Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • NHL's Worst Rule Contest Finals: Intent to Blow vs The Loser Point


    Guest

    Following a typical bracket methodology, and more completely unscientific polling, we eliminated those rules fans seem to be more willing to live with than others. There has not been a rule among the competitors that does not deserve a strong look from the league and a real, thorough thought process about why the rules are what they are.

    If the only answer is "because that is the rule," then things need to change. 

    For now, we have a contest to settle. Cast you vote below, and make your case to others in the comment section. The finals poll will run through Sunday at 3PM. We need to settle this before the deadline. 

    The Rules:


    Why do these rules suck?

     

    Intent to blow has crushed all opponents thus far in this competition. The reason is clear. Fans are tired of a rule that has so clearly cost teams games. The referees are not supposed to affect the outcome of a game. They are simply supposed to call the penalties and ensure a fair game. With a rule such as this, they have the subjective control to change the outcome of a game. That's just not acceptable.

    The rule of "play to the whistle" seems so simple. It is reviewable, it is fair, and it is indisputable. Was the puck across when the whistle blew? Yes or no are the only two answers. Was the puck across the line when the referee intended to blow the whistle? How are we ever supposed to know that?

     

    This rule is the topic of nearly constant debate, especially this time of year. I have read several posts around the web showing that the standings change very little if the league were to use different point systems. Three points for a regulation win, two for OT win, one for OT loss. There are some changes in seeding, but most of the playoff teams are still playoff teams. 

    What the "new" system would do is change the way the game is played. Right now, as the third period winds down, teams hold on tight for the point. If they knew there were a bonus for winning in regulation, you don't think the game would change in those final two minutes?

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...