Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Six Experiments The Wild Should Try


    SPOILER: The Wild aren't making the playoffs.

    No, that doesn't mean tank the season in order to get Connor McDavid or Jack Eichel. The odds of the Wild earning that draft position is probably even less than them making the playoffs. And it doesn't mean intentionally lose games down the stretch, either.

    This makes sense of course, when the Wild are in the thick of the playoff hunt. If the Wild's #1 priority is to win games, at whatever cost, it makes sense for the Wild, and Coach Mike Yeo, to rely on options that are the most established over dealing with the growing pains of younger players. But right now? Development should be the Wild's priority.

    Here are 5 easy experiments the Wild would benefit from trying, and better yet- these wouldn't be likely to hurt the Wild's chances of winning by a significant margin.

    With his stagnating offensive output, and injury concerns over the last few seasons (concussion issues last season, wrist injury in December), it's come into question whether Granlund is going to be physically durable enough to handle the rigors and defensive responsibilities of being a Top-Line Center™.

    The solution? With a big ol' shout-out to Alec Schmidt for intriguing me with the idea in the first place, I'd say put Granlund on the wing. Maybe it keeps Granlund healthier. Maybe the lessened defensive responsibilities will allow Granlund to focus on the offensive game Wild fans have been counting on since he was drafted in 2010. Either of those results would be a boon to the Wild, should they work out. According to Michael Russo, the Wild brass has considered it, leaning towards center for his speed down the middle.

    A big concern with Granlund moving towards the wing is that it leaves a Top-6 Center-shaped hole in the Wild. But luckily, the Wild have an interesting option to potentially fill that role.

    The Wild have been trying out Charlie Coyle at Center throughout significant portions of the season, and he's found intermittent success, scoring at a better pace than last season, but not enough to register as impressive to anyone.

    Coyle's big, strong on the puck, and has skills, even if they don't show up as often as we'd like. This lost season gives the Wild a chance to put Coyle into an ideal situation, and see if he can produce as a center in the NHL.

    Distribute Defensemen Ice Time Evenly

    There's no reason that Suter should play 200 minutes per game, or even a more reasonable number, like 30. The Wild have him under contract for 10 more years, meaning running him into the ground when you're 7 points out of a playoff spot in January is ridiculous. The Wild would benefit from resting Suter and letting other players develop. My proposal? The Wild should strive for this ideal:

    Suter: 22 minutes

    Spurgeon 22 minutes

    Scandella: 21 minutes

    Brodin: 21 minutes

    Folin: 17 minutes

    Dumba: 17 minutes

    This enables everyone on the Wild to avoid being overtaxed, and provides an opportunity to let Folin and Dumba develop with a TOI load worth keeping them in the NHL. This might actually cost the Wild some points this season, but the development and rest should pay dividends down the road.

    Take Haula Out of the Doghouse

    This simply can't do. Not now. It doesn't serve the Wild's interest to continue to put Haula in positions where he can't use his offensive talents, and with ice time that makes producing points consistently a pipe dream. The Wild need to get Haula going, and we can combine the first experiment with this one and have a Granlund-Haula-Niederreiter line. Boom, Granlund's on the wing, Haula gets put in a position to succeed offensively, and Niederreiter gets to be excited about his linemates. Everyone's happy.

    Hey! Let Someone Else Try the Shootout!

    We all know the shootout order: Parise, Koivu, and Pominville.

    And there's good reason for it: It works. Parise and Koivu both have success rates north of 43%, and Pominville has a not-too-shabby 36% rate.

    So what's the problem?

    Here it is: There's no opportunities for younger players to be relied on in those spots. Granlund, Niederreiter, Coyle, and Zucker have a combined 8 shootout attempts for the Minnesota Wild. Not this season, in their careers. Eight.

    This is another thing that could potentially cost a point or two down the stretch, but if you want to see these players become prominent members of your team, it would make sense for you to put those players in situations.

    And man, who doesn't want to see more goals like these?

    Fire Matt Cooke into the Sun

    I would expect this to garner some controversy in the Wild's front office, as Craig Leipold would not only want to not waste the remaining 3 million on Cooke's contract, but even with the considerable funds this would raise on Kickstarter, it's a very expensive proposition when you consider the cost of firing a human being into the sun in what I assume would have to be a humane and dignified way.

    So, having established that this is a pipe dream, let's settle for "Dump Matt Cooke". On a team that isn't making the playoffs this year, and has solid depth options in the minor league, Cooke's value to the Wild isn't all that much. Would his playoff experience / veteran guy in the room thing / ability to eliminate players be valuable to some team? I would guess some front office would think so.

    We haven't seen Yeo manage a team with no stakes since his rookie year as a coach, and his philosophy has changed greatly in that time. I would hope that Yeo, who's gotten more open-minded about diverging from an old-school mindset, would recognize the value in trying some of these things for an extended run in an effort to develop players.

    He may not do it, either because he prefers maintaining the status quo, or because he feels his job is safer if he squeezes a few more points out of this team than if we went a more developmental route. But not trying some outside-the-box deployments, and continuing to curtail the minutes of young players despite no playoff-related incentive to do so would be a disservice to his team. If there's a gift at all to this season, it's the freedom to experiment with this team.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...