Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Minnesota Could Target A Jake Middleton-Type Player With Spurgeon's LTIR Money


    Image courtesy of Timothy T. Ludwig-USA TODAY Sports
    Justin Hein

     

    Pablo Picasso once said, “Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.” While the computers of Picasso’s day weren’t the same as what they are now, the musing still holds a grounded truth. In nine words, he gets right to the heart of the joy of asking questions. 

    That might sound rich to Minnesota Wild fans. Straightforward answers would be comforting in the middle of an uncertain 2023-24 season. Perhaps that’s why Bill Guerin has been so direct in the media about his desire to add a defenseman. “They are going to get a defenseman,” Michael Russo said during a recent episode of his Worst Seats in the House podcast, “I’m reporting what Bill Guerin is thinking of doing. That’s not opinion.”

    Not only has Guerin been open about his desire to add a defenseman, but he’s also named his price. Russo provided in-depth details of the Wild’s trade goals in the same podcast:

    When I talked to Bill Guerin… he made it extremely clear to me that he plans to go out and get a defenseman, and pretty quickly here. But he doesn’t want to give up a first or second-round pick. He doesn’t want to give up a top prospect.

    Guerin has an impressive track record of bringing in bottom-of-the-lineup players and maximizing their value. Frederick Gaudreau had only played 103 games in four NHL seasons when he joined the Wild at age 29. But he became a reliable utility forward for Minnesota until he suffered an injury earlier this year. 

    Jake Middleton is another great example. The San Jose Sharks played Middleton 14 games total between his age 23, 24, and 25 seasons. Since then, he’s been a fixture on Minnesota’s second pair for two-and-a-half seasons. 

    That doesn’t sound like the type of trade Minnesota executed on Thursday afternoon. 

    Maxim Cajkovic, 23, has spent most of his time in the ECHL, even though Minnesota’s injuries have created depth issues in Iowa. On top of that, Will Butcher won’t bolster the Wild’s current defense corps. No matter how much doubt you have in the third pair, Butcher is 29 years old and hasn’t played an NHL game since 2021-22. If this is the move Guerin had in mind, Russo was overselling it. 

    So, it seems that Minnesota is still in the market to add an NHL defenseman. 

    The Middleton trade might be the prototype for the move Guerin wants to make right now. If he can get back a player of that same ability level, why wouldn’t he pull the trigger? 

    Here’s the thing: I don’t believe Guerin when he says he won’t part with more than a third-round pick. 

    Guerin sent out backup goaltender Kaapo Kahkonen and a fifth-round pick to acquire Middleton. Trading Kahkonen, an established NHL backup at the time, plus a fifth-round pick, seems like a greater price than a third-rounder. If Guerin could do that all over again right now, why wouldn’t he? 

    On top of that, the difference between a third-round pick and a second-rounder is pretty small. We can calculate the trade value of NHL draft picks based on historical pick-for-pick trades. To do so, we can create a Jimmy Johnson-style trade chart like the one below:

    Trade chart -- 1st 5 rounds.JPG

    Depending upon where teams pick in the draft order, the dropoff from a first-rounder to a second-rounder is about four or five times as large as the dropoff from a second-rounder to a third-rounder. 

    Why would Guerin be comfortable giving up a third-round pick but not a second-rounder when the two assets are so similar? 

    1. Guerin wants to hold his second-round pick as ammunition to trade up.
    2. Guerin doesn’t want to lose value if he has to trade that player away at the deadline.

    If the Wild miss the playoffs and they feel there’s a can’t-miss prospect within reach of a trade-up, a third-round pick probably won’t even be enough to move up one spot. Based on historical draft-day trades, a second-rounder can move the needle. 

    If the Wild miss the playoffs and lose the draft lottery, they could package their first- and second-round picks to create the following trades in a typical market: 

    Mathematical Trade Up Options (Lose Lottery, miss playoffs).JPG

    Minnesota currently holds the 25th-best standings points-percentage. If they finish the season 25th, they could package their first and second pick to move up to the seventh overall selection. 

    On the other hand, If the team trades a second-round pick and nails the trade, it still might not be enough to make the playoffs. They’ve dug a deep hole in the standings, and Spurgeon’s injury makes it harder for them to enter the playoff picture. If the team trades its second-rounder and still only finishes 20th, it would be a shame that they can’t use that pick to move around on draft day. 

    Another reason Guerin may not be interested in parting with more than a third-rounder is that trading for a defenseman may turn into the world’s slowest three-team trade. “His goal is…to get a defenseman that’s going to help right now,” Russo reported in the same podcast episode, “and if things turn south and they turn into sellers at the deadline, is good enough that then he can flip at the deadline.” 

    Minnesota has experience flipping players from one team to another. They acted as an intermediary in the Ryan O’Reilly trade, retaining part of O’Reilly’s cap hit in exchange for draft compensation. That extra cap retention allowed the Toronto Maple Leafs the cap flexibility they needed to pull off the move, and they sent Minnesota a fifth-round pick for their trouble. 

    If that retained salary is worth no more than a fifth-round pick, Guerin can’t afford to gamble much on the initial trade. Given Minnesota’s place in the standings, it would simply be too short-sighted. If Guerin parts with more than a third-round pick, it will be extremely difficult to recoup that value at the deadline. 

    It all depends on how much Guerin is willing to gamble on this season’s playoff run. While the team is enjoying the return of players like Kirill Kaprizov and Jonas Brodin, it’s not unreasonable to believe Spurgeon’s absence will ultimately end Minnesota’s playoff hopes. 

    Therefore, Guerin’s trade to replace Spurgeon will say a lot about him and how he views this team. Is a third-round pick really his highest price, or is he just negotiating through the media? Does he really believe this team can make a playoff run, and is he right? 

    If you came here for the comfort of straight answers, I’m sorry to leave you with more questions. On the other hand, the answer to these questions will be revealed in good time. 

    In the meantime, lean into Picasso’s sentiment. If computers can only give us answers, maybe sports can only give us questions. So, ask your questions, and enjoy the answers you come up with. 

     

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    I love the idea of getting another Middleton. I'd prefer a RHS, someone younger who can replace Bogosian....eventually. 

    But, where do you find such a player? I would suggest he may cost more than a 3rd rounder, but what could a prospect like, say, Firstov bring? We have several prospects which may or may not be in the longterm plans of the organization.

    I get that Brackett likes drafting smaller, more mobile, puck moving defenders who can skate well and pass well. That seems to be all he looks for, guys under 6'3" who can skate and handle. And, when developing, having a bunch of guys like that pretty much helps the coaching staff with 1 consistent message, since they will play similarly. What I don't get is why we have a bunch of grinders developing them, and, they pay little attention to bulking them up to be able to handle NHL forwards? I don't think our drafting is bad, I do think our developing needs to be restructured and refocused. 

    I guess you can say the same thing about the forwards, except for last year's draft. The focus was on smaller skilled players. Perhaps the thought pattern with both forward and defense was we can develop the skilled guys a certain way and trade for the grinders later. Effective grinders probably need to be identified more in their D+2 or 3 years (much like goalies), and your bottom 6 guys/bottom pairing guys are easy to find and don't cost much on the free agent market. But, again, why would you not emphasize getting to NHL size?

    We have been drafting late in the rounds, so you can't really have the size/speed/skill guys like at the top of the draft. That might make someone like Broberg a target to get, even though he hasn't shown off all the skill yet. So, that's what makes this year more important. We are in reach of getting one of those size/speed/skill defenders with our first if we don't screw it up. 

    So, who here was really disappointed that Nashville took us down in regulation the other night? It seems like the silver lining of drafting a high pick is more and more growing on me/us. That guy will be ready sooner AND be more in line with the guys we currently have in the system. 

    So, that said a look at the prospect pool reveals that:

    • Heidt hit 75 points in 43 games
    • Kumpulainen is 1 short of 20 goals
    • Tiger is still above PPG
    • Yurov had another 3 point night the other night, 42 points

    I'd really like to see what Guerin can pull off this TDL season. I think Butcher is just the tip of the iceberg as he makes small moves to position himself for larger ones. I'd love a couple of pieces that could help now and help later. Last season, part of what was included in trades were drafted players he did not plan on signing. Could there be more of that this season? 

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So using that draft pick value chart, the incentive to tank becomes rather marginal at possibly the 5th pick.  The value between pick 5 and 6 is 35 points which is basically the first 3rd round pick.

    This does put tanking into a pretty good perspective.  Lottery aside, there is very marginal value in tanking to move up unless you are a bottom 5 team.

    Also, how difficult is it going to be to actually be a worse team than Ottawa and Montreal and Buffalo to get to that 5 spot?  Aren't they also going to be incentivized to tank and have a much easier time doing so?

    I highly doubt we can out tank any of these teams even if we sabotage our current roster.  I doubt we can hold our current spot without sabotage.

    Damn seems kind of ridiculous to tank actually.  Also seems kind of ridiculous to hope to make the playoffs.  We are in no mans land.  

    I think at this point the winning ticket is to focus on player development rather than tanking or bringing in rentals.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I’m for trading one of our  forward player/prospects for a comparable D. An NHL, ready for next year and beyond prospect/player. We desperately need help at defense in our mid/ bottom pairings. Hopefully there’s enough cap space left for next year to make this happen. It sure looks like our best prospects arriving will be forwards first. If we can find a value player now I’m all for it. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Will D. Ness said:

    Also, how difficult is it going to be to actually be a worse team than Ottawa and Montreal and Buffalo to get to that 5 spot?  Aren't they also going to be incentivized to tank and have a much easier time doing so?

    I highly doubt we can out tank any of these teams even if we sabotage our current roster.  I doubt we can hold our current spot without sabotage.

    Montreal has some pretty good young players. I don't think they are actively tanking either, they've had some pretty good drafts and should be waiting for some pieces to develop. Now they may sell off some coveted pieces like Monahan and some D, to get some extra ammo for the draft. Plus, we beat them twice.

    Buffalo is a different story, I think they are really better than us. What is the issue here? Tage has been hurt some, perhaps that has something to do with it? Their rebuild is over, and they just need to play better. This must be a real disappointing season for them. Should they get healthy, I think they end up passing us....unless they are cursed to be in the East. 

    4 hours ago, Will D. Ness said:

    I think at this point the winning ticket is to focus on player development rather than tanking or bringing in rentals.

    Could our "addition" be Dino? His season ends February 26th, and I'm pretty sure he's not playoff bound. I could see him signed and here by early March. Just how much confidence do you have in our development system? To me, I think it's highly questionable and I particularly question if the right people are in charge of this area. 

    But you're right, the winning ticket here is player development! It's not something that can be rushed, especially after Covid and where we were picking from. And, I'll have to admit, I have grown less patient to see the new toys get here and show off. I'd also have to say that if some of the kids get a taste of the N, they will know better what they need this offseason. I'd say this is a big offseason for quite a number of players.

    What do we do with Charlie Stramel? Another year at WI or try something else? Does anyone have eyes on him?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    31 minutes ago, Burnt Toast said:

    I’m for trading one of our  forward player/prospects for a comparable D. An NHL, ready for next year and beyond prospect/player. We desperately need help at defense in our mid/ bottom pairings. Hopefully there’s enough cap space left for next year to make this happen. It sure looks like our best prospects arriving will be forwards first. If we can find a value player now I’m all for it. 

    Did you have anyone in particular in mind? I'd like an RHS with some size and untapped offense. Perhaps a guy just finishing up his ELC? I simply don't know who's out there, and when we traded for Middleton he was not on my radar one bit. BT, is Firstov on your trade list?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Did you have anyone in particular in mind? I'd like an RHS with some size and untapped offense. Perhaps a guy just finishing up his ELC? I simply don't know who's out there, and when we traded for Middleton he was not on my radar one bit. BT, is Firstov on your trade list?

    Chychrun. 6’2” L shot but plays both sides. Signed through next season.4.6 $M AAV. 25 years old. If he wants to be here past next year he checks a lot of boxes for me. Why not bring him in with this year’s LTIR $. Then extend him next year asap. What would it take for Ottawa to trade? Not sure. Probably depends on what his agent has already been telling them. He’s going to be an UFA after next year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Burnt Toast said:

    Chychrun. 6’2” L shot but plays both sides. Signed through next season.4.6 $M AAV. 25 years old.

    This would be a nice target and immediately help with the Spurgeon void. Ottawa paid a lot for him last season, so I'd think he'd be more expensive than what Guerin was wanting to pay (a 3rd round pick). I don't think a 3rd+Firstov would get it done, and I think Ottawa thinks they're close to competing. That said, I think it will take a rostered player who is kind of young in that 25 year old range. To me, Duhaime is the only one who meets that criteria (Ek was a non-starter). So, for this to work, Guerin better have some good pictures of the Ottawa FO. Perhaps Nashville's draft provided them?

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    What do we do with Charlie Stramel? Another year at WI or try something else? Does anyone have eyes on him?

    He plays the Gophers next weekend so hopefully we can see what is going on with him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Montreal has some pretty good young players. I don't think they are actively tanking either, they've had some pretty good drafts and should be waiting for some pieces to develop. Now they may sell off some coveted pieces like Monahan and some D, to get some extra ammo for the draft. Plus, we beat them twice.

    Buffalo is a different story, I think they are really better than us. What is the issue here? Tage has been hurt some, perhaps that has something to do with it? Their rebuild is over, and they just need to play better. This must be a real disappointing season for them. Should they get healthy, I think they end up passing us....unless they are cursed to be in the East. 

    Buffalo is definitely underperforming similarly but I didn't think they hit the injury bug nearly as bad as we did.  They just haven't really put it together from the games I've watched.  I would blame coaching mostly.  Of all the teams higher in the lottery than us, Buffalo is definitely the one with the most talent though.  They should be close to a playoff team.

    After losing to the Ducks though, it's pretty clear that the Wild don't have the depth and don't have the desire to really fight... so tanking might be a little easier.  We may actually get a top 10 pick without major sabotage IMO.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Why? I don't think it will help. Another small D? Trade bait? UGH!!!

    When the HCJH says that they need to work on the attention to detail after every loss and it seems to get worse on the structure. There is a re-occurring pattern where they falter in the late stages of the game. Very concerning in my eyes.

    Sorry folks but being one of the biggest supporter and fan of the MN Wild, I'm beginning to loosing all confidence in the management. Now that we can see that we are not that good and GMBG has handcuffed the roster with (NTC, NMC, M-NTC) extensions. I still feel it's time for a soft tank and maybe even a shake-up in upper management. I'm sure there are a lot of you who disagree, that's fine. Just giving my opinion.

    P.S. How about a new owner? One who believe in building a cup contending team (eg. Chicago) vs. keeping a mediocre team that tries to keep the seats filled?

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Backwoodsbob said:

    I'm beginning to loosing all confidence in the management. Now that we can see that we are not that good and GMBG has handcuffed the roster with (NTC, NMC, M-NTC) extensions. I still feel it's time for a soft tank and maybe even a shake-up in upper management. I'm sure there are a lot of you who disagree, that's fine. Just giving my opinion.

    I believe that the extensions, all of them early, are a lesson for a new GM to learn. In hindsight, we can see that with the extensions came a lack of urgency. Perhaps Guerin thought we had better character than that? Well, hopefully lesson learned! There was a risk of this happening, but there was a greater risk of signing them early only to have a really bad injury hit. Doing this to a lot of players increases the risk that it will happen to one of them. I'm not talking about the minor stuff we've seen, I'm talking about blowing up a shoulder or having to have hip surgery. Thankfully none of that has happened.

    As for the front office shake up, I think you'll get one, not with the Grand Poobah, but with the capologist and logistics guys. That's probably not what you had in mind, but it is a shakeup. Now we need to find a really good capologist. I suppose we'll find one when a GM is fired this offseason, maybe then we can pluck staff!

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Possible trade targets:

    Shai Buium- a lefty defender for U of Denver. He's in his 3rd season there and is property of the Detroit Red Wings. 6'3" 209. His stats look good for college hockey, has anyone seen him play?

    Scott Morrow- A righty defender playing for U-Mass Amherst. He's in his 3rd season there and is 6'2" 195, property of the Carolina Hurricanes. Stats also look good for college, again, has anyone seen him play?

    Logan Mailloux- A righty defender playing for Laval. He's in his first year in the A with the Montreal Canadiens affiliate. 6'3" 220 is pretty imposing, but he actually has some very nice offensive numbers. 

    Corson Ceulemans-Another righty defender who is playing in Cleveland, the A affiliate of CBJ. He's 6'2" 198, and played for WI for a couple of years putting up decent numbers. He doesn't have good numbers in the A and has either been hurt or scratched. 

    All of these were 2021 late 1st or early 2nd round choices.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...