Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • To Sam Steel Or Not Sam Steel? That Is the Question


    Image courtesy of Matt Blewett-USA Today Sports
    Luke Sims

    He's been a first-round pick and prized prospect. A cast-off bust and reclamation project, and a cheap depth option who somehow became a first-line center. Then he went from a frequently-scratched player to playoff hero. Sam Steel has done it all in his NHL career.

    After flaming out as a prospect in the Anaheim Ducks organization, Steel signed a one-year deal with the Minnesota Wild. At a near-league minimum $825K, Steel's contract was a bit of a low-risk/high-reward type of deal. There was a small chance he could round into the offensive dynamo Anaheim drafted him to be. But if he didn’t, that would've been fine, too. All he needed to do was play solid minutes in the bottom-six for Bill Guerin to get a bargain. 

    They needed those good deals, too. The Wild were (and still are) in a cap crunch, which means plenty of need for cheap bodies to fill out the roster. Steel was that, and maybe a bit more over this past year. But now that his deal is up, he's competing for contracts with many other bottom-six mainstays Brandon Duhaime, Mason Shaw, and Ryan Reaves.

    So now there's a sticky state of affairs for 'Sota. 

    To Sam Steel, or not to Sam Steel? That is the question. Whether 'tis nobler of the front office to suffer rewarding him outrageous fortune, or to take arms against a sea of uncertainty, and by opposing, end his tenure.

    Steel held up his end of the bargain last year. Going into next season, we can expect more of the same. He put up 30 points in 70 games (including playoffs) while being a versatile member of the bottom six. 

    The points may not leap off the stat sheet, but it was an improvement over his previous career-high of 22. Last year was his first season cracking double-digit goals. Steel has also struggled to play a full season, and that also continued last year. Less because of injury this time, and more to sitting in the press box. But the point still stands. He’s never played a full 82 games, although he played in 65 of 71 with Anaheim during the COVID-shortened season. 

    According to Natural Stat Trick, Steel centered Kirill Kaprizov and Mats Zuccarello for at least two faceoffs in 30 games last year. It started during the November 19 game against the Carolina Hurricanes, where Steel scored a goal and added an assist in overtime.

    Dean Evason deemed Ryan Hartman and Freddy Gaudreau unworthy to dance between the dynamos, and Steel seized the opportunity. Evason rewarded Steel with a jump in minutes and a bigger role. From mid-November through mid-January, he had a nice little run of production with 36 and 97.

    But sometime after that, Steel's production stalled even as Kaprizov and Zuccarello kept producing. The line was solid when it was together, but the wingers were clearly driving the bus, and not the man in the middle. Steel went from scoring 19 points in 25 games starting on November 19, then scored zero in the following 11.

    His fortunes turned during the shake-up following a 5-1 butt-whoopin' by the Vegas Golden Knights on February 9. Steel found himself sitting in the press box three games later. He was out for the rest of February and played sporadically throughout March.

    Still, Steel finished fourth among Wild forwards in 5-on-5 expected goals for percentage (xGF%). The only players on the team to best Steel's 51.9% xGF% were Kaprizov, Joel Eriksson Ek, and Matt Boldy. In the playoffs, though, his on-ice metrics were some of the worst on the Wild, and he only had two points to show for his efforts.

    That didn't stop him from scoring a big game-tying goal in Game 1 or notching the assist on Hartman's overtime winner, though.

    And that's a big reason you want Steel back. Whatever you can say about him, the fact is he outproduced a lot of other bottom-six guys. Steel scored more points than Marcus Foligno and Connor Dewar, and many of the bottom-six free agents that he's competing with for new contracts.

    But will he do that in a bottom-six role full-time? Steel should not be playing in the Wild’s top line, or even their second, if they are serious about winning games. He had a fun little run with Kaprizov and Zuccarello, but it’s clear who was doing the heavy lifting in that arrangement. 

    Where would he slot in? The Wild’s lines currently stand as: 

    Kaprizov - Hartman - Zuccarello 

    Marcus Johansson - Eriksson Ek - Boldy 

    Foligno - Gaudreau - ???

    ??? - Dewar - ??? 

    Minnesota probably won't re-sign trade deadline acquisitions Gustav Nyquist and Oskar Sundqvist because they will most likely be out of its price range. The Wild already re-signed Johansson, their other deadline splash, to a two-year, $2 million deal. So his spot in the top six is locked in after the strong showing he had with the team -- especially Boldy. 

    The Wild have expressed interest in bringing back Shaw, who should return from his ACL tear sometime mid-season, and Reaves. That would fill out the rest of the slots on the fourth line. So that third-line winger spot would be up for grabs if that is the direction Wild management wishes to go in.

    Steel is a fine player. He is passable defensively, can chip in some offense, and is a good depth guy to have around. That should be his role with the Wild. He can step in and fill a spot anywhere in the lineup if need be. If injuries arise, Steel can fill in a spot, but he should not be counted on any more than that. Let the kids like Adam Beckman, Sammy Walker, and Rossi compete for any big-minute spots should they open, and don't bury them for guys like Steel. 

    If the Wild want Steel to play a big role and block the youngsters from playing, they outta say c'est la vie to the former Duck. Still, it would be a wise investment to bring him back on a cheap deal. Another contact of $825K or something in that range sounds reasonable. If he can take on fourth-line money, and a small role, Steel can be a valuable depth piece. That is, as long as that’s is the extent of his role on this team.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    What is the reasoning behind giving "youngsters" a non-merit based opportunity for a spot over a known commodity in Steel?  If they cannot beat out said commodity, then why should they be playing in the NHL?

    I think Sam Steel is a good benchmark to gauge the value of a youngster.  Steel is somewhat pedestrian, but can be effective at times and isn't a defensive liability.  If you can't beat out that then by what standard should you be given an opportunity?

    Well, the answer is obviously potential.  I just wish that said potential was a little more apparent.  I like to look at Brock Faber as a prime example.  

    Talk about a guy who was thrown in the to fire of the NHL playoffs with what 2 game warm up?  That is apparent potential not only seen but banked upon.

    Now when talking about Rossi, Sammy, or Beckman... yeah their potential isn't so clear.  Rossi was such a deer in the headlights last season, any potential he has was not on display.  Sammy has the wheels and actually needs to be on the roster next year.  Beckman needs to earn it and beat out Steel.

    Now with that said... I think Rossi is in a peculiar situation.  We really need a top line center.  Hartman isn't it.  Steel isn't it.  Freddy isn't it.  Even Ek isn't it.

    We cannot go out in FA and get one either.  We are stuck in dead cap horror and our only play here is a Hail Mary.

    We need to put Rossi with KK97 and see if anything is there.  

     

     

     

     

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^^^

    I agree with a lot of what's above here but Rossi with Kaprizov and the Norwegian Hobbit is like an All-Star  line for get'n beat up. 

    I like to keep an open mind. Who would play with #97 and Rossi?

     

    Steel had some nice moments. If he was more consistent, that would help. Jester Strudel territory he's in. Could go either way. Might not sign here again.

    Beckman being a wing with scoring pedigree will hopefully take another step. He's getting there in the pecking order. Steel being a center makes him more valuable to keep around if it's cheap. Could he have a Hartman type breakout? Hartman bounced around a little bit himself before having his big season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    With a contract around the minimum, I'd definitely bring back Steely Sam so that the young guys have someone to beat out. At 25, he's also young enough that he might still improve/impress and earn future contracts.

    In even strength points/60 minutes, Steel finished ahead of Gaudreau and Foligno, just behind Zuccarello and Boldy. Not sure how many minutes he played with Kaprizov, which generally helps anyone in collecting points, but he was able to put up okay points over the course of the season.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, Protec said:

     I like to keep an open mind. Who would play with #97 and Rossi?

    Boldy would have to be that guy.  It's hard to break up Ek/Boldy/Mojo although this is a Hail Mary so yeah Boldy.

    This frees up Ek to center a shutdown line as well which would also give a home to Foligno who was lost after the Greenway trade.  ?EEF 2.0.

    3rd line of pure speed?  Mojo/Freddy/Sammy?

    Stacked top line.  Shutdown 2nd line.  Speed 3rd line.

    Good balance.  Add a solid 4th line with Hartman/Dewar/Shaw?

    I'm going deep here... haha.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    "At 25, he's also young enough that he might still improve/impress and earn future contracts."

    I think people forget how young Steel is.  25 to 32 is when players are at their best.  He is only a year older than Shaw.  No, he isn't top 6... yet.  is he still improving?  His biggest weakness is the faceoff dot which really hurt in the playoffs when he got schooled during the PK and Dallas was able to score quick goals on set plays with easy face-off wins.  

    I reserve my judgement on Steel here.  To accurately assess him I would need to study his tape over the course of the entire year and gauge his improvements or lack thereof.... and then compare it to the players in IA.  I am guessing this will not be an easy assessment for player personnel.   Good Luck GMBG.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Let's put Steel's season into proper perspective. According to Luke, Steel had a nice 25 game run with Kaprizov-Zuccarello scoring 19, essentially, gimme points. Steel didn't get in the way and his speed was useful. 

    I kept hearing how Steel was offensively talented last season by Panther, but what I most noticed was his inability to convert grade A chances, chances Hartman put in the basket the previous season. 

    Outside of those 25 games, Steel put up 9 points. For an offensively talented center, that's pretty pitiful. Steel could create chances, but shanked a lot of shots. He also goes at 5'11" 184. For a bottom 6 physical player, that is simply too light. 

    I think you qualify him, and sign a 1 year deal at around that qualification price. He's worth about $900k/yr. Perhaps he gets a few games with Kaprizov again and if he can be heavier on his stick, maybe even produce. My suggestion for the coaches is a strong strength program where he comes back at 195 and can contribute on the boards. His game screams 13th forward. He's also got to get stronger forearms and wrists to pop in those tight goals. 

    Will D. is explaining things perfectly. You have to have a fall back plan for the hungry A players to beat out. You already know Shaw starts the season on LTIR. He could fill the role of Pitlick, especially if Rossi or Beckman doesn't start out on the big club. If he produces even mediocre, there will be a trade partner at that low cap number. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, MNCountryLife said:

    His biggest weakness is the faceoff dot which really hurt in the playoffs when he got schooled during the PK and Dallas was able to score quick goals on set plays with easy face-off wins.  

    I thought it was Gaudreau losing those faceoffs. While Steel was still stinky in the dot, I didn't remember him being Gaudreau's partner. 

    Also, good luck to the Kraken tonight so we can slide up to 20 in the draft process.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I thought it was Gaudreau losing those faceoffs. While Steel was still stinky in the dot, I didn't remember him being Gaudreau's partner. 

    Also, good luck to the Kraken tonight so we can slide up to 20 in the draft process.

    Freddy did lose plenty of faceoffs. It wasn't a mirage.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 5/14/2023 at 11:56 AM, Will D. Ness said:

    What is the reasoning behind giving "youngsters" a non-merit based opportunity for a spot over a known commodity in Steel?  If they cannot beat out said commodity, then why should they be playing in the NHL?

    I think Sam Steel is a good benchmark to gauge the value of a youngster.  Steel is somewhat pedestrian, but can be effective at times and isn't a defensive liability.  If you can't beat out that then by what standard should you be given an opportunity?

    Well, the answer is obviously potential.  I just wish that said potential was a little more apparent.  I like to look at Brock Faber as a prime example.  

    Talk about a guy who was thrown in the to fire of the NHL playoffs with what 2 game warm up?  That is apparent potential not only seen but banked upon.

    Now when talking about Rossi, Sammy, or Beckman... yeah their potential isn't so clear.  Rossi was such a deer in the headlights last season, any potential he has was not on display.  Sammy has the wheels and actually needs to be on the roster next year.  Beckman needs to earn it and beat out Steel.

    Now with that said... I think Rossi is in a peculiar situation.  We really need a top line center.  Hartman isn't it.  Steel isn't it.  Freddy isn't it.  Even Ek isn't it.

    We cannot go out in FA and get one either.  We are stuck in dead cap horror and our only play here is a Hail Mary.

    We need to put Rossi with KK97 and see if anything is there.  

     

     

     

     

    This gets my nomination for post of the week.  Lots of uncomfortable realities laid bare here.  I admire your courage Will D.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Re Steel, I think BG signs him to a cheap two year deal.  He's an acceptable placeholder C who can fill in 1C-4C.  If his testacles do drop at 26 (50/50 probability) he becomes an expensive free agent after next season, so that's why BG signs him for two yrs.  Safe to assume Steel game improves over next yrs.

    And seriously (as has been mentioned above) who in the A has demonstrated they're ready to TAKE that spot from Steel next season?  Who's next after Rossi on this list?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think Petan is a guy who can play C, and Fogarty is another guy who can play C. We've got a lot of guys who supposedly can play C but aren't real Cs.

    Bankier will be there next year and he's a little larger body, but was used as an LW in the playoffs this year for Kamloops (not sure about the regular season).  Haight will also be there. I think Petrovsky still gets another year of jrs. but I'm not looking at him to see for sure. 

    Perhaps a trade would make more sense? Something we have a large commodity in for something we don't.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    36 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Haight will also be there. I think Petrovsky still gets another year of jrs. but I'm not looking at him to see for sure. 

    Looked it up, both these guys have another year of jr. left. Petrovsky's only 5'9" tall, why do we keep drafting 5'9" guys?????

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Wild need Steel to become the next Hartman. 
     

    Hartman needs to keep out of the box and direct his energy towards scoring and grizzling without getting distracted. 
     

    Let’s say they can get Steel for 1.2M for two years and he has a much more consistent season. That would be great value. The Wild might not have luck this off-season with transactions or the draft. 
     

    #brackettsnoguru

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...