Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Ready Or Not, Daemon Hunt Is In Minnesota


    Image courtesy of Nick Wosika - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    The Minnesota Wild have always been high on Daemon Hunt, maybe even higher than the rest of the hockey world. This year might not be much different. The Wild coaches and front office loved Hunt throughout the preseason, making a point of making him one of their final cuts. 

    “I think Huntsy’s taken that next step in his development where he got some games last year, learned some things, played really well down the stretch for Iowa, has come back to this camp and he looks more mature,” John Hynes told The Athletic's Michael Russo on September 28. “He looks physically able to handle the battles, skating looks good, more confident I think in himself and his decisions."

    Minnesota sent Hunt down to the Iowa Wild -- it was a numbers game with veterans like Jon Merrill and waivers-eligible Declan Chisholm on the roster -- but it didn't take long for him to come back up I-35. Jared Spurgeon's injury left a door open, and the Wild are taking advantage to give Hunt his first NHL opportunity of the year.

    So, what can we expect from the rookie defenseman?

    Last season's 12 NHL games didn't give us much to go on, but what he did at Iowa last year shows a lot about what the Wild like in him. Hunt skates well and has a good shot, but he's not a flashy defenseman. However, he's a tough, smart defender who has had to take on a leadership role as a 22-year-old on a young, inexperienced Iowa blueline. 

    McKeen's Hockey's 2024 Prospect Report praises him as a defenseman who "seems to always find a way to get the job done, even if it’s not always pretty or exciting. If he needs to bear down and defend hard, he can do it. If his team needs a goal and he needs to ramp up the pace, he can do that too. The best way to describe him might be 'low maintenance.'"

    That screams out "third-pairing defenseman," but Minnesota seems to have higher hopes for Hunt than that. And they might be right. If you can skate and are smart, you can thrive in the NHL, and Hunt checks those boxes. The 2020 third-round pick even showed some power play utility in the short opportunities he got in the preseason.

    The problem is that Hunt's 5-on-5 preseason metrics don't quite align with the hype. According to Natural Stat Trick, Hunt ended the preseason with an Expected Goals For share of just 46.6% at 5-on-5. That ranks 83rd among 132 defensemen with 50-plus preseason minutes. Granted, it's a small sample in the preseason, so we can take this with a grain of salt (after all, superstar Adam Fox's metrics were slightly worse). But it's not incredibly encouraging after watching Hunt struggle last year, controlling just 43.8% of the expected goal share in 138 minutes.

    The good news is that Hunt's best preseason showings came in two games against the Chicago Blackhawks, where he faced their NHL squad. One of those games came alongside Spurgeon, and the other came with Chisholm, which might point to his best potential partner in Minnesota.

    While most young defensemen are seen as defensively deficient and needing a partner who can cover for them, Hunt may instead need someone who can help him push the tempo. Last season, he spent about 70 minutes combined with Merrill and Zach Bogosian and struggled with each stay-at-home-type defenseman. Despite his mobility and shot, that might be Hunt's role. He's got a reputation for being an old-school defenseman who can lay out huge hits.

    The Wild are excited about his potential and offseason, and now we'll see the proof. Minnesota probably isn't recalling Hunt to see him play for a handful of minutes; they'll want to see if he can apply his growth in real NHL regular-season competition. Chances are, we're going to get a much better idea of what the Wild have in Hunt than ever before.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    15 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    He won't have a choice.  The Wild might go 11/7...

    Does 11/7 ever work?

    Apparently it does when Kaprizov is one of your forwards...

    Gus with a .948 save percentage on the season doesn't hurt either!

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I didn't think that last year Hunt struggled. He did try to run PP2 and this was a struggle. I thought this was probably outside of his wheelhouse, and that Chisholm is a better fit there.

    But, Hunt was a rookie. Rookies learn, and what looks like struggle is just part of the process. He got ally ooped a couple of times in the Boston game. That will happen to a rookie defender who hasn't seen such moves before. That's not struggle, that's learning. He didn't recover as smoothly as hoped, but I think he learned from the experience. Next time he sees that move, I assume he'll be better. 

    On a little different front: Does it look like Faber and Chisholm have gained a bit of strength? Faber especially looks a little bigger, but had 0 trouble tying up Winnipeg players behind the net. Chisholm I saw in preseason looking a little more stable in the contact area. To me, Hunt also looks stronger.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    Has mitchkov been benched yet by Torts?

    billy call fletch or whoever is running flyers and offer up

    Rossi Trenin Yurov for Mitchkov

    throw is Freddy too

    That’s way too much to give and it’ll never happen. Rossi is playing great so far and a ppg.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Mateo3xm said:

    That’s way too much to give and it’ll never happen. Rossi is playing great so far and a ppg.

    Too much for someone that has been compared to Panarin to Kaprizov to Kucherov to Malkin to Fedorov? I think i'd take a chance on him if at all possible. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I didn't think that last year Hunt struggled. He did try to run PP2 and this was a struggle. I thought this was probably outside of his wheelhouse, and that Chisholm is a better fit there.

    But, Hunt was a rookie. Rookies learn, and what looks like struggle is just part of the process. He got ally ooped a couple of times in the Boston game. That will happen to a rookie defender who hasn't seen such moves before. That's not struggle, that's learning. He didn't recover as smoothly as hoped, but I think he learned from the experience. Next time he sees that move, I assume he'll be better. 

    On a little different front: Does it look like Faber and Chisholm have gained a bit of strength? Faber especially looks a little bigger, but had 0 trouble tying up Winnipeg players behind the net. Chisholm I saw in preseason looking a little more stable in the contact area. To me, Hunt also looks stronger.

    I definitely noticed Faber and Chisholm being tougher on opponents in the corners. Definitely added some strength but just being by harder to play against. Looked very noticeable. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/16/2024 at 11:52 AM, OldDutchChip said:

    Too much for someone that has been compared to Panarin to Kaprizov to Kucherov to Malkin to Fedorov? I think i'd take a chance on him if at all possible. 

    Yurov's also been compared to many (if not all) of those depending on what hype you are reading.  If that's all you're basing the suggestion on, it's poor reasoning and too much to give up.

    I agree that Yurov is an unknown at this point and only hyped potential, but Michkov is the same sort of unknown right now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 minutes ago, raithis said:

    Yurov's also been compared to many (if not all) of those depending on what hype you are reading.  If that's all you're basing the suggestion on, it's poor reasoning and too much to give up.

    I agree that Yurov is an unknown at this point and only hyped potential, but Michkov is the same sort of unknown right now.

    i think mitchkov ceiling looks to be higher. he may have flaws in defensive game, but his offensive game seems to be much better than yurov's. we'll see soon!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/16/2024 at 11:52 AM, OldDutchChip said:

    Too much for someone that has been compared to Panarin to Kaprizov to Kucherov to Malkin to Fedorov? I think i'd take a chance on him if at all possible. 

    It’s irrelevant because they would never do it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...