Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Kaprizov Saga Is Putting the Wild Franchise's Credibility On the Line


    Tony Abbott

    The Minnesota Wild are celebrating their 25th anniversary this season. In most circumstances, that's a huge milestone and cause to celebrate. Fans get a chance to remember their past while looking toward a bright future. 

    Unfortunately, that might be all the State of Hockey gets to celebrate on this anniversary. 

    The "25" patch on their sweaters will, to many, represent a quarter-century of irrelevance. That's definitely not charitable. Minnesota has had moments in the sun. Their 2003 Western Conference Finals run, the blockbuster signings of Zach Parise and Ryan Suter in 2012 being the biggest. But even the rosiest view of the Wild's history has to admit that they've often been afterthoughts to the national media, free agents, and most disappointingly, in the playoffs.

    That's what hurts the Wild faithful so much about this week's news that Kirill Kaprizov rejected a would-be record-shattering eight-year, $128 million contract from Minnesota.

    From Day 1, the superstar winger made the franchise relevant in a way no one else has. Not Marian Gaborik, Mikko Koivu, Zach Parise, Ryan Suter, or anyone else. His Calder Trophy win is the only major player hardware the franchise has ever taken home. For lack of a better term, Kaprizov just has that 'it' factor, giving Minnesota rare and desperately needed pizazz. When he's on, the Wild become appointment viewing.

    If this week's news is truly the beginning of the end for Kaprizov, Minnesota will return to irrelevance. 

    That's a fate too terrible for the Wild, and everyone involved knows it. It's why owner Craig Leipold got out ahead of any rumors that Kaprizov might want to go elsewhere and declared, "Nobody will offer more money than us." Putting $128 million on the table showed Mr. Leipold was serious.

    But Kaprizov rejecting that offer plays into the worst fears of Minnesota sports fans: The offer might be serious, but the players don't take the Wild seriously.

    There aren't a lot of winning scenarios from here. The possibility that Minnesota trades the only superstar in their history is impossible to swallow for most Wild fans. But having it go public that Kaprizov rejected a max deal at $16 million per season, and eventually signing him for, say, $18 million, doesn't send a great message to the rest of the league, either.

    $16 million is already $2 million more than the next-highest-paid player in the NHL. Someone will eventually get more than that number, of course, but $128 million is $128 million. It's mind-blowing that an NHL player, even one who was looking to hit a home run and cash in, would turn it down. Just this offseason, superstars like Mitch Marner and Mikko Rantanen took discounts to be on teams they felt would win. Sam Bennett, the reigning Conn Smythe winner, did the same to stay with the Stanley Cup Champion Florida Panthers.

    Intentionally or not, refusing a $16 million AAV but accepting $17 to $18 million sends a signal that Kaprizov isn't impressed with the direction the team is taking. If that's the route he goes, it suggests that all Bill Guerin and Mr. Leipold could offer him -- after four years to prepare the conditions that would entice him to stay -- was money. 

    Unfortunately, it'd be hard to blame Kaprizov if that's his thought process. He's spent five years in the organization, playing at an MVP level, and hasn't been able to advance past the first round. It wasn't for a lack of effort, either. Kaprizov has 15 goals and 21 points in 25 playoff games with the Wild. That 0.60 goals per game mark is the highest among any player in the Salary Cap Era with 25 games or more.

    Hell, reduce that threshold to 10 games, and Kaprizov's still at the top of the heap!

    But even with historic goal production, even with dominant playoff series against the St. Louis Blues in 2022 and the Vegas Golden Knights this spring, it wasn't enough to get them out of the first round. 

    Now, are there mitigating circumstances here? You'd better believe it. The Zach Parise and Ryan Suter contracts bit the franchise at the exact worst moment, hobbling a franchise that should have been in win-now mode with their superstar in tow. It's a tough break, and it is impressive that the Wild have continued to make the playoffs despite their dead cap space woes.

    That doesn't erase the fact that, as much as the team noted that a hand was tied behind their back, as much as they tried to downplay their inability to get past the first round, that lack of success plays into their reputation. They're not serious contenders, not in the eyes of the NHL.

    We saw it on July 1 -- a day that might go down in infamy among Wild fans as "Christmas Morning." With all of Minnesota's new cap space, they were never seriously in the hunt for big fish like Marner, Bennett, Nikolaj Ehlers, or anyone else. Home-grown players like Brock Boeser and Brock Nelson -- historically, reliable targets for the franchise -- elected to stay put rather than join forces with the Wild.

    We know what Minnesota wanted their pitch to be. That they had the roster, personalities, and culture to play winning hockey. That their prospects -- including blue-chippers like Zeev Buium, Danila Yurov, and David Jiříček -- were NHL-ready and primed to take them to the next level. That even after coming up empty this summer, they'd kept their powder dry for the next big superstar to come up on the market.

    It doesn't look like that pitch was attractive to Kaprizov, just as it wasn't alluring for Nelson, Boeser, or any other big fish this summer. Without a buy-in to the pitch, all the Wild had was money, and Kaprizov just said no to that.

    How do you fix that problem? How does Mr. Leipold, the front office, and the organization convince Kaprizov -- or any other top player in the NHL -- that they're an organization to be taken seriously, and not the perpetual also-rans of the league? That's the issue at the root of their biggest crisis in the Wild's 25-year history, and unless they can find a solution, it also threatens to define their next quarter-century.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 3

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Winning playoff games matters.  When the Wild figure out how on a consistent basis, I'd love to see i.  That being said, Fiala chased money too and didn't find playoff success with the Kings either.  Winnipeg can house the greatest goalie in recent memory and still nearly get bounced by a Wild-Card team.

    Playoff hockey is weird

     

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The St. Louis Blues found a way to break their own playoff drought in a dramatic turnaround season. 2019 Stanley Cup Champions. Small market team also. What I remember most about that team was their strong on ice leadership group. They exuded a “Oh Yes We Can” attitude. I’m a huge ROR guy. I’m not sure they cared about what the rest of the league was thinking about them and I sure hope our players can do the same. 

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Great article, very true!  It can all change when and IF, and that's a big IF at the moment, Kaprizov re-signs before training camp starts next week.  I definitely won't be buying any tickets this season until that happens.  I hope he re-signs, I don't want to go back to watching completely mediocre hockey.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My thoughts on what I'm seeing and reading about is this is more about the term being 8 years than anything else.

    As we are hearing the contract of 8x16 was rejected. My guess is Kaprizov actually wants a shorter term, maybe 4-5 years, and the Wild want to try and talk him into the longer term of 8.

    Time will tell...

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    28 minutes ago, BeanPole Harvester said:

    My thoughts on what I'm seeing and reading about is this is more about the term being 8 years than anything else.

    As we are hearing the contract of 8x16 was rejected. My guess is Kaprizov actually wants a shorter term, maybe 4-5 years, and the Wild want to try and talk him into the longer term of 8.

    Time will tell...

    If that is true, and i have no idea one way or the other, i think the Wild are foolish. i would gladly take a 4-5 year contract vs an 8 year. You get KK through his peak years and are not locked into paying huge dollars for the last few years when his body is probably failing him. He has struggled staying healthy as a youngish player. That will not get better as he ages.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm just not sure that the 4-5 year counteroffer is on the table yet. Yes, Guerin would want him for 8, but there is no indication about the short term deal being taken. Now, here's another possibility, Kaprizov came back with 3 years and Guerin is negotiating for 5. 

    Shootah is known for his handshake deals. Here's the thing about that, sometimes you aren't the one giving the handshake deals, sometimes you have to be the taker. What if it was for 3 more years with a handshake extension for 3 more if certain team goals were met? 

    I forget who it was who was talking about options, but this might be the closest thing the NHL has to an option. Maybe the 2nd 3 year deal has something in it to be able to move from "contender" status to "front runner or favored" status? 

    Or, as I posted earlier, maybe it's a promise to wear sharper looking jerseys!

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Friedman on 32 thoughts had some interesting takes on kappy. He didn’t think it was term. Because of kappys injury history , he thinks he would want long contract. He could have just signed the biggest 8 year deal an in 2 years when team sucks , demand a trade. So why go short term in his opinion.  The other thing he kept talking about is the belief an other team is sending smoke signals that there is a bigger deal out there for krill. Tampering basically. Like krill has his eye on a sign and trade.  Who knows how this turns out but it won’t be in the wilds favor. 
       Great article! Spot on. It’s funny Tj oshie in an interview was talking about moving back to Minnesota. How great it was all these retired nhl ers here. Funny they all like to live here in offseason or in retirement but not to come play here.  

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I see a lot of national guys writing on this, but the weird thing is that Russo remains fairly silent. I expected the information to come out from him and that he'd be tweeting or Xing (I don't know what you call it now) updates. 

    The Wild don't get a lot of attention from national writers. When reading through their season previews or playoff previews, about the only thing they do is spell a bunch of names correctly but have absolutely no feel for the team. When they make trade proposals, it almost always screws the Wild with something they don't need or someone who isn't interesting. 

    So why now do they seem to have the inside scoop? None of them work for the Athletic. Is Russo gossiping to these guys and not writing the scoop himself? I also haven't really seen anything from a Strib writer (is it still Jessi Pierce?). 

    I know I don't trust ESPN hockey guys for the scoop, and I really don't trust guys who focus on East Coast and especially Toronto with a scoop. Something here seems to be off balance. If there is tampering, who has confidence that the NHL will do anything about it....or going further, what if the NHL wants Kaprizov in a larger market? 

    Pewter, what does your spidey sense tell you about a conspiracy happening?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I hope Wild still signs Kaprisov but like I mentioned number of time before seems to me he just does not want to be in Minnesota Wild. And in this case it does not matter how long or how much. He will get his money in the place he wants to be and if this is a little bit of less it still will be big. I hope I am wrong but listening his interviews - he never said any good word about Wild. Yes he never said anything bad but … So we will see soon. I think Rangers or Tampa the places he would want to be . Florida as well but I don’t think they will change their core

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, Lovehockey said:

    Tampa

    Seems like the most likely alternative to extending here in MN. Ever since Tampa unloaded their older core players in the Pred’s trade I’ve been waiting to see why. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Don't the Wild have to have credibility before they can lose it? What was the last big name free agent to sign with the Wild? Zuccarello, five years ago?

    Boeser and Nelson didn't even want to come home. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, Scalptrash said:

    What was the last big name free agent to sign with the Wild? Zuccarello, five years ago?

    Boeser and Nelson didn't even want to come home. 

    Sadly, yes, it was Zuccy brought in by Paul Fenton, BG has yet to get the bat off his shoulders in FA and take a big swing!  The Minnesota Wild are the playoff version of the Buffalo Sabres😔

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Winning playoff games matters.  When the Wild figure out how on a consistent basis, I'd love to see i.  That being said, Fiala chased money too and didn't find playoff success with the Kings either.  Winnipeg can house the greatest goalie in recent memory and still nearly get bounced by a Wild-Card team.

    Playoff hockey is weird

    Yeah, Sidney Crosby has nearly 40 more regular season points over the last 5 seasons compared to Kaprizov(though KK97 is slightly ahead in PPG). Crosby has missed the playoffs 3 years in a row and was ousted in the first round 2 years in a row before that, winning 2 games in each of those first rounds.

    Playing at a really high level as an individual doesn't guarantee much. Kaprizov has at least made the playoffs nearly every season and it seems a little odd that Kaprizov would encourage Tarasenko to waive his no trade to come to the Wild if his plan was to be elsewhere.

    I understand losing some patience, but the Wild appear to be heading towards more competitive hockey if Kaprizov does end up sticking around. He's a key piece, but if he decides he wants to be elsewhere, then the Wild might need to pivot to a new plan.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I see a lot of national guys writing on this, but the weird thing is that Russo remains fairly silent. I expected the information to come out from him and that he'd be tweeting or Xing (I don't know what you call it now) updates. 

    The Wild don't get a lot of attention from national writers. When reading through their season previews or playoff previews, about the only thing they do is spell a bunch of names correctly but have absolutely no feel for the team. When they make trade proposals, it almost always screws the Wild with something they don't need or someone who isn't interesting. 

    So why now do they seem to have the inside scoop? None of them work for the Athletic. Is Russo gossiping to these guys and not writing the scoop himself? I also haven't really seen anything from a Strib writer (is it still Jessi Pierce?). 

    I know I don't trust ESPN hockey guys for the scoop, and I really don't trust guys who focus on East Coast and especially Toronto with a scoop. Something here seems to be off balance. If there is tampering, who has confidence that the NHL will do anything about it....or going further, what if the NHL wants Kaprizov in a larger market? 

    Pewter, what does your spidey sense tell you about a conspiracy happening?

    It tells me that Peart will be on drums for the next Rush tour before he'll play in the NHL.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    39 minutes ago, Scalptrash said:

    Zuccarello, five years ago?

    And Paul "it's between y'all" Fenton gets credit for this one.  bill brought us Maroon, Reaves and Trenin in free agency though so there's that.  He has a type.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    35 minutes ago, Scalptrash said:

    big name free agent

    Eric Staal had a few good years as well as MAF with respectable stats. To your point MN is not an NHL destination franchise. That’s ok, it doesn’t mean a team can’t be built to win. We’re looking at ways it can happen. When I get some time I am going to review the years leading up to the St. Louis SC in 2019. Just to see how they did it. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...