second unit. 

    At 5-on-5, Kaliyev can play with Boldy, who could use a sniper with a lethal release on his line. Yurov could eventually center Kaliyev and Boldy, which should make up a dangerous scoring line. Perhaps Boldy and Yurov could potentially duplicate Kevin Fiala and Boldy's chemistry. But once you add a sniper like Kaliyev to the mix, you're suddenly looking at a line that John Hynes can rely on for scoring. Yurov and Boldy are two-way forwards, which only helps Kaliyev improve his defensive game. 

    Maltsev has underrated offensive talent who can help bring versatility and perform on the power play if needed. He is a transition player with offensive talent to complement his 6-foot-3, 200-pound frame. He plays a mix of Eriksson Ek and Boldy’s styles. Maltsev has the skill to play with Kaprizov if needed, which could make him another Ryan Hartman-like player at a bargain price in his second NHL stint. 

    Maltsev is making $775,000 and will be an RFA. Guerin can sign Maltsev to a contract similar to Frederick Gaudreau's $1.2 million cap hit during his first term, which helps more prospects develop instead of being rushed. Maltsev is capable of playing on the power play as a net-front presence or playmaker from the half wall. He can also be reliable injury insurance on the power play and play on the penalty kill

    Maltsev can center Marat Khusnutdinov and Ohgren, who are becoming a dynamic duo. Khusnutdinov and Ohgren play similar styles built around forechecking to get pucks on net. Adding a big center like Maltsev can create a new shutdown line for the Wild. The Wild’s average age in the top-nine is 23, which includes Heidt playing with Kaprizov. 

    Having this kind of depth at center would allow Heidt to slot in in as a winger, helping him translates his WHL production to the NHL on a top line. Playing with Eriksson Ek, who can do the dirty work around the net and boards to complement Kaprizov and Heidt offensively, only makes Heidt more of a dangerous threat to score because Kaprizov will empower him. 

    The Wild would have to roll a line of Zuccarello, Hartman, and Marcus Foligno as their safety net of veterans who can be a fourth scoring line. That helps reduce their ice time because it allows Hartman to play more disciplined hockey, Foligno to play 82 games, and Zuccarello to add offense. Hartman and Zuccarello have shown good chemistry, and Foligno will protect Zuccarello. 

    The Wild can convince Marcus Johansson to waive his No-Trade Clause and Gaudreau to waive his Modified No-Trade Clause. However, the Kings aren’t going to surrender young talent to get Johansson and Gaudreau. The Wild will likely have to give up multiple young players and prospects like Declan Chisholm, Vladislav Firstov, Rieger Lorenz, or Adam Beckman to balance things out. But it’s worth it to reunite Boldy and Faber with Kaliyev and for Maltsev to provide center depth. However much you like Firstov, Lorenz, and Beckman, they can’t play center. 

    The Kings can be the Wild's ticket to getting a bigger team to support Marc-Andre Fleury and Jesper Wallstedt. Their core four of Kaprizov, Boldy, Eriksson Ek, and Faber would remain in place. Adding that size up front would make that core more comfortable to produce against the bigger teams in the NHL. Accomplishing that may mean they can surprise the NHL and compete with the top teams in the West.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Confused 4

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Not too sure about these suggested players. MN already has developing logjams and prospect pecking order.

    If MN is gonna trade or acquire players, I’d expect Guerin to target established guys who can come in justifiably ahead of young guys. 
     

    If the Wild could sign UFA Warren Foegele and get rid of Johansson somehow, that would make sense to improve the team.(40pt big NA guy.) Getting other marginal type guys or incomplete players isn’t my idea of how to improve. 

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    30 minutes ago, viper3119 said:

    Is this MNFans burner account writing this article?

    Patrick thinks it's AI. 😀

    I think the Wild should start with benching NoJo. 

    Plus if it was mnfaninnc there'd be bulking up in the weight room Kaliyev criticisms.

    Edited by Protec
    • Like 1
    • Haha 7
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Protec said:

    Not too sure about these suggested players. MN already has developing logjams and prospect pecking order.

    If MN is gonna trade or acquire players, I’d expect Guerin to target established guys who can come in justifiably ahead of young guys. 
     

    If the Wild could sign UFA Warren Foegele and get rid of Johansson somehow, that would make sense to improve the team.(40pt big NA guy.) Getting other marginal type guys or incomplete players isn’t my idea of how to improve. 

    With what money?  Foegele is coming off a 41 point season and a 3x2.75M contract...his base salary this season is 3.25M, my guess he's looking $3.25-3.75M AAV for 3-4 years.  Quick glance at what the oilers fans are saying and they seem to think some stupid team is going to go $4M for him.

    Which is in the same playing field to the Foligno ($4x4), Hartman ($4x3) and Zucarello ($4.125x2) which everyone around here hates.

    Paying that type of money for another bottom/middle six forward doesn't make much sense to me. 

    Also, he's not played with the Pittsburgh org nor does he have a family member on the MN Wild staff so I'd be highly doubtful BillyG has any interest anyways.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here's my take...How about giving the "Let's Trade Agenda" a rest?! Let GMBG do the thinking concerning any trade possibilities.

    Quote

    The Wild will likely have to give up multiple young players and prospects like Declan Chisholm

    We finally get a capable D man for cheap and you want to trade him away? OMG Bonkers!

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, MrCheatachu said:

    With what money?  Foegele is coming off a 41 point season and a 3x2.75M contract...his base salary this season is 3.25M, my guess he's looking $3.25-3.75M AAV for 3-4 years.  Quick glance at what the oilers fans are saying and they seem to think some stupid team is going to go $4M for him.

    Which is in the same playing field to the Foligno ($4x4), Hartman ($4x3) and Zucarello ($4.125x2) which everyone around here hates.

    Paying that type of money for another bottom/middle six forward doesn't make much sense to me. 

    Also, he's not played with the Pittsburgh org nor does he have a family member on the MN Wild staff so I'd be highly doubtful BillyG has any interest anyways.

    I'm not really suggesting that specific guy necessarily but if we looked at the production you get from NoJo or Foligno and their cost plus what they bring to the ice every game, a guy like that would be an upgrade. 

    Since Guerin sent Sturm and Bjugstad packing plus signed NoJo and Foligno, it's gonna be nearly impossible but maybe not if Gus was traded. The 1M recapture from Fleury and 2M from Goligoski might be enough to get DuClair or Trenin or similar affordable role players. The Wild obviously aren't trading for an expensive star player yet but they'll need to improve the depth somehow. The right player at ~3M could be perfect to improve the Wild IMO. 

    In general though, you're right. Guerin would need to find a suitable substitute for a Bertuzzi or Guentzal type guy MN wouldn't be able to afford or give too much term. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I can see where Kalisha is trying to help, but I think we've misunderstood some of the problems here. It's not just getting bigger. On the PP, where Kalisha is trying to help, the #1 thing we need is someone in Ovechkin's office to open up the PP. If that guy were a larger body it would be ideal, but he's got to have a lethal shot from that spot. 

    So, I would be targeting RHS larger players in this scenario. I think if they are maybe a little unproven, such as trading prospects for prospects it could still work. I also think there might be a way to pry Laine loose from CBJ, especially since he went into the mental health assistance program. I would think you could convince CBJ to retain too. 

    If you want to get Kaprizov's assists higher, having a shooting option on that side of the ice is necessary. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So I have a question, everyone wants the wild to be bigger and stronger and that is more important than anything else YET several high profile teams are lighter and smaller overall. 

    The only thing the wild are in the top 5 for is being old... wondering how this all helps?

    Skill wins out, reaching for guys like stramel vs Perreault is a recipe for losing. Skill wins out. You can always draft low 6 big guys in later rounds.

    • Like 4
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, Need4speed99 said:

    So I have a question, everyone wants the wild to be bigger and stronger and that is more important than anything else YET several high profile teams are lighter and smaller overall. 

    The only thing the wild are in the top 5 for is being old... wondering how this all helps?

    Skill wins out, reaching for guys like stramel vs Perreault is a recipe for losing. Skill wins out. You can always draft low 6 big guys in later rounds.

    The age thing can be overrated. The Wild are old in depth positions and net (where would they rank if you took Fluery out and put Wallstedt in?)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Kaliyev would move Boldy to the second power-play”

    Naw Boldy is way better and will be on #1 PP

    Gus will be number 1 goalie with 40 year old fleury as back up

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, Need4speed99 said:

    So I have a question, everyone wants the wild to be bigger and stronger and that is more important than anything else YET several high profile teams are lighter and smaller overall. 

    The only thing the wild are in the top 5 for is being old... wondering how this all helps?

    Skill wins out, reaching for guys like stramel vs Perreault is a recipe for losing. Skill wins out. You can always draft low 6 big guys in later rounds.

    Gabe Perreault had 60pts out of 36 games at Boston college I think he lead all of college in points or close to it. Size is extremely important in the playoffs. Of these so called high profile teams, are any of them highly successful in the playoffs?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Patrick said:

    The age thing can be overrated. The Wild are old in depth positions and net (where would they rank if you took Fluery out and put Wallstedt in?)

    I don’t think taking one player out is going to do much. A lot of our core is well into their 30s. age absolutely is a factor. Statistically players start regressing consistently after 29 years old. The average age of every Stanley cup winning team in the last 10 years is 26-27 years old.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Mateo3xm said:

    I don’t think taking one player out is going to do much. A lot of our core is well into their 30s. age absolutely is a factor. Statistically players start regressing consistently after 29 years old. The average age of every Stanley cup winning team in the last 10 years is 26-27 years old.

    Our top 6 is pretty young on average.  Zucc is an outlier but should be replaced by Yurov in 25-26. 

    Also, don't read too much into that regression curve based on age.  It is skewed for injuries.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, Will D. Ness said:

    Our top 6 is pretty young on average.  Zucc is an outlier but should be replaced by Yurov in 25-26. 

    Also, don't read too much into that regression curve based on age.  It is skewed for injuries.  

    According to this website, which I have no clue how accurate it is, this season's wild ranks https://leftwinglock.com/teams/biometrics/

    • 16th for Age
    • 30th in Height
    • 20th in Weight

    So we're dead middle of the pack for age, with some short husky fella's filling out their breezers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, MrCheatachu said:

    According to this website, which I have no clue how accurate it is, this season's wild ranks https://leftwinglock.com/teams/biometrics/

    • 16th for Age
    • 30th in Height
    • 20th in Weight

    So we're dead middle of the pack for age, with some short husky fella's filling out their breezers.


    I have seen this average age of NHL teams posted on multiple sites. I don’t think 16th is right. We do have a good amount of players over 30.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Will D. Ness said:

    Also, don't read too much into that regression curve based on age.  It is skewed for injuries.  

    I don’t exactly follow how injuries impact this, also how do you know it’s skewed for injuries?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Mateo3xm said:

    I don’t exactly follow how injuries impact this, also how do you know it’s skewed for injuries?

    I think it was one of the writers here that was talking about it a couple months ago. 

    Working from memory here, there was a graph showing the decline at specific ages that had a pretty drastic bottoming out.  Face value it looked bad but upon further review, I think the writer basically said it wasn't representative due to not factoring in injuries.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    47 minutes ago, Mateo3xm said:


    I have seen this average age of NHL teams posted on multiple sites. I don’t think 16th is right. We do have a good amount of players over 30.

    I believe that tweet references the average age of the roster at the start of the season, wereas the website I quoted calculates the weighted average of age per game this season (i.e. average age on for every game roster averaged out through the season)

    By the end of the season, with Spurgeon (34, 16gp), Goose (38, 36gp), Maroon (35, 49gp for the wild) and Foligno (32, 55gp) not playing full seasons and replaced by the young guys we could afford the average age of the team drifted back towards the mean.

    So yeah...I'm not sure what conclusion you want to draw from that, maybe what doomed us is some combination of the decrease in skill as players aged combined with the lack of durability to play a full season and then their only replacements are young AHL level tweeners?  I guess 'getting younger' doesn't tell the full picture, unless your younger players are on the upswing of their careers (Boldy/Rossi/Faber/etc)...if your roster is young because you can only afford pylons on ELC's then, well, idk how you fix that.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, Patrick said:

    The age thing can be overrated. The Wild are old in depth positions and net (where would they rank if you took Fluery out and put Wallstedt in?)

    I'm not sure what you are saying... the age caught up to them and letting youth play would least show where the team is headed, with the vets we KNOW the ceiling. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, Mateo3xm said:

    Gabe Perreault had 60pts out of 36 games at Boston college I think he lead all of college in points or close to it. Size is extremely important in the playoffs. Of these so called high profile teams, are any of them highly successful in the playoffs?

    Yea the avalanche, early Tampa Bay. The Blackhawks owned us years ago while being smaller but they went with skill over anything.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 4/19/2024 at 9:17 AM, Mateo3xm said:

    I don’t think taking one player out is going to do much. A lot of our core is well into their 30s. age absolutely is a factor. Statistically players start regressing consistently after 29 years old. The average age of every Stanley cup winning team in the last 10 years is 26-27 years old.

    Who? Spurgeon and Zuccarello are the only ones I can think of. That's hardly a lot.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, Need4speed99 said:

    I'm not sure what you are saying... the age caught up to them and letting youth play would least show where the team is headed, with the vets we KNOW the ceiling. 

    I'm all for letting the youth play. I would have benched nojo and Gaudreau at Christmas.  My only point is the most important players (except Spurgeon) on MN are at or entering their prime. (I don't count Zuccarello because he is only riding KKs coattails and does absolutely nothing on his own. They should trade him he is a dead end)

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...