Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Minnesota's Record Is Masking A Serious Underlying Issue


    Image courtesy of Nick Wosika-Imagn Images
    Phillip Garrett

    Minnesota Wild fans have repeatedly seen the Wild’s penalty kill give up goals in the biggest moments. In a league where special teams win championships, the Wild have faltered against the best Western Conference teams in the postseason. 

    In 2022-23 and 2021-22, the Wild’s last two trips to the playoffs, the team has had the worst postseason PK% in the franchise's history with 62.5% and 69.2%, respectively. The awful penalty kill and average powerplay success have only earned the team four playoff wins in three years, which is not a recipe for success. 

    Despite allowing goals on 30% of their penalty kills, the 2024-25 Wild are winning at an unprecedented rate. Still, they have some of the worst special teams stats in the league. So, can the Wild be considered a legitimate contender in the Western Conference?

    In the last five games, the Wild allowed six shorthanded and 12 power-play goals (PPG) in their previous 12. For context, they have only let in 22 PPG in 31 games this season. 

    So, what’s going wrong? 

    John Hynes seems to think they’re lacking attention to detail.

    “We’re in situations where we pressure, and it’s a corner containment, and the other team comes out with the puck,” he said. “It’s the faceoff intensity, the pressure intensity, how we pressure, pressuring together, staying on pressure. All those little components.”

    The Wild are 20th in power play percentage (19%) and 30th in penalty kill percentage (70.7%). However, their e 5-on-5 performance has propelled them to the top of the Western Conference. Losing Joel Eriksson Ek meaningfully contributes to their recent challenges. Still, they’ve had ongoing struggles throughout the year. 

    Minnesota must improve its special teams to make the playoffs. Nine Western Conference teams are currently above the Wild in power play percentage, and only the Dallas Stars have a worse power play and remain in the playoff picture.

    If the season ended today, the Wild would play Dallas. However, with the Winnipeg Jets slowing down with a 4-5-1 record in their last ten games, Minnesota could take that top spot and hold it down. However, the Wild would play the Vancouver Canucks, Edmonton Oilers, Colorado Avalanche, or Calgary Falmes as the 1-seed. Each of those teams has a better PP% and PK%. 

    To counterbalance their poor special teams, the Wild are among the league's least penalized teams. They are 27th in penalty minutes with 222. While this seems encouraging, they aren’t the least penalized team in the West. Edmonton, the Seattle Kraken, and the Vegas Golden Knights have taken fewer penalties and have better PK%. 

    Even if the Wild stay out of the penalty box, they would likely still struggle to capitalize on the power play. Still, Minnesota would likely end up shorthanded against any of these teams. The Oilers and Golden Knights are Stanley Cup contenders and potential first-round matchups, and they have capitalized on their power play opportunities.

    Edmonton has scored 18 power-play goals. With Leon Draisaitl and Connor McDavid on their top unit, I don’t see them slowing down. The Oilers have had the same number of power-play opportunities as the Wild, 79, but they are scoring at a better rate. 

    Vegas is doing even better, scoring 21 power-play goals in 31 games. They’ve scored more than the Wild with fewer power-play opportunities (76). 

    Even if the Wild don’t play Vegas or Edmonton, there’s a good chance that any team in the West will have to face one of these clubs in the playoffs. In a seven-game series, I am not sure Minnesota could continue and win at this rate. 

    Minnesota’s 7-1 loss to Edmonton last Thursday highlighted the importance of these stats. The Oilers scored twice on the power play and once shorthanded, essentially putting the game out of reach. The team was missing key defensive players, Jonas Brodin, Joel Eriksson Ek, and Jacob Middleton, who left after the first shift. Still, the Wild must endure injuries like any other team. 

    The Wild’s goaltending hasn’t helped, ranking 24th in shorthanded save percentage with .832. However, the netminders aren’t fully culpable. Marc-Andre Fleury and Filip Gustavsson have shown they can make important saves. 

    So, how can the Wild fix their special teams? They haven’t been protecting their goalies as well as they should. They have failed to get possession of the puck shorthanded, winning only 38.6% of shorthanded faceoffs. Without faceoff wins and clears, Minnesota’s penalty kill has had to extend its shifts, leading to more high-danger chances. 

    That has outwardly affected the outcome of games. Vegas’ game-tying goal on Sunday was off a failed faceoff attempt and clear. If the Wild had found a way to gain possession in a situation like that, they might have delivered Jesper Wallstedt his first win. 

    The Wild seem to lack energy on the penalty kill and look like a completely different team on special teams. John Hynes has recognized this issue and forced the team to work on their shorthanded faceoffs and board battles in practice. Still, as the NHL season inches closer to the halfway mark, it has become more evident that if the Wild want to contend, they must make a change. 

    If these issues prevail after Christmas, it may be time to evaluate the roster construction.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    If these issues prevail after Christmas, it may be time to evaluate the roster construction.
    And now we’re back to the apathetic old core extensions?  Basically the bottom six + nojo

     again winning makes everyone look smart.   (Thank you 97’s mvp performance. ) now that the same old cracks are showing with this same group (and new coach) we have same team and all its same deficiencies?  Whose fault is this?  Buck stops with Guerin at year 5.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Good article. I didn’t think the wild would be in playoff hunt this year. Looks like the core jumped some teams early this year and racked up points . However now that teams are gelling and gearing up to make playoffs. Our core can’t handle the good teams. Imagine that the same thing is happening again with the same players . Billy can blow his whole wad on a d-man years away but can’t get secondary scoring,  a center that can win a face off  , or some size on the team so they quit getting bullied . 
       The simple problem with the wild is they are weak and small !  Those pretty early season passing goals don’t work in playoffs . The wild get punched in the face and  then fall apart . Unless the offense goes through kappy there is no offense. Boldy can’t drive anything . Either can Rossi. Kappy is all alone but Billy has a d man a respected gm gave up on instead of help for kappy !  I like taking a chance on the d man but only if the rest of your house is in order . The wild need a legit center and secondary scoring Rossi , Freddy , knat . Is a pathetic center depth down the middle. . They get caved on faceoffs and in the d zone.  None of them are over 6 ft . The pk is terrible because they have no size or length on the pk. They are weak and get manhandled. 
       The wild are wimps. They have no strength .the speed game only works if you play fast. The wild can’t do that long enough to win a playoff series or games against good teams . When Freddy g is your 3 rd line center and pk guy your a bad team! 

    • Like 1
    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Vegas and Panthers showed us what to expect when we play good/physical playoffs teams. Add to that list Dallas, Jets and Avs and Kings.

    What do we do?  Billy will do something. 

    (a) Status Quo - let it proceed as it will and then bring some old Minnesotan in the off season (Brock N, Brock B, Kessel, Oshie?) and play Zeev and Yurov and let them experience some growing pains and hope Kap really really loves it here

    (b) Trade for Brock Nelson at this year trade deadline (giving up a first rd pick) i don't know play him on line 2? And do L1 Ek Kap Zuccy L2 Nelson Rossi Boldy L3 Freddy Trenin Foligno L4 Marat Lauko Harty? MJ plays for whoever is injured i guess? 

    (c) Trade Rossi for a bigger player (i am not naming names cause i'll be screamed at by Mateo and it's too early in the day for that!) but if Rossi is traded for say Tuch, and i guess we can still trade for Nelson that would give us? L1 Ek Kap Zuccy L2 Nelson Tuch Boldy L3 Freddy Trenin Foligno L4 Marat Lauko Harty

    Lastly - i think last two games basically sealed Rossi's fate. 

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    Vegas and Panthers showed us what to expect when we play good/physical playoffs teams. Add to that list Dallas, Jets and Avs and Kings.

    What do we do?  Billy will do something. 

    (a) Status Quo - let it proceed as it will and then bring some old Minnesotan in the off season (Brock N, Brock B, Kessel, Oshie?) and play Zeev and Yurov and let them experience some growing pains and hope Kap really really loves it here

    (b) Trade for Brock Nelson at this year trade deadline (giving up a first rd pick) i don't know play him on line 2? And do L1 Ek Kap Zuccy L2 Nelson Rossi Boldy L3 Freddy Trenin Foligno L4 Marat Lauko Harty? MJ plays for whoever is injured i guess? 

    (c) Trade Rossi for a bigger player (i am not naming names cause i'll be screamed at by Mateo and it's too early in the day for that!) but if Rossi is traded for say Tuch, and i guess we can still trade for Nelson that would give us? L1 Ek Kap Zuccy L2 Nelson Tuch Boldy L3 Freddy Trenin Foligno L4 Marat Lauko Harty

    Lastly - i think last two games basically sealed Rossi's fate. 

    I like option C of getting both Nelson and Tuch.  We badly need them both.  Agree Rossi is gone after his last 4-5 games against bigger teams are not what we need.  
     

    We also need to try move off spurgeon for anything if we can and use that salary elsewhere to get bigger on D.  We got manhandled in front of our net last night.  Both Faber and Spurgeon looked bad last night. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    I like option C of getting both Nelson and Tuch.  We badly need them both.  Agree Rossi is gone after his last 4-5 games against bigger teams are not what we need.  
     

    We also need to try move off spurgeon for anything if we can and use that salary elsewhere to get bigger on D.  We got manhandled in front of our net last night.  Both Faber and Spurgeon looked bad last night. 

    i think regardless how we feel about spurge - he stays. i actually think he has been good for us this year, but yeah going to be hard in the playoffs for him.... Midds has been amazing. Brodin and Spurge have been good to great most nights. Faber is my disappointment on D so far. I know there will be some stats that may suggest otherwise but you see it in his game. He has not been as good as i've expected him to be.

    you really hope Midds comes back and plays at the same level to stabilize the group. 

    Edited by OldDutchChip
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    i think regardless how we feel about spurge - he stays. i actually think he has been good for us this year, but yeah going to be hard in the playoffs for him.... Midds has been amazing. Brodin and Spurge have been good to great most nights. Faber is my disappointment on D so far. I know there will be some stats that may suggest otherwise but you see it in his game. He has not been as good as i've expected him to be.

    you really hope Midds comes back and plays at the same level to stabilize the group. 

    Spurg has been better than expected this year and to me has outplayed Faber.  I sure wish they would have waited to sign Faber to that extension as he is playing like a 4-5mm dman right now. Very very average and not good against the big teams. If you watch him closely he is very jumpy and shys away and spins away from any contact. 
     

    I worry if we have both Spurgeon and Faber in our top 4 d come the playoffs they are going to get stepped on like last night.  They both are just to small.  I know people don’t like it but if we could use Faber to get a stud of a 1C I am for it. The contracts will offset for cap purposes and it will sure get any GMs attention. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    37 minutes ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    Spurg has been better than expected this year and to me has outplayed Faber.  I sure wish they would have waited to sign Faber to that extension as he is playing like a 4-5mm dman right now. Very very average and not good against the big teams. If you watch him closely he is very jumpy and shys away and spins away from any contact. 
     

    I worry if we have both Spurgeon and Faber in our top 4 d come the playoffs they are going to get stepped on like last night.  They both are just to small.  I know people don’t like it but if we could use Faber to get a stud of a 1C I am for it. The contracts will offset for cap purposes and it will sure get any GMs attention. 

    Faber for Bedard! 🤔

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Wild are elite defensively 5v5 and are getting elite goaltending 5v5. The problem is the scheme. It's incredibly stupid. Letting the best players on the planet waltz around the zone unmolested is going to result in a lot of goals against. Change it. 

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, OldDutchChip said:

    (c) Trade Rossi for a bigger player (i am not naming names cause i'll be screamed at by Mateo and it's too early in the day for that!) but if Rossi is traded for say Tuch, and i guess we can still trade for Nelson that would give us? L1 Ek Kap Zuccy L2 Nelson Tuch Boldy L3 Freddy Trenin Foligno L4 Marat Lauko Harty

    Lastly - i think last two games basically sealed Rossi's fate. 

    Interestingly enough, Russo's last Pod he walked back the 'Rossi's a goner' and seemed to believe that he has played his way into being kept around, with an extension coming after the season but prior to July 1 as that's when they'll announce the cap going up.

    While Ross-Vegas seems to be in the doghouse, he also seems to have listened to the coaching and bought into what he needs to do to improve which seems to be a trait that's appreciated by this organization.  

    Maybe we'll look back at this season and regret not selling high on Rossi, but I don't see how an organization who's near the top of the league in points can sell off a guy on an ELC who's producing at the rate Rossi is.

    I know as MN fans we're conditioned to wait for the other shoe to fall and figure out how the team is going to disappoint us, but it's absolute lunacy to think the Wild should be selling off parts at this point in the season.

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Wild are getting bigger players, but they either aren't up to NHL speed yet (Ohgren and Jiricek), or aren't on the roster in some other country (Yurov).  I still think Rossi gets you consistent points, and it doesn't seem to matter what team he is against. I'd be more worried about why other players like Ek Hartman aren't nearly as productive as they were last year.  The team has one guy who scores against anyone (Kap), and 3-4 that consistently do well, but not to that level (Boldy/ Rossi/Zuccarello).

    What sucks is the team as constructed is defense first, offense second.  But if they get on the PK, they have to get 1-2 extra goals and aren't playing the Evason style where they just run and gun.  Play it close, or forget it 

    Also, if Tuch costs Rossi, fine.  Otherwise, I'd rather not.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No Ek is definitely hurting.  He plays a physical game that is frustrating to play against.  Get him back and we don't seem so small anymore.  Without him and the top 2 lines do seem to get pushed around a bit.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think players are starting to revolt against Hynes.  He keeps rolling out Nojo with his lazy/poor effort and it causes us lots of d-zone time and players get injured blocking shots and tired when they can't get shift changes.  There is a collapse coming on this team and it will continue until you get Nojo off the ice.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There is a lot of parity near the top. Injuries and momentum streaks make big differences for teams. MN doesn't need to panic but there's been a good sample size to evaluate and contrast your group against FL or Edmonton now as opposed to the first weeks of the season. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Is all of this a reaction to the recent homestand? I think we've got the best roster construction we can put out there right now. Important players are out, larger players, and we simply don't have the depth pieces to put in there. Some of it is -$15m, some of it is the kids aren't ready yet. 

    I would play the long game. Zuccarello will be gone soon, Spurgeon too. I think as soon as Jiricek is ready to take over for Spurgeon's slot, he will have to be moved. Our center depth is coming, it's not here yet, but you guys are right, hat tip to Dean, who called out our current center depth as being rough. 

    I am in disagreement on size=draw wins. I would think both Rossi and Khus would have a leverage advantage, but perhaps even more strength is needed? We do miss our best draw man in Ek. I don't understand why it is so hard to find guys who can take draws and win them consistently. Certainly there is someone around who can teach them what to do and how to make a decision on what move you're going to go with?

    As for Phillip's point of the article, I don't think any of us have been fooled by the atrocious PK. We've been banking points, but let's really face it, we've also been punching over our weight. But, that's what it takes to get to the playoffs. Take care of business against the ugly teams, win most of your middling games, and try to win some of the top of the league games, which we've done. 

    I think we can keep 3 small players. For me, Rossi and Khus are 2/3. Spurge and Zuccy are near the end. Freddy is too small too. It's not the height, it's the strength/weight. And, with a bunch of grinders who were strong and are now in charge of player development, I find it tremendously odd that they are not stressing this part of development. It's like it's malpractice!

    But, this is our team this year. We've got some holes. We have a bright future with The Wall, Yurov, Buium, and Jiricek playing significant roles coming up. My patience is waning, but these guys still aren't quite ready.  

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    36 minutes ago, MrCheatachu said:

    Interestingly enough, Russo's last Pod he walked back the 'Rossi's a goner' and seemed to believe that he has played his way into being kept around, with an extension coming after the season but prior to July 1 as that's when they'll announce the cap going up.

    While Ross-Vegas seems to be in the doghouse, he also seems to have listened to the coaching and bought into what he needs to do to improve which seems to be a trait that's appreciated by this organization.  

    Maybe we'll look back at this season and regret not selling high on Rossi, but I don't see how an organization who's near the top of the league in points can sell off a guy on an ELC who's producing at the rate Rossi is.

    I know as MN fans we're conditioned to wait for the other shoe to fall and figure out how the team is going to disappoint us, but it's absolute lunacy to think the Wild should be selling off parts at this point in the season.

    agree, but one edit - we are not selling Rossi. we are using him at the highest point of his tenure to attract a possible bigger fish to compliment our team, and more importantly, our superstar better. i am against just selling Rossi to anyone. No No. You bait another GM to give up a good player. If not - just keep him i guess. For now...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, MNCountryLife said:

    I think players are starting to revolt against Hynes.  He keeps rolling out Nojo with his lazy/poor effort and it causes us lots of d-zone time and players get injured blocking shots and tired when they can't get shift changes.  There is a collapse coming on this team and it will continue until you get Nojo off the ice.

    I disagree. I think Johansson has been far better than last year. He's hustled more, he's been way more physical, he has done a good job entering the zone and not coughing it up immediately, and he hasn't passed up shooting more. 

    I don't think he's a good fit for the 2nd line, but he hasn't been awful. For a $2m/yr. player, he's been about that good.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    31 minutes ago, Citizen Strife said:

    The Wild are getting bigger players, but they either aren't up to NHL speed yet (Ohgren and Jiricek), or aren't on the roster in some other country (Yurov).  I still think Rossi gets you consistent points, and it doesn't seem to matter what team he is against. I'd be more worried about why other players like Ek Hartman aren't nearly as productive as they were last year.  The team has one guy who scores against anyone (Kap), and 3-4 that consistently do well, but not to that level (Boldy/ Rossi/Zuccarello).

    What sucks is the team as constructed is defense first, offense second.  But if they get on the PK, they have to get 1-2 extra goals and aren't playing the Evason style where they just run and gun.  Play it close, or forget it 

    Also, if Tuch costs Rossi, fine.  Otherwise, I'd rather not.  

    Right - i would be against Rossi trade if it's just to trade him. If Sabres keep Tuch - fine, we keep Rossi. 

    And yes - Harty has been headless chicken out there. What to do....wait for him to start taking dumb penalties or Maybe switch him and Marat? Marat is being stuck with who knows who for the last 2 - 3 weeks. I'm sure he can do no worse. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    agree, but one edit - we are not selling Rossi. we are using him at the highest point of his tenure to attract a possible bigger fish to compliment our team, and more importantly, our superstar better. i am against just selling Rossi to anyone. No No. You bait another GM to give up a good player. If not - just keep him i guess. For now...

    Ah yes, RossVegas is on an ELC and on pace for 60ish points this season.  Do tell, what player on an ELC (the only thing we can afford without moving out additional pieces) is available who's going to be anywhere near that production?

    18 minutes ago, MNCountryLife said:

    I think players are starting to revolt against Hynes.  He keeps rolling out Nojo with his lazy/poor effort and it causes us lots of d-zone time and players get injured blocking shots and tired when they can't get shift changes.  There is a collapse coming on this team and it will continue until you get Nojo off the ice.

    This is sure a take.  

    If this is true, fire the whole damn bunch of them.  What sort of professional hockey player 'revolts' against his coach because of the who he picks to put on the ice?  That is the dumbest thing I've read on the internet in a while.

    Hynes has lost the room because he keeps playing Mojo, and Mojo is lazy?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, MrCheatachu said:

    Ah yes, RossVegas is on an ELC and on pace for 60ish points this season.  Do tell, what player on an ELC (the only thing we can afford without moving out additional pieces) is available who's going to be anywhere near that production?

    This is sure a take.  

    If this is true, fire the whole damn bunch of them.  What sort of professional hockey player 'revolts' against his coach because of the who he picks to put on the ice?  That is the dumbest thing I've read on the internet in a while.

    Hynes has lost the room because he keeps playing Mojo, and Mojo is lazy?

    i meant Rossi can be a tempting get for some underachieving team or someone looking to reset or bunch of other reason. Rossi is on ELC and has scored 22 goals last year and is on pace to exceed this year. so why wouldn't someone consider him in a player swap? 

    and as far as affording...

    well there are other ways - you throw in a player or they retain salary ... there are ways - it's much better than last year

    Edited by OldDutchChip
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, OldDutchChip said:

    i meant Rossi can be a tempting get for some underachieving team or someone looking to reset or bunch of other reason. Rossi is on ELC and has scored 22 goals last year and is on pace to exceed this year. so why wouldn't someone consider him in a player swap? 

    But who?  Obviously Rossi would be a intriguing get for a number of teams in this league, but who are we getting in return that makes it make any sense for the Wild in the position they are currently in?

    Just give me one example of an <23 year old on an ELC (all we can afford) that would improve the wild if we swapped for Rossi.  Give me one name, that would be a likely candidate who could come in here, and improve this team compared to what we are getting out of Rossi this season.

    I can give you a list of 32 teams who would look at a player like Rossi and have a roster spot for him, but there's a much shorter (or non-existent) list of players coming back that make any sort of sense on Rossi this season prior to the TDL

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    40 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I don't think he's a good fit for the 2nd line, but he hasn't been awful.

    I will give you that he has been better than last year.  But he is still awful.  His whole MO is skating with the puck which he does a pretty good job.  But it ends there.   He rarely wins a 50/50 puck.  Usually he is out skated to the puck so the 50/50 never actually happens.  He may pester a player from behind but he rarely catches the guy and rarely steals the puck or causes a turn over.... and he turns the puck over quite often.  He doesn't belong on the ice.  His lack of pressure makes it easier for teams to establish the zone on us.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    45 minutes ago, MrCheatachu said:

    If this is true, fire the whole damn bunch of them.  What sort of professional hockey player 'revolts' against his coach because of the who he picks to put on the ice?  That is the dumbest thing I've read on the internet in a while.

    Hynes has lost the room because he keeps playing Mojo, and Mojo is lazy?

    Dumbest?  Dang man.  I read a few social media posts or something on politics and I'm pretty sure it lacks all sense of reality much less any common sense.  Giving me the "Dumbest thing I've read on the internet in a while" seems a bit harsh.  LOL.

    Hartman made the comment last year:  "Wild were too easy to play against".  We just got thumped by the Oilers and again against Florida.   Easy goals against us on special teams.  Glimmers of this team being too easy to play against is real and happening again... why... frustration is evident.  Marcus' style of play makes it easier for teams to move into our d-zone and cycle.  He is making us "Easy to play against".  At least that is my dumb opinion. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    53 minutes ago, MrCheatachu said:

    But who?  Obviously Rossi would be a intriguing get for a number of teams in this league, but who are we getting in return that makes it make any sense for the Wild in the position they are currently in?

    Just give me one example of an <23 year old on an ELC (all we can afford) that would improve the wild if we swapped for Rossi.  Give me one name, that would be a likely candidate who could come in here, and improve this team compared to what we are getting out of Rossi this season.

    I can give you a list of 32 teams who would look at a player like Rossi and have a roster spot for him, but there's a much shorter (or non-existent) list of players coming back that make any sort of sense on Rossi this season prior to the TDL

    Just give me one example of an <23 year old on an ELC (all we can afford) that would improve the wild if we swapped for Rossi.  
     

    I never said I’m looking for under 23 on ELC

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...